1. Home
  2. Companies
  3. Battlefield 6
  4. Outage Map
Battlefield 6

Battlefield 6 Outage Map

The map below depicts the most recent cities worldwide where Battlefield 6 users have reported problems and outages. If you are having an issue with Battlefield 6, make sure to submit a report below

Loading map, please wait...

The heatmap above shows where the most recent user-submitted and social media reports are geographically clustered. The density of these reports is depicted by the color scale as shown below.

Battlefield 6 users affected:

Less
More
Check Current Status

Battlefield 6 is a 2025 first-person shooter game developed by Battlefield Studios and published by Electronic Arts. Serving as the eighteenth installment in the Battlefield series, the game was released for PlayStation 5, Windows, and Xbox Series X/S on October 10, 2025.

Most Affected Locations

Outage reports and issues in the past 15 days originated from:

Location Reports
Nantes, Pays de la Loire 1
Lyon, Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes 3
Montignac, Nouvelle-Aquitaine 1
Paris, Île-de-France 16
Méry-sur-Oise, Île-de-France 1
Halle, Flanders 1
Bordeaux, Nouvelle-Aquitaine 1
Bourg-en-Bresse, Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes 1
La Paz, BCS 1
Cahors, Occitanie 1
Saint-Genis-Laval, Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes 1
Brisbane, QLD 1
Partido de José C. Paz, BA 1
Saint-Étienne, Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes 1
Orléans, Centre 1
Castelnau-le-Lez, Occitanie 1
Comuna 1, CABA 5
Barrhead, Scotland 1
Lausanne, VD 1
Nairobi, Nairobi Area 1
Tiruvalla, KL 1
Propières, Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes 1
Lübeck, Hansestadt, Schleswig-Holstein 1
Montpellier, Occitanie 2
San Bruno, CA 1
Buenos Aires, CF 2
Firmi, Occitanie 1
Garons, Occitanie 1
Manchester, NH 1
Ihlow, Lower Saxony 1
Check Current Status

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Battlefield 6 Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

  • kayembe52536
    Mutombo Kayembe (@kayembe52536) reported

    @McFaul You are very delusional. How many soldiers are there left in Ukraine? The biggest problem Ukraine is now facing on the battlefield is manpower shortage. We see Ukrainian intelligence agents rounding up people on the streets & forcing them into the army after 2 weeks training.

  • realbryanmead
    B$ (@realbryanmead) reported

    @EndersFPS That was my main issue trying to get into battlefield 2042. I found the outcome of the match to be pretty much a sidenote. Didn’t matter if I won or lost it didn’t really make a difference. I’ve been playing gauntlet and the tournament style makes the stakes higher. Tons of fun

  • OpLowcountry
    Operation LowcountryWildfire (@OpLowcountry) reported

    OPERATION LOWCOUNTRY WILDFIRE INTELLIGENCE EXTERNAL BRIEF FORCED REOPENING UNDER FIRE 03 JUNE 2026 Open Source Derived | Cross-Checked | Analytical Assessment | No Classified Inputs EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Iran theater has entered a new phase. The current structure is not clean de-escalation, but it has also not broken into full regional war. The best read is forced reopening under fire. The Strait of Hormuz is now the central test of the emerging framework. Washington is pushing to turn protected movement through the Strait into a formal open lane, with mine-clearing, military overwatch, maritime enforcement, and no-toll transit becoming core conditions rather than side issues. This matters because Hormuz is not just a waterway. It is leverage. Iran has used the Strait as pressure, while the United States is now trying to turn that pressure point into the first visible deliverable of any agreement. If ships move freely, mines are cleared, and Iran loses the ability to gatekeep passage, the framework gains real weight. If the Strait remains selective, threatened, or dependent on quiet military coordination, the agreement remains vulnerable. CURRENT OPERATIONAL PICTURE The Gulf has moved into an active enforcement and interception phase. Kuwait has taken confirmed casualties after missile and drone activity struck Kuwait International Airport, while Bahrain remains inside the defensive ring. U.S. forces continue to intercept threats and conduct precision responses against Iranian military nodes tied to the current escalation cycle. Iran is not simply walking away from diplomacy. Tehran is using pressure as negotiation. The Iranian economy remains under severe strain, with oil revenue, financial access, sanctions evasion routes, and internal stability all weighing heavily on the regime. The IRGC cannot accept a framework that looks like surrender. It needs leverage preserved, resistance language intact, and enough battlefield pressure to claim it was not forced into concessions. That is why the current pattern looks contradictory from the outside. Talks continue while missiles fly. Hormuz is discussed while ships move under pressure. Sanctions expand while Iran claims retaliation and the United States keeps military pressure in place. This is not contradiction. It is coercive bargaining. INTERNAL IRANIAN PRESSURE The deeper issue inside Iran remains the power structure. The formal state is still visible, but the coercive state appears dominant. The IRGC remains the central actor across security, maritime pressure, missile activity, internal control, and sanctions evasion networks. Civilian authority appears weakened. Public anger remains real in many segments of Iranian society, but fear and repression continue to limit open action. This creates an unstable balance between a population under strain, a formal state seeking relief, and a security apparatus trying to preserve its role. Iran needs a deal, but the IRGC needs not to look like it needs a deal. The United States wants compliance before relief, while Iran wants relief before surrendering leverage. Gulf states want open shipping without becoming the battlefield, while Israel wants continued freedom of action against Iranian proxies and infrastructure. STRATEGIC ASSESSMENT The current phase is a hot middle zone. It is not peace, but it is not full blowout. It is pressure. The most important watch points are now clear. The first is whether Kuwait sees another wave. The second is whether U.S. strikes remain limited to Qeshm-style military nodes or expand deeper. The third is whether Hormuz transit becomes openly normalized or remains selective and protected. The fourth is whether Iran accepts a framework or continues using pressure to alter the terms. The answers to those questions will determine whether this becomes a managed reopening or the next escalation ladder. FINAL READ The banks have not broken, but the tide is moving. King of Cainhoy 🇺🇸🔥 🔥

  • JulianWinters9
    Julian Winters (@JulianWinters9) reported

    @BattlefieldComm @Battlefield The battle pass is not working

  • SEXTAESPXDA
    𝕲𝖗𝖎𝖒𝖒𝕵𝖔𝖜 𝕵𝖆𝖊𝖌𝖊𝖗𝖏𝖆𝖖𝖚𝖊𝖟 (@SEXTAESPXDA) reported

    A crash heard as it seemed the attack worked, but all that remained was nothing among the battlefield, as if the arrancar was no where to be seen. As if he didn’t exist But above? The Arrancar was already floating, his spiritual pressure cloaking him in a more calm +

  • Odensfrilla
    SwedishViking (@Odensfrilla) reported

    @Battlefield Will you please fix the game, right now it sucks. Do something about all the ******* cheaters! And why the hell is it freezing all the time? Keep this up and we will all be playing cod soon.

  • dangainor
    Dan Gainor (@dangainor) reported

    @judgementdaze @LeighWolf There were people on both sides who felt that secession was legal. No matter what your view of the issue, it was decided on the battlefield and not in the Courts.

  • Mr_too_soon
    deion (@Mr_too_soon) reported

    @macishish I know I don’t have a job. U really didn’t have to bring that up. I was just mentioning it was dope to have skins in cod. When I did work I did get some that was dope. But ok I guess skins is a problem I see for having fun. Guess everything can be like battlefield with just generic looking soliders.

  • RealDonElliott
    Don Elliott (@RealDonElliott) reported

    shooting down choppers in @Battlefield is ridiculous now: 5 rockets to maybe take one down if i'm lucky. How it goes with these cheaters: flares, nothing but the rockets miss x2 and then 'maybe' if they don't drop down one might hit. Usually not though. fix these flying cheaters!

  • OrangeVol1321
    Orange_Vol1321 (@OrangeVol1321) reported

    @LFCJay0 @BattlefieldComm Any rank gets put with any rank when playing Redsec ranked. That's a problem. Players should be required to have so many hours of normal redsec before being allowed to join ranked redsec.

  • ChrisPa18948536
    DaddyShark (@ChrisPa18948536) reported

    @LibTard43740 @iamAtheistGirl So again, your retardness just flares up. YOU ridiculed Walz, so I suppose simply pointed out your tone deafness by mentioning Vance to show how insane your argument was. Then you leaped to service in Iraq to justify your bone head comment. Vance never even saw the battlefield.

  • XavierDeChris1
    Chris Xavier (@XavierDeChris1) reported

    @SheilahGashumba @ReachDrMuganga If leadership is about serving people, why do some fight so hard for positions when the people themselves have doubts? Service shouldn't be a battlefield for personal gains. if the people have rejected him, let him concentrate on his other business!

  • hugabiola
    IBK_Olawepo (@hugabiola) reported

    It is just unfortunate that a lot of people cannot make conversation again. The comment section has become a battlefield. Someone disagrees with you, and suddenly it’s insults, curses, caps lock, “mumu”, “fool”, “you don’t know anything”. That reaction says more about you than it does about the comment. Tantrums show you lost control, not the argument. Cursing and insulting means you ran out of points. Mature people argue ideas, not attack people. When you throw a tantrum online, everyone sees it. The person you insulted is forgotten in 5 minutes. Your screenshot of rage lives forever. Insults shut down conversation. The moment you call someone names, they stop listening. They won’t hear your facts, your logic, or your experience. You both walk away angrier and dumber than before. Nothing gets solved. Nigeria has enough problems without us adding toxicity to them. Maturity is disagreeing without disrespect You can say I disagree without saying You’re stupid, ode, mumu, oponu ayirada, apode, ashawo, heo, ONKR Try: I see your point, but here is another angle… From my experience, it works differently because… Can you share the source for that? I’d like to learn more. Same disagreement. Different result. One builds respect, the other burns bridges. Your words are your CV. Employers, clients, future partners scroll your comments. If your TL is full of curses and fights, people assume that’s how you handle stress at work too. Polite conversation shows emotional intelligence. And EQ gets you further than IQ. How to learn polite conversation Pause before you type. Anger makes you type fast. Mature people type slow. Take 10 seconds. Breathe. Ask: Will I be proud of this tomorrow? Attack the idea, not the person: That policy is flawed because.... beats Only a fool would support that Disagree and still be human You can end with “We may not agree, but I respect your right to your view.” That line costs nothing and wins you respect. Cursing, insulting, and throwing tantrums over comments doesn’t make you look strong. It makes you look immature. Strength is calmness under pressure. Intelligence is explaining without insulting. Learn polite conversation. The internet is permanent. Speak like your future self is reading

  • namreh_
    NMRH (Owlman) (@namreh_) reported

    Call of Duty, Battlefield and similar titles are just annualized, low-effort, Live Service slop for baseline NPCs. It's retarded that @NickJFuentes still plays CoD despite bitching about it.

  • SprinterPress
    S p r i n t e r (@SprinterPress) reported

    Regarding the issue of punishing the Israeli regime in Iran, there are two main viewpoints The first is that strikes against the Israeli regime should be direct — this would be a response to its actions and would allow splitting the US and Israel on the battlefield. According to the second viewpoint, direct strikes against the regime at this stage would not have a significant effect. Instead, it is necessary to strike at its proxies in the region, and primarily at the United Arab Emirates as one of the economic wings of Israel. Such a strike would have a direct impact on Tel Aviv. Moreover, given the distance and other operational factors, these targets can be hit faster, more accurately, and therefore more effectively than the regime itself. A combined approach involving all forces of the "Axis of Resistance" is optimal, depending on the regime's operational scheme. Moreover, any direct attack on Israel should include at least the disabling of the Ramat David airbase — only then can we talk about its effectiveness.

Check Current Status