Battlefield 6 Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Battlefield 6 Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Jerry Razor Travone™️ (@JerryTravone) reported 46 seconds ago

  @hrplays7 Battlefield has major audio problems. A tank should make a ton of noise and the screen should shake not fly down the road at 50 mph and pull up behind you with no audio . That right there is why I quit battlefield.

• 
  Ziegengrimm (@LowlightCafe) reported 1 minute ago

  @JezCorden @MckKirk My big issue is: I have to buy a new GPU for every GTA but I still cannot blow up a single house and maybe not even drive through a wall. I like the Finals in that regard and Battlefield.

• 
  Mohamed Ibrahim (@m_ibrahim_21) reported 4 minutes ago

  I have been broken and defeated. The world has finally won its long and arduous battle over my soul. There is nothing to be done now but walk the bloody battlefield and gaze upon my fallen soldiers... and weep.

• 
  Entry Liquidity (@UnprofHater) reported 4 minutes ago

  @exitliquid1ty There is something uniquely fascinating about a memecoin trader who mocks other people for analyzing their successful trades while simultaneously having lost all of his money. It is the financial equivalent of someone crashing their car into a tree and then laughing at another driver for reading the owner's manual. The post makes fun of traders who hit a five-figure PnL and then write detailed explanations about how they executed the trade. But regardless of whether those threads are insightful or self-congratulatory, there is an obvious distinction: they are examining something that worked. A trader who has blown up his account might actually be one of the people who stands to benefit most from studying why other traders entered, sized, managed, and exited their positions successfully. Losing everything in memecoins doesn't necessarily mean someone is unintelligent or incapable of trading. Memecoins are extraordinarily volatile, and even talented traders can suffer enormous losses. But repeatedly losing money while believing you have nothing to learn from profitable traders is a much bigger problem. Markets have an extremely efficient way of punishing excessive confidence. Perhaps the funniest part is the accusation that someone else is "poor" for celebrating a five-figure win. If your own PnL has gone to zero, wealth-shaming the guy who just made $10,000+ is a questionable battlefield to choose. The scoreboard is doing a lot of work against you. A good trader doesn't have to blindly follow anybody's advice. In fact, they shouldn't. But they should constantly be willing to examine other people's strategies, identify what works, discard what doesn't, and reconsider their own assumptions. If your strategy resulted in losing all your money, refusing to learn from anyone else isn't conviction—it's a very expensive commitment to being wrong. Sometimes the five-figure PnL essay might actually be worth reading.

• 
  EcstasyDesignz (@EcstasyDegen) reported 7 minutes ago

  @Coachie01 I knew someone was going to question Ivar. His intelligence is more strategic than the others. Put them in a battlefield situation rather than a heist or prison, and suddenly Ivar becomes a very serious problem.

• 
  Pepe Silvia (@DevRev0) reported 7 minutes ago

  @WizrdofNazareth @gremloe Because I think wanting to play a body cam video game that’s hyper realistic, looks indistinguishable from modern videos coming out of war torn areas is indicative of some serious disconnect from reality. Just play call of duty or battlefield like a normal person.

• 
  John Lane (@JohnLan70186141) reported 14 minutes ago

  @Mr_Andrew_Fox Battlefield Ecology describes evolving technology and tactics. What works well gets used until changes make it work worse. Even then, old solutions sometimes address contemporary problems.

• 
  Psycho Fella (@Psycho_Fella) reported 17 minutes ago

  THE TANK ERA IN UKRAINE IS OVER. JUST NOT THE WAY COUCH EXPERTS, ADVISORS, AND CONSULTANTS UNDERSTAND IT By Rimas Armaitis, Armed Forces of Ukraine (ZSU) veteran—Lithuanian, sapper, instructor. The New York Times reports that about half of the tank battalion soldiers from Ukraine’s 33rd Mechanized Brigade have already retrained as drone operators. Some recruits are no longer being trained to operate tanks at all. Leopard 2A4s are still maintained, repaired, and used for training, but they are rarely sent on combat missions—mostly during bad weather when drone activity decreases. This does not mean that all tanks will be scrapped tomorrow. It means something much more unpleasant for tank enthusiasts: the tank has lost its status as the primary strike platform. The platform remains, but its role, frequency of use, and cost-to-risk ratio have fundamentally changed. A tank costing millions cannot operate freely on the battlefield because it is under constant surveillance by reconnaissance drones. Once detected, a tank doesn’t even need to be destroyed in a single strike. The first FPV drone might damage a track or optics, the second hits the engine, and the third attacks the crew or the evacuation vehicle. Later, the job is finished off by a heavy bomber drone, artillery, or aerial mining. Even if the tank remains repairable, the combat mission is already ruined, the crew’s lives are at risk, and another expensive machine must be sent to evacuate the vehicle. This is where the economics of war begin—something our couch generals for some reason stubbornly refuse to understand. The key issue isn't whether a tank can theoretically be protected. What matters is how much its protection, logistics, repairs, and trained crew cost compared to how little it costs the enemy to detect, disable, and finish it off. When a chain of drones costing a few hundred or a few thousand euros disables a platform worth millions, we are not facing an emotional debate of "tanks vs. drones," but a catastrophically unfavorable cost-to-result ratio. Of course, some advisor-consultant will now pop up and solemnly declare: "But a drone doesn't hold ground!" Thank you for the breakthrough. An artillery shell doesn't hold ground either. A landmine doesn't control an intersection, and a fighter jet doesn't sit in a trench. Different tools perform different functions. The logic of modern assault is as follows: reconnaissance drones spot positions and movement; FPVs and bomber drones destroy or suppress targets; ground-based robotic systems transport explosives, lay mines, scout, provoke the enemy into revealing firing points, and provide fire support. Only then do the infantry clear, capture, and consolidate the territory—performing what is called "zakrep" on the front lines. Unmanned ground vehicles (UGVs) are already being deployed with machine-gun modules, grenade launchers, shaped charges, and fragmentation charges. They handle logistics, evacuation, engineering, and specific assault tasks. They haven't replaced all light armored vehicles yet, but they are already taking over functions where it is better to lose a machine than to lose a machine along with its driver, crew, and squad. Infantry aren't going anywhere. However, a pure infantry assault without aerial reconnaissance, electronic warfare, drones, combat engineering preparation, and fire support is nowadays more simply referred to as a "meat assault." The neat phrase "an infantryman will still have to clear the trench" does not justify the idiotically wasteful decision to send him into that trench first. The role of artillery is also evolving. It remains essential for mass firepower, suppression, area targets, and operating under conditions where drones are restricted. However, single targets have long been handled by FPVs, heavy bomber drones, and mid-strike drones. Deep-strike systems and cheaper cruise missile analogs operate further behind enemy lines. So, drones haven't "replaced everything." They have taken over a huge share of reconnaissance, spotter adjustment, precision destruction, mining, logistics, and even assault roles. As a result, tanks, armored vehicles, artillery, and aviation are used less frequently, more cautiously, and only when their impact justifies the cost and risk. Another argument from the couch experts: "Just turn on electronic warfare and the drones won't fly." Right, of course. Strange that the Ukrainians themselves haven't thought of pressing the magic "turn off drones" button over more than four years of war. Electronic warfare (EW) is essential, but it is not an invisible dome. We now have frequency hopping, relays, elements of autonomous control, machine vision systems, and fiber-optic-guided FPVs. Every line of defense triggers a countermeasure, and technological cycles at the front line sometimes change within weeks. While our consultant spends six months coordinating the final version of a PowerPoint presentation, his "latest" conclusion is already outdated twice over. We are not anti-tank. We are against using tanks according to the doctrine of yesterday's war. For a tank to make a proper comeback to the battlefield, it needs more than just a metal cage welded onto the roof. It requires a complete protection ecosystem: drone detection, electronic warfare, active and passive defense, interceptor drones, dedicated reconnaissance drones, reduced physical and electromagnetic visibility, and integration into a unified intelligence and fire-control network. The tank of the future will likely be unmanned or optionally manned. Because the issue isn't just armor thickness. The issue is sending human beings, along with the tank, into a zone under constant surveillance and targeted fire. This is what we have been talking about for years now. Except our conclusions weren't drawn from watching YouTube or dragging blue and red rectangles across a screen. They emerged from the trenches of the current war. We have seen how the kill zone is shifting, how drones evolved from an auxiliary tool into a primary means of destruction, and how outdated procedures began costing human lives. Yet in Lithuania, a strange qualification system still prevails: if you were at the front yourself, you are "too emotional." If you fought on Facebook for four years, you qualify as a military expert. If you saw the doctrine fail, you are a radical. If you rewrote it three times in PowerPoint, you are an advisor or consultant. So let me repeat this as simply as possible: Tanks haven't disappeared. What has disappeared is the ability to use them the way it was planned ten or twenty years ago. Aerial and ground robotic systems have already taken over a portion of the roles previously held by light armor, artillery, aviation, and infantry. Anyone who fails to grasp this isn't "defending classic warfare"—they are simply preparing for yesterday's war using tomorrow's budget. And if, after all these arguments, someone still only hears "veterans want to get rid of tanks," it's not an additional explanation they need. They lack the ability to read a text longer than the headline of a tank procurement contract.

• 
  Red Robbo 🇺🇸🇪🇺🇪🇸🇷🇺🇨🇳 #NoLabConDuopoly (@Gl3nny5705) reported 21 minutes ago

  @NoelTurner24715 The problem is not who or what survives in a MAD exchange between Nuclear powers We only have the US, UK and France to fear The use of tactical battlefield nuclear artillery and missile warheads is possible in Ukraine to bring a rapid close A truce would be agreed and the war end

• 
  Giacomo (@sc4recrow619) reported 21 minutes ago

  @Battlefield Someone things that's a good season? Matchmaking broken, balanced weapon broken, netcode broken, when you fix this problema Will be a good season.. all the rest Is only wasted time

• 
  Mark Kaplan (@markkaplan20) reported 21 minutes ago

  This is where the beetroot comes in. Beetroot is one of the richest dietary sources of inorganic nitrate. When you consume it, bacteria on your tongue convert the nitrate to nitrite. The nitrite enters your bloodstream and converts to nitric oxide. This pathway does not need the eNOS enzyme at all. It bypasses the broken system entirely. It restores nitric oxide through a completely separate route. The wall gets its protection back. The stent stays open. The smooth muscle stays calm. The artery heals instead of re-narrowing. 300 patients proved it in a clinical trial. And nobody told you about it. Because nobody can patent a beetroot. There is no $50,000 per year drug to sell. There is no device to implant. There is no billing code. There is no rep walking into your cardiologist’s office with a brochure and a dinner invitation. There is just a vegetable. And a clinical trial. And a result that should have changed the standard of care overnight. 700,000 Americans die of heart disease every year. Trillions spent on drugs, devices, and procedures. And a daily shot costing pennies outperformed the current prevention for the most common complication of the most common cardiac procedure on earth. The wall is the battlefield. Nitric oxide is the shield. Protect the shield and you change the outcome. Nobody is selling this because nobody can patent a beetroot. The truth heals

• 
  War Detective (@seekersomething) reported 24 minutes ago

  @JosephJakeKlein All these were presented in the media as starvation victims in the summer 2025, but every single one had pre-existing conditions: 1. Mohammed Al-Mutawaq: He has cerebral palsy, proven by the medical report signed by Dr Saeed Mohammed Al Nassan on 20th May 2025, also confirmed by NY Times later and by the Anti-Israel site Drop Site News. The death of his father was also used as a framing for this story, claiming that: "Mohammed's father was killed last year when he went to seek food". But footage and reports from that day and location showed that he was most likely killed on the battlefield, as a Hamas soldier. 2. Youssef Matar: Toddler with cerebral palsy. He was initially meant to be used by NY Times as the cover photo, but they agreed to not do it when they found out that he had the pre-existing illness. So NY Times then changed the image to Mohammed, that later turned out to have the very same condition as him. 3. Osama Al-Raqab: He has been in Italy receiving treatment since 12th June 2025. This was confirmed in September 2025 by the hospital in Verona, by the doctor there, where he was treated for leaky SCID. 4. Karam Khaled Al-Jamal: He was 27 years old but on the images he was so skinny that he was presented like a child in the media. On 31 July 2025 he was reported dead by malnutrition. According to the IDF he had a lifelong muscular dystrophy and partial paralysis, confirmed by both Palestinian media and Turkish media: "Karam, who had suffered from muscular atrophy and hemiplegia since childhood". 5. Abdullah Abu Zarqa: Has a genetic disease causing deficiencies, osteoporosis, and bone thinning. 4 months before the outbreak of the war, he traveled with his mother to receive medical treatment in East Jerusalem. 6. Atef Abu Khater: Was severely burned on his foot and hand in a soup kitchen. This led to a form of psychological distress by which he stopped eating and drinking. 7. Mosab al-Debs: He sustained a critical injury that resulted in a portion of his skull being removed and severe brain hemorrhaging, leaving him completely paralyzed. 8. Najwa Hussein Hajjaj: Suffered from a long-term condition that causes vomiting and requires specially prepared food for her to digest properly. 9. Hamza Mishmish: Living with disabilities since birth and was confirmed by Drop Site News to suffer from cerebral palsy. 10. Maryam Dawas: Suspected of having a serious undiagnosed stomach illness, causing diarrhoea, intestinal malabsorption and unspecified severe protein-energy malnutrition. Her mother and her brother can be seen looking healthy in the images from that location. Her illness is proven by the medical file from Al-Rantisi Children’s Hospital. 11. Najwa Hussein Hajjaj: She had esophageal stenosis. This was later confirmed by Drop Site News, in an interview with her mother: "Before the war started, we had taken her to the hospital, and she was diagnosed with esophageal stenosis. Her condition had not yet worsened, and a surgery was scheduled for December 4, 2023". 12. Jana Ayad: This story was first presented as being from 2025, but already in June 2024 she was seen in a hospital showing these conditions and then reported for the same thing still in September 2025. So if the conditions were ongoing during such a long time, is it likely that they came from the lack of food? Well Jana's sister Joury died of kidney problems in July 2025 and her father had left the Gaza Strip for medical treatment before the war.

• 
  Xela the Brotaku (@XelatheBrotaku) reported 25 minutes ago

  @trenthegent21 @usa_specialist @Battlefield My guess would be to fine-tune the mode and deal with any lingering issues that they probably didn't think about or didn't care to address, given that both were initially limited time modes.

• 
  LO NA GO (@otaku_D_sa) reported 29 minutes ago

  Dear PlayStation Team Do you think you’re safe? In the early 90s, Nintendo owned this industry. They were bigger than Sony ever was in gaming, until the first PlayStation arrived and took the market out from under them. And the reason was simple: Nintendo stopped listening… They clung to cartridges while the world moved to discs, they protected their traditions instead of evolving, and the developers walked. Square took Final Fantasy VII to PlayStation, and that single move decided the entire generation. Nintendo’s throne collapsed, and it took them more than a decade to recover and only by leaving your battlefield entirely and building their own. So don’t assume Xbox can’t pull your developers and your future exclusives away from you. Don’t assume a new platform can’t appear and do to you exactly what you did to Nintendo. The only thing protecting you is the loyalty of the players you already have…. and loyalty…. is not permanent. It’s earned every generation. So listen to your players. Listen now, while the problems are still small enough to fix. Every complaint you ignore today is a player you lose tomorrow, and you will not notice they’re gone until it’s too late to bring them back. Companies don’t fall overnight. They fall slowly, while ignoring messages like this one

• 
  Faded Joke (@FadedJoke) reported 30 minutes ago

  @Battlefield Sweet, now fix the bipods. Plenty of obvious locations im the open to mount on that you just cant.