Battlefield 6 Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Battlefield 6 Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  TTV Master (@TTVMaster118408) reported 15 seconds ago

  @Battlefield Still trash how 99% of the game is bots while matchmaking is broken as hell also if i get disconnected why must I wait to rejoin my friends game because im in a queue it honestly makes 0 sense when like i said 99% of the players are bots just kick a bot out

• 
  kampfhex (@kampfhex) reported 58 seconds ago

  @DakdaR22 seems, Zelensky can't admit a fault, still incommunicado, despite+after Drapaty's appointment as CinC doesn't seem to know how to maneuver himself out of a dead end why not say it's trial+error, U were right, I was wrong + concentrate on the battlefield+preparations for winter

• 
  UZEE STOCKS UPDATE LTD (@UpdateUzee) reported 2 minutes ago

  📊 5 U.S. stocks on my watchlist just gave investors something to think about. Today’s TipRanks updates included Amazon, Google, Nvidia, Palantir and Microsoft. But here's the lesson: A headline is a starting point for research, not a reason to buy or sell. 🔹 GOOGL — Google Reports of a potential $25 billion bond sale raised concerns about increased borrowing. The important question isn't simply: "Why is Google borrowing money?" Ask: What will the company use the money for, and will the investment generate returns greater than its cost of capital? Debt isn't automatically bad. Unproductive debt is the problem. --- 🔹 NVDA — Nvidia Nvidia continues to benefit from the AI infrastructure boom, and technical analysts are watching the stock after recent AI-related developments. But investors should separate business performance from share-price momentum. A great company can still become an expensive stock. Look at: 📌 Revenue growth 📌 Gross margins 📌 Free cash flow 📌 Competitive advantage 📌 Valuation 📌 AI demand sustainability --- 🔹 PLTR — Palantir One headline argues that Palantir's valuation matters less when its growth continues to beat expectations. There's an important investing lesson here: High valuation can sometimes be justified by exceptional growth — but only if that growth actually materializes. The danger is paying today's price for tomorrow's growth and then watching the growth disappoint. --- 🔹 AMZN — Amazon Amazon-backed X-Energy (XE) is attracting attention as investors react to developments around advanced nuclear energy. This is a reminder that Amazon's investment strategy extends beyond e-commerce and cloud computing. But don't confuse Amazon's backing with a guarantee of success. Research the underlying company, economics, risks and valuation independently. --- 🔹 MSFT — Microsoft Microsoft is also facing developments around the rapidly evolving AI landscape. And that's the bigger story: AI is no longer just a technology trend. It is becoming a competitive battlefield involving cloud computing, chips, software, data centres and enormous capital expenditure. --- Here's what I take from today's watchlist: Don't invest because: ❌ A stock is trending ❌ Analysts are bullish ❌ The price is rising ❌ A company is backed by a major corporation ❌ Everyone is talking about AI Instead, ask: What is the business worth? How fast is it growing? How much cash is it generating? What could go wrong? And am I paying a reasonable price for the future I'm expecting? That's how you move from stock watching to stock analysis. Fundamentals first. Always. — UZEE STOCKS UPDATE LTD Educational content only. Not a buy/sell recommendation. Market prices and company fundamentals change, so conduct independent research before investing.

• 
  Radagast The Brown (@pnwradagast) reported 2 minutes ago

  A) it's funny to me that the women's/trans issue and race war are sharing a "battlefield" and it's the WNBA B) Do you think the WNBA knows that they are promoting a race war and doesn't care because they're getting more views?

• 
  General Warmonger (@GeneralWarmong) reported 4 minutes ago

  I see a big problem with America right now. It's unwillingness to sacrifice soldiers on the battlefield. This makes the strongest army completely useless. The world elites are not amused... So, they will make America Great Fighter Again, by making it Communist. After failing to defend Hormuz, it is a 100% certainty now.

• 
  medoyid_ua (@LetsArmUKR) reported 6 minutes ago

  @yasminalombaert Miroshnik just admitted what actually bothers the Kremlin: Ukrainian drones are working, and the only real fix is to choke off the money keeping Ukraine going. That is a confession, not a legal argument: moscovia cannot win on the battlefield.

• 
  nAtEdAwG (@natedawgg46) reported 10 minutes ago

  @Rapha_828 @MrProWestie No one will care if it does, the trust is already severely broken with the community and way past the chance of being repaired by the Devs. Players won't buy the next battlefield. I think I'm headed down that path too.

• 
  Hurricane (@hurricane1926) reported 10 minutes ago

  @BattlefieldComm Ask Genshin impact what happened with kernel level anti cheat in 2022.. one mistake and you are done. Also, the anti cheat is not working and they, dice/EA games, are lying about the cheat attempts because there are not even so much people playing this game lol.

• 
  USAI Media (@USAI_Media) reported 13 minutes ago

  @tedlieu Calling Iran “second rate” misses the strategic lesson. The U.S. can hold overwhelming technological advantages, and still run into a munitions problem, if a prolonged conflict burns through interceptors, and precision weapons faster than industry can replace them. The Pentagon’s 21-day production directive is therefore less a verdict on Iran than a warning about the U.S. defense-industrial model. Modern war is increasingly an equation of inventory depth + expenditure rate + replenishment speed. If those numbers do not balance, even the superior force can lose strategic flexibility, before it loses battlefield dominance.

• 
  InfantryDort (@infantrydort) reported 20 minutes ago

  Readiness It seems we all unanimously agree that the better commander is the one who tells the truth. Why then, do we promote the ones who don’t? We should all know the reason. Because it’s comfortable to live in a lie. This is a great technique honestly, lying. If you’re a careerist who only cares about advancement. The problem is that it falls flat once a formation is put to the test. Combat has a way of exposing all flaws. But what happens if you don’t go to combat during your command? I guess you luck out then. You avoid the test. It’s a gamble that often pays off. We want the commander who tells the truth because we need to count on his word to make our own plans as his superiors. If he reports 90% efficiency and shows up to the battle exposing 60%, well that’s a problem. Because I’ve calculated in redundancy and even by my most aggressively pessimistic views of his capability, he still fell short. Now people are going to die. And he may not have been a liar per se. But he was incompetent and didn’t know about his own unit. Either is unfit for command. I started on X talking about tactics and leadership. Now I’ve come full circle to just telling the truth. Because every battlefield effect rests on our ability to do this. GWOT caused us to over inflate everything. If you need proof, look no further than the Afghan Army we said would hold after being propped up for two decades, it folded in days. If I were Army Chief of Staff for a day, I’d be taking advantage of this period where we aren’t embroiled in a ground war to recenter this truth telling culture that has atrophied so far. It’s not even complicated, you can just order units to leave garrison and come back. Checking their reported readiness percentage and comparing it to whatever returns to the motorpool. A test, if you will. Then you can have hard conversations like: “General (or Colonel) X, you reported your formation at 82%. After a simple maneuver to the range and back, testing your fleet, you clocked in at 58%. The delta is unacceptable. Thank you for your years of dedicated service to the nation, but it is no longer required.” @KTB_500 and I talk about this frequently. I think it is a fine COA for GEN LaNeve to consider. And it will ruffle many feathers. Oh well.

• 
  Anthony Clark (@ATC4561) reported 22 minutes ago

  @FmrRepMTG I would’ve told them if you give me a rifle, I’m fighting for the other side. If only they could solve their problems like the Greeks use to do it where their best fighter vs their best fighter. Also I remember when the leader use to be on the battlefield with his troops.

• 
  RetroVercetti (@retrovercetti) reported 23 minutes ago

  @BattlefieldComm Hey here’s a thought, why don’t you just have persistent lobbies and stop disbanding them? That should fix your matchmaking problem and rebalance teams after the match.

• 
  Idk30K (@AmariX13) reported 24 minutes ago

  @skyed1ed To me he kinda just exists on the battlefield and can have good or bad ults, isn't really too over or underwhelming. It probably feels weird to the community cause of how "broken" other characters have felt on their release

• 
  Tim Matula (@timmatula) reported 24 minutes ago

  @GeorgeRoush George, I think the next battlefield isn’t the same as the old one. The reality is that if something is connected to the internet, our agencies can access it—all of it. Access has never been the hard part. Once we have the data (and we already have more than anyone could ever begin to comprehend), the real challenge begins: finding the needle in the haystack—the signals that actually matter and are actionable. We already possess all the data we need. AI is starting to make that needle-hunting problem more manageable, but our adversaries are right there with us, doing exactly the same thing. It’s not planes and battleships anymore.

• 
  Epithelial Atronach (@DaedalusIV) reported 26 minutes ago

  @ExoGhost It’s kind of always been this way though to some degree. With dolphin-diving in Battlefield, b-hopping in CS, slide-canceling in CoD. I’ve never had much of a problem with it - pattern recognition, adaptation, and satisfaction when their technique doesn’t work.