Candy Crush Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Candy Crush Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  PaulituHD (@PaulituHD) reported 1 minute ago

  @MarvelRivals YOUR *** IS BETTER BE WORKING ON FIXING BLACK PANTHER RN. BECAUSE IF I HAVE TO DEAL WITH BLACK PANTHER JUST ABSOLUTELY MOWING OVER MY WHOLE TEAM ALMOST 1 SHOT THEN ID RATHER PLAY CANDY CRUSH WHILE WATCHING MADAME WEB. YES, ITS THAT BAD

• 
  Hamzart ✊🏿🇳🇬 (@Hamzart_B) reported 5 minutes ago

  @The_Chidimma We handle real-life problems and not SUWE or Candy Crush

• 
  Luís Carlos Zardo (@ImpactSuit) reported 9 minutes ago

  @Pirat_Nation The problem is, Candy Crush is the only reference she has...

• 
  Squeegee McGriddles (@OneinaGarillion) reported 10 minutes ago

  @arcanistsaphras @56pearo People have a problem with the direction the entire art is taking and the other person is spot on the money with blaming you for it. Saying "its not that bad" because they throw you crumbs is the saddest form a consumer can take. I wish people like you would stick to Candy Crush

• 
  Anish Moonka (@anishmoonka) reported 11 minutes ago

  The new boss of Xbox took one of its biggest games and put it on PlayStation, the console its arch-rival sells. It sounds like a mistake. Instead, it became the best-selling new game on PlayStation last year and has passed 5 million copies, beating Sony's own new games. That single move tells you what Asha Sharma is really doing. She took over Xbox in February 2026, after Phil Spencer, who had run it for years, retired. At Bloomberg's tech conference this week, an interviewer asked what winning would look like by 2030. Her answer was blunt: the number one gaming and entertainment company in the world. Xbox is not there yet. She even called the business "not in a healthy spot," with sales falling in four of the last six quarters. So she stopped trying to win the old fight. For decades, consoles worked one way: you keep your best games locked to your own machine, so people have to buy it to play them. Sony does this better than anyone, selling close to three PlayStations for every Xbox. Sharma looked at those odds and walked away. Now she sells Xbox's games to the people who already bought a PlayStation, and last year Forza, Doom, Indiana Jones, and a stack of others showed up on Sony's console. A 70 dollar game brings in the same 70 dollars no matter whose machine you play it on. The bigger prize is reach. A few years back, Microsoft paid 75.4 billion dollars for the company behind Call of Duty and Candy Crush, the most expensive deal gaming has ever seen. Candy Crush alone has more than 200 million players a month, most of them on their phones, not on an Xbox. Count every phone, PC, console, and TV, and a Microsoft game now reaches over 500 million people a month. Sony's online network reaches 132 million. Her other moves point the same way. She cut the price of Game Pass, the monthly games subscription that works like Netflix, after admitting last year's price jump had chased people off. Sign-ups started climbing again. She scrapped an Xbox AI assistant because players did not want it and it solved no real problem. And she revealed the next Xbox, a machine built to play both Xbox games and PC games. None of this is a sure thing. The chips Xbox needs keep getting pricier instead of cheaper, because the AI boom is buying them up, and Sony still crushes Xbox on console sales. What Sharma has done is change the scoreboard. She is racing to reach the most players on every device that exists, and by that count, Xbox already sits near the top.

• 
  Listening to Theme of Lu Bu on Repeat (@shonan_naminori) reported 13 minutes ago

  @Sandsdiego @10News Working on that new Candy Crush record

• 
  Ostateman (@Ostateman2) reported 14 minutes ago

  @TheOnlyDSC I'm pretty sure she had money for the many piercings she's sporting, but she has a problem having to pay for her own candy as the taxpayers (you and me) won't be supplimenting your fat arse with our money. A part time job might cover you candy crush, but you'd have to work.

• 
  Paul Kuharsky (@PaulKuharskyNFL) reported 15 minutes ago

  @JaredStillman And no one told me he was sleeping and playing Candy Crush while others were doing their work. May have had issue last, those were not them.

• 
  Mike (@dillpicklemike) reported 17 minutes ago

  @JessicaHamel19 @MeghanEMurphy it’s better to spend 18 hours a day yelling at internet people then playing a game that has puzzles and requires problem solving. They are just jealous they suck at 99% of games besides Candy Crush

• 
  𝘑𝘪𝘮𝘣𝘰 𝘎𝘩𝘰𝘶𝘭𝘴𝘣𝘪𝘦 (@chloroneural) reported 21 minutes ago

  it's like seeing someone you know crash out from **** years ago, and now after intervention, every six weeks they have a new addiction (did you hear about candy crush?) and they just can't quite get it together.

• 
  brian (@brianonhere) reported 25 minutes ago

  Like who are we trying to convince here. Vickie Palladino? Or the average working person who can easily understand that paying some fat idiot triple overtime to play Candy Crush when he's not beating up homeless guys means their kids teacher now has 50 other kids in their class

• 
  Shawn (@BlueCow_Betting) reported 25 minutes ago

  @MrWaDdLeSeY @TJWilkinson @ArcRaiderAlerts You’re delusional, my lobbies have been mostly friendly for weeks and nothing has changed. It’s literally a PVPVE game, and a EXTRACTION shooter.. the folks the come on here and cry because they occasionally get shot at need to go play candy crush and get their dopamine fix there

• 
  tshi art (@ArtTshi) reported 26 minutes ago

  @UmberHouse @Sir_Dammed Yes, *I* make it a quality issue. The whole problem, at its core, is a quality issue. Anyone can eat cheap fast food, that doesn't make everyone a gourmet. Just like anyone can play candy crush and that doesn't make them gamers

• 
  Alex Minecan (@alecsandrull) reported 30 minutes ago

  Meta charges you up to 4x more per impression on Audience Network placements that convert at near-zero And the toggle to turn them off is buried 3 menus deep in ad set settings When you launch a Meta ad it runs on 4 placements by default: Facebook Feed, Instagram Feed, Stories/Reels, and Audience Network. You probably know about the first 3. The 4th is where Meta sends your ad to random apps and websites to fill cheap inventory Audience Network CPMs are cheap. $1-3. That looks good in your dashboard. The problem: conversion rates on Audience Network are near-zero for ecom because the "viewer" is playing a mobile game and your ad is a banner they accidentally tapped trying to close it. The click was accidental. She didn't want your product. She wanted to get back to Candy Crush Your ad dashboard shows a blended CPM across all placements. The $6 CPM you see is actually $14 on Facebook Feed (where people buy) and $2 on Audience Network (where nobody buys). Meta blends them to make the number look good. Your real cost to reach a buyer is $14. You think it's $6 The fix: - go to ad set level - click "Placements" - switch from "Advantage+ Placements" to "Manual Placements" - uncheck "Audience Network" entirely - while you're there uncheck "Messenger" too (same problem, different placement) Your CPM will "increase" on the dashboard because you removed the cheap garbage placements. Your cost per PURCHASE will decrease because every impression now goes to a placement where people actually buy things One operator turned off Audience Network and Messenger. Dashboard CPM went from $8 to $13. Cost per purchase went from $22 to $14. He was paying $22 per customer while Meta showed him an $8 CPM that included thousands of accidental taps from people playing mobile games Meta defaults to all placements because Meta gets paid per impression regardless of whether it converts. The more placements your ad runs on the more impressions Meta sells. Their incentive is volume. Your incentive is conversions. These are different goals. The default setting serves their goal not yours 3 clicks deep in your ad settings. 2 minutes. Your cost per purchase drops and your dashboard finally shows real numbers instead of blended fiction

• 
  Tim C (@TimC_266) reported 33 minutes ago

  @CollinRugg This is not a bad thing of course, but I don't understand why they can't use cell signal blockers around the school to prevent cell phone use (allowing kids to keep them on their person) and have it set up so that in the event of an emergency, a kill switch is activated deactivating the cell signal blockers. Seems more reasonable to me; gets the desired result (no cellphone use in class) and also allows immediate access to emergency help in the event of an emergency. Is the problem with this idea that kids use their phones even without cell signals? To do what? Play an offline version of Candy Crush or something?