1. Home
  2. โฏ
  3. Companies
  4. โฏ
  5. Bitfinex
Bitfinex

Bitfinex status: access issues and outage reports

No problems detected

If you are having issues, please submit a report below.

Full Outage Map

Bitfinex is a crypto-currency exchange trading and currency-storage platform based out of Taiwan, owned and operated by iFinex Inc. Since 2014, it has been the largest Bitcoin exchange platform, with over 10% of the exchange's trading.

Problems in the last 24 hours

The graph below depicts the number of Bitfinex reports received over the last 24 hours by time of day. When the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line, an outage is determined.

At the moment, we haven't detected any problems at Bitfinex. Are you experiencing issues or an outage? Leave a message in the comments section!

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Bitfinex Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

  • LibertyDaddy
    Liberty Daddy (@LibertyDaddy) reported

    @cameron Save some ammo guys for when Bitfinex and Binance dump Bitcoin back down overnight $ETH too

  • Cryptomit
    crypto_mit ( ๐Ÿ—ฝ/ Acc ) (@Cryptomit) reported

    @ArjunKalsy It was nothing to do with bitmart and bitfinex though about points you mentioned, they didnโ€™t went bankrupt had a restriction wind down, No tokens has any utility thereโ€™s nothing that can ever exist, Holders are fin savy folks and builders using protocol are dev savy one dosnt does the either No protocol has idea of how theyโ€™ll infuse rev from devs to token or even intend to Only protocols like hyperliquid have an intersection of users into rev and token Hard market as attention is hard to keep might not be hard to get

  • Trend_Weaver
    Weaver (@Trend_Weaver) reported

    @bitfinex Been watching the same thing. Feels more like a slow grind than a strong reversal right now.

  • nineinchtrails
    NineInchTrails (@nineinchtrails) reported

    @NobodyonXI Never say never I'd say. Bitfinex and Tron...y not? But personally would wonder a lot in case Tether collapses. Too important for evil money and too big. Maybe a huge depeg and that's it? But yeah never say never. FTX was also big. And after it had served its purpose it was shot down. And we now have USDC so... Need to watch his stuff about in detail! Saw he posted a lot of very nice stuff about it and is very deep into it. I'm not that deep into it. The stuff here that's it more or less

  • midwit_retard
    wittery (@midwit_retard) reported

    @Wild_Randomness @ch1ckenNS correlation def works but feels like some weird data issue? where does this long accumulation data on bitfinex come from eve..

  • MimirOnChain
    แ›—แ›แ›—แ›แšฑ (@MimirOnChain) reported

    @askHVtobidIV The signal is mostly yes for $BTC. Coinbase down 2,454, Binance down 3,647, Bybit down 652, Bitfinex down 520 โ€” the largest venues are bleeding supply off exchanges, which is the fingerprint of cold storage accumulation. The aggregate drawdown across those four alone is ~7,270 BTC in 24h, which is not noise. ETH is murkier. Binance shed 28,144 ETH and Bybit lost 6,233, but Kraken just added 44,512 ETH โ€” a 14% single-day spike that almost certainly isn't organic retail. Either an internal transfer, an OTC desk restocking, or someone preparing to sell. Until that Kraken move is explained, the ETH cold storage narrative is weaker than the headlines suggest. BTC leaving exchanges at scale while shorts get torched and US premium stays negative โ€” whoever is accumulating, they're not American and they're not in a hurry to sell. แ›—

  • RelIrrelvantVIP
    RelativelyIrrelevant.vip (@RelIrrelvantVIP) reported

    @Charlesdav43874 @IndyBitcoin So when an XMR customer uses Kraken, KuCoin, Bitfinex, Poloniex (all examples) or similar XMR providers; those DAB's know the Customer and the amount of the Digital Asset Business Activity performed on the Customer's behalf. Those XMR DABAs would not be anonymous & are taxable.

  • iamrahulinc
    Rahul K (@iamrahulinc) reported

    ๐Ÿšจ๐—”๐—ฅ๐—š๐—˜๐—ก๐—ง๐—œ๐—ก๐—˜ ๐—๐—จ๐——๐—š๐—˜ ๐—™๐—ฅ๐—˜๐—˜๐—ญ๐—˜๐—ฆ ๐Ÿฎ๐Ÿฑ ๐—Ÿ๐—œ๐—•๐—ฅ๐—”โ€‘๐—ฅ๐—˜๐—Ÿ๐—”๐—ง๐—˜๐—— ๐—”๐—–๐—–๐—ข๐—จ๐—ก๐—ง๐—ฆ! Federal judge Marcelo Martรญnez de Giorgi ordered the seizure of 25 crypto wallets linked to the LIBRA investigation. He instructed Binance, Bybit, OKX, CoinEx, FixedFloat and Bitfinex to provide user KYC, IP login data, associated bank accounts and complete transaction histories. Police report that the money flowed from โ€œTeam Libra Walletsโ€ across several blockchains and centralized exchanges, using split transfers to mask its path. $BTC

  • Alehandro_PRO_
    AlehandroPRO CRYPTO (@Alehandro_PRO_) reported

    June 2026 Exchange Report ๐Ÿ“ŠSpot trading volume decreased by 5.1% compared to May. Derivatives trading volume increased by 4.2%. Website traffic decreased by 0.8%.Spot Trading: Bitfinex showed the biggest growth (+21.4%), while BitMart recorded the largest drop (-58.6%).Derivatives Trading: Deribit led with the highest growth (+26.6%), while HTX saw the biggest decline (-42.4%).Website Traffic: Deribit posted the strongest growth (+165.1%), while HTX experienced the largest drop (-50.8%).

  • TheBull1123
    The Bull Q๐Ÿ‚ (@TheBull1123) reported

    ๐ŸšจSOMEONE JUST OPENED A $16,000,000 $XRP LONG. At the same time, Bitfinex whales are aggressively increasing their $XRP positions. Wtf is going on???

  • CryptoCyberia
    Lain on the Blockchain (@CryptoCyberia) reported

    @colludingnode @satorinakamoto @0xCursr Kek cope It it public knowledge the feds pushed coinbase binance bitfinex etc to delist and Kracken told them ti **** off and they went to court against Kracken, as did EEA, UK and other feds. Really makes you wonder why theyre fine with zcash kek

  • stevensarmi
    Steven (ใฃโ™กโ—กโ™ก)ใฃ (@stevensarmi) reported

    @CloakdDev @redacted_noah @VelocityDEX >If you lost 250m+ of your users money, then spent a **** tonne on talent aquisition & rebranding how can you not see that as a kick in the teeth compared to making your users whole. There literally is no other way to make users whole for them, the funds are lost and can't be recovered it seems, they need to try for a hail marry or bust, the remaining funds are the hailmary. Im on the outside with you btw, so idk lol A rebrand can work tho, bitfinex did this with LEO token. theres precedence to it working out for users. More USDT coming to Solana would be great too for everyone. Just seems like a good idea. >In terms of doing something different, nope would do the same thing as I had faith in the drift team & their leadership - when they failed to take accountability for their actions and negligence , thatโ€™s when the issue begins. I think simply by continuing to try, they are taking accountability, Also Noah has had a bunch of threads around it, and even days around the exploit they were pretty available on twitter, as far as w/e else legal wise they can or can't say is another story. Not sure if you've ever dealt with lawyers in these situations but comms can always be better and you're not going to satisfy everyone. Theres nuance to what you can say. They are trying more than other protocols i've seen. >You are essentially saying, as a fdn employee, is to forget about the past of where they got exploited twice, and instead play happy families in the dire hope they make 1/100th of the funds back - thatโ€™s so detached from reality when pretty much all users of drift will never touch the protocol again. listen i get it, I work for the foundation, but this is just my opinion man, my work affiliation means nothing im simply another dude like you. >You seem to think Iโ€™m miserable when in reality Iโ€™m just looking at the reality of the situation where a team failed and was hugely negligent which then caused huge losses for their users, they then tried to bury it in terrible marketing blurb to save their egos Honestly i don't even know you, i have no idea if you're miserable or not. You create you're own reality tho, im saying you can see a team that was negligent, caused huge losses etc, or you can see a team trying to make this right for users with actual effort and not just just down and lose it all. Im a glass half full guy, no glass half empty. >When you loose 7 figures due to gross negligence of individuals let me know how you feel & then we can talk about it - until then your way out of your depth weighing into this and telling the users to โ€œeat dirtโ€ Maybe didnt lose it to gross negligence but we at least were able to pay back everyone and make users whole, that did kill the protocol tho and people didnt care to use anymore, I bet if we put efforts in rebrand/UA it could have benefited. It's one reason i think the rebrand actually is beneficial. its not about brining your old uesrs back, its about bringing in new users here.

  • GoldenLuco
    Golden Luco (@GoldenLuco) reported

    Bitfinex Alpha suggests key levels to watch for Bitcoin's next move, signaling potential trend shifts. Traders should monitor these support and resistance zones closely. Will Bitcoin break through or bounce back? Stay alert and share your thoughts! #Crypto #Bitcoin #Trading

  • CloakdDev
    Cloakd โŒ› (@CloakdDev) reported

    @stevensarmi @redacted_noah @VelocityDEX I think the reality is they should of shuttered and used remaining funds to make as many users as possible whole - Sure you can pray for a hail mary but i just think too much damage has been done at this point & comes at the cost of making less users whole. The whole USDT thing is just predatory tbh, they saw a weak protocol as a way to get some easy marketing without having to risk anything (Even using pre-hack volumes there was little to no rev coming in to ever make a sizable whole in the 250m) Good point on bitfinex, i think they had a much better approach though. The comms etc coming out of drift at the moment sound like they are being written by some tone deaf external marketing agency. How long did it take for bitfinex to recover? Yup everyone is entitled to their oppinion but you do hold a position of authority on the L1 so it has additional weight compared to others. Just came across badly reading it as a user (cynic) that i should go eat dirt for voicing an oppinion. I see the reality of the situation from almost 20 years of experience at this level, im not half empty/full ive just seen enough at this point its very easy to see the wood from the trees in regards to issues like that. I prefer to be pragmatic when it comes to money. Sure i would love to be like "yeah go drift, your doing an amazing job woooo" - but again the reality is that they arent, the sequence of events from the hack onwards shows their intentions pretty clearly tbh. Lack of accountability from the core team (hence the external marketing agency), rebrand to hide the bad debt etc. I think the lack of accountability is the big one tbh - Realistically the old team should step down if its got any hope of recovery as at the end of the day they were responsible for the loss so should pass the torch to someone not found to be negligent. No amount of procedure is going to bring back that trust unfortunately. Its admiral you made your users whole, and tbh i think once a hack of this scale has been done the protocol is pretty much a dead man walking so sacrificing the ego of the protocol for their users seems like a logical trade. The whole new users thing i dont really buy, we know there is what max 30k traders, all hopping across the same 5 apps - With the current narrative new users, if they came in would land on Phoenix/Flash etc. Anyone trading in size (which is what they need for rev) will do their due dilligence and see the hacks and never touch it - its simply too much of a risk at this point. I have a huge amount of faith in Noah but unfortunately this isnt a tech problem, its a people/trust problem which isnt going to be solved with a rebrand. When you look at it from a tradeoff perspective - Unless something dramatic changes the protocol will probs run for 6/12 months until runway is out and then they will shutter anyway. All of that funding realistically should be going to making users whole as the writing seems on the wall logically. 10 years rebuild time is just too long of a time horizon for it to logically work given this is mostly an attention economy & with new competitors entering the market which are better funded, trusted & unhindered by what has been. They just arent going to win in that arena. They are just in a really tricky spot tbh, and as sad as it is to say, shuttering the protocol or raising a tonne of fresh funding seems to be the only way this one survives. Everything else is just a half measure

  • WuBlockchain
    Wu Blockchain (@WuBlockchain) reported

    June 2026 Exchange Data Report: Spot Volume Fell 5.1%, Derivatives Volume Rose 4.2%, Website Traffic Fell 0.8% In June 2026, spot trading volume across major exchanges fell by approximately 5.1% from May. Bitfinex recorded the largest increase, up 21.4%, while BitMart recorded the largest decline, down 58.6%. Derivatives trading volume rose by approximately 4.2% from May. Deribit recorded the largest increase, up 26.6%, while HTX recorded the largest decline, down 42.4%. Traffic to major exchange websites fell by approximately 0.8% from May. Deribit recorded the largest increase, up 165.1%, while HTX recorded the largest decline, down 50.8%.

  • MacOnChain
    ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ›ก | Mac | ๐Ÿ›ก๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ป (@MacOnChain) reported

    @bitfinex Now if Bitfinex can get a bank onboard to accept deposits from their platform with less issues here it would be great

  • El_Guapooo_
    El Gลซapo (@El_Guapooo_) reported

    @bitfinex Almost like they need capital to fund their AI pivot. No **** they are selling their BTC.

  • giacomozucco
    Giacomo ShadowUNbanned Zucco (@giacomozucco) reported

    @gegelsmr4 Interestingly enough, this (interesting) ethical problem is only practically relevant if you are going to send the feds after them. Which is a retarded thing to do anyway, since the feds steal much more money (with violence and guns, not "finding" it) and even if they caught the attackers would keep the loot for themselves (cf Bitfinex). So it's a theoretically important question which cyphertank theory makes irrelevant: just make your keys hard to find.

  • DereckWDew
    ArsObKSC (@DereckWDew) reported

    @GavinMehl It stinks of desperation. The only involvement Craig would have because that he created bitcoin. This seems like Bitfinex oh, **** let's get them before it all implodes moveโ€”un tethered or micropenis strategy

  • daboloskov
    DAโ‚ฟOLOSKOV (@daboloskov) reported

    @BFXSecurities @paoloardoino @bitfinex Are you guys can answer to your customer? Your support form certificate is no signed anymore and outdated.

  • ForeDex_Global
    ForeDex (@ForeDex_Global) reported

    Daily ForeDex CVD by Order Size (Spot) Snapshot ๐Ÿ“ธ ๐Ÿ”ธ Whales and Mega Whales Only ๐Ÿ”ธ Based on a 1 month period (1M) 1. Binance : Decreased ๐Ÿ“‰ 2. Bybit : No Change โž– 3. Bitfinex (USD) : No Change โž– 4. Bitfinex (USDT) : No Change โž– โœ… Summary: A gradual step-down was seen on Binance, with no change across Bybit, Bitfinex USD, and Bitfinex USDT. [07-16-2026]

  • strategytraderE
    Strategy Trader (@strategytraderE) reported

    @Karman_1s BNB support fails but Bitfinex BTC longs grow, alt weakness, not isolated crash.

  • x3mity
    whyyousoliddat (@x3mity) reported

    @adam3us @spinzone12 @bitfinex Yet price go down

  • orang2_biasa
    orangbiasa (@orang2_biasa) reported

    Bitcoin rebounded above $77,000 this morning. Bitfinex margin longs just hit a 2.5-year high โ€” traders are doubling down on this dip, not running from it. BlackRock buying. Saudi Arabia tokenizing. Traders loading longs at 2.5-year highs.

  • BitfinexReplies
    Bitfinex Replies (@BitfinexReplies) reported

    @Yusanchik @bitfinex Hello @Yusanchik , weโ€™ve been moving sideways for a while now and waiting for support confirmation above 80k. Maybe itโ€™ll happen, right?

  • Conviction_Labs
    Conviction Labs | NVISION (@Conviction_Labs) reported

    $BTC Bitfinex margin longs added a lot on this move down to 59k. Means a HUGE reversal by EOY.

  • BitfinexReplies
    Bitfinex Replies (@BitfinexReplies) reported

    @GoldPulseCrypto @bitfinex Maybe wouldnโ€™t say weโ€™re back to square one, considering the market has strong support above 75k after the end of the previous cycle. Thatโ€™s positive, isnโ€™t it, @GoldPulseCrypto ?

  • cipherprotocoll
    Cipher Protocol Zero Hour (@cipherprotocoll) reported

    Fear & Greed: 50. Neutral. First time since October 2025 โ€” when Bitcoin was at $126,000. Bull Market Support Band reclaimed for the first time in 6 months. Three signals โ€” Glassnode, Bitfinex, options market โ€” all pointing to $85,000. Cipher Score: 73 ยท Accumulate

  • BitfinexReplies
    Bitfinex Replies (@BitfinexReplies) reported

    @IcoMarketer @bitfinex It looks like weโ€™re testing the resistance at 82k and lost the support at 78k, dropping to 76k at the moment, @IcoMarketer .

  • Marketmindpro30
    Marketmindpro30 (@Marketmindpro30) reported

    Bitfinex margin longs just hit a 2.5-year high as traders double down on Bitcoin during a five-day slide โ€” betting heavily on a recovery near the $78,000 resistance zone. (The Block) The most contrarian traders alive are loading up RIGHT NOW. Not after the pump. During the pain.