Battlefield 6 Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Battlefield 6 Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Jay (@JasonHu37332083) reported 4 minutes ago

  @MooseFPS Mate 2042 was a "decent" game for a teamwork FPS fix and I realise that now. BF6 is just confirmation that battlefield now will go forward as an arcade shooter. As of now FPS games are in the dust. Having said that... Wardogs might save this

• 
  BarkinBoss (@BarkinBossMacro) reported 7 minutes ago

  🇺🇸🇺🇦 The empty launchers matter, but the bigger story is that the U.S. can’t supply missiles fast enough. When Ukraine’s batteries go quiet because Washington’s stockpiles are tapped, that’s a strategic problem, not just a battlefield one.

• 
  IG Agent: Delta 🇺🇸 (@Assault_Teddy) reported 8 minutes ago

  @Neoncookies111 @punishedtamale 5.56 used in the typical AR is the same caliber as the the standard issue M4 the US army uses. The M18 the standard issue handgun of the US army uses 9mm, the most common handgun caliber among civilians. If neither of those weapons were effective in the battlefield, they wouldn't be standard issue.

• 
  G.I. Jolonco (@Jolonco) reported 9 minutes ago

  @Dakota_Meyer @Johnny_Joey I don't agree with most Vet Bro sentiments, but I also understand that service ain't easy. Telling someone who left so much on the battlefield you don't agree is okay, chastising them and name calling isn't.

• 
  talkingINTROVERT (@ALAUDDINSHAHED) reported 9 minutes ago

  @Battlefield bro, just give up. you guys dropped the ball. just kill the game and work on next one. the game ******* sucks. i get balck screen stuck issues. deployable cover isnt deplaoyable lol.

• 
  The Cradle (@TheCradleMedia) reported 11 minutes ago

  Iranian military warns shipping companies against supporting US military operations —— An Iranian military official has warned that shipping companies involved in "meeting US military needs" against the country will face consequences, Nournews reported. "Iran is closely monitoring the commercial and maritime network supporting US operations, and any company, ship owner, or service provider that knowingly plays a role in meeting US military needs against Iran will face legal, economic, and counter-sanctioned consequences," the Iranian news outlet cited the official as saying. The official said the transport of fuel, ammunition, equipment, food, and other items needed by US troops will not be seen by Iran as "merely a commercial activity", but it would be viewed as supporting Washington in its war on Iran. Maersk, Schuyler Line Navigation, Crowley Government Services, Overseas Shipholding Group, Seabulk Tankers and Patriot Contract Services were named by the official as some of the companies being examined by Iran for their connection to the US. "War is not only costly on the battlefield ... Those who, knowing the nature of the mission, provide the commercial and logistical infrastructure for military operations against Iran cannot expect their role to remain hidden from Iran," the military source said.

• 
  🌹 The Infamous E.G.🌹 (@TheInfamousEG) reported 11 minutes ago

  I will explain this again because the Battlefield community cannot understand this Low HS damage is objectively bad, it encourages non movement and people to take angles so only their head is showing "Lucky headshots" is a skill issue and low skill floor misconception-

• 
  USAI Media (@USAI_Media) reported 16 minutes ago

  @War_Radar2 This is where asymmetric defense becomes more important than platform symmetry. Taiwan does not need to match the PLA ship-for-ship or aircraft-for-aircraft to complicate an invasion. A large, distributed unmanned force can raise the cost of every stage of an operation: reconnaissance, beach approaches, logistics, air-defense suppression, troop movement, and resupply. But the headline number of drones is only part of the equation. The decisive questions are whether those systems can survive electronic warfare, maintain communications, find targets under contested conditions, disperse before launch sites are struck, and keep being replaced after the first wave of combat. That is why industrial capacity matters as much as inventory. A drone force that can be produced quickly, launched from many locations, and replaced faster than an opponent can destroy it creates a very different deterrence problem from a small number of exquisite platforms. Beijing would therefore have to plan not only for Taiwan’s existing defenses, but for a battlefield filled with cheap, mobile, disposable sensors and weapons. The strategic value is not in owning hundreds of thousands of drones. It is in making an invasion harder to predict, harder to suppress, and far more expensive to sustain.

• 
  OWNED (@KonovalovA29770) reported 16 minutes ago

  @BattlefieldComm It's been a problem for months and you only notice it now ??? Also can you fix the Trigger Bug again .... since you were so nice to patch it into the game again 🤮🤮🤮

• 
  Oloyede Olayinka (@YinKysmileS) reported 16 minutes ago

  We live in a world where you had better know your left from your right, be able to tell the sun from the moon, and, above all, know what TRUTH really is. Because there is a world out there desperately trying to sell you ideologies built on fallacy, lies, deception, and darkness, and it is working overtime to rub them in your face at almost every turn. Things that were once obviously wrong are being repackaged, renamed, celebrated, and demanded as truth. Scripture warned us about days like these: “Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil; that put darkness for light, and light for darkness.” Isaiah 5:20 So make no mistake about it: we are on a battlefield. And if you are going to stand for truth in this generation, you must be prepared to fight for it like someone standing on a warfront. Not with physical weapons, hatred, or hostility toward people, because “we wrestle not against flesh and blood” (Ephesians 6:12), but with truth firmly fastened around us and “the sword of the Spirit, which is the word of God” (Ephesians 6:14–17). But here is the problem: How do we fight for a truth we ourselves do not know? How do we defend convictions we aren't sure about? How do we shine enough light to dispel the darkness ravaging our world when we have barely taken the time to understand the light ourselves? That is why, perhaps more than ever, believers must become people of the Word. We must know God's will. We must understand His truth. We must know what we believe and why we believe it. Jesus prayed, “Sanctify them through thy truth: thy word is truth” (John 17:17). God has not left us wandering through history trying to determine truth by popular vote. He has revealed Himself and His will through His Word. And when a generation increasingly asks, like Pilate, “What is truth?” (John 18:38), Christians should be among those who know where to find the answer. The world may tell you that black is the new white, the moon is the new sun, darkness is light, and evil is the new good. If a lie is repeated loudly enough, celebrated widely enough, and enforced culturally enough, many will eventually become afraid to call it what it is. Don't be one of them. Yesterday was the time to prepare for the warfare confronting us today. And today is the time to prepare ourselves and our children for the battles that may confront them tomorrow. Study the Word. Know the truth. Teach the truth. Defend the truth. Live the truth. And when standing for it makes you look outdated, foolish, intolerant, unsophisticated, or inferior in the eyes of the world, remember that Scripture already told us that “the foolishness of God is wiser than men” (1 Corinthians 1:25). Stand therefore (Ephesians 6:14). You have been entrusted with something infinitely more valuable than cultural acceptance. Take your stand and fight for God's truth. Don't allow the world to intimidate you into being ashamed of what God has spoken. Don't exchange conviction for applause or surrender truth merely because error has become fashionable. Know the truth. Hold fast to it. Contend for it. Live by it. Pass it on. And whatever you do, do not sell it for silver or gold. “Buy the truth, and sell it not.” Proverbs 23:23

• 
  Xistentialism (@alstonlin101) reported 21 minutes ago

  @CraigHampton321 @Battlefield and thats why before we had server browser so we didnt had this issue,or just fill up with bots first and sub it with real player

• 
  Hugo Lord 🇨🇦 (@OutOfStockPod) reported 21 minutes ago

  $ONDS raised full-year guidance to $525–550M and the stock dipped on it Its not a broken company, that’s a market that hasn’t caught up to a defense-tech backlog that’s exploding, insane growth, and huge potential to become a key player on the modern battlefield and national defense Im adding, not trimming. Long $ONDS NFA

• 
  Cipher Of Being (@AlteredEndeavor) reported 24 minutes ago

  @bongo_is_barry I don't know that I buy the premise that these are necessarily the same people. Games like Call of Duty, FIFA/EA Sports FC, Battlefield, and Assassin's Creed have massive casual audiences, and a large portion of those people probably aren't terminally online discussing every trailer and design decision surrounding Wolverine. The people heavily involved in gaming discourse are a much smaller and more enthusiast driven portion of the overall gaming audience. There is probably some overlap, sure, but saying "90% of the people complaining" are buying those games every year feels like an assumption more than something we actually know. More importantly, even if someone does buy Call of Duty every year, that doesn't really address the criticism. You can enjoy a familiar formula in one type of game while still thinking another publisher's lineup has become too reliant on a particular style or structure. I actually think the bigger issue is the opposite of what you're suggesting. Publishers continue using familiar formulas precisely because the much larger casual audience keeps buying them. That's part of why I understand Sony's position. When AAA development costs hundreds of millions of dollars, taking major creative risks becomes harder to justify. The question I'm interested in is how long that remains sustainable before enough of the audience starts wanting something different.

• 
  Jexxits (@JexxitS) reported 28 minutes ago

  @CaptSwellHell @BattlefieldComm Don't give them any idea now lol. To actually fix the game would be too much 🤷

• 
  P-HADR USA (@p_hadr) reported 31 minutes ago

  @thinkdefence @TomSharpe134 @CISACyber Evening update, its warranted. IRAN SITREP & ASSESSMENT 19:30 ET Cut Off Tuesday, 18 August 2026 Executive Assessment The operational picture continues to deteriorate across the Gulf and northern Middle East. The UAE has suspended trade, commercial exchanges and financial transactions with Iran following its report that two ballistic missiles were launched toward Emirati territory. Iran denies responsibility. Two separate attacks against commercial shipping in the Strait of Hormuz are now known, reinforcing the assessment that the maritime security environment is more dangerous than initially understood. Commercial traffic remains possible but confidence, insurance availability and predictable scheduling remain severely degraded. Israel's strikes against Abu al-Duhur Air Base in Syria have also widened regional military pressure beyond the Gulf, while diplomatic channels remain effectively stalled. The overall conflict continues evolving into a prolonged campaign centred on logistics, economic pressure, maritime denial and regional proxy activity rather than continuous strategic air warfare. 1. BATTLEFIELD DEVELOPMENTS Confirmed Reporting UAE reports two ballistic missiles launched from Iran. Iran denies responsibility. Two confirmed attacks against commercial shipping have now been reported in the Strait of Hormuz. Israel conducted multiple strikes against Abu al-Duhur Air Base in Syria. No new large-scale U.S. strike package against mainland Iran has been confirmed. Assessment Current escalation priorities: Hormuz maritime security: Very High Iran–UAE confrontation: High/Rising Red Sea/Yemen: Very High Syria: Elevated Iraqi Kurdistan: Elevated LATAM: Elevated The conflict continues broadening geographically rather than intensifying in one theatre alone. 2. UAE Confirmed Reporting The UAE states that two ballistic missiles were launched from Iran toward the Emirates and subsequently suspended trade, commercial exchanges and financial transactions with Iran. Assessment The significance is not only military but economic. The Gulf confrontation is increasingly moving toward: Military pressure to Financial isolation to Commercial separation to Increased pressure on Iranian logistics and regional trade. Should Iran transition to a campaign of large-scale conventional missile strikes, likely target priorities would be: Logistics hubs Major ports Energy infrastructure Aviation facilities Commercial shipping Dual-use manufacturing Defense Industry Tourism Venues (not hotels or resorts) Strategic warehouses Communications infrastructure Particular concern surrounds industrial free zones. Many contain: Foreign-owned manufacturing Defence suppliers Aviation maintenance Electronics production Logistics companies Dual-use industrial facilities While national military bases generally possess stronger air defence, many commercial industrial areas rely primarily on civil security arrangements and would likely be more vulnerable to mass missile or drone attacks than dedicated military installations. This remains an analytical assessment rather than evidence of Iranian operational planning. 3. STRAIT OF HORMUZ Confirmed Reporting Two separate commercial vessels have now been confirmed struck near Khasab within recent days. Both incidents resulted in vessel damage and crew casualties. Assessment The issue is no longer whether ships can physically transit Hormuz. The issue is whether operators can obtain: Insurance Crew acceptance Predictable schedules Commercial confidence Security guarantees Current assessment: Physical transit: Less Possible Commercial normality: Not restored Insurance environment: Severe Operational confidence: Very Low 1/few