Battlefield 6 Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Battlefield 6 Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Yuya Hosokawa (@yuyan_mtg) reported 2 minutes ago

  @joseaf_PT @RWishnitze92421 @Papa_Jablo Thank you for speaking up on my behalf. Sometimes you lose easily, and other times you do not. It is a issue with lands. Since three-color commons are weak, you might lose without being able to do anything because of too many lands entering the battlefield tapped, or you might win through card power because you can use three colors. Ultimately, whether it works or not comes down to luck, and often the three-color player who was the luckiest that day wins. I understand that Magic is a game that goes hand in hand with mana screw and flood, but in Pauper, it was unbearable. Just to be clear, I am generally a good player, but I have not played Pauper since High Tide was banned.

• 
  BKScoPe (@BKScoPe) reported 4 minutes ago

  been sitting with one idea about @quipnetwork for a few days now. what if the work that secures a chain was also the work someone actually needed solved. not hashes for the sake of hashes, actual optimization problems, proof of useful work instead of proof of work. i keep going back and forth on what that actually changes. one side of me says it's just a scoring trick, put every kind of hardware on the same problem and call it fair. the other side wonders if this is actually the first time cpus, gpus, asics, and quantum machines get measured on one shared battlefield instead of separate leaderboards. both feel true at once. quantum capacity right now mostly sits behind a handful of closed platforms, expensive, gated, hard to even test against. if this holds up at scale, that idle capacity starts looking like infrastructure other people can actually rent and check the work on. researchers get a reason to point real problems at it instead of vanity benchmarks, and operators get a reason to keep machines running past the demo phase. none of that is guaranteed yet, still early.

• 
  Ollie Forsyth (@ollieforsyth) reported 5 minutes ago

  .@LambdaAPI didn't hire its new CEO @stephenbalaban for AI experience. They hired him because he'd already run capital-intensive infrastructure races at Sprint, @SoftBank, telecom. Same war, different battlefield. Sometimes the best hire isn't the industry expert. It's the person who's solved your structural problem before.

• 
  Stormfall (@stormfall33) reported 5 minutes ago

  Star Wars Zero Company really surprised me with its characters and dialogue. It's written very well. The problem is the gameplay is too simple, anyone playing the game for few hours could think of 10 ideas to make it more fun and it just feels like they needed a few months to add in deeper mechanics and dial the balancing in. There's 7 characters and you can recruit up to 20 people for your team.. but the squad cap is only 4 and the people you don't take on missions have nothing to do so most of them are never being used. It's also very hard for them to die so you aren't going to be cycling in and out characters. Making and recruiting your own custom characters is pointless because if I can only use 4, why would I take Glup Shitto over a Jedi and a Mandalorian? There's no A-team and B-team to manage, it's just "pick your 4 favorites" You can send crew members on unplayable operations but it doesn't seem to matter who you send for what task. Each mission has a briefing that tells you NOTHING about what the battlefield will be like or who you might want to bring with you on the mission, and when the mission starts all your characters are randomly placed so you usually end up with your supports stuck in the frontline while your tank is in the back. I'm new to XCOM-likes but all of this seems like no-brainer fixes that will hopefully happen in future patches. 👍

• 
  Jonathan Quick (@Qwest336) reported 7 minutes ago

  @Battlefield , you're losing your RedSec community. 1)Most US don't play ranked before noon due to EU server lag. 2)In Pubs, give a penalty for leaving mid game. 3)Stop listening to the CoD players with this movement crap. They will leave for #MW4 anyway. 4)Fixed Top 250 1/2

• 
  Isaiah 🇮🇱🇺🇲 (@brotherstrikebs) reported 14 minutes ago

  @Battlefield Yeah? How about being able to reconnect to the same redsec match after a crash?

• 
  Not A ****** (@BIG_PARMENIDES) reported 22 minutes ago

  @Battlefield But make the damn red dots less thicc. Most of them have way too big of a dot at least for me on MnK. I doubt roller players have that issue but the dots lose effectiveness past really short ranges because they obscure the target too much.

• 
  Grip N Rip Sport Cards (@GripCards) reported 23 minutes ago

  After multiple hours spent on the MW4 beta, I can now confirm it’s genuinely the worst CoD I have ever played. The game lacks identity and unfortunately just feels identical to the previous IW games with 0 risks taken or any innovation. Atleast with Bo6/7 you can say they tried to take risks with Omnimovement. What’s different about MW4 compared to other recent IW games? Absolutely nothing and that’s one of the major issues. I could write an essay of feedback but I feel like I’d be putting more effort into that than the devs play testing the game. And don’t even get me started on SBMM If Battlefield 6 scared them so bad to remove SBMM in BO7, why isn’t GTA 6 scaring them? Is Activision raising the white flag already on MW4? Overall such a terrible experience made even worse by the manipulation matchmaking Spend your $70 elsewhere. Great job @InfinityWard 👍 #MW4

• 
  Mind of the Motherland (@UncolonisedMind) reported 25 minutes ago

  One thing I genuinely don’t understand is how some people can acknowledge that colonialism obstructed Africa’s development, yet somehow refuse to recognise that neocolonialism continues to do the same thing, in some cases even worse. Is the difference simply that the white man is no longer physically there to administer it? There is no meaningful difference between the colonial master and the local agent who administers the same system on his behalf. Your mistake is thinking these people are your people simply because they look like you. Physical appearance does not change the interests they serve, the system they uphold, or the consequences of their actions. Neocolonialism does not require the continued physical presence of the colonial master. It works precisely by reproducing the interests and structures of the former colonial order through local institutions, elites and agents. There is no “post-colonial era”. There is the pre-colonial era, the colonial era, and the neocolonial era. The system continues. The administrator changed. The structure of ********** did not. Replacing one agent with another is not the same as destroying the system entirely. And this is why understanding what we are fighting matters. If you do not understand the battlefield, you can defeat a local agent and still fail to defeat the system that produced and empowered that agent. You may mistake a few concessions and reforms for sovereignty, only to find yourself reproducing the same system under a different administration. And eventually, you either become another agent of that system or you are removed and replaced by one. When people tell you about neocolonialism, they are not denying the actions of its local agents. They are trying to give you a fuller understanding of what you are actually fighting. Because if you think the local agent is the entire problem, you will celebrate replacing the agent while leaving the system intact. The system is not failing. It has not failed. It is working as designed.

• 
  💁🏻 James (@brotherhoodcree) reported 26 minutes ago

  @Ryangofett_2490 @Battlefield pls fix it and add this weapon 🙏🙏

• 
  RBazify (@RBazify) reported 26 minutes ago

  This is the exact reason, I am worried about the battlefield community coming to WARDOGS. This isn't an issue. But now it will be what we hear about for the games entire lifespan now. A rare L take this round.

• 
  Aric Chen (@aricchen) reported 27 minutes ago

  Japan put 8.9 trillion yen on the table Monday for fiscal 2027, a record request, and left more than 100 line items unpriced. Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi is rewriting the three security documents before year-end. The final figure is widely expected to clear 10 trillion yen. That is not a rounding error. It is Tokyo deciding that the cheap, attritable systems the PLA already fields in quantity are now Japan's problem to solve at scale. The Defense Ministry is asking for attack drones that can launch from the surface or from underwater, built at home, produced fast and cheap, and flown with standoff missiles. Officials point to Ukraine. They also want an AI coordinator inside command and control so battlefield assessment and target selection move faster than a human staff can cycle. A ministry cloud is meant to keep classified traffic up when the network is under stress. I have watched Japanese cabinets talk around this problem for years. This request does not. Shinjiro Koizumi's ministry is buying tools that raise the cost of a first move across the first island chain. Beijing still calls any Japanese hardening "new militarism." Koizumi already answered that in Singapore: China fields nuclear weapons and strategic bombers. Japan does not. The budget paper is the operational follow-through. The 2022 documents put spending on a path to 2 percent of GDP. Tokyo hit that two years early. This request is the bridge to whatever Takaichi writes into the revised strategy. The blank lines are the tell. They are holding space for a larger counterstrike architecture, not padding a press release. If the PLA assumed Japan would stay a high-end, low-volume force that runs out of munitions in week one, that assumption is being written down. ACI — Aric Chen | Insights

• 
  kirito _4kirigaya (@K4kirigaya) reported 27 minutes ago

  @BattlefieldComm We need the TTK to be slower and animations to be slowed down and reworked too. Why do I mantle so fast? Why do I switch to a LMG so fast? Why when I throw a grenade I throw it without pulling the pin? Grenade indicators not working and the weapon screen is dimmed.

• 
  Andrew Lydiard (@andrewlydiard) reported 28 minutes ago

  @grvmpss @Tremourx47 @BattlefieldComm It's been that way for months. It's not like we didn't use it for that time. It's not a **** you, it was a free item that wasn't terribly difficult to obtain. You didn't purchase anything. This is better for the health of the game (albeit lightly so given other issues).

• 
  Rosemary O'Connell (@RosemaryOConne6) reported 29 minutes ago

  I want to talk against alcohol. It's not cool. It's pathetic. People have a problem& they NEED to numb themselves like they were in screaming agony on the battlefield? It's pathetic. You CAN handle your problems. And you CAN handle an alcohol or drug pusher. Only a loser can't just walk away. It's ridiculous. Oh let me shoot myself up & numb myself rather than walk away from an enemy ***** or bastard. ???