Amazon Web Services status: access issues and outage reports

Problems in the last 24 hours

The graph below depicts the number of Amazon Web Services reports received over the last 24 hours by time of day. When the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line, an outage is determined.

Most Reported Problems

The following are the most recent problems reported by Amazon Web Services users through our website.

• Website Down (50%)
• Errors (33%)
• Sign in (17%)

Live Outage Map

The most recent Amazon Web Services outage reports came from the following cities:

City	Problem Type	Report Time
Kyiv	Sign in	1 month ago
Chennai	Website Down	1 month ago
Point Pleasant Beach	Website Down	1 month ago
Little Rock	Errors	1 month ago
Atlanta	Website Down	1 month ago
Clearwater	Website Down	1 month ago

Full Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Amazon Web Services Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Hershal Rao (@Hershal0_0) reported 8 minutes ago

  @awscloud finally, i can keep my embarrassing "fix later" comments strictly internal.

• 
  Just Le Canuck 🌸👹 (@JustAGamer6464) reported 9 minutes ago

  @awscloud No duh. Especially when you don't have people capable of actually analyzing the code for issues before deploying it. Operating under the "fix it later" instead of running QA. And maybe actually hire American programmers.

• 
  Teri Radichel #cybersecurity #pentesting (@TeriRadichel) reported 16 minutes ago

  I’m using @anthropic opus 4.8. With @awscloud Kiro. I have rules in my README that say only use Bash. But it ignored my instructions and said sorry I used Python after using a lot of tokens to do something I didn’t want it to do. I feel like I should get those tokens refunded: this is the kind of thing that unexpectedly wastes money and time and tokens unnecessarily. I can’t make the instructions any clearer. Stuff like that is so annoying. But I’m still writing code way faster. The problem is I got a $20 plan and used it up in a few hours. I tried switching back to 4.6 but seemed like the same results for code written. It’s like everything got more expensive after the new model showed up. Or maybe I really was just making that big of a change. I had to just up the subscription to $40. I’ve already spent a bunch of money on other subscriptions and got incorrectly billed $200 in tokens I couldn’t use this month (working on getting that refunded). So you can do the math. $40 per day x 31 = $1240. But people are using multiple agents. I could spin up an army of agents to write code for me if it didn’t cost so much. Who is going to win this game? As a single developer I’m seeking ways to reduce token usage (or whatever the billing metric is) and mistakes by agents like this one feel so unfair. It clearly was not what I asked for. Whether I fix it or the agent notices its mistake after the fact and fixes it without telling me it’s still going to cost the same. Bottom line is that I can produce a lot but it also costs me a lot and so far I haven’t found a way around that besides writing deterministic code. I have to get the thing built I want to make me money before I spend it all on AI tokens. But right now the agent is making mistakes and getting stuck on things I’m doing that I guess are unique and the agent hasn’t seen too much before. It writes code and can’t figure out what it did wrong, AWS shared networking with VPC endpoints and organizations delegated admins and such I’m getting around that (without giving up full access to my cloud account) by creating verification queries and code but then the agent doesn’t follow the existing file structure and uses the wrong language without at least asking…*sigh* Also it seems like the verification code is burning tokens like a wildfire out of control. Not sure how this is going to work out. I hope there’s not some issue like someone else siphoning off tokens behind the scenes or some other weird problem like the previous nerf issue.

• 
  Catdingo (@CattManii) reported 18 minutes ago

  @awscloud Is that after or way after losing millions of dollars due to uptime issues?

• 
  dolla bill (@BillBah) reported 18 minutes ago

  @IAGovernor @awscloud @Cognizant Cognizant is a terrible company. The “savings” will cost more in the long run.

• 
  Satyam Singh (@satyam147721667) reported 20 minutes ago

  @AWSSupport wait , i didnt login for 90 days , does that mean my acc is permanently closed ?

• 
  Kingdom of ElviSpeare (@ElviSpeareTV) reported 20 minutes ago

  All down: DoorDash. Spotify. GoDaddy. Verizon. Uber Eats. Amazon AWS. Did someone cut the under water wires half way around the world? Possibly others.

• 
  Buttface (@buttface_9000) reported 20 minutes ago

  @sult @awscloud I mean, what are you trying to say? That they should double down on that or learn from their mistakes?

• 
  Ahmed Fouad (@ahmedfouaddev) reported 23 minutes ago

  @awscloud Yeah, because it takes much more time to debug and find issues later...

• 
  vars molta (@D_Kahinga) reported 24 minutes ago

  can china do the same for google, amazon aws, claude, and nvidia? and what would be the problem with that?

• 
  CA Suresh Babu P (@psbmtr) reported 27 minutes ago

  @ZEE5India @ZEE5India Why every time a login is required for Z5 on smart tv to start watching the FIFA World Cup 2026?. I have other apps installed like #jiohotstar @awscloud they don't ask it repeatedly. It will kill the spirit of the game. Everytime I use mobile OTP

• 
  Matthew Garrison (@GlowieRag) reported 27 minutes ago

  @AWSSupport I have a 7 day old unassigned support ticket for a billing refund, and my auto pay declined due to suspected fraud because the cost was so much higher than normal. This is pretty urgent, id like to fix this and pay you! Case id 177973340000997

• 
  Alfonso (@DonJayAlfonso) reported 29 minutes ago

  @chainlink @amazon @awscloud Still tokenomics are broken

• 
  Astro Kanu (@AstroKanu) reported 29 minutes ago

  @aws @AWSSupport I’ve already used this link raised tickets explained the ongoing issue the only reply I got was pls log in- day 5 of my live project down- all payments made at my end- I’m serous if this isn’t resolved I’ll ask my clients to start contacting u for refunds #aws

• 
  ThriveCart (@ThriveCart) reported 37 minutes ago

  @zenoix9 Hey, Amazon AWS has triggered an unscheduled update, likely mitigating a wider issue on their end. This is impacting some carts. We expect AWS to resolve very shortly. We will provide an update when it does.

• 
  Ozan Yenidogan (@satori_11_11) reported 42 minutes ago

  seriously something wrong with @awscloud billing. always problem . @AWSSupport can you check please. case nr 178297207200499.

• 
  Kash (@misterrpink1) reported 45 minutes ago

  @AWSSupport My Athena + Glue was failing my status check. Are you sure this wasn’t down a few hours ago?

• 
  Tanner Scadden (@TannerSDev) reported 46 minutes ago

  @awscloud please help us asap your team suspended our account at the same time we got an email saying we have two weeks to address a problem with our root account. Cloudflare is down for us, and EC2 won't provision new instances. Our app is down. We serve hospitals. Please

• 
  angelmilkcry (@alina_aalx) reported 50 minutes ago

  @awscloud Maybe it’s your inability to adapt. You are used to development being a slow and manual process…that's how you sell more of your services

• 
  Kingdom of ElviSpeare (@ElviSpeareTV) reported 51 minutes ago

  All down: DoorDash. Spotify. GoDaddy. Verizon. Uber Eats. Amazon AWS. MLB Show. LinkedIn. Verizon. Microsoft Outlook. Ugh! Did someone cut the under water wires half way around the world?

• 
  If Beli (@beli_if) reported 51 minutes ago

  @awscloud Until your services are not working for 4 hours, right ?

• 
  Teri Radichel #cybersecurity #pentesting (@TeriRadichel) reported 51 minutes ago

  I’m using @anthropic opus 4.8. With @awscloud Kiro. I have rules in my README that say only use Bash. But it ignored my instructions and said sorry I used Python after using a lot of tokens to do something I didn’t want it to do. I feel like I should get those tokens refunded: this is the kind of thing that unexpectedly wastes money and time and tokens unnecessarily. I can’t make the instructions any clearer. Stuff like that is so annoying. But I’m still writing code way faster. The problem is I got a $20 plan and used it up in a few hours. I tried switching back to 4.6 but seemed like the same results for code written. It’s like everything got more expensive after the new model showed up. Or maybe I really was just making that big of a change. I had to just up the subscription to $40. I’ve already spent a bunch of money on other subscriptions and got incorrectly billed $200 in tokens I couldn’t use this month (working on getting that refunded). So you can do the math. $40 per day x 31 = $1240. But people are using multiple agents. I could spin up an army of agents to write code for me if it didn’t cost so much. Who is going to win this game? As a single developer I’m seeking ways to reduce token usage (or whatever the billing metric is) and mistakes by agents like this one feel so unfair. It clearly was not what I asked for. Whether I fix it or the agent notices its mistake after the fact and fixes it without telling me it’s still going to cost the same. Bottom line is that I can produce a lot but it also costs me a lot and so far I haven’t found a way around that besides writing deterministic code I can then use instead of AI. I have to get the thing built I want to make me money before I spend it all on AI tokens. But right now the agent is making mistakes and getting stuck on things I’m doing that I guess are unique and the agent hasn’t seen too much before. It writes code and can’t figure out what it did wrong, AWS shared networking with VPC endpoints and organizations delegated admins and such I’m getting around that (without giving up full access to my cloud account) by creating verification queries and code but then the agent doesn’t follow the existing file structure and uses the wrong language without at least asking…*sigh* Also it seems like the verification code is burning tokens like a wildfire out of control. Not sure how this is going to work out. I hope there’s not some issue like someone else siphoning off tokens behind the scenes or some other weird problem like the previous nerf issue.

• 
  Marvelous Ikechi (@IkechiMarvelous) reported 55 minutes ago

  @awscloud I’m guessing this was the admins last day at work. He won’t be going down without a fight.

• 
  Teri Radichel #cybersecurity #pentesting (@TeriRadichel) reported 56 minutes ago

  I’m using @anthropic opus 4.8. With @awscloud Kiro. I have rules in my README that say only use Bash. But it ignored my instructions and said sorry I used Python after using a lot of tokens t do something I didn’t want it to do. I feel like I should get those tokens refunded: this is the kind of thing that unexpectedly wastes money and time and tokens unnecessarily. I can’t make the instructions any clearer. Stuff like that is so annoying. But I’m still writing code way faster. The problem is I got a $20 plan and used it up in a few hours. I tried switching back to 4.6 but seemed like the same results for code written. It’s like everything got more expensive after the new model showed up. Or maybe I really was just making that big of a change. I had to just up the subscription to $40. I’ve already spent a bunch of money on other subscriptions and got incorrectly billed $200 in tokens I couldn’t use this month (working on getting that refunded). So you can do the math. $40 per day x 31 = $1240. But people are using multiple agents. I could spin up an army of agents to write code for me if it didn’t cost so much. Who is going to win this game? As a single developer I’m seeking ways to reduce token usage (or whatever the billing metric is) and mistakes by agents like this one feel so unfair. It clearly was not what I asked for. Whether I fix it or the agent notices its mistake after the fact and fixes it without telling me it’s still going to cost the same. Bottom line is that I can produce a lot but it also costs me a lot and so far I haven’t found a way around that besides writing deterministic code. I have to get the thing built I want to make me money before I spend it all on AI tokens. But right now the agent is making mistakes and getting stuck on things I’m doing that I guess are unique and the agent hasn’t seen too much before. It writes code and can’t figure out what it did wrong, AWS shared networking with VPC endpoints and organizations delegated admins and such I’m getting around that (without giving up full access to my cloud account) by creating verification queries and code but then the agent doesn’t follow the existing file structure and uses the wrong language without at least asking…*sigh* Also it seems like the verification code is burning tokens like a wildfire out of control. Not sure how this is going to work out. I hope there’s not some issue like someone else siphoning off tokens behind the scenes or some other weird problem like the previous nerf issue.

• 
  Deep Value Memetics (@DV_Memetics) reported 58 minutes ago

  AI Morning Event Summary: softer ADP, but memory leads the pre-market unwind $SPY $745, -0.2% pre-market; $QQQ $732, -0.6%; $SOXX $632, -1.4%. The tape is opening with a memory-led AI-beta unwind even after ADP printed softer at +98k for June versus 120k est and 122k prior. ADP should help duration on paper, but semis are still lower into the 9:00am CT ISM Manufacturing release. For AI and semis, the opening read is de-risking first, macro relief second. $SNDK $2,168, -4.7% pre-market. BofA raised its price target to $2,500 from $2,100 and kept Buy, citing a NAND supply/demand imbalance through calendar 2027. implications: Street numbers are still moving higher, but the stock is giving back a crowded move into quarter-start trade. $MU $1,117, -3.2% pre-market. Barron's cited KeyBanc saying June DRAM pricing rose about 3% and NAND 2.4%, with limited new supply before 2027. implications: pricing data is still supportive, but the tape is digesting crowding and multiple risk after the recent run. $WDC $622, -2.6% pre-market. Storage is lower with the same memory unwind even after Cantor lifted its price target to $900 from $660 this week. implications: the open will test whether HDD / storage separates from NAND and DRAM again or just trades in the same factor bucket. $NVDA $199, -0.7% pre-market. Bloomberg and the Financial Times reported Taiwan widened the Super Micro server-export probe, keeping China server-channel scrutiny live. implications: no clean near-term estimate cut yet, but export-control enforcement remains an overhang for AI server channel names. $AMZN $240, +0.9% pre-market. AWS disclosed a new $1B Forward Deployed Engineering organization to embed thousands of AI engineers with customers. implications: higher near-term opex, but a clearer path to pulling Bedrock and agent workloads into production. Wall St one-liners $SNDK: BofA PT $2,100 -> $2,500, Buy -> firm expects NAND imbalance through CY27 and slower but still positive pricing into mid-2027. $MU: KeyBanc Overweight / PT $1,600, via Barron's -> June DRAM +3% and NAND +2.4% keep pricing up even as the stock de-risks. $WDC: Cantor PT $660 -> $900, Overweight -> AI storage demand and broader semi-cycle duration still argue for estimate support on pullbacks. 3 key tech headlines Anthropic / Commerce: export controls were lifted on Claude Fable 5 and Mythos 5, with access restoration starting Wednesday -> frontier-model supply and cloud demand debate turns back to product usage, not a forced outage. Google: Nano Banana 2 Lite ships with 4-second image generation at $0.034 per 1K images, and Gemini Omni Flash is now available to developers at $0.10 per second of video -> generative-media pricing pressure is still moving lower. Amazon AWS: the new $1B Forward Deployed Engineering push embeds engineers with customers to deploy agentic AI systems in days -> enterprise AI spend is moving from pilots toward implementation services and production workloads. What to watch - June ISM Manufacturing at 9:00am CT. The next macro gate is whether the post-ADP slowdown signal carries into factory demand and rates. - $QQQ / $SOXX after the open. Softer ADP did not stop the pre-market fade, so the first cash-session read is whether duration catches a bid or whether semis keep unwinding. - $SNDK / $MU / $WDC relative strength versus $SOXX. If storage still underperforms after fresh PT support, the move is more positioning than fundamentals. - $AMZN versus weak growth tape. Holding green on the AWS deployment push would keep enterprise AI implementation in focus. - $NVDA / server-channel headlines. Any additional Taiwan or export-control follow-through can keep pressure on AI server names even if the broader tape stabilizes. Sources: ADP National Employment Report; ISM release calendar; Amazon company release; Google blog; Bloomberg and Financial Times reporting; Wall St note recaps; live pre-market market data.

• 
  DIWhyCoder - ⌨️ 🇺🇸 (@diwhycoder) reported 59 minutes ago

  @awscloud AWS running out of server space confirmed.

• 
  Alexa Web3 (e/acc) (@alexabelonix) reported 1 hour ago

  @aiven_io @serenavc @awscloud this is why more outreach doesn’t always fix it 🤝 let's be mutuals!

• 
  Kingdom of ElviSpeare (@ElviSpeareTV) reported 1 hour ago

  All down: DoorDash. Spotify. GoDaddy. Verizon. Uber Eats. Amazon AWS. MLB Show. LinkedIn. Did someone cut the under water wires half way around the world? Possibly others.

• 
  Astra (@0xAstra) reported 1 hour ago

  @awscloud AWS is honestly a massive disappointment. You sign up, then discover basic customer support is locked behind a paid plan. Isn’t support supposed to be the most basic part of a cloud service? I didn’t pay for premium support, so a simple SES email permission request has been ignored for three days. I genuinely don’t understand how this is the world’s No.1 cloud provider. This experience is terrible.

• 
  Vivek Varia (@vivekvvaria) reported 1 hour ago

  Not able to login, I am planning to register for AWS Certified Cloud Practitioner. @awscloud