Battlefield 6 Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Battlefield 6 Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Maris (@Nazumejud) reported 33 seconds ago

  The blizzard had buried the driveway beneath thick drifts, yet it could not hide the sight of Emma lying beside the porch steps, clutching Noah beneath her coat to keep him alive. One look at her frostbitten hands and exhausted eyes hurt more than every battlefield I had survived during the past eighteen months. For one horrifying moment, I feared I was already too late. I dropped my duffel bag and sprinted through the snow. “Emma!” Her eyes opened weakly. “Ethan?” She said my name as though she believed I was a dream. Noah’s faint cries barely rose above the howling wind. Emma had wrapped him in layers of her clothing, leaving her own arms and feet exposed to the cold. I tore off my military coat, wrapped it around them both, and lifted them into my arms. “How long have you been out here?” Emma tried to answer, but her teeth were chattering too violently. I reached the front door and twisted the handle. Locked. I pounded once. No one answered. Through the living-room window, I saw the glow of the fireplace. Shadows moved inside. Someone laughed. My family was warm while my wife and infant son were freezing to death outside. I stepped back and kicked the door beside the lock. The frame cracked. A second kick sent the door flying inward. Warmth spilled over us. So did the smell of roasted meat, expensive bourbon, and burning cedar. My father, Richard Cole, sat beside the fireplace holding a glass from the bottle I had saved for my homecoming. My mother, Diane, wore Emma’s favorite cream cashmere robe as though it belonged to her. My younger brother, Kyle, stretched across my couch with muddy boots resting on the coffee table Emma and I had chosen together. All three stared at me. My mother’s face lost its color. “Ethan?” she blurted. “We weren’t expecting you until Friday.” My return date had changed after a transport aircraft opened an earlier seat. I had kept it secret because I wanted to surprise Emma. Instead, I had surprised the people destroying her life. I carried my wife and child across the room. My father rose from his chair. “Put her back outside.” I stopped. “What did you say?” “She attacked your mother,” he replied. “She became hysterical when we explained the situation.” Emma buried her face against my shoulder. “They changed every lock,” she whispered. “They took my phone, my wallet, everything. They said the house belonged to them.” Kyle gave a careless shrug. “Legally, it does.” He nodded toward the wall above the fireplace. A framed property deed hung where Emma and I had once displayed our wedding portrait. My father’s name appeared beneath the description of my property. On the dining table sat mortgage documents, bank statements, legal notices, and a thick folder marked CUSTODY PETITION. My mother crossed her arms. “Emma became unstable while you were deployed. We had to protect your assets and your son.” “You left them outside in a blizzard.” “She refused to cooperate,” my father said. No anger showed in his face. That frightened me more than shouting would have. I had seen men justify terrible actions with the same calm expression. They did not think of themselves as cruel. They believed they had the right to decide who deserved safety. I carried Emma upstairs. My mother followed. “You cannot take the baby,” she said. “Our attorney advised us to keep Noah away from her.” I turned so quickly that she stepped backward. “Come near my son again, and the police will be the least of your problems.”….

• 
  The Ancient One (@TheOnesAncient) reported 3 minutes ago

  The problem with the Corp system is that if the Crop’s themselves don’t have enough troops they can’t fight by themselves or turn areas of the battlefield. So at minimum you need three devisions of four brigades

• 
  Jared (@The_Scrinn) reported 3 minutes ago

  @Battlefield fix your ******* rockets for **** sake

• 
  Mark Farris DDS (@MarkFarrisDDS) reported 4 minutes ago

  Key Passage: Ephesians 4:30 — "And grieve not the holy Spirit of God, whereby ye are sealed unto the day of redemption.” Christian teaching commonly crashes into one of two ditches when dealing with sin in the believer's life. In the first ditch, every serious failure supposedly drives the Holy Ghost out, cancels salvation, reverses regeneration, breaks the seal, removes the believer from Christ's body, and forces God to begin the entire operation again after the backslider sufficiently proves his sincerity. In the other ditch, eternal security is twisted into an excuse for carnality, as though the blood of Christ were divine permission to live like the devil while carrying a certificate to heaven in the glove compartment. The first error turns salvation into a revolving door; the second turns grace into a pigpen. The King James Bible rejects both. The Holy Ghost seals the believer unto the day of redemption, yet that same believer is commanded not to grieve Him. The Spirit's permanent indwelling does not mean He approves everything done by the body He inhabits. He is the Holy Ghost. His holiness opposes bitterness, lust, pride, deception, greed, wrath, doctrinal corruption, and every other product of Adam's fallen factory. The believer can grieve the Spirit personally, quench His operation, resist His direction, refuse His word, walk after the flesh, and waste opportunities for service. None of those acts makes the Spirit nervously pack His belongings and move back to heaven. They do, however, produce serious consequences: broken fellowship, diminished spiritual power, chastening, a damaged testimony, barren service, and loss before the Judgment Seat of Christ. Security does not make rebellion harmless. It makes rebellion more shameful because it occurs inside property God purchased with blood. The Christian life therefore involves war. Galatians 5:17 says, "the flesh lusteth against the Spirit, and the Spirit against the flesh: and these are contrary the one to the other." Salvation does not convert the flesh into spirit or persuade Adam's nature to cooperate with Christ. God creates a new man, places His Spirit within the believer, and commands the Christian to walk under the Spirit's control. The old nature remains present, hostile, deceptive, and eager for the steering wheel. The Christian does not need another birth every time the flesh wins a battle; he needs to reckon the old man dead, confess the sin, yield to the Spirit, and resume the fight. The war is real, but the Spirit did not enter the battlefield planning to surrender. -Paul Tackett Believing loyalty in Jesus, each day, is the way. It is known.

• 
  Farlans (@farlansangel) reported 6 minutes ago

  @IMJasonRhode fix the bugged sound. especially warzone. footsteps are just not there. sound effects way to loud even with turning down. it feels like i have wartapes from battlefield on. maybe this is battlecod?

• 
  No Reason #UmaSafety (@No_Rizun) reported 6 minutes ago

  [Just then Nori spotted Greed, battered and injured. Yet even then she was trying to repair the broken infrastructure. Nori, reverting back to her uma form, landed behind Greed as she held Rice in her arms.] You there! What has brought you to this battlefield?

• 
  Ivan7G (@Ivander777) reported 7 minutes ago

  @hrplays7 Both. But I've actually been playing Battlefield 6 more lately. That's because in COD there are things like time to kill, and if your TV/monitor has more response lag than others, you lose gunfights that were previously impossible. First frame rate (FPS) is very important in COD so you can keep up with the good players even if you are one of them. Before, I could do nukes and MOAB with my phone's internet, but nowadays, even aiming first, I lose certain gunfights that shouldn't be possible with an ethernet connection on the PS5 or PC. A lot is happening these days.

• 
  Psycho Fella (@Psycho_Fella) reported 9 minutes ago

  THE TANK ERA IN UKRAINE IS OVER. JUST NOT THE WAY COUCH EXPERTS, ADVISORS, AND CONSULTANTS UNDERSTAND IT By Rimas Armaitis, Armed Forces of Ukraine (ZSU) veteran—Lithuanian, sapper, instructor. The New York Times reports that about half of the tank battalion soldiers from Ukraine’s 33rd Mechanized Brigade have already retrained as drone operators. Some recruits are no longer being trained to operate tanks at all. Leopard 2A4s are still maintained, repaired, and used for training, but they are rarely sent on combat missions—mostly during bad weather when drone activity decreases. This does not mean that all tanks will be scrapped tomorrow. It means something much more unpleasant for tank enthusiasts: the tank has lost its status as the primary strike platform. The platform remains, but its role, frequency of use, and cost-to-risk ratio have fundamentally changed. A tank costing millions cannot operate freely on the battlefield because it is under constant surveillance by reconnaissance drones. Once detected, a tank doesn’t even need to be destroyed in a single strike. The first FPV drone might damage a track or optics, the second hits the engine, and the third attacks the crew or the evacuation vehicle. Later, the job is finished off by a heavy bomber drone, artillery, or aerial mining. Even if the tank remains repairable, the combat mission is already ruined, the crew’s lives are at risk, and another expensive machine must be sent to evacuate the vehicle. This is where the economics of war begin—something our couch generals for some reason stubbornly refuse to understand. The key issue isn't whether a tank can theoretically be protected. What matters is how much its protection, logistics, repairs, and trained crew cost compared to how little it costs the enemy to detect, disable, and finish it off. When a chain of drones costing a few hundred or a few thousand euros disables a platform worth millions, we are not facing an emotional debate of "tanks vs. drones," but a catastrophically unfavorable cost-to-result ratio. Of course, some advisor-consultant will now pop up and solemnly declare: "But a drone doesn't hold ground!" Thank you for the breakthrough. An artillery shell doesn't hold ground either. A landmine doesn't control an intersection, and a fighter jet doesn't sit in a trench. Different tools perform different functions. The logic of modern assault is as follows: reconnaissance drones spot positions and movement; FPVs and bomber drones destroy or suppress targets; ground-based robotic systems transport explosives, lay mines, scout, provoke the enemy into revealing firing points, and provide fire support. Only then do the infantry clear, capture, and consolidate the territory—performing what is called "zakrep" on the front lines. Unmanned ground vehicles (UGVs) are already being deployed with machine-gun modules, grenade launchers, shaped charges, and fragmentation charges. They handle logistics, evacuation, engineering, and specific assault tasks. They haven't replaced all light armored vehicles yet, but they are already taking over functions where it is better to lose a machine than to lose a machine along with its driver, crew, and squad. Infantry aren't going anywhere. However, a pure infantry assault without aerial reconnaissance, electronic warfare, drones, combat engineering preparation, and fire support is nowadays more simply referred to as a "meat assault." The neat phrase "an infantryman will still have to clear the trench" does not justify the idiotically wasteful decision to send him into that trench first. The role of artillery is also evolving. It remains essential for mass firepower, suppression, area targets, and operating under conditions where drones are restricted. However, single targets have long been handled by FPVs, heavy bomber drones, and mid-strike drones. Deep-strike systems and cheaper cruise missile analogs operate further behind enemy lines. So, drones haven't "replaced everything." They have taken over a huge share of reconnaissance, spotter adjustment, precision destruction, mining, logistics, and even assault roles. As a result, tanks, armored vehicles, artillery, and aviation are used less frequently, more cautiously, and only when their impact justifies the cost and risk. Another argument from the couch experts: "Just turn on electronic warfare and the drones won't fly." Right, of course. Strange that the Ukrainians themselves haven't thought of pressing the magic "turn off drones" button over more than four years of war. Electronic warfare (EW) is essential, but it is not an invisible dome. We now have frequency hopping, relays, elements of autonomous control, machine vision systems, and fiber-optic-guided FPVs. Every line of defense triggers a countermeasure, and technological cycles at the front line sometimes change within weeks. While our consultant spends six months coordinating the final version of a PowerPoint presentation, his "latest" conclusion is already outdated twice over. We are not anti-tank. We are against using tanks according to the doctrine of yesterday's war. For a tank to make a proper comeback to the battlefield, it needs more than just a metal cage welded onto the roof. It requires a complete protection ecosystem: drone detection, electronic warfare, active and passive defense, interceptor drones, dedicated reconnaissance drones, reduced physical and electromagnetic visibility, and integration into a unified intelligence and fire-control network. The tank of the future will likely be unmanned or optionally manned. Because the issue isn't just armor thickness. The issue is sending human beings, along with the tank, into a zone under constant surveillance and targeted fire. This is what we have been talking about for years now. Except our conclusions weren't drawn from watching YouTube or dragging blue and red rectangles across a screen. They emerged from the trenches of the current war. We have seen how the kill zone is shifting, how drones evolved from an auxiliary tool into a primary means of destruction, and how outdated procedures began costing human lives. Yet in Lithuania, a strange qualification system still prevails: if you were at the front yourself, you are "too emotional." If you fought on Facebook for four years, you qualify as a military expert. If you saw the doctrine fail, you are a radical. If you rewrote it three times in PowerPoint, you are an advisor or consultant. So let me repeat this as simply as possible: Tanks haven't disappeared. What has disappeared is the ability to use them the way it was planned ten or twenty years ago. Aerial and ground robotic systems have already taken over a portion of the roles previously held by light armor, artillery, aviation, and infantry. Anyone who fails to grasp this isn't "defending classic warfare"—they are simply preparing for yesterday's war using tomorrow's budget. And if, after all these arguments, someone still only hears "veterans want to get rid of tanks," it's not an additional explanation they need. They lack the ability to read a text longer than the headline of a tank procurement contract.

• 
  NATO Allied Joint Force Command Brunssum - JFCBS (@NATOJFCBS) reported 10 minutes ago

  Drones are the challenge of the present. Two recent stories say it all: 🇸🇰In Slovakia, three people were arrested over an alleged plot to set fire to a drone manufacturing facility. 🇵🇱 In Warsaw, the city is investing around PLN 1 million in a system to detect and identify drones over sensitive areas. One story is about protecting our drones. The other about protecting ourselves from them. Drones are no longer just a battlefield issue. @Poland_MOD @Slovakia_NATO #WeAreNATO

• 
  Aaron Golding ✝️ (@aaronGolding9) reported 16 minutes ago

  @32Cassell Let's have what you melt? All the white British lads that currently have no job, because we imported 4 million indians, will be sent to die, in the trenches of Ukraine. All to try and cover the EU debt crisis, and UK pension liabilities problem. They need 500 million dead to solve the issue. ***** like you cheer it on. You would not last 5 minutes in today's battlefield.

• 
  Tye Jak (Eternal Heel Arc) 🖤🐅 (@TyeJakTV) reported 19 minutes ago

  @K4kirigaya @Battlefield Main issue with bullet drop for snipers is that their velocity is surprisingly low for the game, which makes the drop feel more impactful. Longer to get to distance makes drop more apparent. The longest range sniper somehow has less Velocity than the mini Scout.

• 
  Gareth (@Gazreyn) reported 24 minutes ago

  @h3artbreakh0t3l @Brammflakes Had zero issues playing 180 ping. Much much better experience than Battlefield 6 at the same ping

• 
  War Detective (@seekersomething) reported 27 minutes ago

  @JosephJakeKlein All these were presented in the media as starvation victims in the summer 2025, but every single one had pre-existing conditions: 1. Mohammed Al-Mutawaq: He has cerebral palsy, proven by the medical report signed by Dr Saeed Mohammed Al Nassan on 20th May 2025, also confirmed by NY Times later and by the Anti-Israel site Drop Site News. The death of his father was also used as a framing for this story, claiming that: "Mohammed's father was killed last year when he went to seek food". But footage and reports from that day and location showed that he was most likely killed on the battlefield, as a Hamas soldier. 2. Youssef Matar: Toddler with cerebral palsy. He was initially meant to be used by NY Times as the cover photo, but they agreed to not do it when they found out that he had the pre-existing illness. So NY Times then changed the image to Mohammed, that later turned out to have the very same condition as him. 3. Osama Al-Raqab: He has been in Italy receiving treatment since 12th June 2025. This was confirmed in September 2025 by the hospital in Verona, by the doctor there, where he was treated for leaky SCID. 4. Karam Khaled Al-Jamal: He was 27 years old but on the images he was so skinny that he was presented like a child in the media. On 31 July 2025 he was reported dead by malnutrition. According to the IDF he had a lifelong muscular dystrophy and partial paralysis, confirmed by both Palestinian media and Turkish media: "Karam, who had suffered from muscular atrophy and hemiplegia since childhood". 5. Abdullah Abu Zarqa: Has a genetic disease causing deficiencies, osteoporosis, and bone thinning. 4 months before the outbreak of the war, he traveled with his mother to receive medical treatment in East Jerusalem. 6. Atef Abu Khater: Was severely burned on his foot and hand in a soup kitchen. This led to a form of psychological distress by which he stopped eating and drinking. 7. Mosab al-Debs: He sustained a critical injury that resulted in a portion of his skull being removed and severe brain hemorrhaging, leaving him completely paralyzed. 8. Najwa Hussein Hajjaj: Suffered from a long-term condition that causes vomiting and requires specially prepared food for her to digest properly. 9. Hamza Mishmish: Living with disabilities since birth and was confirmed by Drop Site News to suffer from cerebral palsy. 10. Maryam Dawas: Suspected of having a serious undiagnosed stomach illness, causing diarrhoea, intestinal malabsorption and unspecified severe protein-energy malnutrition. Her mother and her brother can be seen looking healthy in the images from that location. Her illness is proven by the medical file from Al-Rantisi Children’s Hospital. 11. Najwa Hussein Hajjaj: She had esophageal stenosis. This was later confirmed by Drop Site News, in an interview with her mother: "Before the war started, we had taken her to the hospital, and she was diagnosed with esophageal stenosis. Her condition had not yet worsened, and a surgery was scheduled for December 4, 2023". 12. Jana Ayad: This story was first presented as being from 2025, but already in June 2024 she was seen in a hospital showing these conditions and then reported for the same thing still in September 2025. So if the conditions were ongoing during such a long time, is it likely that they came from the lack of food? Well Jana's sister Joury died of kidney problems in July 2025 and her father had left the Gaza Strip for medical treatment before the war.

• 
  Norseman (@CollinBotner) reported 27 minutes ago

  @HaywoodChablomy @Springfield_Inc Show some respect! They prolly have experience, likey more than a keyboard warrior, COD/Battlefield operator, and or hipster with rolled up jeans, talking **** on X! lol I’m 55, I Do take my vitamins, and I Can shoot the hair off a frogs *** at 50 yards! Problem ********!?!??

• 
  Mark Kaplan (@markkaplan20) reported 27 minutes ago

  This is where the beetroot comes in. Beetroot is one of the richest dietary sources of inorganic nitrate. When you consume it, bacteria on your tongue convert the nitrate to nitrite. The nitrite enters your bloodstream and converts to nitric oxide. This pathway does not need the eNOS enzyme at all. It bypasses the broken system entirely. It restores nitric oxide through a completely separate route. The wall gets its protection back. The stent stays open. The smooth muscle stays calm. The artery heals instead of re-narrowing. 300 patients proved it in a clinical trial. And nobody told you about it. Because nobody can patent a beetroot. There is no $50,000 per year drug to sell. There is no device to implant. There is no billing code. There is no rep walking into your cardiologist’s office with a brochure and a dinner invitation. There is just a vegetable. And a clinical trial. And a result that should have changed the standard of care overnight. 700,000 Americans die of heart disease every year. Trillions spent on drugs, devices, and procedures. And a daily shot costing pennies outperformed the current prevention for the most common complication of the most common cardiac procedure on earth. The wall is the battlefield. Nitric oxide is the shield. Protect the shield and you change the outcome. Nobody is selling this because nobody can patent a beetroot. The truth heals