Battlefield 6 Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Battlefield 6 Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Libertad_24 (@FlacoG_2023) reported 2 minutes ago

  @Battlefield Stop releasing content, because technically the game runs like ****. Desync with console players, advantages for console players, desync with players having very low or high latency (-10ms/+60ms)—fix the game!

• 
  D00M42 (@D00M42) reported 4 minutes ago

  @XtremelyDad @RealDonMarshall @DefiyantlyFree It is a rather sophistic move. The problem, and I say again, is the banning of certain thought, not actions. To ban a group because of thought is no limiter at all. You grant the field to those would make thought the very battlefield. For instance, those who claim the name of Christ, that thought (belief) can be banned. This who claim communism, that thought can be banned. (The problem with the current anti-communism legislation is the ambiguity towards thought instead of action. Proof of thought and intent without action is very very difficult.) Etc., etc. I've laid options time and time again to utilize existing methods for crimes which we already know they are guilty of, so why then must we make an even more ambiguous claim to guilt for someone who hasn't actually done anything wrong? (I don't mean that in the sense of they have plausible deniability, but in that they haven't done anything, never intended to do anything, etc.)

• 
  Nkuka (@UgochukwuO91441) reported 4 minutes ago

  [🔒CLASSIC] 🚨🇺🇸 SECRETARY OF WAR PETE HEGSETH DELIVERS A BLUNT ASSESSMENT OF IRAN’S MILITARY SITUATION U.S. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth compared Iran’s current predicament to a football team that had carefully planned its opening plays but is now struggling to respond as the game unfolds. He said Iran may have entered the conflict with its initial moves already prepared, but with the pressure now intensifying, its leadership is reportedly struggling to determine what to do next—or even how to effectively coordinate its response. According to Hegseth, Iran’s senior leadership has suffered heavy losses, while the governing body that could have helped select a successor is reportedly dead, missing, or hiding in fortified bunkers. He further claimed that senior commanders, mid-level officers, and lower-ranking personnel are facing serious communication problems, making it difficult for Iran to organize and sustain a coordinated offensive. Hegseth also described the situation as devastating for Iranian military morale, claiming that the country’s air force—built around capabilities dating back decades—has been severely damaged. He likewise claimed that Iran’s navy has been effectively destroyed, describing it as combat ineffective, decimated, and defeated. Whether every part of that assessment holds up will ultimately depend on developments on the battlefield, but Hegseth’s message was clear: Washington believes Iran’s military command structure and ability to coordinate sustained operations have been severely weakened. 🇺🇸🇮🇷[🔓JAILBREAK] 🚨🇺🇸 PETE HEGSETH: “IRAN DOESN’T KNOW WHAT PLAY TO CALL NEXT” U.S. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth used a football analogy to describe what he says is happening inside Iran’s military command structure. According to Hegseth, Iran entered the conflict like a football team with its opening plays already scripted. But once the pressure intensified and the “blitz” began, he says Tehran was left struggling to figure out its next move. Hegseth claimed Iran’s senior leadership has been devastated, while the governing council that could potentially oversee a succession process is reportedly either dead, missing, or hiding in underground bunkers. He further alleged that Iranian generals, officers, and enlisted personnel are struggling to communicate, making it extremely difficult to organize a coordinated and prolonged military response. And the damage, according to Hegseth, goes beyond command and control. He claimed Iran’s air force has been effectively wiped out, arguing that much of it was built around decades-old capabilities and has now been severely damaged. He delivered an equally harsh assessment of Iran’s navy, claiming it has been decimated and rendered combat ineffective. His overall message was unmistakable: Iran may have entered the conflict with a plan—but according to Hegseth, the pressure of the war has disrupted its ability to execute that plan or coordinate what comes next. 🇺🇸🔥🇮🇷

• 
  Mazi okwuoma (@MaziEzike_Nedu) reported 5 minutes ago

  Steam just bypassed its strict 2-hour policy limit to issue a legendary refund. 🤯🎮 A Battlefield 6 fan managed to claw back a full $109.24 refund on the Phantom Edition after logging 470+ hours of playtime. The trigger? The latest update quietly removed their most-played legacy modes—including Rush—from Quick Play. After the player filed an explicit consumer complaint detailing the unannounced loss of core advertised features, Steam support overrode the system and gave them every cent back. Live-service developers are officially on notice: you don't get to erase content and keep the cash. 💸📉

• 
  LtMcGuganfps (@TheRobbieBlair) reported 5 minutes ago

  @BattlefieldComm The single BEST thing y'all could do is to stop forcing crossplay 10s of thousands of us will not play with crossplay on Crossplay destroys the experience. From great fun to garbage with the flip of that switch Ping from 38 to 100 Constant light glitches Constant lag issue

• 
  PurpleKoolAidMan (@prplekoolaidman) reported 6 minutes ago

  @MrProWestie I think the issue is that Battlefield relies on microtransactions, which tie in to the game's assignments and live service progression. If the devs allow a server browser, a significant amount of the playerbase is just in 24/7 metro servers and never interact with that system.

• 
  Jason Reza Jorjani (@Jason_Jorjani) reported 6 minutes ago

  Gary and I went to see Swann, the psychic artist, who was living at an apartment in the Bowery. He was a flaming ******, not that I minded much. What bothered me more than his annoying mannerisms was that a cursory look through his bookshelf made it clear that Ingo was a member of the Church of Scientology. Parts of his relatively small library looked like the L. Ron Hubbard required reading list. His paintings were technically impressive but had the same lurid and garish quality characteristic of Battlefield Earth and Hubbard’s even lesser works. I looked over at Gary silently, with an expression that he had no trouble interpreting as some cross between dismay and contemptuous skepticism. Feinberg looked back in such a manner as to reassure me and urge me to be patient. The professor turned out to be right. Ingo Swann’s abilities as a psychic were truly remarkable. He picked up on my cynical attitude and was so affronted by it that he reached right into my mind, or as he might put it, reached out into past places and times, to confront me with information about my life that he could hardly have known. Some of this concerned my aunt, and I had to stop Ingo before he embarrassed me in front of Gary who was starting to look very uncomfortable. He had the decency never to ask me to elaborate on what Swann was getting at that day when I cut him off. – Jason Reza Jorjani, PSYCHOTRON

• 
  James P. Pinkerton (@JamesPPinkerton) reported 6 minutes ago

  “Edwin Cohn, a Harvard biochemist, took on the problem of breaking down blood plasma to isolate a protein called albumin that could be stored for long periods without spoiling, shipped efficiently and used easily on a battlefield to save lives.” A hero in a laboratory.

• 
  Jon (@JonShadwellX) reported 6 minutes ago

  Fix the ******* ballistic walls. They never place quick enough, let alone consistently on uneven ground. @EA_DICE @Battlefield

• 
  Kylos (@KylosWeb3) reported 7 minutes ago

  Craziest glitches in Pokemon history. In Pokemon Gold, Silver, and Crystal, there are two moves that seem somewhat harmless. Spike chips away at any Pokemon that is sent into battle, while Sandstorm slowly damages the Pokémon on the battlefield unless they're rock, ground or steel types every single turn, and on their own they do almost nothing dangerous. Nintendo never expected anyone to line them up in a very specific way, but if you faint your own team to them in a very specific order, the game quietly loses track of whether your Pokemon are even conscious, so here's what you do. You let one of your Pokemon faint to the sandstorm first, then you send in three more Pokemon back to back and let all three of them faint to the spikes. When that third Pokemon goes down, the game gets confused and leaves it standing at zero HP. So now you just run from the battle, and every Pokemon on your team stays in your party sitting at zero HP, without the game ever forcing you to black out. But that broken party is the exact setup the developers never planned for. They added a simple safety net for an empty party, but never expected a player to reach it with a team this broken, since your entire team is technically unusable. The game panics every time a new battle tries to start, and because it can't send out a single Pokemon, it cancels the fight instantly, and copies the result of your last real battle. If you won the previous battle, you'd just keep winning, which means you could walk into any trainer or wild encounter, and as soon as the screen fades, you have already won. Due to this glitch, people have beaten the Elite Four and the Champion without every making a single move against them.

• 
  Lady Justice (@DominaIustitia) reported 10 minutes ago

  @rhondamsd @EYakoby Who started it? Who came dispossession and occupation? Who turned another people’s homeland into a battlefield and then demanded the victims justify their resistance? And whow asks humanity to accept mass suffering in service of a religious claim we don't believe in?

• 
  早起鸟 (@bicc8eth) reported 11 minutes ago

  @dotkrueger The core controversy of BIP-110 is not essentially "whether spam should be cleared", but rather "who has the right to define the use of Bitcoin block space: Miners claim that 'the transaction fee market has the final say'" The node claims, "I have the right to refuse verification/execution." I think the next major battle might escalate from a "block size war" to a "block space usage war". The fate of BIP-110 will eventually fail, but it has brought the issue of "the use of Block Space" to the forefront, similar to an upgraded version of the debate over block size in the past. The main battlefield of the dispute over the use of block space is the storage of inscriptions/data in user transactions $NAT is precisely the inscription based on the Ordinals + TAP protocol - it is currently the only inscription incentive asset that miners are allocated to each block So in the future, $NAT might be: The benchmark token of the "incentive alignment layer" that naturally emerged among the market camp after the block space usage war In other words, $NAT could become a very good "soft landing point" for all stakeholders after this upgraded war: It not only retains the core proposition of miners that "transaction fees are determined", but also uses an inscription mechanism to directly return part of the data value to those maintaining the network, thereby partially alleviating the long-standing concern of nodes about incentive asymmetry without the need for consensus layer review. If this logic holds true, the next stage of the Bitcoin ecosystem debate might no longer be about "whether to allow inscriptions", but rather "how to make inscriptions better serve miners and network security". And $NAT, as the only inscription incentive asset currently that has achieved "automatic allocation to miners per block", is likely to be at the center of this new debate

• 
  Warlord (@MarkU27717) reported 12 minutes ago

  @ATipplingPhilo @AMK_Mapping_ AMK is the problem because you don’t like his tone. But the guy who only reports 40% of the battlefield advances is fine? Haha alright

• 
  Fixyou (@Fixyou8701) reported 13 minutes ago

  @westerosies Ulf really went from being given a dragon to becoming one of the biggest problems on the battlefield. Silverwing made that betrayal even more brutal

• 
  Tim Matula (@timmatula) reported 14 minutes ago

  @GeorgeRoush George, I think the next battlefield isn’t the same as the old one. The reality is that if something is connected to the internet, our agencies can access it—all of it. Access has never been the hard part. Once we have the data (and we already have more than anyone could ever begin to comprehend), the real challenge begins: finding the needle in the haystack—the signals that actually matter and are actionable. We already possess all the data we need. AI is starting to make that needle-hunting problem more manageable, but our adversaries are right there with us, doing exactly the same thing. It’s not planes and battleships anymore.