Battlefield 6 Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Battlefield 6 Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  John Lane (@JohnLan70186141) reported 44 seconds ago

  @Mr_Andrew_Fox Battlefield Ecology describes evolving technology and tactics. What works well gets used until changes make it work worse. Even then, old solutions sometimes address contemporary problems.

• 
  Bill Bruin (@Hockey14144) reported 2 minutes ago

  @BattlefieldComm Fire Anyone who was working On Call of duty at any time. . Remove Battlepass. Fix the TTK Let us turn off the Top Gun Music. Make Better Maps stop ruining old ones. Let PC players turn off crossplay. Future BF Remove Crossplay.

• 
  Big Brain AI (@realBigBrainAI) reported 2 minutes ago

  Palantir co-founder and CEO Alex Karp on why almost every company buying AI is getting nothing back for it: Karp's diagnosis is short and unkind: "The classic Silicon Valley way up until recently was just buy some large language model and have a nice chat with it, and that really doesn't create any actual enterprise value." That's the whole failure mode. A model gets procured, a chat window appears, nobody's revenue changes. His alternative starts with a definition he says Palantir arrived at years before the rest of the market: "We were years ahead for lots of reasons of anticipating what operational AI would mean. Meaning AI where you make more money or your revenue goes up and your costs go down." Two lines on the P&L. Nothing else counts. Karp claims the numbers follow from that. "We have a thriving commercial business. It grew 71% last quarter. And we're at a very pretty significant scale." He also flags something rarer in the sector: "We make money on our money, which is unusual in software. People have growth but no profitability. We have a lot of both." So why does the same underlying technology produce nothing at most companies and revenue at his? Karp says the answer is "a little more technical," and it isn't the model: "Our platforms are built to use large language models and machine learning in a way that is actually operationally effective. We had a relatively privileged insight into how you would do that and built this thing called an ontology which manages large language models in a way where they become crazily useful both commercially and actually on the battlefield." The ontology is the missing layer. A model on its own doesn't know what your business is made of. Something has to translate between the two before the model can touch anything that matters. What it gets used for is deliberately unglamorous. Karp lists underwriting, acquisition of real estate at scale, construction at scale, and supply chain management — "anywhere where you have volatility." He picks out one problem specifically: "Understanding the true cost of inputs into your enterprise, which is super hard to do at scale, especially if things are shifting or there's disruptions." And the larger version of the job: "reimagining your business into a digital as opposed to a non-digital business." Then he moves from the technology to the thing he actually treats as the differentiator — who carries the risk that none of it works: "Our claim to fame really is we absorb the risk of creating value." He contrasts that with how enterprise software is normally sold, in language he flags as the vulgar version: "The way you're taught to build a software company is your customer thinks they're getting laid but they're getting effed." Palantir's internal reframing: "We used to internally say no, we're in the mutual pleasuring business. Both sides should be happy." In practice that means the vendor is on the hook for the outcome, not just the licence: "We absorb the risk of value creation. So like you will make more money, your enterprise will work better. That's been a bonanza and we're pretty much alone in doing that in the world." Karp doesn't claim it's all his own execution. He credits the moment too: "The truth is we're also riding the back of the fact that this is just an American revolution." Underneath the specifics, he also frames the commercial work as secondary to something else. Asked what matters most, his first answer isn't revenue at all: "The most important thing we've done for you is help establish dominance on the battlefield with the DoD and stop hundreds of terror attacks."

• 
  Pavlomir K (@pavlomir1) reported 9 minutes ago

  @TruthFairy131 I do believe that cowards are risk at the battlefield. I do believe every able man should protect their country as an obligation. What if Australia gets attacked @TruthFairy131 ? Won't you defend it? The issue is the approach and who gets drafted and who won't be.

• 
  Mark Kaplan (@markkaplan20) reported 12 minutes ago

  I want you to try a thought experiment with me. You have coronary artery disease. You are given two choices. You can only pick one. Door one. You take a statin or Zetia for the rest of your life. Your LDL drops. Your doctor is happy. But you change nothing else. Same diet. Same metabolic environment. Same insulin. Same inflammation. Same oxidative stress. Door two. You take no drug. But you fix your metabolic health completely. You reverse insulin resistance. You lower fasting insulin and HOMA-IR. You bring hs-CRP and homocysteine down. You eliminate seed oils. You move your body every day. You sleep. You protect the wall. Which door does the evidence support? Door one lowers the cargo. That is all it does. The glycocalyx is still degrading. The wall is still damaged. Whatever LDL remains is still oxidizing inside an inflamed artery. The foam cells are still forming. The fire is still burning. You lowered the number on the lab report. The disease is still being built. Door two fixes the battlefield. The glycocalyx rebuilds. The endothelium heals. Insulin sensitivity returns and the particle pattern shifts from small dense to large buoyant. Oxidative stress drops so LDL is no longer modified. Macrophages have nothing to eat. Inflammation cools. The chain is broken at five of the six steps simultaneously. The Lyon Diet Heart Study showed a 70% reduction in cardiac events with a dietary intervention. LDL barely moved. The wall changed. The JUPITER trial selected patients by inflammation, not by cholesterol. Then gave them a cholesterol drug. The benefit tracked with CRP reduction, not LDL reduction. They proved the environment mattered and then prescribed a drug for the particle. I had a cardiac event at 52. My LDL was 110. I chose door two. My fasting insulin went from 10.3 to 2.8. My hs-CRP dropped below 0.5. My triglycerides went from 150 to 63. My metabolic age is 43. I take zero pharmaceutical drugs. This is not medical advice. This is what I chose for myself based on four years of learning where the disease actually starts. And to everyone who asks why not do both. That is a fair question. Here is my honest answer. I do not want to put these drugs in my body. Statins deplete CoQ10, raise the risk of insulin resistance, and come with a side effect profile I am not willing to accept when the root cause alternative exists. That is my choice. That is my risk reward calculation. Yours may be different. Make it with your doctor or make it on your own. But make it with your eyes open. One exception I will always state publicly. Familial Hypercholesterolemia. Lifelong extreme LDL elevation can overwhelm even a healthy wall. That is the one condition where I believe medication alongside root cause work is appropriate. For everyone else, the question is simple. Do you want to lower the cargo or fix the battlefield? Just dropped my daughter at college in Madison Wisconsin and the other one in Ohio State - so grateful to be here. We all have to make our own choices every day and manage our risks keep asking questions - the science is not settled. The truth heals

• 
  B.E. Weymeyer (@Writer_BE_Wey) reported 13 minutes ago

  @ipMFTxbxeCuYIdp @MAXIMUM_ODEN A lot of it is just weight. These drones can't carry much because of how inefficient they are for carrying payload (one of the problems with FPV drones on a battlefield). Net hits it, and it's automatically too heavy to fly.

• 
  Entry Liquidity (@UnprofHater) reported 14 minutes ago

  @exitliquid1ty There is something uniquely fascinating about a memecoin trader who mocks other people for analyzing their successful trades while simultaneously having lost all of his money. It is the financial equivalent of someone crashing their car into a tree and then laughing at another driver for reading the owner's manual. The post makes fun of traders who hit a five-figure PnL and then write detailed explanations about how they executed the trade. But regardless of whether those threads are insightful or self-congratulatory, there is an obvious distinction: they are examining something that worked. A trader who has blown up his account might actually be one of the people who stands to benefit most from studying why other traders entered, sized, managed, and exited their positions successfully. Losing everything in memecoins doesn't necessarily mean someone is unintelligent or incapable of trading. Memecoins are extraordinarily volatile, and even talented traders can suffer enormous losses. But repeatedly losing money while believing you have nothing to learn from profitable traders is a much bigger problem. Markets have an extremely efficient way of punishing excessive confidence. Perhaps the funniest part is the accusation that someone else is "poor" for celebrating a five-figure win. If your own PnL has gone to zero, wealth-shaming the guy who just made $10,000+ is a questionable battlefield to choose. The scoreboard is doing a lot of work against you. A good trader doesn't have to blindly follow anybody's advice. In fact, they shouldn't. But they should constantly be willing to examine other people's strategies, identify what works, discard what doesn't, and reconsider their own assumptions. If your strategy resulted in losing all your money, refusing to learn from anyone else isn't conviction—it's a very expensive commitment to being wrong. Sometimes the five-figure PnL essay might actually be worth reading.

• 
  J_Omotola (@J_omotola28) reported 17 minutes ago

  and then you will be able to solve the problem at hand. Child of God, nobody prepares for war on a battlefield. Oftentimes, commanders and soldiers plan their battle strategies long before wars break out.

• 
  Mazzphysics (@fredrik_fdev) reported 20 minutes ago

  @dhh @dhh The main problem I have with any Linux is I can't play battlefield 6 on it. Is this something omarchy could fix? Or are we doomed to use windows? I'd switch without hesitation if all my games worked on a Linux environment.

• 
  Lost In LA (@lost_in_la) reported 25 minutes ago

  @pdxraj @lookner I don’t believe that but high tolerance for conventional casualties ≠ indifference to battlefield contamination that can immobilize your own advance and logistics. Those are different problems.

• 
  EpimeTheAus (@EpimeTheAus) reported 30 minutes ago

  @CAMIKAZE78 I can't see what we could do that would incentivise them to fix it. Walking away could kill it entirely, sticking around will make them focus on shiny new content instead of fixes. This long after launch, Battlefield 6 seems pretty stuck in this pattern now.

• 
  JTCrawford (@JtCrawford) reported 30 minutes ago

  FBI seized Chinese botnet tools used against NASA, DOE, and Senate networks. When adversaries penetrate critical infrastructure with impunity, it's not just an IT problem—it's proof we're not treating cyberspace like the battlefield it is. #Cybersecurity #CriticalInfrastructure

• 
  Ambrigalist 🇩🇪 (@ambrigalist) reported 31 minutes ago

  @VeryBadSCAVR Played Rainbow six, Halo, Destiny, CoD, overwatch and Battlefield all had bigger hit boxes and some kind of aim assist. They should just give people a option to search for lobbys that accept aim assist aka "Arcade" games, and Advanced where tou actually need to aim. Aim assist Hardware has been getting out of hand and even softaim software and hardware can't be traced anymore. But aim assist should be disabled to not follow players enemys behind and trough smokes. I don't think aim assist is bad for shooters. SBMM after playing rounds I noticed, that I no longer play against people who use Hardware and software external game seetings to see in the dark and less lag switch users and ping abusers in lobbys.

• 
  No Man's Smile (@NoMansSmile) reported 32 minutes ago

  @Battlefield @BattlefieldComm So sad that these guys work hard to add good features/modes to the game just to take it away from their player base weeks later because of greed and a broken anti-consumer live service system. Every developer should take a page out of HelloGames. Make games as passion not greed.

• 
  🌑🕷️RiskE80🕷️🌑 (@RiskE80_) reported 33 minutes ago

  @clarityysix But then again I guess it is kindve a vague definition cuz there are games that are considered live service but have a similar content cycle like Borderlands (CoD, GTA Online, Battlefield) where they make a game, make new content, then make a new game eventually, repeat