Battlefield 6 Outage Map
The map below depicts the most recent cities worldwide where Battlefield 6 users have reported problems and outages. If you are having an issue with Battlefield 6, make sure to submit a report below
The heatmap above shows where the most recent user-submitted and social media reports are geographically clustered. The density of these reports is depicted by the color scale as shown below.
Battlefield 6 users affected:
Battlefield 6 is a 2025 first-person shooter game developed by Battlefield Studios and published by Electronic Arts. Serving as the eighteenth installment in the Battlefield series, the game was released for PlayStation 5, Windows, and Xbox Series X/S on October 10, 2025.
Most Affected Locations
Outage reports and issues in the past 15 days originated from:
| Location | Reports |
|---|---|
| Saint-Malo, Brittany | 1 |
| Buenos Aires, CF | 1 |
| Comuna 1, CABA | 5 |
| Perpignan, Occitanie | 1 |
| Domingos Martins, ES | 1 |
| Courbevoie, Île-de-France | 1 |
| Strasbourg, ACAL | 1 |
| Chaumont, ACAL | 1 |
| Amagney, Bourgogne-Franche-Comté | 1 |
| Annecy, Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes | 2 |
| Paris, Île-de-France | 17 |
| Itapemirim, ES | 1 |
| São Paulo, SP | 2 |
| Brech, Brittany | 1 |
| Trévoux, Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes | 1 |
| Nidau, BE | 1 |
| Villa Victoria, MEX | 1 |
| Santiago de Querétaro, QUE | 3 |
| Telêmaco Borba, PR | 1 |
| Bordeaux, Nouvelle-Aquitaine | 4 |
| Bron, Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes | 1 |
| Madrid, Madrid | 4 |
| La Trinité, Martinique | 1 |
| Lyon, Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes | 5 |
| Persan, Île-de-France | 1 |
| Metz, ACAL | 3 |
| Aubais, Occitanie | 1 |
| Toulouse, Occitanie | 4 |
| Seysses, Occitanie | 1 |
| Colmar, ACAL | 1 |
Community Discussion
Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.
Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.
Battlefield 6 Issues Reports
Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:
-
Gera (@GeraKerla) reported@stefayylmao1 I do not understand why we keep putting in snipers in moba shooters when they create so many issues and are extremely unfun to play against at the level that the majority of every playerbase operates on. At least in battlefield you have more meaningful ways to work around them.
-
BigCheeseTX (@BigCheeseTX) reported@Battlefield This mode has been completely ruined by people camping the ships before it's open. Teams don't care who wins they just want to troll the other carrier. I can't play it anymore. Make the opponent ship out of bounds until the 50% is hit, when it has been opened, that would fix it
-
SimpleDigit7 (@SimpleNinja7) reported@w40295 @kek2server if you think that, then you are part of the problem. If you need to run around like sonic to be able to play, then maybe go back to COD or battlefield
-
Jeremy the therapist (@psychfox) reported“Identity diffusion is represented by a poorly integrated concept of the self and of significant others.” - Kernberg, 1984 This is the heart of borderline personality organization: not simply mood swings, but unstable self-other representation. Under threat, the self cannot mentalize (understand emotional/cognitive/behavioral causality) itself or others. One minute: “I’m safe with you.” Next minute: “You are dangerous, I am humiliated.” Identity diffusion in action: the self fractures, turning the other person into a source of fear, and the relationship consequently becomes a battlefield of unstable meanings and self-states. Kernberg saw this clearly; the problem is a self-system that loses integration when attachment is activated and vulnerability ensues.
-
Grip N Rip Sport Cards (@GripCards) reportedAfter multiple hours spent on the MW4 beta, I can now confirm it’s genuinely the worst CoD I have ever played. The game lacks identity and unfortunately just feels identical to the previous IW games with 0 risks taken or any innovation. Atleast with Bo6/7 you can say they tried to take risks with Omnimovement. What’s different about MW4 compared to other recent IW games? Absolutely nothing and that’s one of the major issues. I could write an essay of feedback but I feel like I’d be putting more effort into that than the devs play testing the game. And don’t even get me started on SBMM If Battlefield 6 scared them so bad to remove SBMM in BO7, why isn’t GTA 6 scaring them? Is Activision raising the white flag already on MW4? Overall such a terrible experience made even worse by the manipulation matchmaking Spend your $70 elsewhere. Great job @InfinityWard 👍 #MW4
-
Gunny🇨🇦Gunnerson (@GunnsForShow) reported@Senzah All shooters have sbmm- its Cods heavy handed sbmm/eomm that is the problem. Battlefields works much better and doesn't make the game feel like work. I'll stick to Battlefield. Other than the original Black ops for a change, my time playing new Cod games is over.
-
panopticon (@harrypanopticon) reported@ghostof_bb Labor fans hate that the truth is recorded as it makes them defenceless regardless if evidence is admissible or not. They know the truth is recorded. No spin. They desperately try with putting up posters in government buildings linking it to privacy of staff. But the issue is if breached and the truth is recorded, it also becomes evidential that recording was justified and required. This will become a complete battlefield, especially as the biggest party who breaches privacy is our government.
-
良月三 (@liangyuesan) reported@Kevin1138159 The military industry solved the problem of employment at the bottom, and the bottom accepted the redistribution of the state on the battlefield by selling their lives. However, the inflation caused by military Keynesianism damaged those middle-class proletariat.
-
Decode Conflict (@DecodeConflict) reportedAMERICA’S DRONE PROBLEM IS NOT TECHNOLOGY. IT IS PROCUREMENT. The United States can design some of the world’s most advanced autonomous weapons. Its weakness is turning those designs into inexpensive, replaceable systems at wartime scale. The Department of War acknowledges that adversaries collectively manufacture millions of unmanned systems annually while the United States has been slow to field comparable mass. Washington has responded with a Drone Dominance initiative intended to deliver tens of thousands of small drones in 2026 and hundreds of thousands by 2027. Roughly $1 billion has been allocated toward approximately 340,000 systems. A new Direct Reporting Portfolio Manager has also been given authority to coordinate the development, procurement, deployment and sustainment of unmanned systems across the military. The decision exposes the underlying problem. Responsibility was previously divided among services, acquisition offices and disconnected programs, each operating with separate requirements and timelines. The battlefield will not wait for that machinery. Ukraine has demonstrated that drone warfare evolves in weeks. Airframes, frequencies, software and tactics must be continuously modified as the enemy adapts. A system that takes years to approve may be obsolete before it reaches a combat unit. China’s advantage is not simply that it can build drones cheaply. It controls much of the commercial ecosystem that supports them, including motors, batteries, cameras, electronics and manufacturing capacity. America may design the superior platform while China retains the ability to manufacture and replace the larger fleet. Decode Conflict Assessment Drone dominance is a production contest disguised as a technology competition. Washington should purchase drones in large recurring batches, establish common interfaces, authorize frontline units to test competing systems and guarantee manufacturers enough demand to expand domestic production. The objective cannot be one perfect drone. It must be an adaptable American ecosystem capable of producing thousands of acceptable systems every month. The Pentagon has finally identified the problem. The decisive question is whether its acquisition system can move faster than the battlefield it is trying to dominate.
-
Aric Chen (@aricchen) reportedJapan put 8.9 trillion yen on the table Monday for fiscal 2027, a record request, and left more than 100 line items unpriced. Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi is rewriting the three security documents before year-end. The final figure is widely expected to clear 10 trillion yen. That is not a rounding error. It is Tokyo deciding that the cheap, attritable systems the PLA already fields in quantity are now Japan's problem to solve at scale. The Defense Ministry is asking for attack drones that can launch from the surface or from underwater, built at home, produced fast and cheap, and flown with standoff missiles. Officials point to Ukraine. They also want an AI coordinator inside command and control so battlefield assessment and target selection move faster than a human staff can cycle. A ministry cloud is meant to keep classified traffic up when the network is under stress. I have watched Japanese cabinets talk around this problem for years. This request does not. Shinjiro Koizumi's ministry is buying tools that raise the cost of a first move across the first island chain. Beijing still calls any Japanese hardening "new militarism." Koizumi already answered that in Singapore: China fields nuclear weapons and strategic bombers. Japan does not. The budget paper is the operational follow-through. The 2022 documents put spending on a path to 2 percent of GDP. Tokyo hit that two years early. This request is the bridge to whatever Takaichi writes into the revised strategy. The blank lines are the tell. They are holding space for a larger counterstrike architecture, not padding a press release. If the PLA assumed Japan would stay a high-end, low-volume force that runs out of munitions in week one, that assumption is being written down. ACI — Aric Chen | Insights
-
💁🏻 James (@brotherhoodcree) reported@Ryangofett_2490 @Battlefield pls fix it and add this weapon 🙏🙏
-
Josie Simmons (@JosieSi69363788) reported@Selene_Mariposa Like in so many other situations, Americans in military service may hope for the better to shine in any decisions made, Jackson served his state, that he loved dearly, and hoped...(he was in the South at the time, and had six slaves..."Some were given as gifts or brought to his marriage by his second wife, Anna Morrison, while others asked Jackson to purchase them so they could choose a master with a kind reputation or avoid being separated from family." ) " Stonewall Jackson actively chose to return to military service. However, his decision was motivated strictly by loyalty to his home state of Virginia rather than a desire for secession.Before the outbreak of hostilities, Jackson actually opposed secession and hoped the South would find a way to secure its rights while remaining within the United States. His personal values and motivations shaped his return to the battlefield: State Loyalty: When the state of Virginia officially seceded from the Union in April 1861, Jackson felt his primary duty was to defend his home state against Northern invasion." He was a loyal Virginian and yet fools decided to virtue signal and remove his statue instead of adding a plaque to educate people. So sad.
-
posiedon1971 (@posiedon1971) reported@BasilTheGreat Brown people will be the majority in the public service, professional services and the intelligence agencies while white people will be dying on the battlefield - it is a very deliberate and calculated policy. Pretend it isn't at your own peril!
-
Dajovi (@Dajovi2) reported@Battlefield Enough with rotating modes out of nowhere. I'm tired of checking if my favorite mode is up every single day. Just kill Portal, it’s garbage. Keep the core modes -including Rush- and fix them so they work properly. Completely useless.
-
BlackWidow (@Blackwidow8163) reported@BattlefieldComm Also please fix the respawn beacon occasionally doesn’t work!