Battlefield 6 Outage Map
The map below depicts the most recent cities worldwide where Battlefield 6 users have reported problems and outages. If you are having an issue with Battlefield 6, make sure to submit a report below
The heatmap above shows where the most recent user-submitted and social media reports are geographically clustered. The density of these reports is depicted by the color scale as shown below.
Battlefield 6 users affected:
Battlefield 6 is a 2025 first-person shooter game developed by Battlefield Studios and published by Electronic Arts. Serving as the eighteenth installment in the Battlefield series, the game was released for PlayStation 5, Windows, and Xbox Series X/S on October 10, 2025.
Most Affected Locations
Outage reports and issues in the past 15 days originated from:
| Location | Reports |
|---|---|
| Argences, Normandy | 1 |
| Minneapolis, MN | 2 |
| Reims, ACAL | 1 |
| Pfaffenhoffen, ACAL | 1 |
| Americana, SP | 1 |
| Rennes, Brittany | 1 |
| Nantes, Pays de la Loire | 1 |
| Lyon, Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes | 3 |
| Montignac, Nouvelle-Aquitaine | 1 |
| Paris, Île-de-France | 14 |
| Méry-sur-Oise, Île-de-France | 1 |
| Halle, Flanders | 1 |
| Bordeaux, Nouvelle-Aquitaine | 1 |
| Bourg-en-Bresse, Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes | 1 |
| La Paz, BCS | 1 |
| Cahors, Occitanie | 1 |
| Saint-Genis-Laval, Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes | 1 |
| Brisbane, QLD | 1 |
| Partido de José C. Paz, BA | 1 |
| Saint-Étienne, Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes | 1 |
| Orléans, Centre | 1 |
| Castelnau-le-Lez, Occitanie | 1 |
| Comuna 1, CABA | 5 |
| Barrhead, Scotland | 1 |
| Lausanne, VD | 1 |
| Nairobi, Nairobi Area | 1 |
| Tiruvalla, KL | 1 |
| Propières, Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes | 1 |
| Lübeck, Hansestadt, Schleswig-Holstein | 1 |
| Montpellier, Occitanie | 2 |
Community Discussion
Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.
Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.
Battlefield 6 Issues Reports
Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:
-
Mex Sim (@essimelane) reported@World_Affairs11 USA should step aside and let Iran & Israel settle their issues on a battlefield without external interference. A boss will emerge and the loser will starts showing respect to the boss.
-
Patrick (@TrickNyhan) reported@BattlefieldComm The deployment screen jumping issue is also a thing for console (Xbox)
-
Silver Rook (@Silver_Rook) reported@SgtDangerCow Automatics ... Hipfire Always. Ads in the battlefield series seems to have been crippled over the years. You can't out shoot lag and soft aimers if you ads most times. It's just too slow
-
Proud *****, The Infidel King (@Asamoah0117) reported@Battlefield Fix the bugs. Skipping to redeploy sometimes doesn't work
-
steve-O (@SteveSteveo126) reported@BattlefieldComm is there a fix in the works for the lop sided server issue..its really bad. On xbox series x games are crashing periodically as well.
-
steadygoing (@steadygoing) reported2/10 A subject becomes serious when it is forced to expose a problem beneath its name. In this case, the question is not “AI and writing.” The question is: what is the human function when production is no longer scarce? More precisely: how does a person remain an author when the text can be generated before he has earned it? The operator’s first achievement is therefore not a sentence, but a clarification of the battlefield. He must know what the essay is not about. Without exclusion, the machine will produce coverage instead of thought. A topic becomes a work only when it has been narrowed to a necessity. III. Literature as Resistance The second operation is confrontation with literature. Literature is not ornament. It is not a display cabinet of names placed behind an argument to make it appear educated. It is resistance. It tells the operator which formulations are already available, which concepts have become lazy, which anxieties are inherited, which distinctions are too coarse, and where an opening remains. In the present case, the relevant background is not only contemporary commentary on AI writing. That would be too narrow. The problem touches older questions: writing as a technology of consciousness; the relation between inscription and thought; tacit knowledge; craft and revision; computation and judgment; bullshit as language detached from truth; institutional dependence on documents; the social performance of competence. The operator does not collect these literatures in order to obey them. He uses them to locate the point at which they are insufficient. Ong and Goody help show that writing is not mere recording but an organizer of consciousness and classification. Polanyi clarifies why explicit text cannot exhaust tacit competence. Weizenbaum warns against the confusion of computation with judgment. Frankfurt helps identify language indifferent to truth. Sennett gives the craft dimension: correction, resistance, form. Writing studies reminds us that composition was never merely final product but process, revision, audience, genre, and control. But these literatures do not by themselves deliver the governing claim. They provide elements. The operator must find the axis that organizes them. That axis is the relocation of authorship. AI does not merely assist writing. It decomposes writing into operations and forces the human being to occupy the level of command. The author becomes responsible less for manual production than for the ordered passage through topic, literature, angle, structure, generation, criticism, verification, refusal, and defence. Literature, used properly, does not enlarge the essay by accumulation. It sharpens the essay by resistance. IV. The Angle The decisive intellectual act is the selection of the angle. A topic can be handled indefinitely. An angle forces direction. It says: of all possible ways of treating this subject, this is the level at which it becomes most revealing. The angle is not a decorative phrase. It is the governing cut. “AI and writing” remains too loose. “AI makes writing easier” is too obvious. “AI produces fluent but possibly empty text” is also too obvious. The stronger angle is this: AI shifts the author from producer of text to operator of the process by which text becomes defensible thought. This angle changes the essay. It prevents it from becoming a complaint about machine prose. It prevents it from becoming a policy essay about academic cheating. It prevents it from becoming a technical discussion of prompting. It relocates the subject in the human being’s changed position.
-
Brolis_ (@Brolis_92) reported@guledesma @onebattlefield Dice make smaller maps idiots like you: WE WANT BIG BATTLEFIELD MAPS! They make this big map YOU IDIOTS: WE WANT SMALLER MAPS LIKE FCK OFF ALREADY! Tired of gaming communities. No wonder game gets more and more broken with each patch, because Dice listen to ALL OF YOU IDIOTS!
-
Shawn Chauhan (@shawnchauhan1) reportedIran just added Starlink to its list of military targets. Not a weapons system. Not a military satellite. A consumer internet network. This is the logical endpoint of dual-use infrastructure - when your product is critical enough to matter on a battlefield, it becomes a target whether you intended it to be one or not. Starlink powers drone operations. It keeps activists online during blackouts. It is the connective tissue for AI-driven military systems. The lesson for anyone building critical infrastructure: neutrality is not a permanent option. The more indispensable your product becomes, the more it attracts the attention of people who would rather it did not exist. Musk did not build a weapons system. He built something more valuable than one - and that is exactly the problem.
-
Ian Wilkie (@Wilkmaster) reportedYet another *****, dangerous aspect of Project Ukraine that people were forbidden from talking about. We funded wild gene and GOF germ research, using them as medical guinea pigs like we use them as crash test dummies on the battlefield. Ouch!
-
Animosity 📸 (@ContainedAni) reportedPeople are fundamentally misunderstanding a lot about this card and why it may or may not be something to worry about. On one hand you have people saying "omg free value, axe it!" and they're wrong. On the other hand you have people saying "lol dies to removal, 6 mana do nothing, ect" and they're also wrong. If you think you can judge cards solely in a vacuum, then you're missing the plot. In a vacuum - Winota is a bad card as it a 4 mana dude who does nothing unless you have other things on the battlefield. Winota also has zero protection and dies to removal just as easily as MM. However we all can understand that Winota is a broken card because of the sheer value the card can give that snowballs out of control. You don't see Winota at anything lower than high B3 games for a reason (if you do, the player is trying to pubstomp you) and it's because the sheer value the card presents overshadow's even the game changer's list at times. MM is a card that requires other pieces to push it, and anyone playing MM is also likely playing those pieces as well. I am not saying MM is like Winota entirely, I'm saying that you can't judge MM like any old creature in magic that can only be in the 99. You also cannot ignore that he does provide progressively more and more value the longer the game goes, which is what happens a lot at bracket 2-3 games. The minute someone lands a piece that allows them to draw a card on each opponents turn you've effectively turned the game into "every turn is my turn". Let's flip the script: MM is colorless and that is a hinderance more than a benefit. Busted legendary creatures in commander are more often judged by their power in the zone, and much less the 99 (eg Erayo, Golos, Leovold, ect). MM's deck HAS to be colorless and colorless has much less resources to work with to draw cards on each opponents turn with little upfront investment. There are some, but they are usually symmetrical (temple bell, GRS, ect) and can provide your opponents with other benefits as well. This is a massive hinderance to MM's overall power as a card because the higher value it can provide will be hard to unlock without more investment and requires your opponents to not use that benefit you're likely providing to remove your game piece. MM is much like the other 6 mana colorless commander: Zhulodok. Does nothing itself but provides really good value with other cards. You don't see Zhulodok at bracket 2 games very often because the type of deck Zhulodok pilots is often too oppressive for bracket 2 games. Someone playing a tuned Zhulodok deck playing against what is effectively the precon tier is someone trying to get easy wins (which is kind of funny considering Zhulodok helmed a precon and the OG list is actually pretty fine for bracket 2, all things considered). Overall, Molecule Man is pretty good card. It'll shine much better in the 99 than in the command zone alongside cards that allow you to draw on each opponents turn with little investment. He's a very good card in bracket 2, completely fine if not a little mid in bracket 3, and bad in bracket 4 and 5.
-
현스타.grvt (@MINDBRIDGEE) reported@Battlefield there is an issue with this key binding. When I bind the Minimap to Mouse Button 4, pressing it once opens the minimap correctly, but pressing it again does NOT close it. On the other hand, the keyboard 'M' key works perfectly—pressing it once opens the map,
-
Battlefield Comms (@BattlefieldComm) reportedBattlefield 1.3.2.0 Blastpoint Update We wanted to provide a quick update before the weekend regarding the issues we’ve seen reported this week. As we are still working on several of these problems, we don't have an exact rollout date just yet, but we will provide updates next week when possible. Deployment Screen Jumping Issue for PC The root cause has been found for the issue that causes the screen to jump around when trying to deploy. We understand the frustration this causes and are looking into how/when a fix can be deployed while trying to avoid introducing any new issues. In the meantime, players on PC have recommended using the keyboard to select a deployment target as a workaround. Lighting Bug in REDSEC As we previously mentioned, the intended resolution for this, which rolled out with the Blastpoint update on Tuesday, unfortunately did not work. We are continuing to investigate this to get it properly fixed and will update you when we have more details. Black Screen/Game Hanging on Battlefield 6 Logo We’re aware of reports from some players that the game may hang on the BF6 logo screen or a black screen after leaving a match or installing/uninstalling game content from the in-game menu. While the result is similar, they seem to have different causes so we are continuing to investigate and understand possible resolutions. For now, if content like the campaign needs to be installed or uninstalled, we recommend doing it through the game service like EA app and not the front-end menu. Missing Bonus Path/Explosive Charge Points We deployed a fix on Wednesday which allowed players to complete this Bonus Path and unlock all of the items. Since then, we have seen reports from players on missing a few points to complete the Bonus Path. These have been more scattered than the initial issue and appears to be related to the use of re-rolls. We are looking into a fix for this, but it will primarily affect future rollouts. On Tuesday, the next week of Explosive Charge challenges will be available and there should be 50 more points to earn which will make this completable for affected players. Thank you all for your continued feedback, patience, and support. We’ll talk more soon, and we hope you have a great weekend on the Battlefield! 🧡
-
Battlefield Bulletin (@BFBulletin) reported@SNKYGamer @Nodone00 I remember reading a comment from Ganslinger43 (community manager) indicating Battle Pickups have been on 'ice' since there are still some issues with them that are difficult to fix. Battlefield Studios is currently testing some fixes in Labs, and they want Battle Pickups to be back in more modes when possible.
-
BUZZ3R (@BUZZ3RX) reported@Battlefield Bugs to fix: [REDSEC] - graphical bugs - characters randomly screaming "who's got rockets" - randomly hearing vehicle alerts while on foot - Class selection screen - random crashes of PC [BF6] - dots are gone... they are not even working at all - igla bypassing flares
-
WORLDINTEL24🛜 (@WORLDINTEL24) reported@RoaaWarStudies These are all the statements of Iran's Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi: 💥The best time to end the war is when we are in a superior position; we are truly victorious on the battlefield. 💥We have stood against the world's apparent superpower for 40 days. 💥The agreement and ending the war will reinforce the victory. 💥The final agreement has not been reached yet; and if it is finalized, I promise you that I will explain each clause separately. 💥The agreement includes two phases, and we have moved the nuclear issue to the second phase. 💥We will never leave Hezbollah in Lebanon to its own devices, and ending the war will also encompass Lebanon and all other fronts. 💥In this agreement, the United States will declare in writing that it respects Iran's sovereignty. The memorandum of understanding includes the nuclear issue, sanctions relief, reconstruction, and the frozen/seized funds. 💥If we were going to surrender to threats attacking our infrastructure, we would have done so earlier. We have sent a message to the other side stating that threats have a counterproductive effect, and if they want to move toward war, we are ready. 💥This agreement has opponents, foremost among them the Israeli regime, which is looking for pretexts and opportunities to undermine it. 💥Ending the war in the agreement also means Israel's withdrawal from the occupied areas in southern Lebanon, and we have made this clear explicitly to the other side. 💥The United States' demands regarding the nuclear field in this phase were completely unacceptable to us. 💥We are dealing with people in the United States who do not respect their commitments; we must prevent them from backing out of their obligations. 💥The difference this time compared to previous agreements is that we have not yet reached a final agreement; this is just the first step, or the first phase. 💥If the agreements reached in the first phase are not implemented, we will not proceed to the second phase. 💥We must expect various problems and complications in the implementation of the agreement by the other side. 💥The Strait of Hormuz, without a doubt, is under the sovereignty of Iran and Oman. There is no international waterway in the Strait of Hormuz. For many years, this waterway has been open to all ships. Iran and Oman have ensured its security and provided services; until now, all services have been free. However, the management of the Strait of Hormuz in the future will not be like the past. No one can challenge the sovereignty of Iran and Oman over the strait. The management of the Strait of Hormuz will not return to the pre-war system. 💥Fees will be imposed on services in the Strait of Hormuz, and these services will no longer be free. This important matter has been confirmed: it requires payment of fees. 💥According to the memorandum of understanding, if signed, Iran's frozen assets will be released. No assets of ours will be allowed to be frozen again. 💥A reconstruction plan has been put in place to compensate Iran for the damages it has suffered. 💥There are supporters and opponents of the draft text among the council members, but in the end, a collective decision will be made. Once a decision is reached, it will be officially announced. 💥The enemy had hoped to achieve its goals in negotiations before the war, but due to our resistance, it was disappointed and started the war. Even during the war, it realized it would not achieve its goals and was disappointed. Therefore, it requested negotiations. 💥Once the final stages of the negotiations are completed, the agreement will be signed and announced. The initial signing will take place remotely in digital form. This may happen in the coming few days.