Battlefield 6 Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Battlefield 6 Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Nadim (@Nadz094) reported 52 seconds ago

  @Battlefield Fix dying from controllers behind walls when already hiding

• 
  Itsadiee_Fx (@Itsadiee1) reported 5 minutes ago

  XAUUSD . 🚨GOLD CRASH ALERT! THIS LEVEL COULD TRIGGER A MASSIVE SELLOFF! Throughout this entire week, Gold repeatedly attempted to close above $4087, but failed every single time. From Monday to Wednesday, we did witness several impulsive buying moves, yet every rally into the $4087 region was met with strong rejection. This clearly tells us that sellers are still in control around that level and that institutional buyers are not showing enough interest to support a sustained breakout. Because of that, I believe a very attractive selling opportunity is developing over the next few sessions. So make sure you read this analysis carefully, because it could help you lock in a high-probability trade with me. This week, the $4030-$4065 zone has become the main battlefield between buyers and sellers. So far, the market has failed to break below this range, but it has also failed to break above $4065. Price is simply consolidating while both sides continue fighting for control. The most important question now is, who will win this battle? Buyers or sellers? One thing you should always remember is that whenever the market spends a long time consolidating in one area, it means a large number of orders are building there. Once that consolidation finally breaks, the market usually delivers a very strong move in the direction of the breakout. I have been closely watching Gold over the past three days, and according to my analysis, if the bulls were truly strong, the market should have already closed above $4080. Instead, every time price approached that level, sellers stepped in aggressively and rejected the move. Even after several strong buying pushes from the lows, sellers continued to absorb all of that demand. To me, this is a clear sign that the sellers are currently stronger than the buyers. Another important observation comes from Tuesday's CPI move. If you look at the 4-hour candle that formed during the CPI release, its low has still not been broken. Instead, Gold has continued retracing higher and repeatedly attempted to move back into buying territory. After a strong impulsive move, many traders naturally assume the market is only retracing before continuing higher. As a result, they begin buying while treating the origin of that move as a strong support zone, placing their stop losses just below it. Keeping that psychology in mind, I believe the low of the CPI 4-hour candle, which is around $4014, has become an important liquidity zone. As long as Gold remains above this level, the market can continue attracting more buyers. However, the moment Gold breaks below $4010, I expect a highly aggressive selling move that could push the market directly toward $3977, $3944, $3920, $3908, and eventually $3890. The reason is simple. As you can clearly see, Gold has repeatedly found support around the $3950 region, meaning a significant amount of buy-side stop losses are likely resting below that area. On top of that, Monday's session managed to close above $4000, which encouraged many random retail traders to enter long positions. Most of those traders are still holding their buys with hope. Based on how Gold has behaved throughout this year, the market has consistently moved toward the side where the largest pool of liquidity was waiting. Looking at the structure formed over the past few weeks, I still consider the overall trend to be bearish. Most importantly, we have not yet received a valid higher-timeframe buying confirmation. Yes, buying pressure has appeared several times, but notice when those aggressive buying moves occurred. They mainly happened during high-impact news events. In my opinion, those spikes were strong enough to create FOMO and attract random buyers into the market, while the broader trend remained unchanged. For that reason, I have no interest in buying Gold unless we see a daily close above $4080. Until that happens, I will continue looking for selling opportunities and prefer holding positions for larger downside targets because I strongly believe that a major bearish move in Gold is approaching. I hope you found this psychological analysis logical and that it helped you understand the market from a different perspective. Wishing everyone the very best for Thursday. I hope you all have a profitable trading day. What is your current view on Gold? Do you think buyers will finally break above $4080, or are sellers about to take full control? Let me know your opinion in the comments.

• 
  Noted (@IdleMindl4qg) reported 7 minutes ago

  @Battlefield Hmm! Better to fix the hit reg? The game is broken!!

• 
  Nick Albertini (@njalbertini) reported 7 minutes ago

  @wbridgefa The reason I'm having trouble is that I took care of my father who had dementia for the past six years basically. And before that I had a startup, ARKA Robotics. Originally it was me and Waylon, and then Nicole, and then kinda Alex Stickle as a financial guy. Waylon was the CEO, because I frankly didn't want to be and he had more business experience, and I really didn't want to be. I was head of R&D, and worked on the robots, and the designs and IP. We made some money, not a lot. We never got real investment and the market for the product had issues which are rather complicated. So I switched to converting the robotic systems to weapon systems to try to sell them to the military. Almost supplied Ukraine, through a second company, but I backed out, and the partner said he did, though I don't know if he did, because I kinda recognize some of my tech on that battlefield today... but whatever. So, I haven't worked for SOMEBODY ELSE for quite a while.

• 
  Ophnell Cumberbatch II (@Ophnell_II) reported 11 minutes ago

  Genuinely curious what standard people think this movie is failing to meet, because "authentic Greek casting" has never been the bar for any major Bronze Age/Classical Greek film. Troy (2004) didn't clear it either — no one raised this over Brad Pitt, Eric Bana, or Orlando Bloom. Nolan himself cast Tom Hardy as Bane, a character who's Latino in the original text, and that predates the current wave of casting-accuracy discourse entirely. If the standard only gets invoked now, it's worth asking why. There's a deeper problem with "faithful to the original" as a standard at all: there isn't a stable original to be faithful to. The Homeric Question is a real, unresolved scholarly debate — we don't know if "Homer" was one person, several, or a name attached to centuries of oral-formulaic composition and later redaction. Even Troy, which people hold up as the more "authentic" adaptation, isn't actually built on Homer alone. The Iliad stops before the wooden horse, before Achilles' death, before the sack of the city — none of that is in Homer. Troy had to pull from Quintus of Smyrna's Posthomerica, written roughly 1,100 years after Homer's traditional dating. So the "more historically accurate" comparison is itself leaning on a text further removed from the source than most people realize. Given that, I think the more useful question isn't "did they cast this faithfully" but "why did Nolan make the choices he made." His Odyssey clearly isn't just restaging the Trojan War — reviewers have connected it directly to the antiwar throughline he started in Oppenheimer, and the film's ending (the horse burning, a line about the lessons of this age being forgotten) reads like a deliberate argument that glorifying past violence is what lets it repeat. That's a different project than reproducing "the sensibilities of the original text" — and it's worth noting that most of the visceral, glorified battlefield violence people associate with Homer is Iliad material anyway; the Odyssey itself is mostly Odysseus narrating the war secondhand, years after the fact, which is a different register to begin with. None of this means you have to like the movie. "I didn't enjoy it" or "this take on the character didn't land for me" doesn't need defending — that's just taste. The claim that opens you up to pushback is "this is what it should be" — because that's asserting there's one correct version, and for a story with no fixed original, passed down and reshaped for millennia, there just isn't one. Every adaptation, every reading, every classroom interpretation of a 2,700-year-old poem is already a departure from something that was never fixed in the first place. Might as well judge the movie Nolan actually made. **I used AI assistant and Internet browser queries to refine my ideas and clean up grammar and composition. I just wanted to get your thoughts on the take since you're my movie queen. You are always so insightful. @gmgeiko

• 
  Niꓘ0bi1 (@Nik0bi1) reported 11 minutes ago

  @EndersFPS And you know What ? BF7 Will have the same issue 🤡 battlefield is dead !!

• 
  Ryan O'Leary (@RyanO_ChosenCoy) reported 20 minutes ago

  @Longtstanding I assure you no one still thinks the CiC of the mil has done a good job or reversed the problems and put Ukraine at a better level on the battlefield. Quite the opposite

• 
  Michael Weiss (@michaeldweiss) reported 20 minutes ago

  It's easy in the West to romanticize Ukraine given what it's been through and what it's withstood. But that tendency is quickly erased the minute you talk to Ukrainians. These are near-universal complaints and criticisms about the state of the AFU. And if you really want to indulge in romanticism, consider how much better Ukraine would be doing on the battlefield now, when it is doing reasonably well, if these problems were seriously addressed and corrected.

• 
  Karim Ramzy (@KarimRa69622048) reported 21 minutes ago

  @whatevereverig @SlushiiPls I play on my laptop. With a 2 gb graphics card and 12 GB ram. And the problem is the games I play work just fine, I got Battlefield 6 working fine for example. I'm not gonna buy a whole new PC or laptop just for one videogame 😭🙏🏼🙏🏼 Although I'm saving money

• 
  Chris Cook (@LetChrisCook) reported 25 minutes ago

  @BattlefieldComm No mention of the flare bug or any other air fixes. Kind of crazy for a map with tons of air vehicles yall just ignore all the issues with air. The biggest being missiles just going through flares.

• 
  Maan (@h2o_m3) reported 25 minutes ago

  @miztifying The problem with battlefield is the devs , they think they know better. Server browser? No the game doesn't need one.....said who? Im the one playing the game not you . Its insane how bf6 was wasted.

• 
  Archaeo - Histories (@archeohistories) reported 27 minutes ago

  She came to Troy not to win the war. She came to die in it... Her name was Penthesilea, queen of the Amazons. She arrived on the plain of Troy in the weeks after Hector's funeral, when the Trojan cause was already tilting. The city knew it. So did she. But she had not come because Troy needed saving. She had come because she needed what only war could offer. Months before her arrival, during a hunt, she had thrown a javelin that went wide. By the account preserved in post-Homeric tradition, the weapon was meant for a deer. It killed her sister Hippolyta instead. The death was an accident. The guilt was absolute. Under the warrior code she carried, blood guilt of that kind could not be settled in gold or ceremony. It required an answer in blood: either the killing of enemies, or the death of the killer. Penthesilea made her choice. She would go to Troy, fight with everything she had, and let the outcome balance the account. She arrived with twelve Amazon warriors at her side. On the battlefield, by the account in Quintus of Smyrna's Posthomerica, she fought with a ferocity that shook the Greeks. Some accounts name Ajax among those she bested. The Trojans, who had not felt hope in weeks, lined the walls to watch. For a stretch of that day, she pushed the Greek forces back toward their ships. That had not happened since Hector was alive. Then Achilles came onto the field. He, too, was carrying something. His closest companion Patroclus was dead. He had already killed Hector in vengeance. He was fighting now with nothing left to prove and nothing left to protect. Two people at the edge of what they could carry met in the middle of the plain. The accounts differ on the particulars of their duel. They agree on the outcome. Achilles killed her. When he removed her helmet and looked at the woman he had just fought, something in him broke. Ancient sources describe grief, astonishment, an emotion the chroniclers could not name cleanly. A soldier named Thersites mocked him for it. Achilles killed him for that. He returned her body. He would not leave her in the field. She came seeking a warrior's death. She received one. Whether it resolved the guilt she carried is a question the poets left open. The queen who arrived at war already broken. The duel that produced a grief no one expected. The moment when the greatest fighter of his age wept over the woman he had just killed. Troy produced many stories. Few carry that particular weight. 📷 : A red-figure cup painted in Athens around 460 BC, now in the Antikensammlungen in Munich, depicts the precise moment Achilles kills her. Their eyes are shown meeting at the instant of death. Scholars know the painter primarily from this work, and gave him the conventional name the Penthesilea Painter. #archaeohistories

• 
  Jig (@Jiguiski) reported 29 minutes ago

  @sho_90r @tones_best @BattlefieldComm Yeah Redsec is the root of a lot of problem in this game

• 
  Mino (@MinoTheRealest) reported 34 minutes ago

  @Pecanskin30 @Battlefield A feature that does not work as intended = skill issue? I hope that’s rage bait, otherwise you must be incredibly retarded.

• 
  Lasurak (@Lasurak) reported 35 minutes ago

  @theredpix @nvidia @EA_DICE Even an 8800GT had no issue running it max at 900p.