Battlefield 6 Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Battlefield 6 Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  StarBoySAR 🇭🇰 🇨🇳 🥭 (@StarboySAR) reported 5 minutes ago

  @felix375 Sorry but that is "fatalism-as-analysis" Nothing you can do" is the intellectual surrender that Washington counts on — it's exactly what every empire wants its designated battlefield to believe. Also you still haven't addressed a single point I made earlier: not the leaker math, not the radar exposure problem, not the fact that Japan's Tomahawks are wired into a US combat system. Three replies, zero engagement. Just war-cosplay and fatalism. Some more points I want to raise before closing the conversation cos it is getting tiring "The last war" — no, it is never the last war. The US got kicked out of Vietnam and was back building bases within decades. Empires don't retire after losing, they relocate. There's no scoreboard where "kicked out of WestPac" means you are out forever The region just gets rebuilt — unfortunately if history is a guide always at Asia's expense — and the firestarter comes back. "An idiot nation starts it" — you've accidentally made my argument. Japan isn't the arsonist, it's the tinder. The Aegis system, the targeting infrastructure, the C2, the alliance "commitments" — that's the accelerant, and it's all poured from Washington. Saying "nothing you can do" about that is like saying nothing you can do about arson while the guy with the gasoline is still in the building. And here's the part your fight analogy keeps ignoring: when this "fight" starts, it's not two guys in a parking lot. It's saturation strikes on cities, closed shipping lanes, a generation of Asian development torched — while the instigator's homeland stays untouched. The US has fought every major war since 1945 on someone else's soil. That's not an accident. That's the business model. Deterrence, diplomacy, economic development, raising standards, strengthen soft power & hard power, regional architecture — that IS "something you can do." ASEAN, RCEP, SCO, BRICS every mechanism that makes Asia too integrated to burn is a weapon against the American firestarter. "Nothing you can do" isn't realism. It's fatalism and an invitation, written in someone else's blood

• 
  celticlegend (@celticlegend7) reported 10 minutes ago

  The Marine Corps just found a cheap answer to one of the most expensive problems in modern war. It takes a machine gun every Marine already knows how to use, the M240, and turns it into an Al-guided drone killer. The system is called Bullfrog, built by a Texas company called Allen Control Systems, and the Marines selected it this week to add teeth to their frontline counter-drone units. HOW IT WORKS Bullfrog is not a new gun. It's a robotic mount that uses artificial intelligence, computer vision, and precision robotics to turn an ordinary machine gun into a system that can detect, track, and engage drones on its own. The version the Marines chose is built around the M240, the 7.62mm machine gun that has been a fixture in the Corps for decades. The robotic station handles the hard part, spotting a small, fast-moving drone, tracking it, and calculating the shot. It's accurate to less than one minute of angle, a very fine degree of precision, and it uses passive sensors rather than radar, so it doesn't light up the battlefield and give away the unit's position. But it does not pull its own trigger without permission. A human operator always gives the final authorization to fire. The machine does the tracking and presents the solution. A Marine decides whether to take the shot. That human-in-the-loop design keeps it inside existing rules of engagement. WHY IT MATTERS: THE PRICE OF A KILL The reason this is a big deal comes down to money, and it's the same lesson coming out of Ukraine and the Middle East. A single attack drone can cost a few tens of thousands of dollars, sometimes far less. The interceptor missiles traditionally used to shoot them down can cost hundreds of thousands, even millions. That math is unsustainable. You cannot win a war spending a million dollars to destroy something that cost the enemy a few hundred. Bullfrog's answer is brutally simple. A well-aimed burst of machine gun ammunition solves the same problem for the price of the bullets. The company measures its cost per kill in the low tens of dollars. The M240 configuration fires 850 rounds a minute. FITTING INTO THE MARINE TOOLKIT The Bullfrog is being added to L-MADIS, the Marine Corps' lightest and most mobile counter-drone system, which normally rides on a pair of small all-terrain vehicles, one for command and control, one carrying electronic jamming gear. Jamming works well until it doesn't. Newer drones fly autonomously, without a radio link to jam. When electronic attack fails, the unit needs something that can physically knock the drone out of the sky. That's the gap Bullfrog fills, a kinetic backstop for when jamming isn't enough. The system is already in use or under contract with the Army, the Navy, US Special Operations Command, and allied forces including South Korea and the United Arab Emirates. The Marine Corps has requested more than $1 billion for its broader ground-based air defense effort in the 2027 budget, a measure of how seriously the drone threat is now being taken. WHY IT'S SMART The genius of it is that it doesn't reinvent anything. It doesn't create a new supply chain or a new weapon Marines have to learn from scratch. It takes a gun every Marine already knows how to feed, clean, and maintain, mounts it on a robotic station that never gets tired of watching the sky, and lets a human make the decision to fire. Familiar weapon. Cheap ammunition. Al doing the tracking. A Marine making the call. In a war where the sky is full of cheap threats, that combination is exactly what keeps a unit moving instead of pinned down waiting for something bigger and more expensive to come save them.

• 
  LtMcGuganfps (@TheRobbieBlair) reported 12 minutes ago

  @RusteesGaming @BattlefieldComm Where is there any proof there's any issue with actual net-code? Seems more of a support/power/tick-rate issue It runs really well on Xbox and low pop Every time They should have built a dedicated server farm running at 100 tick-rate with some of that money they made off Bf6

• 
  michael harman (@ColourBuddy369) reported 13 minutes ago

  @RoyIsThaTruth Letterman is considered the father of US EMS. 1865—Cincinnati, Ohio, establishes the first civilian ambulance service. 1868—New York City advertises 30-second response by an Ambulance Surgeon. WWI—Wounded soldiers on the battlefield use signal boxes to summon medical help.

• 
  Jarl Finland (@jalle51) reported 14 minutes ago

  No more scrolling in the war zone? US commander warns troops’ phones are leaking secrets to Iran The modern battlefield has a major vulnerability, and it fits right in a soldier’s pocket. A senior US commander is sounding the alarm, warning that troops are inadvertently compromising operational security through their personal smartphones. The problem is simple: innocent social media posts, stories and geotagged photos are giving Iranian intelligence exactly what they need. Tehran and its proxy network are actively scraping data from US soldiers’ accounts to map out base locations, routines and troop movements to plan drone and missile strikes. As a result, the Pentagon is seriously debating whether to remove troops’ phone privileges and impose a total ban on personal devices in deployment zones. You can have the most sophisticated missile defense systems in the world, but it won’t matter if a soldier’s digital footprint reveals the coordinates.

• 
  jokergroyper (@cirolikechurro) reported 16 minutes ago

  @Battlefield FIX THE BULLET REG YOU STUPID USELESS ******* ****** GO TO ******* HELL

• 
  Angelus Irae (@realAngelusIrae) reported 17 minutes ago

  I'm sure that spear users took great issue with gun users, on the battlefield. You either embrace technology or get steamrolled by people who do.

• 
  robbie troof (@RobbieTroofinho) reported 19 minutes ago

  @matnashed @EE_Ibrahim23 Respectfully, you're making basic analytical errors. the only reason that defections were operationally viable and strategically desirable was because of SAF's operational progress on the battlefield, and it's superior strategic posture.

• 
  Jeffrey Mansfield (@JeffMMansfield) reported 20 minutes ago

  @Jens7berlin this is the problem for the West: making peace is to admit defeat so they can't do it. The war will be decided on the battlefield.

• 
  Mukzilla (@Mukzillla) reported 22 minutes ago

  @Battlefield fix the game. Jumping, ducking, sukcing **** and shooting at the same time. Ping with ching chong players is sky rocket. Ma majku vam jebem. Lau off the whole studio @EA_DICE

• 
  𝙎𝙬𝙖𝙜𝙪𝙡𝙚𝙮 (@swaguley) reported 25 minutes ago

  @R7PTORBF Ok, but why? What is it about slide cancels or chained bhops that make them a problem? Is it a thematic thing, balancing? What is it about Battlefield that informs the devs how to design the basic movement mechanics? My position is that Battlefield's tone and authenticity are what determine that line. This is what separates BF from COD, despite both being arcade games. Authenticity for movement means to present things that do actually happen in reality, but just in faster, "gameified" versions that are fun and not too realistic. Despite that, it still is designed to give you the "appearance of realism" so you get the balance of the immersion while still being fun. That's the important piece. For example, the combat roll itself is authentic. I don't see complaining about it ever. It intuitively seems plausible to the average person that a person (could) jump from a first story window, land, and roll to not get as hurt. It's what you'd do in parkour. If a real soldier did this, they'd likely get hurt, but like I said, it's at least plausible to the brain. It's also naturalistic and readable which helps the natural game balance. A slide-jump, on the other hand, is where I would say it can start to CROSS the line. That's why you see many players annoyed when they see it. It's not a "natural" movement that happens anywhere apart from maybe the Haunt Sliders, and even those guys sliding on all fours can't get more than like a foot off the ground from their knees. To the average person, it comes off as uncanny and strange when someone is able to jump out of a slide with such height and forward momentum from their knees. The slide-jump lowkey in BFV both in height and distance, so nobody really complained about it. BF6 lets you launch yourself into rooms and around corners with it. It regularly happens in CQC gameplay to the point where it's almost the meta and the first option aggressive players use. It's an example of stretching the imagination too far for most people where the believablity starts to fall off and where it becomes annoying and frustrating. It's also not readable really, you wouldn't expect any person to be able to do that, even in a gameified sense. I do it all the time to compete against others doing it to me, but I certainly don't like it. Authenticity setting the "line" makes even more sense when you see the designed penalties DICE have put in place over the years that seem to serve this ideal, in addition to developer comments over the years stating it. All of this is why I'm against various movement actions that don't fit that standard, like slide jumping or accurate jump shotting. There can be exceptions, but they have to justify themselves by being so fun that it can ignore the rule, and it can't introduce big balance issues either, because that isn't fun either. Does that make sense? I'd really like to know what you think determines the line, if not authenticity and tone, which I think makes the most logical sense

• 
  Junda (@JundaFPS) reported 26 minutes ago

  FIX THE BLACK SCREEN @EA_DICE

• 
  N0M4D The Medic (@N0M4DV0NGR3Y) reported 29 minutes ago

  Dice, EA, and Battlefield 6 developers might wanna start listening to their communities before someone gets the bright idea to break their servers down and force them to recycle them. That or a data breach could happen. Not saying I would, just saying there are a lot of fanboys who will revolt if it gets worse.

• 
  Red slayer (@redslayerknows) reported 30 minutes ago

  @Kavorkian3 @BattlefieldComm Wi-Fi what are you talking about?. it’s server specific issues and I’m hard wired with a dedicated internet specifically for gaming. You have network function on then?

• 
  PHVNTOM (@PHVNTOMGG) reported 31 minutes ago

  @Battlefield Fix the audio footsteps