Battlefield 6 Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Battlefield 6 Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Pindazz (@Pindazz2) reported 43 seconds ago

  @Battlefield Fix the rendezook jumps pls

• 
  otismaximus (@otismaximus) reported 3 minutes ago

  @Battlefield please fix the footstep audio!!!

• 
  ＧＨＯＳＴ (@Adam9110) reported 5 minutes ago

  @DooM49 @BattlefieldComm Unfortunately, this update contains nothing significant regarding issues that need immediate fixing. Just nonsense that you won't even notice.

• 
  Aaron A 🇺🇸 🎮 (@GenZod83) reported 9 minutes ago

  @devdogg96 @BattlefieldComm So you just want the battlepass for free is what im hearing. Dude spend the $10. Live service games need to make money somehow to make improvements for the game.

• 
  Punished Curtis LeMay Stan🇺🇸 (@_JETFIGHTERMAN_) reported 11 minutes ago

  @TN_Tornado1 “a problem that will spread to the battlefield” This is supposed to be a bad thing?

• 
  Jada_339 (@Jada_339) reported 13 minutes ago

  @mikumikuuri I think the problem is that having 2nd tank is so, so much more valuable then a 3rd dps. A 2nd tank gives you so much control of the battlefield. Generally you can't win on a team with 3 dps if you're against 2 tanks, so if the enemy is 2-2-2, you gotta go 2-2-2 to counter.

• 
  Saint Javelin (@saintjavelin) reported 14 minutes ago

  Fedorov on why people are protesting today: “Ukrainians did not take to the streets for Minister Fedorov personally. They took to the streets because when Ukraine had seized the initiative on the battlefield and in the skies, that trajectory was broken. Ukrainians can sense when decisions are no longer being made based on the values this country stands for.”

• 
  Pickle (@pickle_chungus1) reported 15 minutes ago

  @Mix1God_ @JosueCriticism @Battlefield it is far from a simple fix

• 
  Mason (@miscomputate) reported 16 minutes ago

  $INFQ @infleqtion The market is treating this like a busted de-**** while Washington / @DoWCTO is treating this category like strategic infrastructure. That is the huge disconnect and where most of my angst comes from. The stock price is ugly. No way around it. Macro is not friendly. Semis have been derisking. High beta names are getting hit. Oil/Iran/rates/small cap sentiment are all real issues in the short term. But the company specific and government specific story is moving in the opposite direction. That’s what I must focus on now. The market is asking: Where is the immediate revenue? Where are the awards? Where are the contracts? Why is this still trading like a speculative quantum name? Fair questions. But Washington appears to be asking something very different and is requesting it as soon as humanly possible: Who can field quantum sensors? Who can support GPS denied environments? Who can improve timing and navigation? Who can detect RF signals? Who can miniaturize cold-atom systems? This is becoming a big one. Who can support ISR, defense, space and critical infrastructure? Who can turn quantum from lab hardware into deployable systems? That is where $INFQ keeps getting stronger. Because Infleqtion is not just sitting in the “quantum computer someday” bucket. They are sitting across the table and working on the exact questions that Washington needs answered: Cold neutral atom compute/sensing. Atomic clocks. RF sensing. PNT. Defense. Space. Networking. Miniaturization. Field deployment. And the federal roadmap keeps moving straight into those lanes. Commerce LOI. White House EO signing. Matt Kinsella in the Oval Office. White House quantum summit. CNBC visibility. Barron’s coverage. QED-C Capitol Hill showcase. Army / ARL RF sensing work. Farseer quantum sensing initiative. DARPA Perrseus. Quantum Genesis. Quantum World Congress. None of these alone makes the thesis. But together, it looks less and less random. @DARPA Perrseus is a great example. That program is not asking “who has the best stock chart? Who has the most revenue? Who is making their own fabs?” It is asking how to build microscale ultra high-vacuum systems for compact cold-atom devices, MEMS, photonics and quantum sensors. Translation: make atomic systems smaller, more rugged, more manufacturable and more field ready. That is exactly the bottleneck for clocks, sensors, PNT, RF and battlefield deployment. That is Infleqtion’s language. That is Infleqtion’s roadmap. And that is the quiet part the market does not price until it has to. The stock can be ugly before the thesis becomes obvious. That is how these things work I guess. The market looks at $INFQ and sees a $9 stock with early revenue and **** baggage. Washington looks at this technology and sees timing, sensing, navigation, defense, space, RF, quantum networks, ISR and national security infrastructure. Those are two very different messages. Important dates I’m watching: August 3 — DARPA Perrseus abstracts encouraged August 18 - Q2 Earnings August 21 — EO deadline for DoW to identify at least 3 next-gen quantum sensor projects September 1 — Perrseus intent to propose deadline September 20–23 — Impact 250 September 23 — Perrseus full proposals due September 23–25 — Quantum World Congress I don’t know when the market wakes up. But I do think this is the kind of setup where the real move happens after most people have already gotten tired, shaken out, or convinced themselves nothing is happening. Wall Street is still trying to value this like another early stage quantum-computing stock. I think Washington may be telling us it is something much more important than that. $INFQ is an atom based infrastructure company. And right now, the government seems to understand that far better than the market does.

• 
  Mudrac (@Mudr4c) reported 18 minutes ago

  @Melenchon4Ever @Battlefield Cool, so why were people so upset about BF2042 "military" hero / personality characters? Do try to use that brain of yours and try to understand why this is a problem before calling someone dumb.

• 
  Dustin Paine (@grizzgolf) reported 19 minutes ago

  @Battlefield @XBOX Fix the Hitreg stop adding stuff like this

• 
  Chris Jackson (@BigModernism) reported 19 minutes ago

  @zx77789 The premise is insulting. SSPX priests did not flee the battlefield; they stayed where the Faith, Mass, sacraments, and formation of souls could survive. Their chapels are full of converts, broken families, addicts, and confused Catholics seeking refuge from the very devastation Wells describes. Asking a priest to abandon that work and submit to the machinery that caused the crisis is surrender.

• 
  Wes Lydon (@lydonw) reported 22 minutes ago

  @GamerLadka @Telepathic_hman @BattlefieldComm Decided to just punk out, find a portal server, and murder some bots. Last ones done in 30 seconds. 8 hate doing that, but I was a bad teammate while working on that challenge. Battlefield team shouldn't be encouraging bad team play with broken challenges.

• 
  Ophnell Cumberbatch II (@Ophnell_II) reported 23 minutes ago

  Genuinely curious what standard people think this movie is failing to meet, because "authentic Greek casting" has never been the bar for any major Bronze Age/Classical Greek film. Troy (2004) didn't clear it either — no one raised this over Brad Pitt, Eric Bana, or Orlando Bloom. Nolan himself cast Tom Hardy as Bane, a character who's Latino in the original text, and that predates the current wave of casting-accuracy discourse entirely. If the standard only gets invoked now, it's worth asking why. There's a deeper problem with "faithful to the original" as a standard at all: there isn't a stable original to be faithful to. The Homeric Question is a real, unresolved scholarly debate — we don't know if "Homer" was one person, several, or a name attached to centuries of oral-formulaic composition and later redaction. Even Troy, which people hold up as the more "authentic" adaptation, isn't actually built on Homer alone. The Iliad stops before the wooden horse, before Achilles' death, before the sack of the city — none of that is in Homer. Troy had to pull from Quintus of Smyrna's Posthomerica, written roughly 1,100 years after Homer's traditional dating. So the "more historically accurate" comparison is itself leaning on a text further removed from the source than most people realize. Given that, I think the more useful question isn't "did they cast this faithfully" but "why did Nolan make the choices he made." His Odyssey clearly isn't just restaging the Trojan War — reviewers have connected it directly to the antiwar throughline he started in Oppenheimer, and the film's ending (the horse burning, a line about the lessons of this age being forgotten) reads like a deliberate argument that glorifying past violence is what lets it repeat. That's a different project than reproducing "the sensibilities of the original text" — and it's worth noting that most of the visceral, glorified battlefield violence people associate with Homer is Iliad material anyway; the Odyssey itself is mostly Odysseus narrating the war secondhand, years after the fact, which is a different register to begin with. None of this means you have to like the movie. "I didn't enjoy it" or "this take on the character didn't land for me" doesn't need defending — that's just taste. The claim that opens you up to pushback is "this is what it should be" — because that's asserting there's one correct version, and for a story with no fixed original, passed down and reshaped for millennia, there just isn't one. Every adaptation, every reading, every classroom interpretation of a 2,700-year-old poem is already a departure from something that was never fixed in the first place. Might as well judge the movie Nolan actually made. **I used AI assistant and Internet browser queries to refine my ideas and clean up grammar and composition. I just wanted to get your thoughts on the take since you're my movie queen. You are always so insightful. @gmgeiko

• 
  Clear Signal News (@CSN24X7) reported 25 minutes ago

  @CENTCOM Iran struck a US base in Jordan Friday night, killing two American service members and leaving a third missing, the first US combat deaths in this war since March. CENTCOM says today’s new strikes are direct retaliation, aimed at degrading Iran’s ability to threaten Hormuz shipping and punishing the IRGC units responsible, marking an eighth consecutive night of strikes since fighting resumed in early July. Iran’s ambassador to Pakistan accused the US of exploiting the MOU to seize parts of the Strait of Hormuz it couldn’t win on the battlefield, and said Iran does not accept that outcome. An advisor to Supreme Leader Mojtaba Khamenei went further, warning that if the US continues for two to three more days, Iran will abandon “retaliation in kind” altogether. War Day 141. MOU Day 32. Both sides are now openly discarding the framework that was supposed to end this. 📡 CSN24X7