1. Home
  2. Companies
  3. Battlefield 6
  4. Outage Map
Battlefield 6

Battlefield 6 Outage Map

The map below depicts the most recent cities worldwide where Battlefield 6 users have reported problems and outages. If you are having an issue with Battlefield 6, make sure to submit a report below

Loading map, please wait...

The heatmap above shows where the most recent user-submitted and social media reports are geographically clustered. The density of these reports is depicted by the color scale as shown below.

Battlefield 6 users affected:

Less
More
Check Current Status

Battlefield 6 is a 2025 first-person shooter game developed by Battlefield Studios and published by Electronic Arts. Serving as the eighteenth installment in the Battlefield series, the game was released for PlayStation 5, Windows, and Xbox Series X/S on October 10, 2025.

Most Affected Locations

Outage reports and issues in the past 15 days originated from:

Location Reports
Valence, Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes 2
Biscarrosse, Nouvelle-Aquitaine 1
Pont-Sainte-Maxence, Hauts-de-France 1
Recife, PE 1
Brasília, DF 1
Arlon, Wallonia 1
Coyoacán, CDMX 1
Saint-Malo, Brittany 1
Buenos Aires, CF 1
Comuna 1, CABA 5
Perpignan, Occitanie 1
Domingos Martins, ES 1
Courbevoie, Île-de-France 1
Strasbourg, ACAL 1
Chaumont, ACAL 1
Amagney, Bourgogne-Franche-Comté 1
Annecy, Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes 2
Paris, Île-de-France 17
Itapemirim, ES 1
São Paulo, SP 2
Brech, Brittany 1
Trévoux, Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes 1
Nidau, BE 1
Villa Victoria, MEX 1
Santiago de Querétaro, QUE 3
Telêmaco Borba, PR 1
Bordeaux, Nouvelle-Aquitaine 4
Bron, Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes 1
Madrid, Madrid 4
La Trinité, Martinique 1
Check Current Status

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Battlefield 6 Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

  • eagles7251
    Masten Thrust (@eagles7251) reported

    @BattlefieldComm So no fix for invisible weapon after revive? No netcode improvements between console and PC crossplay?

  • ItsQagain
    GoGitUrFuknShineBox (@ItsQagain) reported

    @Battlefield Who tf cares?? You don’t fix the **** that needs to be fixed and I’m tired of you recycling the same three maps in multiplayer..You’re so in love with empire fck off

  • EliteKingDarth
    Lets negotiate (@EliteKingDarth) reported

    @Parasite Why dont they make the change like all previous cods bro? Simple fix we dont want alot of settings like battlefield

  • UncolonisedMind
    Mind of the Motherland (@UncolonisedMind) reported

    One thing I genuinely don’t understand is how some people can acknowledge that colonialism obstructed Africa’s development, yet somehow refuse to recognise that neocolonialism continues to do the same thing, in some cases even worse. Is the difference simply that the white man is no longer physically there to administer it? There is no meaningful difference between the colonial master and the local agent who administers the same system on his behalf. Your mistake is thinking these people are your people simply because they look like you. Physical appearance does not change the interests they serve, the system they uphold, or the consequences of their actions. Neocolonialism does not require the continued physical presence of the colonial master. It works precisely by reproducing the interests and structures of the former colonial order through local institutions, elites and agents. There is no “post-colonial era”. There is the pre-colonial era, the colonial era, and the neocolonial era. The system continues. The administrator changed. The structure of ********** did not. Replacing one agent with another is not the same as destroying the system entirely. And this is why understanding what we are fighting matters. If you do not understand the battlefield, you can defeat a local agent and still fail to defeat the system that produced and empowered that agent. You may mistake a few concessions and reforms for sovereignty, only to find yourself reproducing the same system under a different administration. And eventually, you either become another agent of that system or you are removed and replaced by one. When people tell you about neocolonialism, they are not denying the actions of its local agents. They are trying to give you a fuller understanding of what you are actually fighting. Because if you think the local agent is the entire problem, you will celebrate replacing the agent while leaving the system intact. The system is not failing. It has not failed. It is working as designed.

  • LaDeXi
    LaDeX (@LaDeXi) reported

    @robynvanpersiee @Battlefield Then you shouldn't have trouble finding people.

  • Keyaswings
    Kartikeya (@Keyaswings) reported

    My take on @WARDOGS Seven years. Two finished games. Three cancelled ones. And at one point, a defence company's lawyers threatening to sue over the shape of a helmet. That's the price @BULKHEAD Studio paid to bring WARDOGS to Steam Early Access on 10th September and as a 40-year-old who's been looking for that “Boys Gaming Together” feeling since the LAN cafe days, I just want to say thank you. I already got my Boomer Squad locked for the beta on 3rd September and the launch on 10th Sept. Mind you, Bulkhead once had a deal on the table with Tencent. Tencent wanted them to "go bigger" basically publisher-speak for cutting the parts of the game nobody would notice missing until launch day, when it's too late to fix. Bulkhead walked away instead. No safety net, no guaranteed funding, just a bet on themselves and Team17 to do it properly. They didn't just build in a bunker and drop a trailer six weeks out. They opened the doors. Closed beta after closed beta, nearly 500,000 players stress-testing servers, breaking things on purpose, telling a small studio exactly what wasn't working. I played the last beta weekend and there were 100,000 people online at the same time, for a game that hadn't even launched. That's not a marketing beta. That's a studio actually listening. 20 years in Gaming. I’ve watch a lot of titles get pushed out of the door because a date on a roadmap looked good in a boardroom slide. Players feel that. They always do. So when a studio this size holds the line, refuses the "ship it now, patch it later" playbook, and tells us straight up not to expect it fully finished until they've earned that right over the next year or two that's rare enough to stop and clap for. If you've never heard of WARDOGS that's fair, most people haven't yet. It's a hundred-player tactical shooter, three teams fighting over a destructible battlefield in the ruins of an Eastern European industrial mountain range, built by people who clearly still love making games. Half a million players already tested it before a single copy sold. That should tell you more than any trailer could. Go look it up. See what a studio looks like when it says no to the suits. To everyone at Bulkhead and @Brammflakes league(team) of extrodinary gentleman. Thank you. (Posted the same on my linkedin :D )

  • ALAEHDx
    ALAEHD (@ALAEHDx) reported

    @BattlefieldComm No need to fix anything Dice just leave the game as it is, you're gonna reintroduce all these bugs next season anyway as you always do.

  • _The_Prophet__
    SightBringer (@_The_Prophet__) reported

    @MtDew_Crabjuice You’re right about the constraint, but I think you’re defining financial repression too narrowly. Repression does not require the bond market to be fooled forever, and it does not require a giant young savings cohort. It requires the state to keep the effective funding cost below nominal GDP growth long enough to stabilize the debt ratio. That can be done through maturity management, central-bank balance-sheet support, bank and pension regulation, capital requirements, captive domestic demand, tax treatment, and policies that steer savings toward government paper. The real problem you’re pointing to is rollover speed. If too much debt reprices quickly, inflation feeds straight back into higher interest expense and the benefit evaporates. That absolutely makes the U.S. position harder than the classic postwar repression model. But that does not kill the strategy. It changes the form. Washington then has to suppress the effective cost of funding while tolerating higher nominal growth. That can mean pushing duration into regulated balance sheets, changing capital rules, using the Fed as buyer of last resort, leaning on banks and money funds, and accepting a lower real return for savers. So the deeper point is: You’re right that inflation alone cannot solve this anymore. The state has to pair nominal growth with forced financial intermediation. That is exactly why the bond market is becoming the battlefield.

  • Blizzy63
    D💯 (@Blizzy63) reported

    @in_TSMWEL_era @BattlefieldComm Yeah definitely a skill issue when everything I’ve listed has been a problem and most of those problem that have been addressed as you say didn’t solve anything…. But yeah my 3.24 K/D is a skill issue brother

  • XeroMindedSY
    Xero Minded (@XeroMindedSY) reported

    @wrenfps Yeah this game is ***. The net code, pc to console Desync, The servers lag, the audio sucks, visibility still needs improvement, no server browser, no persistent servers, there’s clearly EOMM. @EA_DICE ******* SUCKS

  • BKScoPe
    BKScoPe (@BKScoPe) reported

    been sitting with one idea about @quipnetwork for a few days now. what if the work that secures a chain was also the work someone actually needed solved. not hashes for the sake of hashes, actual optimization problems, proof of useful work instead of proof of work. i keep going back and forth on what that actually changes. one side of me says it's just a scoring trick, put every kind of hardware on the same problem and call it fair. the other side wonders if this is actually the first time cpus, gpus, asics, and quantum machines get measured on one shared battlefield instead of separate leaderboards. both feel true at once. quantum capacity right now mostly sits behind a handful of closed platforms, expensive, gated, hard to even test against. if this holds up at scale, that idle capacity starts looking like infrastructure other people can actually rent and check the work on. researchers get a reason to point real problems at it instead of vanity benchmarks, and operators get a reason to keep machines running past the demo phase. none of that is guaranteed yet, still early.

  • grizzgolf
    Dustin Paine (@grizzgolf) reported

    @Battlefield Fix Hitreg Desync and let pc turn off crossplay

  • psychfox
    Jeremy the therapist (@psychfox) reported

    “Identity diffusion is represented by a poorly integrated concept of the self and of significant others.” - Kernberg, 1984 This is the heart of borderline personality organization: not simply mood swings, but unstable self-other representation. Under threat, the self cannot mentalize (understand emotional/cognitive/behavioral causality) itself or others. One minute: “I’m safe with you.” Next minute: “You are dangerous, I am humiliated.” Identity diffusion in action: the self fractures, turning the other person into a source of fear, and the relationship consequently becomes a battlefield of unstable meanings and self-states. Kernberg saw this clearly; the problem is a self-system that loses integration when attachment is activated and vulnerability ensues.

  • RBazify
    RBazify (@RBazify) reported

    This is the exact reason, I am worried about the battlefield community coming to WARDOGS. This isn't an issue. But now it will be what we hear about for the games entire lifespan now. A rare L take this round.

  • GotSauced
    Sauce (@GotSauced) reported

    @BattlefieldComm Fix matchmaking and we won’t leave

Check Current Status