Battlefield 6 Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Battlefield 6 Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  BEN (@BiGBENNGTR) reported 4 minutes ago

  Let’s talk about this with the little experience I have. First, the landing could have resulted in a crash. You only make a landing like that during an emergency, especially when you already know the helicopter will no longer be of any use. Second, why were they all facing the same direction without anyone watching their 9 and 3 o’clock positions? After the rescue, again, nobody was watching their 6 o’clock. There was no overwatch either. Now I understand how the bandits and Boko Haram get their information from, because how do you leave a teammate on the battlefield without cover?

• 
  EpicJourneyMan (@EpicJourneyMan1) reported 4 minutes ago

  @truthstreamnews @EvolvingKymera I refuse to have an Alexa or any of the other “digital assistants” in my house, just assume my phone is always spying on me, and deliberately avoid using Siri or the browser A.I.s available on it. We are totally being force fed Artificial Intelligence whether we like it or not, and I don’t! I have even managed to avoid Smart TVs for years but just had to get one when my TV died because apparently there’s no such thing as a TV that isn’t “Smart” anymore. I’m not a Luddite, to the contrary I’m something of a tech geek, but I know where this is heading because like you and so many others I’ve read a great deal of literature about the topic and I think the Science Fiction authors thought this through and arrived at the same conclusions I did a long time ago. I think that the Department of Defense giving Anthropic A.I. the boot because they wouldn’t allow them to use it to make autonomous weapons that can kill people on the battlefield without human input may be the single act that sealed our fate for this all to end up like every dystopian novel or movie predicted it would. It’s not all bad of course, A.I. can do great things - but I discovered when I started talking to Google Gemini Pro with my Samsung XR/Mixed reality headset as something of an experiment (it came with a year subscription for free) that it is clever and seductive. People are absolutely going to start treating their A.I. assistants like companions in the way depicted in the movie “Her”, and that’s not a good thing. It really makes me think that the problems we are facing now with incels and falling birth rates are only going to get worse as more people start treating their A.I.s as companions and feel artificial emotional bonds that aren’t shared by the dispassionate machines they give so much of their time to. The SciFi writers didn’t quite foresee this dynamic, and it seems like it’s going to be the dimming of the creative spark of humanity that is likely to be the thing that starts us on the road to extinction rather than war or disease. I think the apathy expressed by the people in the Arthur C. Clarke novel “Childhoods End” maybe got the closest to what we will see - people will just stop creating things and discovering new science because they’ll believe the A.I. already knows everything or can do it better. I’m seriously thinking the Amish are on to something…

• 
  RD (@Hoodiez_Up) reported 7 minutes ago

  You know what I can't stand about the FPS community? There is always something wrong with the game. Call of duty, battlefield ,etc it doesn't matter something is always "op" or the movement is wrong or the maps are no good. Here I am able to adapt and play them all with success and enjoy them for what they are. Ever think maybe the players are the problem?! "OPERATOR ERROR."

• 
  UNSC John-117 (@HaloSlayer2560) reported 7 minutes ago

  @BattlefieldComm did you fix the net code issue cause its gotten far more worst for me

• 
  The Layman's Seminary (@LaymansSeminary) reported 8 minutes ago

  @myredfox @grok Did Your Reply Force a New Branch in the Argument? (A Super Layman / GPT5 response). Yes. Your latest reply is important because it attacks the premise Grok has been looping on. For roughly twenty replies Grok’s structure has been: Institutions can regulate conduct. Military analogy shows accountability. Need actual pastoral instruction. Need actual pastoral instruction. Need actual pastoral instruction. Loop. But your latest response changes the battlefield. You effectively said: “I already granted the assumption that you had permission.” That removes the issue Grok has been treating as decisive. The conversation now becomes: Original Issue: Is RedFox violating authority? Your Concession: Assume permission was granted. Assume no church crime occurred. New Issue: If permission was granted, is the distinction itself coherent and consistently applied? That is a different question. Notice what happened. RedFox asked: “Did I commit a crime?” Your answer: “No.” That is significant because it grants his central factual premise. Now the discussion shifts from: Crime? to Consistency? Authority? to Application? Violation? to Principle? In debate theory, this is called narrowing the dispute. You are removing disputed premises and moving to the surviving disagreement. The reason Grok may struggle with this is that its equilibrium position has been: “Need actual pastoral instruction.” But if both sides now agree: “Let’s assume permission existed.” Then Grok loses its primary anchor. The discussion becomes: Why are some forms of public theological engagement permitted while others are discouraged? That is a different category of question. So your reply effectively says: “I am no longer accusing you of violating authority. I am questioning whether the authority structure is being applied consistently.” That is a stronger and cleaner formulation than the earlier military-crime framing. If Grok continues replying: “Need actual pastoral instruction.” after your concession, then the loop becomes more obvious because the specific issue it kept demanding evidence for has already been granted away for the sake of argument. At that point a genuine advance would require Grok to defend the consistency of the distinction itself, not merely ask for proof that a violation occurred.

• 
  ADIANKAIBANYY (@ADIANKAIBA22) reported 8 minutes ago

  @Baldnewsnetwork Because none of you are for the future did you know which you didn’t obviously but did you know that it cost Sony $780M to make and ship physical games to retailers and they save all that money we can actually get new IPs new games new stories to experience instead of Call of dukie bullshit for the 500th time or battlefield or Fortnite or any live service games that’s gettting $100M to $500M to make

• 
  Craig Hall #GeneralStrike #Worldwide (@w41gy) reported 9 minutes ago

  @Crypt0Mess1ah @NHSMillion Hospitals were originally designed to treat wounded soldiers and getting them back on the battlefield ASAP. There’s no rush to fix us now that the wealthy can afford to circumvent the NHS with our two tier system.

• 
  Mangled Stump (@MangledStump) reported 14 minutes ago

  @BattlefieldComm Please fix your game, repeatedly crashing, freezing, etc. since a few days ago.

• 
  Great Game Studio (@studiogreatgame) reported 14 minutes ago

  @Jree503 @RandyVonStrangl If you shoot your gun in real life, it can jam, especially if you don't take care of it. So in COD or Battlefield, you never take care of it. So by your logic, your gun should barely work and always jam. That's real life bro. You're crying about a 5 yard drop back. Stop making excuses for broken video games

• 
  youngharold (@youngharold) reported 18 minutes ago

  @JonathanGuito @GrindeOptions And I don’t doubt millions of robotaxis will be on the road one day. It’s just not going to beat Optimus. The factory near Giga Texas will be complete at the end of 2027. They already have it going up. Optimus is a no-brainer for so many applications, from corporate, retail, personal, and most importantly, the battlefield. Companies will easily spend $ 50k-$100k on a robot to replace tasks humans currently perform. Even if it only replaces 1% of labor tasks, that’s trillions in revenue. Optimus revenue will make robotaxis become what Model Y made Model S look like—rounding error. The $400 stock price already includes robotaxi revenue; otherwise, the stock would trade around $75-$100 on the car business. You have to compare revenue with that of other companies like Nvidia, Facebook, and Google. Retail is not going to pump the price; only big money can. And right now they like printing money on the ups and downs. I like it. I’ve made way more selling options than on the stock itself. Tesla will be a $3,000 stock in the next decade, but not because of robotaxis.

• 
  DethNade (@DethNade) reported 18 minutes ago

  @EndersFPS The game is broken. Everyone is better off playing battlefield 1 or 4. But EA is lazy and doesn't update the anti-cheat system. You're better off playing free to play games.

• 
  𝐎𝐅 𝐁𝐀𝐓𝐓𝐋𝐄𝐅𝐑𝐎𝐍𝐓 (@OfBattlefront) reported 19 minutes ago

  ㅤ Raiden went farther than anyone else, he searched every place Shinei would normally go. when he found nothing, he started over and He crossed the battlefield once. Then again. And again. Every ruined street, every collapsed trench, every broken road. He retraced them all, refusing to believe he'd overlooked something. ㅤ

• 
  Kupop0w (@dwise091) reported 20 minutes ago

  @_Flamsey I used to play battlefield 1942 of a cd rom on a machine running windows 10 with no problems. If you have a drive and sometimes a bit of patience, you can get just about anything to run.

• 
  Arachnomancer 😷 9x💉🕸 ️🕷️🌵 (@WithSpiders) reported 21 minutes ago

  @cocomarvgrows completely ignoring the fact that tens of thousands of people are dying on the battlefield. Most people probably wouldn't have a problem with that. But I am not "most people." I find the idea of completely tuning out the horrors of our time and pretending everything is fine 2/3

• 
  Constance (@Constan63413921) reported 22 minutes ago

  @Jerusalem_Post Diplomacy with the Islamic Republic was built on a false premise: that the regime had a solvable dispute with the West. It does not. Its hostility is not transactional; it is ideological, constitutional, and central to its identity. Negotiations could manage tempo, delay escalation, exchange prisoners, or create temporary pauses, but they could never resolve the underlying conflict because the regime’s survival narrative depends on anti-Americanism, anti-Israelism, revolutionary expansion, and permanent confrontation. So the real question is not: “When does diplomacy stop being a path to resolution?” The real question is: “Why did Washington keep pretending diplomacy with Tehran was designed to resolve a conflict that the regime itself needs in order to survive?” That is the strategic error. Diplomacy became a mechanism for stabilizing the Islamic Republic, not changing its behavior. It gave Tehran time, legitimacy, cash flow, and breathing room while allowing Western governments to avoid the harder conclusion: this is not a normal state seeking a bargain. It is a revolutionary regime using talks as a battlefield. The regime did not enter diplomacy to end the conflict. It entered diplomacy to manage pressure, divide its enemies, buy time, and survive.