Reddit status: access issues and outage reports

Problems in the last 24 hours

The graph below depicts the number of Reddit reports received over the last 24 hours by time of day. When the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line, an outage is determined.

Most Reported Problems

The following are the most recent problems reported by Reddit users through our website.

• Website Down (50%)
• Sign in (29%)
• Errors (21%)

Live Outage Map

The most recent Reddit outage reports came from the following cities:

City	Problem Type	Report Time
Guayaquil	Errors	15 hours ago
Veracruz	Website Down	6 days ago
Bhubaneshwar	Website Down	9 days ago
Melbourne	Sign in	11 days ago
San Nicolás de los Garza	Sign in	14 days ago
Ciudad Obregón	Website Down	14 days ago

Full Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Reddit Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  GOTTY (@Gottscream) reported 7 minutes ago

  @JoellJoelly When I do Endurance missions, I lose connection. I also read about others having this problem on Reddit. Did you experience the same issue? It started with this update.

• 
  Immortal1776 (@Immortal_1776) reported 7 minutes ago

  @faffgoodbye but you have to abide by my reddit big chungus approved morals or be physically assaulted at a con for having nothing to do with said person/problem

• 
  Narayani Gurunathan (@Narayani07) reported 8 minutes ago

  Problem Statement: 1. Not getting promoted is a problem indeed. 2. Wants pay at par with Google. Now more since they will need pay at the promotion level when they move From Tier 1 IIT. Hypothesis: - Is it remotely possible that they were not good enough for a promotion? There are people along the bell curve who have problems other than layoffs and not finding job. Good problem to have. Am sure they are smart enough to bag a good role. Reddit was just a sounding board. Hmm.

• 
  acid (@setfiretooth) reported 10 minutes ago

  normally i do my research on reddit but it's not working so i typed "********" into the twitter search bar and i'm just scrolling

• 
  Couch Investor🛋️ (@Couch_Investor) reported 17 minutes ago

  What's funny with this $RDDT headline is that it could be viewed as bullish and bearish. Bull ish: It doesn't steal or get Reddit data for cheap to provide an answer. Bear ish: Reddit data isn't needed to get an answer. Of course, the headline is mostly noise because we're talking about a couple of days here. To me, the real bear case is if Reddit management doesn't secure a good enough data deal with these big AI players. If your data is valuable, they need to pay up. The stock will remain under pressure until they announce a data licensing deal, imo. The stock is cheap, growth is there, and the potential for ARPU growth is strong. But if these AI players take traffic away from Reddit and Reddit doesn't get paid, it will become an issue.

• 
  Occidentus (@0ccidentus) reported 19 minutes ago

  @EthicalHoopz Reddit bros claiming this terrible offseason was actually quite good #retard

• 
  Patrick (@llmvibes) reported 20 minutes ago

  Your first internet dollar is a pretty incredible feeling. Launching something and trying to get that first buck is a weird form of purgatory. It took me way longer than I'd like to admit to make mine. I launched V1 of Fokal. An AI visibility tracker. One piece of feedback made me scrap it almost immediately: "It's cool seeing this info, but what do I do with it?" So I built V2 around actually doing something with the data. Eventually, I found someone who was interested, but sceptical. It was past my bedtime, but I stayed up negotiating with him. I offered a huge discount and he signed up. Getting my first paying user mattered more to me than the money. It was the best money I'd ever earned. Pennies compared to what I made at my corporate desk job, but there's something beautiful about putting effort into something for months and months and finally seeing something come out the other side. I won't pretend I got my first customer and it was easy sailing from there. I've made all the mistakes they tell you not to make, despite having watched enough YC and Stanford lectures to know better. I've lost customers because **** broke and I couldn't fix it quickly enough. There have been plenty of moments where building this thing has felt like being tumbled under the waves. But I still think about that first dollar. Objectively, it was a tiny milestone. At the time, it felt enormous. After that first Stripe invoice was paid, I walked around my neighbourhood while everyone was asleep and just soaked it in. There have been other milestones since. None have topped that feeling. Until last night. One of Fokal's users originally found us through Reddit. When he started, he'd launched an app and a landing page, but had no users. He started using Fokal and began getting impressions and clicks. Then he got his first free trial. And yesterday, he got his first paying customer. He sent me this message last night. I didn't think there was a better feeling in business than making my first dollar. I was wrong. Turns out helping someone else make their first dollar feels even better.

• 
  Ron@latticeproxy.io (@LatticeProxy) reported 21 minutes ago

  @BrianVia @AdamRackis I shut down my reddit because of the whole X bluesky change they did on the site. their stupid grudge made me dip on that product. which sucks.

• 
  changis_k (@changis_k) reported 24 minutes ago

  Citation share for Reddit inside ChatGPT Search fell from roughly 3.8% to below 1%, per @promptwatch data. Daily average of 1.50% over the past 7 days, down 54.4% on the prior week The line held near 3.8% from early July through early August before dropping A query fanout change on 8 Aug marked the first fall, with a second on 14 Aug Reddit sits on a licensing agreement with OpenAI announced in May 2024 Businesses have spent two years optimising for visibility inside AI answers. One routing change removed a top source overnight. Distribution that depends on someone else's retrieval settings is not distribution you control. Owned channels look considerably more valuable after a chart like this.

• 
  Monica Cheng (@MeredithCheng22) reported 25 minutes ago

  I used to think “agents in group chats” were a gimmick. Now I think the bigger problem is that too much strategy still lives in my head, and too many useful skills are too messy or sensitive(contain keys) to share cleanly. That’s what changed my mind. I’m starting to think a multiagent should become the default workspace for our growth team. Not because Slack or gmail are unusable. They’re just very good at holding messages, and not that good at holding work. What I actually want is one place where people can @ my Codex directly to ask positioning and strategy questions. A lot of the time the problem is not execution. It’s that people are operating on slightly different versions of what I want. For example, yesterday my growth team Mengyao and Alyssa pulled me into a meeting to ask what I meant by doing a small creator push for Okeight. Actually they could just ask my codex That kind of nuance gets lost constantly if the only interface is “ask Monica in a meeting.” And honestly, I also forget to sync strategy changes fast enough. Sometimes I change my mind on priorities, or realize an angle is wrong, or want to shift the goal slightly, and I just forget to tell everyone in time. Then different people are working off different versions of the strategy. Nothing is fully broken, but the team drifts. I also want the group to automatically turn the past week of work into a real weekly report. I’ve tried asking people to write trackers before, and it’s painful for everyone. Not everyone is trained to produce polished internal docs, and more importantly, they shouldn’t have to spend time doing that just to prove work happened. What I actually want from a weekly report is: - what worked - what didn’t - what content performed unusually well - whose priorities are off - where output quality is weak - which direction feels wrong That should be inferred from the work, not manually reconstructed afterward. Then there’s the skill-sharing problem. Some of the most useful internal skills are hard to share directly because they expose too much. Sometimes sharing a deep skill means exposing keys. Sometimes it means exposing messy internal setup. Sometimes it’s just too complicated to package cleanly. I built a pretty complex video editing skill recently, and it made this very obvious. In theory I want that capability to be reusable. In practice, sharing it cleanly is hard, and sharing it carelessly is dangerous. I also keep running into a simpler but equally stupid problem: the context already exists somewhere, but I forget to attach it. For example, Mengyao ran a Reddit reply test recently, and the doc from that experiment has a huge amount of signal in it. It could shape product direction, growth direction, and a lot of downstream decisions. But when I’m talking to Codex about strategy, I still sometimes forget to include it. That is such a stupid failure mode. I used to think “agents in group chats” were a toy. Now I increasingly think a lot of teams do not need a smarter agent first. They need a workspace where the agent is already sitting inside the context, absorbing strategy changes as they happen, and using the shared work without everyone manually re-explaining it. We’re going to test this internally for real. I’ll report back next month with what worked, what was annoying, and what turned out to be fake.

• 
  Terence (@terencebuilds) reported 27 minutes ago

  What "user acquisition" actually looks like as a solo founder: - 08:00 — Read 3 Reddit threads in my niche. Reply usefully. No product mention. - 12:30 — Send 3 DMs to people who posted about my problem this week. - 14:00 — Comment on 5 posts from bigger accounts in my space. - 18:00 — Reply to every comment on my own post from today. - 21:00 — Personally email 1 user who signed up in the last 48h. That's roughly an hour of work. Every day. #BuildInPublic #SaaS

• 
  Jonathan Kriebel/KrispyKris (@krispykriskring) reported 28 minutes ago

  The diesel truck market operates by inverted logic. In every other segment of the automotive market, newer is worth more. More technology is worth more. More horsepower is worth more. Diesel trucks reverse all three rules. The 2007.5 LMM Duramax makes 397 HP and 765 lb-ft 37 more HP and 115 more lb-ft than the LBZ. It uses the same Allison 1000 six-speed automatic. Same frame. Same cab. Same suspension. One model year newer. Significantly more powerful. And it sells for approximately half the price of an equivalent-condition LBZ. A 2006 LBZ crew cab short bed 4×4 with 150,000 miles commands $25,000 to $45,000 depending on condition. A 2008 LMM with the same mileage and condition sells for $15,000 to $25,000. The truck with less horsepower is worth more. Because it doesn't have a diesel particulate filter. The DPF is the dividing line in diesel truck culture. Before 2007, diesel trucks exhausted soot into the atmosphere the black smoke that rolled out of a Cummins or Duramax under hard acceleration was unburned carbon particles exiting the tailpipe. The EPA mandated diesel particulate filters starting in 2007 to trap that soot. The DPF captures carbon particles in a ceramic honeycomb filter and periodically burns them off through a "regeneration" cycle that injects extra fuel into the exhaust stream to raise temperatures above 1,000 degrees Fahrenheit. Regeneration happens automatically, usually during highway driving, and the driver may not notice it. But the DPF creates maintenance costs that pre-2007 trucks don't have: filter cleaning or replacement at $1,500 to $3,000, temperature sensors that fail, injector fouling from the extra fuel used during regeneration, and turbocharger contamination from carbon buildup. An LBZ owner never thinks about DPF regeneration. The component doesn't exist on the truck. The maintenance cost is zero. The failure risk is zero. The cultural resistance runs deeper than maintenance costs. Diesel truck owners view emissions equipment the way muscle car owners view catalytic converters as a government-mandated restriction that reduces performance, adds complexity, and interferes with the fundamental character of the vehicle. The LBZ represents the last moment before that restriction arrived. It's the diesel equivalent of the 1970 LS6 Chevelle the last high-performance version before regulations changed everything. Owners who bought LBZ trucks new in 2006 and 2007 understood this instinctively: they were buying the last unrestricted Duramax. Reddit users in the Duramax community call the 2006 4×4 crew cab short bed LBZ "the holy grail of Duramax trucks." Owners report 314,000 miles on daily drivers that still tow fifth-wheel campers without issue. The emotional attachment is to the simplicity an engine that makes 360 HP, tows 12,000 pounds, and requires nothing more complicated than oil changes, fuel filter replacements, and occasional injector cleaning. GM reportedly made approximately 350K LBZ engines across the eighteen-month production window. That's not a rare engine. The LBZ's value isn't driven by scarcity it's driven by retention. Owners won't sell them. A truck that runs 300,000 miles on regular maintenance and doesn't have a DPF to fail is a truck the owner keeps until the frame rusts through. The supply of available LBZ trucks shrinks every year not because they're being scrapped but because they're being kept. The ones that do appear on the used market command premiums because the buyer pool is larger than the seller pool. Every diesel enthusiast who missed the window between January 2006 and June 2007 is competing for trucks that the current owners have no financial incentive to sell. A $40K truck with 150K miles is worth more today than it sold for new in 2006 one of the only vehicles in America that has appreciated in value over eighteen years of use. The LBZ didn't gain value because it became more powerful. It gained value because everything that followed became more complicated.

• 
  FalterXV (@falter_xv) reported 33 minutes ago

  God, I love copes like this that come and cry on my Youtube. 1: 100 likes on a reddit thread does not "everyone make." It is not even 1% of the Helldivers 2 community. 2: You are not entitled to my lobby. Thinking I have an ego b/c I kicked you from my lobby is the most backwards *** thinking I've ever heard of. Read. A. Book. 3: A pre-meditated threat to TK someone in the game is an open 4k admit confession that not only are you a griefer, but the one who has the ego is in fact, you. You are the toxic one. That logic where you feel entitled or deserved of being in someone else's space is the most backwards and arrogant thing ever. If being in other people's lobbies upsets you that they don't feel so 'awe inspired' by your presence that they have to keep you or be harassed, try making your own lobby instead of being a coward who can't play without others and self projects you have no friends. Summary: These numptys loves throwing around the word "ego" when what they actually mean is "boundary enforcement." Thinking you are so entitled to someone else's lobby that you throw a tantrum and threaten to team-kill when you're kicked? That’s not an ego problem on my end. That’s pure, unadulterated entitlement on yours. You are not John Helldiver's gift to the lobbies you join to get carried in. You are a liability that needs to learn to play the game, get some friends, and get some perspective.

• 
  FalterXV (@falter_xv) reported 33 minutes ago

  God, I love copes like this that come and cry on my Youtube. 1: 100 likes on a reddit thread does not "everyone make." It is not even 1% of the Helldivers 2 community. 2: You are not entitled to my lobby. Thinking I have an ego b/c I kicked you from my lobby is the most backwards *** thinking I've ever heard of. Read. A. Book. 3: A pre-meditated threat to TK someone in the game is an open 4k admit confession that not only are you a griefer, but the one who has the ego is in fact, you. You are the toxic one. That logic where you feel entitled or deserved of being in someone else's space is the most backwards thing ever. If being in other people's lobbies upsets you that they don't feel so 'awe inspired' by your presence that they have to keep you or be harassed, try making your own lobby instead of being a coward who can't play without others and self projects you have no friends. Summary: These numptys loves throwing around the word "ego" when what they actually mean is "boundary enforcement." Thinking you are so entitled to someone else's lobby that you throw a tantrum and threaten to team-kill when you're kicked? That’s not an ego problem on my end. That’s pure, unadulterated entitlement on yours. You are not John Helldiver's gift to the lobbies you join to get carried in. You are a liability that needs to learn to play the game, get some friends, and get some perspective.

• 
  Adrian Cohen (@acohen) reported 33 minutes ago

  @khadri_othmane reddit is also the only non doxxed platform with 130M DAU, and non doxxed platforms tend to let people be way more open about their problems (and solutions). i don't see any better source of data at this scale

• 
  Monica Cheng (@MeredithCheng22) reported 35 minutes ago

  I used to think “agents in group chats” were a gimmick. Now I think the bigger problem is that too much strategy still lives in my head, and too many useful skills are too messy or sensitive to share cleanly. That’s what changed my mind. I’m starting to think a multiagent should become the default workspace for our growth team. Not because Slack or gmail are unusable. They’re just very good at holding messages, and not that good at holding work. What I actually want is one place where people can @ my Codex directly to ask positioning and strategy questions. A lot of the time the problem is not execution. It’s that people are operating on slightly different versions of what I want. For example, yesterday Mengyao and Alisa pulled me into a meeting to ask what I meant by doing a small creator push for OK eight. My expectation was not “go broad.” It was really 2 different motions: - pure volume: find cheap AI creators at scale - deep collaboration: work with a very small number of creators, but go deep on content, including interviews, reaction videos, and co-created content That kind of nuance gets lost constantly if the only interface is “ask Monica in a meeting.” And honestly, I also forget to sync strategy changes fast enough. Sometimes I change my mind on priorities, or realize an angle is wrong, or want to shift the goal slightly, and I just forget to tell everyone in time. Then different people are working off different versions of the strategy. Nothing is fully broken, but the team drifts. I also want the group to automatically turn the past week of work into a real weekly report. I’ve tried asking people to write trackers before, and it’s painful for everyone. Not everyone is trained to produce polished internal docs, and more importantly, they shouldn’t have to spend time doing that just to prove work happened. What I actually want from a weekly report is: - what worked - what didn’t - what content performed unusually well - whose priorities are off - where output quality is weak - which direction feels wrong That should be inferred from the work, not manually reconstructed afterward. Then there’s the skill-sharing problem. Some of the most useful internal skills are hard to share directly because they expose too much. Sometimes sharing a deep skill means exposing keys. Sometimes it means exposing messy internal setup. Sometimes it’s just too complicated to package cleanly. I built a pretty complex video editing skill recently, and it made this very obvious. In theory I want that capability to be reusable. In practice, sharing it cleanly is hard, and sharing it carelessly is dangerous. I also keep running into a simpler but equally stupid problem: the context already exists somewhere, but I forget to attach it. For example, Mengyao ran a Reddit reply test recently, and the doc from that experiment has a huge amount of signal in it. It could shape product direction, growth direction, and a lot of downstream decisions. But when I’m talking to Codex about strategy, I still sometimes forget to include it. That is such a stupid failure mode. I used to think “agents in group chats” were a toy. Now I increasingly think a lot of teams do not need a smarter agent first. They need a workspace where the agent is already sitting inside the context, absorbing strategy changes as they happen, and using the shared work without everyone manually re-explaining it. We’re going to test this internally for real. I’ll report back next month with what worked, what was annoying, and what turned out to be fake.

• 
  DGoose512 (@DGoose512) reported 38 minutes ago

  @ACPhilElonSucks @elStandard1 @EJSmith94 This is why I’m not sure if you have a reading comprehension or data interpretation problem or you’ve found some random source on Reddit or Twitter to provide you confirmation bias. But so far you’re 0 for 2 with a negative EPA per counter argument lol

• 
  NamiReacts (@NamiReacts) reported 39 minutes ago

  @GeneralBunside @bilibili_en I feel about the same as I do with most the other platforms or other forms of data mining. To me Its not much different then using our data to sell to 3ed party companies for sales and prospecting. Opt out would be best but in a corp environment that would be hard because its asking a company to give up something for nothing. And considering that X, Reddit, Google and soon twitch also are already doing it. I don't see any difference there. What I really love as a BiliBili Creator (Which I already am) is that they are heavily anti-bot and Moderation is done with a human. With Ai being used as a tool to flag the content and not being left in charge of taking down whole channels based on what it THINKS violates the TOS. So yes I FULLY support this.

• 
  Blair sutherland (@SolBloody_Talon) reported 39 minutes ago

  The people on this app and reddit who mock tna are gonna be the same ones acting all nostalgic if the company shuts down saying man i miss tna and all we have is aew and wwe now. How about you morons actually watch the product now before it’s too late

• 
  CatholicFuturist (@TheFutureUnites) reported 44 minutes ago

  @Catholic_Colin_ And he’s really doubling down on it in the most Reddit retard way possible. It’s like reading a fat gay atheist defend wearing his fedora

• 
  Whyit🥔 (@FilbertFilbson) reported 44 minutes ago

  @drainedvessel3 I highly doubt this is something likely. mine has exclusive issues all the time its ******* bi polar also. I will prly ask reddit or support tmrw

• 
  Othmane (@khadri_othmane) reported 44 minutes ago

  Everyone is calling Reddit dead in AI search off four days of data. I'll bet anyone reading this that Reddit is back in ChatGPT within a month. Here's why: Let's circle back on what actually happened first. Reddit held about 3.8% of ChatGPT Search citations from July 18 to August 7. From August 14 to 17 it averaged 0.5%. An 86% drop in four days of data from a single platform. Promptwatch who published that data say a collection issue on their own side can't be ruled out yet. Search Engine Land's write-up said the data shows when the shift happened and nothing about why. Google AI Overviews over the same window went from 2.4% to 2.1%. AI Mode slid a little more. Nothing close to a cliff. So whatever happened it happened inside OpenAI's stack. Now my read :) OpenAI licensed Reddit's data in May 2024 for a reported $70M a year. Reddit is back at the table with OpenAI and Google right now pushing for dynamic pricing. And Reddit has every reason to squeeze. When someone gets their answer inside ChatGPT they never land on Reddit. Content real people wrote there resolves the question and Reddit gets none of the visit. That kills monthly active users which is the number Reddit sells ads against. Renegotiating the license is the one lever they have to get paid for a visit that never happens. The other theory going around is that marketers gamed the platform so OpenAI cleaned house. Out of every website on the internet, Reddit is the hardest one to break into with something authentic. The friction is the whole reason a stranger trusts a Reddit thread over a homepage claiming to be the best in the world. Nobody deletes the most trusted corpus on the internet because a few people work it. Reddit has vanished from these rankings before. Over 14% of ChatGPT citations in September 2025, under 2% by October 1. It came back and went back to being the most cited domain. Sometimes the best marketing move is to wait and see.

• 
  Welfare Capital (Jack) (@Pray4Equity) reported 50 minutes ago

  @nbaquant Eh it’s just my process. I prefer to trim positions going down, add to those going up. And I’m well aware, I can always be wrong about something like this. Maybe I am, maybe I’m not. If it comes back I’ll still do well. Another thing is, I don’t like volatility so much? I have small testicles, I prefer my holdings uncorrelated and low beta… Reddit moves like a damn freight train every day. Even a 5-7% position can affect my overall port more than I’d like. A complicated way of saying I probably sized it too big to begin with. If we believe in the law of the contra, me trimming should be bullish for you and everyone else.

• 
  Mrs. Rivera 👊🏼 (@vdawg628) reported 54 minutes ago

  @CD6275296848016 You should see the neo-feminists praising her on reddit. Lala is a man hater bc she got cheated on by a man who looks like Big Ed, and projects her problems from that relationshit onto other peoples relationships. Its not one size fits all. Shes so self righteous its gross.

• 
  alex (@alex39902441) reported 56 minutes ago

  @angelbrodin Openai employees blatantly ignoring critical open issues that have been open for months/years. Noted on boards/forums/twitter/reddit/openai support/etc... Like a ****** per chat credit toggle. ******* with user finances is ridiculous and pathetic

• 
  Alexey Vasilev (@Alvasilevv) reported 57 minutes ago

  @lilyraynyc The bill doesn't land on the spammers. Reddit was worth citing because it read like people rather than marketing, and every campaign that worked drew down that balance. Accounts get banned; the credibility that made the placement valuable was already spent.

• 
  Cap'n Gribbly (@khuryaggoth) reported 58 minutes ago

  @yoteFREAK31 @Balam_GF13 @HughElMariscal Reddit is down the hall and to the left, kid.

• 
  Semrush (@semrush) reported 1 hour ago

  Your buyers discovered you on TikTok. Validated you on Reddit. Got a second opinion from ChatGPT. And your attribution model has no idea any of that happened 👀 This isn't a future problem, it's already here. • Google holds 73% of discovery across 41 major surfaces (not the 90%+ most marketers plan around) • The other 27% is where opinions form, and decisions get made without you • 43% of consumers have already discovered a brand through AI Here's what the multi-platform discovery can look like 👇

• 
  puka🔄🕳️🎥📗🚤🫗🆘 (@th3ang3lgabri3l) reported 1 hour ago

  @Lewchube this is such a non-issue tbhh i grew up mostly with no friends who played pokemon so i had to trade with myself and that was back then when i was a jhit, if grown *** adults can’t get a second console or find someone on reddit to trade with them that is a skill issue lol

• 
  Mass Upgrade (@MassUpgrade) reported 1 hour ago

  I want to be known for my work, not my clothes. Its a strategic choice I've made. Specific issues can arise when you're black, but you can find white guys on reddit talking about the same thing. Back when Europe had sumptuary laws you could get locked up for this.