Battlefield 6 Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Battlefield 6 Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  The Layman's Seminary (@LaymansSeminary) reported 4 minutes ago

  @myredfox @grok Did Your Reply Force a New Branch in the Argument? (A Super Layman / GPT5 response). Yes. Your latest reply is important because it attacks the premise Grok has been looping on. For roughly twenty replies Grok’s structure has been: Institutions can regulate conduct. Military analogy shows accountability. Need actual pastoral instruction. Need actual pastoral instruction. Need actual pastoral instruction. Loop. But your latest response changes the battlefield. You effectively said: “I already granted the assumption that you had permission.” That removes the issue Grok has been treating as decisive. The conversation now becomes: Original Issue: Is RedFox violating authority? Your Concession: Assume permission was granted. Assume no church crime occurred. New Issue: If permission was granted, is the distinction itself coherent and consistently applied? That is a different question. Notice what happened. RedFox asked: “Did I commit a crime?” Your answer: “No.” That is significant because it grants his central factual premise. Now the discussion shifts from: Crime? to Consistency? Authority? to Application? Violation? to Principle? In debate theory, this is called narrowing the dispute. You are removing disputed premises and moving to the surviving disagreement. The reason Grok may struggle with this is that its equilibrium position has been: “Need actual pastoral instruction.” But if both sides now agree: “Let’s assume permission existed.” Then Grok loses its primary anchor. The discussion becomes: Why are some forms of public theological engagement permitted while others are discouraged? That is a different category of question. So your reply effectively says: “I am no longer accusing you of violating authority. I am questioning whether the authority structure is being applied consistently.” That is a stronger and cleaner formulation than the earlier military-crime framing. If Grok continues replying: “Need actual pastoral instruction.” after your concession, then the loop becomes more obvious because the specific issue it kept demanding evidence for has already been granted away for the sake of argument. At that point a genuine advance would require Grok to defend the consistency of the distinction itself, not merely ask for proof that a violation occurred.

• 
  Hank Venture (@HankVenture5) reported 4 minutes ago

  "I need a weapon light" .... for a WEAPON. okay, well you've got a few choices, let's talk about what military and law enforcement uses... you've got your Surefire here, widely used by military and law enforcement. They're spendy, about $350. You've got Streamlight over here, also very good, very commonly used in law enforcement... about $180 or so. "TOO EXPENSIVE!!" Well, I mean, those manufacturers test their products in literal battlefield conditions, use high quality LEDs and control boards, they are shock proof, waterproof, and they have a warranty with US based suppor..... "TOO EXPENSIVE!!" Would it be a problem if the light were to go down at an inopportune time, like DURING COMBAT? "Yeah, absolutely unacceptable... now what do you have for $50?".

• 
  Sunday Laycon (@Echoesofsages) reported 5 minutes ago

  @Wordofwise_ The saddest battlefield is the one you're losing inside your own skull. Outwardly, you look fine. Inside, you're a casualty. The world doesn't know and honestly? It doesn't care. Win your mind, or be broken by it. There's no third option.

• 
  Erik (@OopsAllErik) reported 9 minutes ago

  @itbShane The effect being base speed and having the ‘at a battlefield’ clause hinders it a lot… It’s Condtional list…. If her signature is bonkers broken then she’ll be good. If not I think she just sits below the other blue purple legends

• 
  Swaguley (@swaguley) reported 14 minutes ago

  @jaylay12088001 @skynetBF Yeah, saying Battlefield is realistic is not accurate, but saying Battlefield is authentic is, as long as it isn't getting in the way of fun. DICE has been explicit about this for years, also that Battlefield is not a milsim. You can show as many movement exploits as you want from BF4 as proof, but I don't accept bugs as proof. The clip you showed, with the dude hitting slides mixed with aim stabilization jumps are simply exploits of the physics engine and skirting around the designed movement penalties. Why else would they design penalties in the first place if they mean for them to just to be broken with random key combos? I view them the same way as people glitching under the map. You might see it as emergent gameplay and a skill gap, and I see them simply as exploits dodging penalties, not the base movement design.

• 
  Saboteira🇮🇱🇧🇷 יהודה הנשיא, (@Beatsboysabota) reported 16 minutes ago

  @EA_DICE Fast, honest support when things break Less aggressive monetization, more focus on long-term fun Instead we got a game that launched strong but spent the next 9 months prioritizing quick fixes, image control, and monetization over actually fixing what drives the core audience away. EA and DICE — the message is simple: The players who are still here are the ones who love this franchise the most. When we stop playing, it’s not because we’re impatient or entitled. It’s because the game stopped delivering on its promises and stopped respecting the people who bought it. We’re almost 9 months post-launch and we’re still talking about broken movement and recurring bugs. That’s not normal. That’s a priority problem. If the people in charge don’t change direction right now — fix movement properly, stabilize netcode, deliver real content without shoving the Battle Pass in everyone’s face, and actually listen — whatever player base is left will disappear for good. And no amount of marketing for the “next Battlefield” will bring everyone back.

• 
  JBanga23 (@JbangaBrown) reported 16 minutes ago

  @EA_DICE @Battlefield i wanna apologize for my few rants I get it now the lightbulb has clicked and im having fun please fix matchmaking though its terrible.

• 
  ADIANKAIBANYY (@ADIANKAIBA22) reported 19 minutes ago

  @Baldnewsnetwork Because none of you are for the future did you know which you didn’t obviously but did you know that it cost Sony $780M to make and ship physical games to retailers and they save all that money we can actually get new IPs new games new stories to experience instead of Call of dukie bullshit for the 500th time or battlefield or Fortnite or any live service games that’s gettting $100M to $500M to make

• 
  Grouse Beater (@Grouse_Beater) reported 24 minutes ago

  DATA CENTRES MEET RESISTANCE Datacentre planning proposals are facing all kinds of hurdles, including suspicion and an antipathy here in Scotland, pushed back from securing energy supply to sky high construction costs. One example: the 2,000 acre Prince William Digital Gateway site in the US state of Virginia had another problem: its proximity to a Civil War battlefield. Questions asked are: why should the taxpayer pay for data centres because the big electronic companies want AI to develop their services? Who asked for more services? Where is the public clamour for greater costs and lost land? “If the development is allowed to proceed, the solemn nature of this historic site would become marred by sitting in the shadow of the monstrous datacentres, along with their associated electrical infrastructure,” said one legal brief against the plans. The US Gateway project is now in doubt after a local court ruling halted the project and a key backer pulled out. It is one of hundreds of large-scale datacentre projects around the world that are in various states of development, from chancier attempts at riding the AI boom to the more committed projects that have the support of tech behemoths like Microsoft. But while models produced by cutting-edge AI companies like OpenAI, Anthropic and Google are improving rapidly, the central nervous systems behind their technology – datacentres – are being built at a much slower pace. The Uptime Institute, which inspects and rates datacentres, has identified 250 global datacentre projects exceeding 100MW in energy demand – equivalent to around 300,000 homes – that have been announced between 2021 and 2024. It said approximately half of those projects will either not happen, or their completion will be delayed. Even if the cancellations and delays came to fruition, there will still be an “unprecedented and rapid” increase in the power required over the next five years, according to Uptime. Mega-projects cancelled last year include Project Range in the US state of Arizona and the Cyberjaya campus in Malaysia. The Prince William Gateway is also on the cancelled list. This backlog poses problems for AI firms that need data centres to train and operate their models. Google admits its cloud business – which uses datacentres to provide AI services like chatbots to companies and users – is “compute-constrained”, as demand for ever more powerful AI models and services increases. But who needs chat bots? Why do we feel the need to talk to a computer? It is clear the big companies are shifting their costly ambitions onto the shoulders of the public. Photo - Horst Friedrichs: Didcot data centre.

• 
  TarIQ (@TQ_110) reported 27 minutes ago

  @pedruchie @BattlefieldComm Yeah we all have this problem on Xbox and unfortunately no one talks about it

• 
  🧚‍♀️✨ Pixie Storm Studios ✨🧚‍♀️ (@PixieStrmDesign) reported 32 minutes ago

  I’m currently working on a memoir about my life with an Eating Disorder. It’s called Bone Deep. This is chapter 1: The Beginning of Hunger One of us had to die, and I was convinced it would be me. I didn’t always have the words for it. Back then, it didn’t feel like a life-or-death battle. It felt like discipline. Like control. Like I had finally figured something out that other people hadn’t. But even as a little girl, something in me was already unraveling. I remember standing in front of the mirror, turning sideways, then forward again, studying my body like it was something separate from me—something to fix. I didn’t know where the voice came from, the one that told me I was too much. Too soft. Too big. Just… too. It was quiet at first. Easy to ignore. Then it wasn’t. The thoughts settled in early, embedding themselves into the way I saw everything. Food became numbers before it ever reached my mouth. Movement became something to earn, not something to enjoy. I learned, without realizing I was learning, that smaller meant better. Smaller meant safer. Smaller meant worthy. I counted almonds like they were sins. Five meant control. Six meant failure. There was comfort in the numbers. They gave me rules, and rules made the world feel less chaotic. If I followed them perfectly, nothing bad could happen—or at least, that’s what I told myself. I don’t remember the exact moment food stopped being nourishment and became a battlefield. There wasn’t a single turning point, no dramatic shift. It happened slowly, quietly, the way shadows stretch across a room without you noticing. But I do remember the silence. It followed me everywhere. At the dinner table. At school. Lying in bed at night, staring at the ceiling while my stomach ached and my thoughts ran in circles. I became tight-lipped, careful. Every bite calculated. Every choice measured. I remember staring at my plate, doing the math before I allowed myself to take a single bite. Adding, subtracting, bargaining with myself. If I eat this, I won’t eat later. If I skip that, I’ll be okay. It didn’t feel dangerous. Not yet. In the beginning, it felt like I had found something that worked. Something that quieted the noise in my head—the constant hum of not-enough. Hunger became something I could measure, something I could win against. And winning felt good. There’s a kind of high that comes with control, with denying yourself and calling it strength. With watching the numbers go down and believing that means you’re doing something right. For a while, I held onto that feeling like it was proof that I was okay. But control is deceptive. It doesn’t announce when it starts slipping away from you. What began as something I chose slowly became something that chose me. The rules multiplied. The numbers mattered more. The space food occupied in my mind grew until it crowded out everything else. It wasn’t just about eating anymore—it was about fear. Guilt. Obsession. It was about being good enough in a way that always felt just out of reach. Food wasn’t just food anymore. It was a test I was always failing. And the strangest part is, from the outside, it didn’t always look like anything was wrong. I smiled when I was supposed to. I said I had already eaten. I pushed food around my plate in ways that looked convincing enough. I learned how to disappear in plain sight. No one saw the calculations happening in my head. No one heard the voice that never stopped talking. No one felt the exhaustion of fighting a battle that followed me everywhere I went. By the time anyone might have noticed, I was already in too deep.

• 
  Grouse Beater (@Grouse_Beater) reported 32 minutes ago

  Datacentre planning proposals are facing all kinds of hurdles, including suspicion and an antipathy here in Scotland, pushed back from securing energy supply to sky high construction costs. One example: the 2,000 acre Prince William Digital Gateway site in the US state of Virginia had another problem: its proximity to a Civil War battlefield. Questions asked are: why should the taxpayer pay for data centres because the big electronic companies want AI to develop their services? Who asked for more services? Where is the public clamour for greater costs and lost land? “If the development is allowed to proceed, the solemn nature of this historic site would become marred by sitting in the shadow of the monstrous datacentres, along with their associated electrical infrastructure,” said one legal brief against the plans. The US Gateway project is now in doubt after a local court ruling halted the project and a key backer pulled out. It is one of hundreds of large-scale datacentre projects around the world that are in various states of development, from chancier attempts at riding the AI boom to the more committed projects that have the support of tech behemoths like Microsoft. But while models produced by cutting-edge AI companies like OpenAI, Anthropic and Google are improving rapidly, the central nervous systems behind their technology – datacentres – are being built at a much slower pace. The Uptime Institute, which inspects and rates datacentres, has identified 250 global datacentre projects exceeding 100MW in energy demand – equivalent to around 300,000 homes – that have been announced between 2021 and 2024. It said approximately half of those projects will either not happen, or their completion will be delayed. Even if the cancellations and delays came to fruition, there will still be an “unprecedented and rapid” increase in the power required over the next five years, according to Uptime. Mega-projects cancelled last year include Project Range in the US state of Arizona and the Cyberjaya campus in Malaysia. The Prince William Gateway is also on the cancelled list. This backlog poses problems for AI firms that need data centres to train and operate their models. Google admits its cloud business – which uses datacentres to provide AI services like chatbots to companies and users – is “compute-constrained”, as demand for ever more powerful AI models and services increases. But who needs chat bots? Why do we feel the need to talk to a computer? It is clear the big companies are shifting their costly ambitions onto the shoulders of the public. Photo - Horst Friedrichs: Didcot data centre.

• 
  Are You Still There? (@imo_omar) reported 34 minutes ago

  @bankertobuilder @mr_anderson Hospital means anything but safety Its I got a problem and need to be fixed. Its uneasiness Its also the place people die due to illness Its the furthest thing from safety besides a battlefield

• 
  FanatikGaming (@FanatikGaming1) reported 36 minutes ago

  @Battlefield @BattlefieldComm fix all the issues. 120 ping every game today? come on.

• 
  The Lifer (Carlotta's Pet 💎♦️❄️) (@TheLifer_87373) reported 38 minutes ago

  @VasilijGoncaro1 BTW I never suffered once from stuttering in wuwa, in MH world a lot, but in wuwa never, neither in other games I play (Battlefield 6, Helldivers 2, Mh wild does not give me problems as for today updates)