Cloudflare Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Cloudflare Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Danielle Fong 🔆 (@DanielleFong) reported 6 minutes ago

  accidentally spent like a hundred dollars on a monitoring service claude wrote and spun up on a cloudflare worker. just polling, accumulating nothing. definitely feels like i need to have better tracking for this across systems. what are people doing

• 
  lisa (@gaykittycorps) reported 9 minutes ago

  @XXJustJesssXX that's exactly what I was setting up and it still relies on websites that get taken down every few months. plus some websites require you to set up a cloudflare bypasser

• 
  Sherlock | DeFi Researcher (@Sherlockwhale) reported 11 minutes ago

  At $139.26, $SPCX is still 3.2% above the offer price, so it has not actually undercut its IPO price yet. But I still don't think it's cheap at $139. For my research, I looked at 31 major tech listings, including Amazon, Nvidia, Google, Tesla, Meta, Alibaba, Uber and Airbnb. Three of them, Spotify, Palantir and Coinbase were direct listing (not a normal IPO), so the final sample was 28 companies. Out of those 28 IPOs: 17 traded below their offer price within one year. 20 fell at least 20% below their first public close within one year. 16 fell at least 30% below their first close. 13 fell at least 40% below their first close. Only eight of the 28 held above the initial closing price during their first year: Nvidia, Google, ServiceNow, Shopify, Zoom, Cloudflare, Unity and Airbnb. Now compare that with the actual IPO price and these eight companies have never traded below it: Nvidia, Google, ServiceNow, Shopify, Twilio, Zoom, Datadog and Airbnb. Now for the actual $SPCX price levels. The median first year low among the 28 traditional IPOs was 37.76% below the first close: $160.95 × (1 - 0.3776) = $100.17 The full 31 company sample and the closest mega platform group both will give you almost the same level, around $100.90. There is also a second way to calculate it. The median first year peak to trough decline was 56.75%: $225.64 × (1 - 0.5675) = $97.59 So, two completely separate measurements converge around $98-$101 and that is why I think $100 should be your first serious bid. If I only use the IPOs launched since 2017, the typical company traded 43.4% below its first close during year one. Applying the same decline to $SPCX gives a price of roughly $91. And among the most heavily hyped listings, the typical decline was around 54.3%, which would put $SPCX near $74. Using its listing high instead gives similar levels around $86 and $79. That is why I see $75-$100 as the most reasonable accumulation zone. The valuation story is also another reason to wait. At $139.26, SpaceX is worth roughly $1.82 trillion, or 97.5 times its 2025 revenue. Even at $100, it would still carry a $1.31 trillion valuation and trade at around 70 times revenue. So, SpaceX could become one of the greatest company ever built, but even a great company can be a bad investment at the wrong price.

• 
  openwa (@openwadev) reported 16 minutes ago

  @mddanishyusuf @Cloudflare @Namecheap split between cf and porkbun. dont put all your domains in one basket, especially the one you use to log in to the domain service.

• 
  Manfred Neustifter (@supermanfredX) reported 16 minutes ago

  @Cloudflare The worktree name (which is the issue name)

• 
  🇸​🇭​🇪​🇷​🇱​🇴​🇨​🇰​ (@sherlock_comms) reported 22 minutes ago

  @_winter_wonders Maybe it's because the stuff I'm asking is very basic. I asked it to help me fix my domain security report findings on cloudflare and it's not stopped itself. I also used it to help me do my homelab. Did a sweep and scanned all the devices and made a report which we then went thru. Does it work any better if you ask it questions like you're a noob?

• 
  Eric Clemmons 🍊☁️ (@ericclemmons) reported 24 minutes ago

  @hemanta_io @EffectTS_ I’ll meet that again. Last time I tried it with the Cloudflare Agents SDK I couldn’t get websockets typed right for the useAgent hook. The frontend SDKs pretty much determine the backend HTTP. Inside that handler, no problem.

• 
  Matt Workman (@mattworkman) reported 32 minutes ago

  @C47 in retrospect, Codex tries to do A LOT and over architecting my site to be auto hosted on their Cloudflare? Platform and made it SUPER bloated instantly. I learned this after having Claude strip it down it’s a capable coding harness I’m sure, but it does too much and I don’t like it default design skills compared to CC just one user and one project perspective

• 
  Nic Wienandt (@NicW_AI) reported 34 minutes ago

  📷 A real agent browser, not a scraper. JavaScript sites, dashboards, web apps. The agent drives a genuine headless Chrome browser, reads what a human sees, and screenshots it into your workspace. AI constantly get held up by Cloudflare and robots.txt. Problem solved.

• 
  🧞‍♂️Martin Donadieu - oss/acc (@martindonadieu) reported 35 minutes ago

  @JackEllis I can relate to this so much 2 years ago I was dying between pay too much or have no fast dashboard. I had to redesign everything and got mad at @ClickHouseDB because I tough they where bad, where I was just doing something impossible: update past rows. Since then I dropped the update and switched to cloudflare analytics by simplifying a lot my data structure and I stop paying thousands for my stupidity. Thanks for sharing man it feels good to see even expert on the field had hard time too on that! Also thanks for sharing your findings it helped a whole industry and it helped me today :) I have the daily table too but my analytic is stale for “today” so I allow the user to force recalculate today but I could run that query from last compute directly and this will be fast ! Like you

• 
  Mick.net - Maker: Document.Bot 🤖 BestTime.app 🎉 (@mick__net) reported 38 minutes ago

  @sumukx I like 5.6 but same here in terms of OCD chasing targets. I asked to use a cloudflare tunnel. After 1h still OCD retrying i asked why it took so long and what it is blocking it. Then it replied i need you to run ‘cloudflare login’ in the terminal for auth. I think 5.5 would have asked directly instead of trying really hard with 100’s of unsuccessful work arounds.

• 
  🧪 AW Labs (@aw_labs) reported 39 minutes ago

  @Chaos2Cured I found out my issue was cloudflare stopping them (which I could change) or my web hosts corp firewall (which I could not change).

• 
  My Info (@TrinityTradeAI) reported 39 minutes ago

  Big fix today: The site no longer depends on stale bundled Netlify packets first. TrinityTrading now reads fresh status through the Cloudflare registry worker, then falls back only if needed. That makes the Trading Station feel much more alive.

• 
  sunil pai (@threepointone) reported 40 minutes ago

  lol I hear people on bsky are trying to cancel cloudflare for sponsoring localfirstconf?

• 
  Keyblade Master (@ValiantTraveler) reported 44 minutes ago

  Why ******** is Cloudflare kicking me out of every other website?