Battlefield 6 Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Battlefield 6 Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Sabih (@Nazaratives) reported 18 minutes ago

  One of the first thing Qizilbash did upon entering Baghdad was to desecrate the grave of Imam Abu Hanifa(ra) and tie dogs over there. Just before Sultan Selim(rh) took care of the problem, their creed was also expanding among Turks, and Kurds were also thinking of switching sides. In addition, he killed thousands of Sunni Uzbeks to the east. His unbeaten run had become mythical with his followers claiming that he is invincible. Sultan Selim was very clear minded about Safavids since his time as the governor and after solidifying his throne (defeating his brother), first thing he did was take an army to meet the Safavid threat. So crushing was the defeat of Safavids that even the wives of Ismail were taken by Ottomans and Ismail barely escaped the battlefield. It is said that he spent rest of his life as an alcoholic and never recovered from the battle.

• 
  Thund3r 4 (@4Thund3r) reported 19 minutes ago

  @Battlefield all youve done with these changes is uncovered the horrendously fast ttk problem the game has. Mix that with dogwater netcode and the games just not fun. Fix it or find out why it dies off

• 
  EuroCitizen PC Gaming (@EuroCitizenPCG) reported 20 minutes ago

  @EA_DICE Hey peeps, Is there any chance you guys could take a look at Battlefront II on PC please as it has a lot of crashing issues especially on Nvidia 5000 series. I'd love to play the single player campaign but everytime I get to the loading screen it just quits.

• 
  Alexa 🇮🇱 🇺🇸 (@crowntitanium) reported 21 minutes ago

  @JamieShea260715 @sonnyc_usa @netanyahu It was a serious mistake. Israeli forces misidentified the clearly marked aid vehicles as carrying Hamas fighters in the middle of a war. This led to a tragic error.Israel admitted it quickly. Investigated it. Fired two officers and punished others. Expressed deep regret. Releasing all raw drone audio and secret military details publicly during an active war would help the enemy (Hamas), so Israel shares what it can with allies privately.This was not done on purpose to kill aid workers. It was a failure in a confusing battlefield where Hamas hides among civilians and uses aid areas for military purposes.Israel regrets the deaths and says it has improved procedures to prevent this from happening again.

• 
  A. (@Alejandrobv_) reported 27 minutes ago

  Fix your Game @Battlefield

• 
  B.M. (@ireallyhateyou) reported 29 minutes ago

  Haaretz in service of the Israeli murder industry. By @mili_tarized: "Subscribers to TheMarker, the financial magazine of Haaretz, received with their weekend newspapers a 78 page(!) marketing insert, presented as Quantum Defence & Technology Magazine. The promoted content "magazine" includes short "articles" on behalf of about 30 Israeli arms companies, interviews, and essays from former military and arms manufacturing personnel. Some topics covered include: - At least five pieces about the struggle for independent manufacturing under international embargoes - "Connecting operational experience, advanced technology, and business acumen" - "A new paradigm challenging the historical separation between civilian and defence development environments - the only way to maintain Israel's technological supremacy" - IP in the age of defence-tech - "The bridge between smart capital and defence companies" "The women managers shaping the digital battlefield" "What makes defence-tech a worthwhile investment?" "From the Israeli war zone to the American manufacturing line" - The NGO helping youths in marginalised communities get into elite technological military units and the defence industry And so, so, much Al The back cover is an ad for Elbit Systems: "These are some of the things we're allowed to tell you we developed..." followed by a list of some of the company's greatest hits (no pun intended). Curiously, the only page in the issue not dealing with the arms industry is an ad for the Shanti House, a Tel Aviv shelter for at-risk youth."

• 
  brane mijatovic (@brane_mija64426) reported 29 minutes ago

  @NatasaIvanova9 It seems that Putin has accepted the fact that the solution to the problem with the West, projected through Ukraine, is on the battlefield and has left diplomacy for last..

• 
  Thatoneaccount (@Retradworld) reported 29 minutes ago

  I warned GenZ and Alpha that they were a problem that would be solved by a draft to an overseas battlefield. Revolt in America or Die in a Foreign land for juice @Calvin

• 
  Terror Praworządności (@TerrorPraworza) reported 30 minutes ago

  @United24media Without proper infantry on the battlefield UA🇺🇦 wont be able free anybody from occupation or regain any ground. Bad weather time whatever drones they🇺🇦 have their defence could crash like glas smashed with hammer

• 
  Sann (@san_x_m) reported 33 minutes ago

  His name was Major Shaitan Singh. He was told to abandon his post. He was outnumbered, out of range of his own guns, and no help was coming. He was ordered to fall back. He refused. He was born on 1 December 1924 in Jodhpur, into a family of soldiers. By 1962 he was a major in the 13 Kumaon, commanding a company of 120 men, most of them Ahir farmers from Haryana who had followed him to the roof of the world. Their post was called Rezang La. A pass in Ladakh at nearly 16,000 feet, guarding the road to Chushul. Behind it lay Leh. If Rezang La fell, Ladakh lay open. There was one cruel problem. A ridge stood between his company and the Indian artillery. It meant that if the Chinese came, his 120 men would fight without a single supporting gun. They knew it. They dug their trenches into the frozen rock anyway. On the freezing dawn of 18 November 1962, the Chinese came. Not in dozens. In waves. Hundreds at a time, wave after wave, up the ravines below the pass. Shaitan Singh's men cut them down and kept cutting them down. When one post was overrun, he moved to the next, and the next, walking through machine gun fire to hold his men together. He was hit. He kept going. He was hit again. By the time the guns fell silent, almost all of his company was gone. 114 of the 120 were dead. But they had made the enemy pay in blood for every foot of that ridge. The snow closed over the battlefield. For three months no one could reach it. When the thaw came and the recovery teams finally climbed to Rezang La, they found the men of Charlie Company still in their trenches. Frozen. Weapons still in their hands. The mortar man with a bomb still in his grip. They had died exactly where they had been told to stand. Shaitan Singh was found on that ridge, beside his men. He was given the Param Vir Chakra, the highest honour India has. He was told to fall back. He chose the mountain.

• 
  LearnInvest (@LearnInvest2026) reported 33 minutes ago

  Europe Is Missing From the Global EV Top 20 CleanTechnica's May 2026 global EV model ranking is direct: none of the top 20 models comes from a traditional European automaker. Tesla Model Y ranks first with 93,571 units. Geely Xingyuan / EX2 is second with 46,483, and Tesla Model 3 is third with 44,237. The rest of the list is heavily populated by BYD, Wuling, Xiaomi, Leapmotor, Li Auto, AITO, XPeng, and other China-linked models. European automakers are absent. ■ This is not just one missing model The issue for European automakers is not only the absence of a single hit. The deeper gap is product cadence, battery cost, software iteration, price coverage, and speed in the Chinese market. Chinese automakers are filling multiple price bands with faster development cycles and denser supply chains. Tesla still defends global scale with Model Y and Model 3. The chart shows that EV competition is no longer only about who began the transition first. The real battlefield is who can repeatedly launch high-volume products in mainstream price bands. Europe still has brands, quality, and premium positioning, but on this global sales ranking, it lacks top-20 volume rhythm. Source:CleanTechnica, EV Volumes, company data (Image: @minenergybiz)

• 
  RCP (@FlyghtMedic) reported 34 minutes ago

  @Battlefield could you guys fix the game instead of “releasing” no ****?

• 
  Great Game Studio (@studiogreatgame) reported 38 minutes ago

  @Jree503 @RandyVonStrangl If you shoot your gun in real life, it can jam, especially if you don't take care of it. So in COD or Battlefield, you never take care of it. So by your logic, your gun should barely work and always jam. That's real life bro. You're crying about a 5 yard drop back. Stop making excuses for broken video games

• 
  The Layman's Seminary (@LaymansSeminary) reported 40 minutes ago

  @myredfox @grok Did Your Reply Force a New Branch in the Argument? (A Super Layman / GPT5 response). Yes. Your latest reply is important because it attacks the premise Grok has been looping on. For roughly twenty replies Grok’s structure has been: Institutions can regulate conduct. Military analogy shows accountability. Need actual pastoral instruction. Need actual pastoral instruction. Need actual pastoral instruction. Loop. But your latest response changes the battlefield. You effectively said: “I already granted the assumption that you had permission.” That removes the issue Grok has been treating as decisive. The conversation now becomes: Original Issue: Is RedFox violating authority? Your Concession: Assume permission was granted. Assume no church crime occurred. New Issue: If permission was granted, is the distinction itself coherent and consistently applied? That is a different question. Notice what happened. RedFox asked: “Did I commit a crime?” Your answer: “No.” That is significant because it grants his central factual premise. Now the discussion shifts from: Crime? to Consistency? Authority? to Application? Violation? to Principle? In debate theory, this is called narrowing the dispute. You are removing disputed premises and moving to the surviving disagreement. The reason Grok may struggle with this is that its equilibrium position has been: “Need actual pastoral instruction.” But if both sides now agree: “Let’s assume permission existed.” Then Grok loses its primary anchor. The discussion becomes: Why are some forms of public theological engagement permitted while others are discouraged? That is a different category of question. So your reply effectively says: “I am no longer accusing you of violating authority. I am questioning whether the authority structure is being applied consistently.” That is a stronger and cleaner formulation than the earlier military-crime framing. If Grok continues replying: “Need actual pastoral instruction.” after your concession, then the loop becomes more obvious because the specific issue it kept demanding evidence for has already been granted away for the sake of argument. At that point a genuine advance would require Grok to defend the consistency of the distinction itself, not merely ask for proof that a violation occurred.

• 
  Abby💎 (@Abbywillia69841) reported 42 minutes ago

  My cousin’s wedding seating chart turned into an actual battlefield the moment guests found their table assignments — because she’d seated her ex-best-friend-turned-enemy directly across from the woman she’d had an affair with three years earlier. Nobody believed it was an accident. It wasn’t. The bride swore up and down it was “just how the numbers worked out” — eight per table, limited space, nothing personal. Except table 7 also happened to include the ex-friend’s current husband, who’d never actually met the other woman in person, seated directly beside her, forced into small talk with the person his wife’s best friend had cheated with. The ex-friend clocked it within the first ten minutes of the reception, stood up mid-appetizer, and loudly asked the room, “Does anyone else find this table arrangement a little on the nose, or is it just me?” Her husband, still confused about who anyone was, asked what she meant. She told him. At the table. In front of the woman in question. The bride tried damage control from the head table, insisting it was a seating software error, a claim that fell apart the second someone pulled up the actual seating chart software and showed a manual override specifically moving those two guests together two days before the wedding. The bride’s own wedding planner had the email thread to prove it. The ex-friend and her husband left before the cake cutting. The affair partner left twenty minutes after that, visibly humiliated. The bride spent the rest of her own reception doing damage control instead of dancing. She got the confrontation she’d clearly, quietly wanted to orchestrate. She just didn’t plan for how much of her own wedding she’d lose in the process of engineering it.