Battlefield 6 Outage Map
The map below depicts the most recent cities worldwide where Battlefield 6 users have reported problems and outages. If you are having an issue with Battlefield 6, make sure to submit a report below
The heatmap above shows where the most recent user-submitted and social media reports are geographically clustered. The density of these reports is depicted by the color scale as shown below.
Battlefield 6 users affected:
Battlefield 6 is a 2025 first-person shooter game developed by Battlefield Studios and published by Electronic Arts. Serving as the eighteenth installment in the Battlefield series, the game was released for PlayStation 5, Windows, and Xbox Series X/S on October 10, 2025.
Most Affected Locations
Outage reports and issues in the past 15 days originated from:
| Location | Reports |
|---|---|
| Montpellier, Occitanie | 3 |
| Comuna 1, CABA | 2 |
| Naaldwijk, zh | 1 |
| Talant, Bourgogne-Franche-Comté | 1 |
| Viroflay, Île-de-France | 1 |
| Marseille, Provence-Alpes-Côte d'Azur | 8 |
| Brest, Brittany | 2 |
| Le Luc, Provence-Alpes-Côte d'Azur | 1 |
| Hannut, Wallonia | 1 |
| Laval, QC | 1 |
| Saint-Herblain, Pays de la Loire | 1 |
| Paris, Île-de-France | 28 |
| Pontoise, Île-de-France | 1 |
| Hillsboro, OH | 1 |
| Chicago, IL | 1 |
| Hinesville, GA | 1 |
| Pau, Nouvelle-Aquitaine | 1 |
| Sarreguemines, ACAL | 2 |
| Bern, BE | 1 |
| Lyon, Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes | 6 |
| Madrid, Madrid | 2 |
| Le Nouvion-en-Thiérache, Hauts-de-France | 1 |
| Toulouse, Occitanie | 2 |
| Nice, Provence-Alpes-Côte d'Azur | 2 |
| Bouranton, ACAL | 1 |
| Gijón, Asturias | 1 |
| Douai, Hauts-de-France | 1 |
| Nantes, Pays de la Loire | 3 |
| Vesoul, Bourgogne-Franche-Comté | 1 |
| Villefranche-sur-Saône, Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes | 3 |
Community Discussion
Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.
Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.
Battlefield 6 Issues Reports
Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:
-
Mission Prepper (@DirtyWhiteBoyz_) reportedSo true. The "right" has a problem with courage. It types.....A LOT. But is never seen on the battlefield. It demands the enemy be defeated, but refuses to take part in the fight. Its unsustainable. If we cant conjure up a few million Jake Langs, we're fcked.
-
N0M4D The Medic (@N0M4DV0NGR3Y) reportedDice, EA, and Battlefield 6 developers might wanna start listening to their communities before someone gets the bright idea to break their servers down and force them to recycle them. That or a data breach could happen. Not saying I would, just saying there are a lot of fanboys who will revolt if it gets worse.
-
RallyCarDelta Gaming (@GameOverThirty) reported@axl99 Reading between the lines on Battlefield, I get the impression that money was no object. They hired anyone and everyone to get it over the line since the company needed it to be better than their previous couple of games (and EA had something of a drought when it came to live service hits). It hit, but they quickly realized the players sticking around after 3-4 months were more interested in traditional Battlefield, thus they cut down the team to primarily support that vision. That's my take, anyway.
-
Swaguley (@swaguley) reported@TheInfamousEG @Eclipse_Ilx I never played BF2, I was 8 when it came out. My Battlefield training was on Star Wars Battlefront haha I don't have issues with drop shotting, as long as it's balanced and not spammy. Notice in the second clip how you had to hit the ground before you started firing again? That's just a normal jump peek, which I'm fine with. I am arguing against accurate in-air gunfire. As far as I know, they entirely patched out the ability to fire your gun in mid-air and dolphin diving as well
-
Nik Tennyson (@NikTennyson) reportedBlack ops 2 is dealing with a hacker issue and Black ops 7 is stuck in SBMM hell. If Battlefield 6 is still 50% off when I get paid I might pick it up
-
Doctor Of The Future™ (@g_diets_) reportedYou can have stomach ulcer without testing positive for H. pylori. Yes. You heard me. H. pylori is just one culprit. It is not the only way your stomach can break down. You can burn a hole in your gut with your own habits and not even know it. Here’s what can cause stomach ulcers without H. pylori: — Long-term use of painkillers like ibuprofen or aspirin. — Chronic stress, whether physical or emotional. — Excess stomach acid production. — Bile reflux burning your stomach lining. — Smoking and heavy drinking. — A *****, inflammatory diet full of processed foods and sugar. — Weak immune defense from years of ignoring your body. You don’t always need a bacteria. Sometimes you are the bacteria. You damage yourself little by little until the lining can’t take it anymore. That’s why real ulcer healing is not just about “killing H. pylori.” It is about rebuilding the gut environment. It is about healing the lining. It is about removing what’s causing the injury. If you have a stomach ulcer but tested negative for H. pylori, don’t relax. Don’t think you’re safe. You still need to fix the terrain. Because an ulcer is not just about infection. It’s about the battlefield your stomach has become. Protect your gut. Heal the lining. Respect the body that still wakes you up every morning. Because when the gut goes down, everything else follows. Don't forget to reach out for a well-structured meal plan. Share this post and tag your friends.
-
Mukzilla (@Mukzillla) reported@Battlefield fix the game. Jumping, ducking, sukcing **** and shooting at the same time. Ping with ching chong players is sky rocket. Ma majku vam jebem. Lau off the whole studio @EA_DICE
-
Red slayer (@redslayerknows) reported@BattlefieldComm So no D-sync fixes or netcode, broken animations and audio no tracers from shots,grenade markers disappearing You got new bugs like grenades staying on you when thrown or throwing multiple in one press like 6 when you can throw like only two Glint disappearing,server LAT spikes
-
EricDolphy1848 (@ericdolphy1848) reported"The United States has been fighting Iran for more than five months without achieving the clean victory it expected. It has not broken Iran on the battlefield. It has not won the information war. It has not restored the illusion of effortless American supremacy."
-
GangstalkCarti (@Gangstalkcarti) reported@CameronCorduroy There are fundamental problems with the latest battlefield, it's not about le chud or le woke. Only people who don't play games care about that ****.
-
Ron (@Ronbigguy22) reported@ziegler2u Pete Hegseth received two Bronze Star medals, which were awarded for meritorious service rather than for battlefield valor. And look at the billionaire in his cabinet. Liar!
-
PunishedMichelle (@dissentpod) reported@JundaFPS @EA_DICE They already did. Then they gave it back to us. You can't expect them to fix it twice, can you?
-
Gbuck1968 (@Gbuck1968) reported@m4xim1l1an @Maliparti4 @MelanieLatest Actually, Malcolm isn’t nearly as wrong as you’ve insinuated, and I’m sure you know that. Your post treats contested legal and historical claims as if they were settled black-letter law. They absolutely are not. UN Resolution 181 was a non-binding recommendation. The Jewish Agency accepted it as a minimum workable arrangement. The Arab side rejected it and went to war. Rejection did not confer title on the rejecters, and the recommendation never acquired the force of law. The 1949 armistice lines that followed were explicitly temporary cease-fire demarcations—not borders. Israel’s agreement to stop fighting at those lines did not convert them into its permanent frontier, any more than an armistice turns a battlefield into a deed of title. UNSC 242 does not say what you claim. It calls for withdrawal “from territories occupied,” deliberately omitting the definite article that would have required return to the 1949 lines. The drafting history is clear: language mandating full withdrawal to those lines was rejected. The resolution also affirms every state’s right to live within “secure and recognized boundaries.” That language exists precisely because the 1949 lines were neither secure nor recognized. Accepting 242 is not an admission that the West Bank was foreign sovereign territory; it is acceptance of a framework for negotiating the status of disputed land captured in a defensive war. Oslo is even more straightforward. The accords are interim self-government arrangements that expressly deferred final-status issues—borders, settlements, Jerusalem, and the status of the territories—to later negotiation. Area A/B/C were administrative zones, not a surrender of sovereignty. Treating them as proof the land “was never Israeli” is simply rewriting the text. The territory in question was never under the recognized sovereignty of a Palestinian Arab state. Jordan’s 1950 annexation was recognized by almost no one. Israel’s post-1967 control therefore did not displace a prior legitimate sovereign; it displaced an illegal occupation by a state that had joined the effort to destroy Israel. Continuous Jewish historical connection to Judea and Samaria predates every modern partition plan and is not erased by temporary lines or interim accords. Military administration and selective application of the laws of occupation are pragmatic governing tools under unresolved final status. They are not judicial confessions that the underlying title belongs to someone else. Courts use the instruments available; they do not thereby rewrite history. Temporary cease-fire lines, a carefully worded Security Council resolution, and interim autonomy deals do not extinguish prior claims or create title for the side that refused partition and lost the wars it started. The West Bank remains disputed territory. Presenting that reality as if it were closed, undisputed law does not make it so. Nice try, Max.
-
Angel Osorio (@Macross_Fan_) reported@SirWarfare @Battlefield Yeah, the Map is fine, not perfect but fine. In breakthrough there's literally a fatal funnel spaw point for attackers. My point is, they just conveniently decide to pick the one "stupid" critic to make apostar about the fans (obviously mocking them) while there are real issues.
-
Teezea (@AliasTeez) reported@Battlefield Dice may you please and I mean please fix the matchmaking not bringing everyone in the game