Battlefield 6 Outage Map
The map below depicts the most recent cities worldwide where Battlefield 6 users have reported problems and outages. If you are having an issue with Battlefield 6, make sure to submit a report below
The heatmap above shows where the most recent user-submitted and social media reports are geographically clustered. The density of these reports is depicted by the color scale as shown below.
Battlefield 6 users affected:
Battlefield 6 is a 2025 first-person shooter game developed by Battlefield Studios and published by Electronic Arts. Serving as the eighteenth installment in the Battlefield series, the game was released for PlayStation 5, Windows, and Xbox Series X/S on October 10, 2025.
Most Affected Locations
Outage reports and issues in the past 15 days originated from:
| Location | Reports |
|---|---|
| Brasília, DF | 1 |
| Arlon, Wallonia | 1 |
| Coyoacán, CDMX | 1 |
| Saint-Malo, Brittany | 1 |
| Buenos Aires, CF | 1 |
| Comuna 1, CABA | 5 |
| Perpignan, Occitanie | 1 |
| Domingos Martins, ES | 1 |
| Courbevoie, Île-de-France | 1 |
| Strasbourg, ACAL | 1 |
| Chaumont, ACAL | 1 |
| Amagney, Bourgogne-Franche-Comté | 1 |
| Annecy, Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes | 2 |
| Paris, Île-de-France | 17 |
| Itapemirim, ES | 1 |
| São Paulo, SP | 2 |
| Brech, Brittany | 1 |
| Trévoux, Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes | 1 |
| Nidau, BE | 1 |
| Villa Victoria, MEX | 1 |
| Santiago de Querétaro, QUE | 3 |
| Telêmaco Borba, PR | 1 |
| Bordeaux, Nouvelle-Aquitaine | 4 |
| Bron, Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes | 1 |
| Madrid, Madrid | 4 |
| La Trinité, Martinique | 1 |
| Lyon, Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes | 5 |
| Persan, Île-de-France | 1 |
| Metz, ACAL | 3 |
| Aubais, Occitanie | 1 |
Community Discussion
Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.
Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.
Battlefield 6 Issues Reports
Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:
-
RBazify (@RBazify) reportedThis is the exact reason, I am worried about the battlefield community coming to WARDOGS. This isn't an issue. But now it will be what we hear about for the games entire lifespan now. A rare L take this round.
-
MrNotSo (@MrNotSo_) reported@Battlefield Baby steps. I really want this game to have a long life like bf4, you're headed in the right direction. But there are more pressing issues you might wanna lock down before anymore aesthetic updates.
-
Jason Atwell (@JasonAtwell14) reportedThey could be taking a legitimate look at whether any of these recently removed generals had actually accomplished anything along the lines of adapting to the modern battlefield, but instead they're going to air the grievances of multiple anonymous sources who likely are part of the problem they claim they want to fix.
-
NameIsNotBlank (@TorsoReaper) reported@BattlefieldComm You're going to punish people because your matchmaking is ******* atrocious? Here's a shocking idea. FIX YOUR MATCHMAKING AND LESS PEOPLE WILL LEAVE. I know, it's a crazy idea but just try it.
-
Zach (@prozck) reported@Battlefield Sure we can stay on target all we want, doesn’t mean the bullets are going there. Fix your trash *** game.
-
Joe (@MonFartS) reported@BattlefieldComm Fix the spawn beacon not working
-
Rosemary O'Connell (@RosemaryOConne6) reportedI want to talk against alcohol. It's not cool. It's pathetic. People have a problem& they NEED to numb themselves like they were in screaming agony on the battlefield? It's pathetic. You CAN handle your problems. And you CAN handle an alcohol or drug pusher. Only a loser can't just walk away. It's ridiculous. Oh let me shoot myself up & numb myself rather than walk away from an enemy ***** or bastard. ???
-
helvetica (@helvetica369) reported@BattlefieldComm so they are going to penalize you for leaving a match when they put you into an ongoing match where your team is already getting steamrolled? maybe fix your matchmaking and ppl wouldnt need to leave matches so often.
-
Alex Devine (@SwiftyLunatic) reported@BattlefieldComm Let's hope you actually fix the issues you listed! Most of the time, you just write words and never fix the issues!
-
Marcin Wójcik (@marcinwojcik111) reportedThe real issue with Palantir is not the software itself. It is where the decision-making power begins to shift. When an external system integrates data, filters signals and shapes the battlefield picture seen by commanders, its provider becomes part of the state’s decision loop. The strategic question is simple: are we buying capability, or renting part of our sovereignty?
-
Alex Cohen (@CohenAlex34014) reported@BattlefieldComm Solid but we really need a fix for support emblems when downed.
-
Jon (@JonShadwellX) reportedY’all didn’t fix ****. @EA_DICE @Battlefield
-
Mind of the Motherland (@UncolonisedMind) reportedOne thing I genuinely don’t understand is how some people can acknowledge that colonialism obstructed Africa’s development, yet somehow refuse to recognise that neocolonialism continues to do the same thing, in some cases even worse. Is the difference simply that the white man is no longer physically there to administer it? There is no meaningful difference between the colonial master and the local agent who administers the same system on his behalf. Your mistake is thinking these people are your people simply because they look like you. Physical appearance does not change the interests they serve, the system they uphold, or the consequences of their actions. Neocolonialism does not require the continued physical presence of the colonial master. It works precisely by reproducing the interests and structures of the former colonial order through local institutions, elites and agents. There is no “post-colonial era”. There is the pre-colonial era, the colonial era, and the neocolonial era. The system continues. The administrator changed. The structure of ********** did not. Replacing one agent with another is not the same as destroying the system entirely. And this is why understanding what we are fighting matters. If you do not understand the battlefield, you can defeat a local agent and still fail to defeat the system that produced and empowered that agent. You may mistake a few concessions and reforms for sovereignty, only to find yourself reproducing the same system under a different administration. And eventually, you either become another agent of that system or you are removed and replaced by one. When people tell you about neocolonialism, they are not denying the actions of its local agents. They are trying to give you a fuller understanding of what you are actually fighting. Because if you think the local agent is the entire problem, you will celebrate replacing the agent while leaving the system intact. The system is not failing. It has not failed. It is working as designed.
-
Aitvaras (@Aitvaras2726601) reported@BattlefieldComm For a small bugfixing patch, this is pretty good. Now we just need a few decent feature patches that actually address the major issues.
-
JUST KICKASS BABY #RN4LIFE (@VincentKellam) reported@HondoCarpenter THE @RAIDERS MAY HAVE SIGNED & DRAFTED NEW QBS YET MAJOR ISSUES AT R-TACKLE REMAIN,& THEY JUST WAIVED{DALTON WAGNER}WHOM IS THE CORRECT REMEDY TO THE 12.5 SACKS SURRENDERED BY DJ GLAZE LAST YR. GLAZE SHOULD HAVE BEEN THE PLAYER DEVELOPING ON THE P-SQUAD & NOT ON THE BATTLEFIELD