Battlefield 6 Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Battlefield 6 Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  David Hanna Jr. (@TheKingDavidJr) reported 2 minutes ago

  @joekent16jan19 @DLoesch You're overstating our leverage here. Israel relies heavily on our military industrial base and regional air defense network, but they pay for 90% of their own expenses and almost certainly have more battlefield experience in intercepting ballistic missiles, which will be key to improving our own systems. The issue is that this MOU is structurally flawed. It's the Iranians' 10-point wishlist, which requires some kind of settlement between Israel and Hezbollah, but explicitly excludes discussing Iran's proxy support from the MOU. You can't force Israel to withdraw or fully lift sanctions on Iran without addressing these issues.

• 
  Shadow (@ASmoothTaurus) reported 3 minutes ago

  @Battlefield Does anybody know why when console types this code it in doesn’t load it takes us to a blank screen with nothing showing? Is there a fix for this?

• 
  BillsmafiaMFKA He/Bro/Daddy (@Emanuel56353090) reported 3 minutes ago

  @Battlefield hey douchebags fix strike point. you ruined it and took it away. it was the perfect game mode

• 
  Mαr Mounier 🌐 (@elhigadodmarita) reported 3 minutes ago

  @mhfmvc Dear brother, I deeply appreciate the candor of your analysis. You present a position of impeccable logical rigor within a closed system, yet you commit the very error of those you criticize: you reduce the Mystical Body of Christ to an administrative problem to be solved at a desk. You employ the sedevacantist thesis to denounce the ‘inconsistency’ of others, but to what does your position lead in practice? To a total atomization where every believer becomes their own Pope, awaiting a restoration that, by your own premise, is humanly impossible. Absolute sedevacantism ultimately manifests as a form of quietism: since you posit that there is no authority, there is no mission, and therefore nothing to do but await the apocalypse from the comfort of one’s home. And that is the very triumph of the ‘sect’ you so adamantly oppose! They need not persecute you if you have already excluded yourself from the combat. Furthermore, you accuse me of caring only for ‘externals’ rather than doctrine. On the contrary: precisely because I am concerned for doctrine, I understand that the Church is NOT a corporation whose legal validity is automatically annulled by the errors of its managers. Remember that the history of the Church is a record ad infinitum of Popes who have been weak, erratic, or deeply questionable, without that signifying that the Holy Spirit has abandoned the sacraments or the apostolic succession. The fact that you require the entire ‘protocol’ of history to be flawless to believe in the validity of the hierarchy reveals that your faith depends on bureaucratic perfection, not on divine Providence. Then, you criticize the SSPX for its ‘inconsistency,’ yet in practice, they are the rearguard trench of a war you have already declared lost. Is the SSPX position perfect? No. But the ‘purity of doctrine’ you demand is, at this historical juncture, a LUXURY that does not permit the building of a single chapel, the formation of a single priest, the protection of the Tridentine Mass, or the salvation of a single soul from destruction. The SSPX, conversely, for all its limitations, is fighting the war, taking bullets, missiles, and bombs. They remain in the field because they know that the General on the line is CHRIST and the fortress to be defended is HOLY. Finally, you argue that it is ‘utterly inconsistent’ to recognize the Pope while rejecting the Council. Brother, it is entirely Catholic to acknowledge the historical facts-that Rome is occupied by an anti-theology-and, simultaneously, to maintain that Christ has not abandoned His Sacred Spouse, but has allowed a trial of purification where Tradition remains the only guiding thread. Do you prefer the theoretical purity of self-destruction? So be it. I prefer the resistance in the trenches, with all its wounds, abuse, suffering, and contradictions, for as long as the occupation lasts. But we must not leave the enemies of the Church an easy path. Remember: being Catholic is NOT for the cowardly. To be a militant Catholic, one MUST BE BRAVE. I understand your position perfectly, but we have been pushed into a FRONTAL war, and doctrinal purity is useless if it merely becomes a shroud to bury the cause of Christ. The ‘inconsistency’ of which you accuse me is not a weakness; it is my refusal to let the enemy dictate the rules of my own surrender. No. If the Church is to be defended, we must step directly onto the battlefield. And we do not care about appearing with pressed and perfumed uniforms. All we care is: we are under fire, and we MUST save lives—and souls. Even if there are only twelve of us.

• 
  Monifish 🙊🐟 (@spookyboogy24) reported 4 minutes ago

  @KyuniesBoyMikey The entire fandom knows this will be a big problem 🫣. That company must really hate us because they always throw us into a battlefield I'm so tired of fighting with hater 🥹

• 
  Grim (@GrimBF6) reported 6 minutes ago

  @FlacoG_2023 @Millitings @BattlefieldComm All he said was there’s nothing mentioned about netcode, when there is. Netcode is frustrating, and they’ve been working on it for a decade+ of titles. It’ll always be an issue atp.

• 
  ＧＨＯＳＴ (@Adam9110) reported 7 minutes ago

  @BattlefieldComm Start testing these updates, preferably daily... Because what you fixed in update 1.3.1.0, you later broke in 1.3.2.0. The netcode is broken, and it was relatively fine. The footsteps are once again inaudible. Optimization isn't great either.

• 
  Antonio Conte (@conte6478) reported 9 minutes ago

  @DOWResponse @SecWar Pete Hegseth: Cosplaying as a War Hero Pete Hegseth served. Deployments to Iraq and Afghanistan — real enough. But his two Bronze Stars? Awarded for meritorious service. That's military speak for "showed up and did his job." No "V" device. No heroism under fire. No doors kicked down while bullets flew. The White House actually had to delete a video claiming he got the Bronze Star "for valor." Even they couldn't keep a straight face. And yet here's Hegseth — publicly policing other people's medal racks, questioning senators' military credentials, flexing the warrior persona on every available platform. For a guy whose decorations essentially say "good effort," the audacity is breathtaking. Serve your country? Respect. But dressing up participation awards as proof of battlefield glory while playing Pentagon tough guy is a different story. Pete, the costume is showing. #Hegseth

• 
  BillsmafiaMFKA He/Bro/Daddy (@Emanuel56353090) reported 9 minutes ago

  @Battlefield FIX STRIKE POINT AND PUT IT BACK TO HOW IT WAS ********

• 
  Marwan (@6db560c87fec4ea) reported 12 minutes ago

  @CallieSue1109 @Battlefield And that took them many days to fix

• 
  Batu 🇺🇦 (@BatuPhD) reported 14 minutes ago

  @BattlefieldComm @Battlefield Can you fix the spaws. Why always appears looking back or do they appear to you?

• 
  FaresAlAbdalli (@Knight14015) reported 14 minutes ago

  @Battlefield Ok fix middle east servers

• 
  GeezerJx (@GeezerJx) reported 15 minutes ago

  @Battlefield fix your game, i shouldnt have to alt-f4 to get back into a game

• 
  Douglas MechArthur ☭⃠ (@Kicksbuttson) reported 16 minutes ago

  Way too many of your guys are seeing the Tier system of operators and assuming it's a simple good/better/best hierarchy. What it really represents is a distinction between different mission sets, or mission types. Tier One mission sets are high-stakes, and therefore very low margin or error. That's why the soldiers sent on those missions are so highly skilled, and belong to units that have the strictest gatekeeping measures possible. They also have the best logistics imaginable which lends them special insights prior to most of the missions. Those are things you won't have in a civilian defense scenario. Even if you were trained to their level (which you're not) all it's going to do is cause you to outkick your coverage. In a civilian defense scenario where soldiering skills are going to pay off (a scenario that is unlikely but many of us still prepare for) you're goin to find yourself on foot, weighed down, and fighting from a position of near absolute ignorance of the wider battlefield. You're not in Tier One territory. You're not in Tier 3 territory, which is technically not even an actual tier. We just call them conventional or regular forces, and you have less logistics than they do. Taking all your advice from super Delta SEALs just because they have credentials is going to lead to you running around the backwoods with a Geissele 11.5" AR15 with a Hydra mount equipped with an EoTech, quad nods, and a suppressor that looks like an Aztec death whistle. But you're going to get lost and run out of energy before you reach anything remotely resembling a target. Probably fall into a far ambush the moment you think cutting through a field will save you time, realize your rifle isn't optimized for this engagement, and run out of ammo because you only have 3 magazines across your front on a slick carrier. Those of us who've been there before and aren't taking every lead from Tier One types are going to have a 14.5" AR15 with a reliable LPVO and piggybacked red dot, PVS14s our wife bought us on our anniversary, and a ******* compass because we don't trust GPS. We'll get to the objective and lay the ambush that wins the fight because we've done it before and knew that 12 magazines was far more reasonable. We won't mind carrying that weight to the objective because we know the moment the shooting starts the weight is gonna drop quickly, and we still need ammo to get home. Now is your chance to tell me how wrong I am, and how some ex-Delta guy says competitive shooting is king, and tactical shooters are ruining your sport. Because comp shooting is just a sport whenever I'm at the competition with a tactical setup, but it's suddenly top tier tactical skills whenever you're in fantasy land pretending to do what some of us have done in real life.

• 
  NodeAspect (@IdleMindl4qg) reported 18 minutes ago

  @Battlefield Horrible game! Broken and unbalanced