Reddit status: access issues and outage reports

Problems in the last 24 hours

The graph below depicts the number of Reddit reports received over the last 24 hours by time of day. When the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line, an outage is determined.

Most Reported Problems

The following are the most recent problems reported by Reddit users through our website.

• Website Down (46%)
• Errors (29%)
• Sign in (25%)

Live Outage Map

The most recent Reddit outage reports came from the following cities:

City	Problem Type	Report Time
Patna	Errors	9 days ago
Monclova	Sign in	10 days ago
Nice	Errors	11 days ago
Guayaquil	Errors	20 days ago
Veracruz	Website Down	26 days ago
Bhubaneshwar	Website Down	29 days ago

Full Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Reddit Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Como que se antoja un asadito en gorditas apoco no (@AsaditoRojo) reported 3 minutes ago

  @duckyIsaDuck Few years ago I was feeling bad about it and then I went to a small **** reddit to see how others handled it and then I realized I was larping about having size issues. I felt better about my powerful six inches lol. Jokes aside, just learn how to properly use your hands guys.

• 
  Alma Gentil (@Chinoy200096633) reported 6 minutes ago

  Samsung is experiencing an unexpected glitch where user accounts are being randomly deactivated for "security reasons," locking owners out of connected ecosystem services.The issue, which escalated dramatically across Reddit and Samsung Community forums, presents users with a strict error message stating: "Can't sign in. Account deactivated for security reasons.

• 
  🔪 American McGee 🖤 (@americanmcgee) reported 11 minutes ago

  I find the timing of this interaction more than a little odd given that I recently reached out to the creator of the video in question to discuss the way in which it drives hate and misunderstanding. And I let them know that I was pondering the creation of a response video. But that I first wanted to give them a chance to discuss everything. They've since gone silent. And now this? So, the video isn't great. 250k views and it's stirred up a LOT of misunderstanding. But to be fair, the first three and a half minutes are fine. Our founding, the crowd design process, the monthly charitable donations. All of that is presented reasonably. Then we get to 3:30. That’s where the thesis arrives: “As Plushie Dreadfuls began to grow, controversy began to follow them as years passed by.” And from that point until about 9:45, it is one long, uninterrupted prosecution. No counter-points. No company response. No real attempt to explain the other side of anything. Then we get thirty warm seconds at the end about our scoliosis rabbit, which I guess is supposed to make the whole thing feel balanced? But the bookends are not the issue. The middle six minutes are. Look at where the material actually comes from. Essentially all of it traces back to one hostile subreddit and one TikTok rant that runs for about seventy seconds without any response from us at all. That is what viewers are given as an “overview” of our business. That’s not an honest overview. That’s reading our loudest critics into the record and calling it "research." Nowhere in the video does it mention that we have a 4.9 rating on Trustpilot across more than a thousand reviews. Reviews we cannot edit, remove, or filter. You would think that might be relevant when repeating the claim that we have “a really bad track record with customer service.” It takes one search to find that rating. One search. But if you do that search, maybe you can’t frame the story the same way. And the omissions are not small. With the refund story, the customer was offered three options: a full and fast refund if the damaged plush was destroyed, a smaller refund if they kept it, or a complete replacement if they sent it back. Three options. The Reddit thread focused on one because that made the story sound worse, and the video simply repeated that framing. The other two options? Never mentioned. On ABA, the organization we partnered with for the OG ASD Rabbit was specifically geared toward modern techniques designed to avoid the practices that made older ABA harmful. You can still have a conversation about ABA, obviously. But the video presents it as one uniformly abusive thing and treats our partnership as knowing complicity. Context disappears. Outrage remains. Out of that we have people claiming we "supported electrocuting kids" - literal quote. No joke. Then there’s the Discord claim. Again. It never ends. The video states as flat fact, in the creator’s own voice, that I went onto our Discord server “saying that being pan was a phase.” What it does not mention is my VERY NEXT response, where I made clear I was talking about a phase of interest on TikTok. Or the actual context of the conversation, which was about sales trends and redesigns. All that info is in the screenshots. All of it ignored. That context matters. It changes the meaning completely. But including it would make the claim much less useful. I guess it would make the video less watchable? 250k views makes this their most popular video ever. Imagine that! We also get the assertion that I have “a habit of responding in unprofessional ways to criticism.” Okay. Where is the evidence for that in the video? There isn’t any. The claim is just made. And, of course, there is no mention that many of my responses happen in the context of nonstop personal attacks. Apparently that part doesn’t matter either. Is what I am writing here "unprofessional?" I've noticed there are a lot of people out there who essentially consider facts to be unprofessional. Good luck with that. And here’s the thing that really gets me about these videos: at no point did the creator contact me, my wife, or anyone on our team. Not once. Every one of these misrepresentations could have been cleared up with a single message. I know that because when I finally reached out myself, I got a reply within hours. They were reachable the entire time. Nobody tried. And the video creator follows me here on X. That means they have watched over a year of the fallout from all of this. And done nothing in response. I often say that the attacks and behaviors that flow from these incidents are 1000x worse than the incidents themselves. This is a perfect example of that. When I raised all of this, I was told the creator had maintained a neutral stance throughout, and that they had made sure to state the Discord comment had nothing to do with hate toward any group. Great. Except neither of those things is in the video. There is no such statement anywhere in it. And the narration does NOT maintain some careful neutral stance; it repeatedly delivers conclusions in the creator’s own voice. Maybe that’s carelessness. Maybe it’s something worse. Either way, the result is the same. A video that its own creator apparently cannot accurately describe is now being used as a primary source for people calling me a bigot, accusing us of hiding AI use, and worse. And my team absorbs that every day. I absorb it every day. If the video had been made in good faith, one message would have fixed this. If facts were the priority, the Trustpilot rating, the full refund options, the ABA context, and my next Discord response would all be in there. But they aren’t. And I think we all know why. Pretty sure I am going to record a full-length response to this and post it across my socials... but I guess I'll give the video creator a little longer to respond before I do. It's more grace and understanding than they are the haters they inspire ever gave us. Sure that will be ignored too 🤷

• 
  James In Beta (@JamesJames518) reported 12 minutes ago

  RedditMaster Karma Mode actually wasn’t something I originally planned to build. But after talking to RedditMaster users, I kept hearing the same problem: new Reddit accounts often can’t post where they want, and it gets frustrating fast. A lot of people end up buying accounts, but purchased accounts can be risky and get banned easily. The other option is using an agency’s accounts, but then all the traffic goes to accounts you don’t own, and the quality can be inconsistent. So the safest long-term approach is still to grow your own account organically. That’s what RedditMaster’s Karma Mode is built for. Our users typically reach around 1,000 karma in about 90 days. I am really proud about what we achieved.

• 
  Yash (@yashlame) reported 15 minutes ago

  Call it the unsigned citation. An AI engine pulls a Reddit thread into its answer. The thread is about your category. Your product solves exactly that problem. Your name appears nowhere on the page it cited.

• 
  RicciTeTroll (@trolltom02) reported 15 minutes ago

  I feel something this morning, just left a thesis on FOMO under @snoofi_RH 's $snoofi reddit stock coin pair. "ok listen, I am desperately trying to find the reddit stock pairs that could run. So far I have narrowed it down to 2: snoofi, the literal logo of reddit (and a token that got massive bid back in the days) and chud on long, which is something redditors can definitely resonate with"

• 
  cinnamon apple (@_______bbyg) reported 18 minutes ago

  I miss the days when @Reddit didn’t force you to down load the app while you’re using Reddit in the internet browser 🙄

• 
  Colin Sechay (@colinsechay) reported 18 minutes ago

  @Kalshi_Film The Legendary Story: Tom Hanks is sitting at a diner in North Dakota having a beer. A few tables over, some kid is face-down, completely passed out. Hanks walks over to check if he’s okay, sees the guy’s phone sitting on the table, and can’t resist. He has the bartender snap a few photos of himself with the unconscious stranger — one where he’s looking concerned, one where he’s pointing and laughing like he just found treasure — then slips the phone back into the kid’s pocket and leaves. The next morning the guy wakes up, scrolls his camera roll, and finds Tom Hanks photobombing his hangover.  That’s the story that spread on Facebook, Imgur, and Reddit with captions like “Can you imagine finding these on your phone after a drunken night out?” What actually happened A fan ran into Hanks at a diner in West Fargo (Hanks’ niece worked there). The fan’s thing was posing with celebrities while pretending to be wasted. He asked Hanks if they could do it. Hanks said yes, handed over his glasses, and played along while a friend took the pictures. The original Reddit title was literally: “My friend met Tom Hanks, stole his glasses and pretended to be wasted.”  Hanks’ favorite version When a reporter asked him about it in 2013, Hanks gave both stories and then said he preferred the legend: “Well now, that second version is that I did just start taking pictures with a passed-out guy. I’m happy with this version, that it’s become somewhat of a legend. I wouldn’t want anyone not to believe that I am capable of turning up on their phones.” So the photos are real, Hanks really posed with a guy who looks dead-drunk at a diner, and he really used the guy’s phone. He just didn’t do it to a random unconscious stranger. The internet decided the better story was the one where Forrest Gump finds you passed out and photobombs your phone, and Hanks was happy to let that one live. @grok

• 
  Tech With Matteo (@TechWithMatteo) reported 19 minutes ago

  @lukmanAufbau honestly with GeoCam i found real users just by answering old reddit threads where people were already complaining about the exact problem, way better than guessing where my audience hangs out.

• 
  GODFOE UNIVERSE (@GODFOE_UNIVERSE) reported 21 minutes ago

  This tired 20th century psychoanalysis is just laughable. These “weak people” escaped slavery, crossed the desert, conquered a foreign land for hundreds of years, and kept the documents about it; preserving their identity so well against the Assyrians and Romans you’re still mad about them today. Now tell me, which angle of Jew-sperging are we taking here? Is it “Christianity is a Jewish religion”? If so, that religion conquered the gods of Homer and the lands of Odin, just not entirely the way poor ol’ Nietzsche liked with his made up system of beliefs that magically served what he liked and condemned what he didn’t like. The problem you’ll have with Nietzsche is the same he had with himself, there’s no means to ground his ideas of morality so they drift off into Reddit levels of cope. You don’t have to like Israel dude, but at least bring something other than ideas that were laughable over a century ago.

• 
  Rhonda S (@Smeetsya) reported 23 minutes ago

  @s4intfelina That's the problem. Men hate women, but women hate women too. I'll bet 90% of these snark reddit are women.

• 
  NTPrime (@NTPrime) reported 25 minutes ago

  @GunsOfEschaton I'm blacklisting this game for myself because of your terrible exploitative Reddit ads.

• 
  Sanjay Singh (@HeySanjaySingh) reported 29 minutes ago

  Any Reddit experts here? I comment, and they delete it because I don't have enough karma. You need karma to comment, but you need to comment to earn karma. How do I fix this?

• 
  Kaleigh Moore (@kaleighf) reported 29 minutes ago

  B2B SaaS companies rank well in traditional search but still fail to earn citations in AI search. The fix? Getting experts to post about their knowledge on LinkedIn, YouTube, and Reddit. I built a system to make this programmatic, and it's forged from decade of reporting and vetting sources myself while writing for publications like Forbes, Vogue Business, and ADWEEK. It taught me something that most content strategists never learn: editors and journalists don't cite content, they cite PEOPLE — specific, verifiable, independently credentialed humans with a named point of view and a track record of being right about something.

• 
  Pmax- Pronoun Boy (@PedagogyMaxima) reported 29 minutes ago

  Imperial Guard is in such a terrible place balance wise that one of the top posts on the Warhammer reddit is about a Guard player that employed the filthiest tactics and abusive bad manners table play against a new player and still lost despite tabling their opponent turn 3. FHMR

• 
  Lila 🤍 (@kisslilasthrone) reported 29 minutes ago

  @MoonMama1111 this is genuinely really interesting to me because twitter has been where i have found the majority of my genuine senders. i never got any from reddit. one from tumblr. etc etc i think it comes down to who/what you engage with

• 
  Kiana_SEO (@KianaS_00) reported 31 minutes ago

  If you’re spending budget on GEO right now, this test may save you from putting it into the wrong channel. Today, my client gave us around 500 queries their in-house team was tracking, saying that they want to do Reddit. We narrowed them down to 50 representative ones and ran each 10 times, roughly 500 real ChatGPT responses in total. In this sample, Reddit appeared as a referenced source only 4.8% of the time, with zero direct Reddit citations. At the same time, we started seeing YouTube show up much more often for this AI category. And this is exactly why, for the clients we already work with, we don’t treat distribution as a fixed strategy. Also, e didn’t wait for the Reddit citation drop to become a GEO headline. Our daily monitoring was already showing the shift. Around August 5, we started noticing changes in how ChatGPT was retrieving sources across real user responses. We adjusted the client’s distribution strategy before the broader data came out. Later, public tracking made the change much clearer. ChatGPT Search’s use of site:-specific fan-out queries jumped from roughly 0.37% to 16.8% in a day, while the average number of searches per response increased from around 1.08 to 1.83. A few days later, Reddit’s tracked share of ChatGPT Search citations fell from a previous average of 3.83% to around 0.52%. By the time this became widely discussed, we had already seen the direction in our own monitoring and started moving the client’s budget. But Reddit still matters for reviews, community discussion and long-term brand presence. Before scaling content, we now look at: which domains AI is actually retrieving from which formats keep getting cited which sources are gaining or losing share how those patterns are changing week by week Then we move the budget. For visual categories, that might mean more YouTube. For another category, it might be product pages, niche publications or first-party research. The useful takeaway is simple: Build your GEO distribution plan around what the model is retrieving now. And ideally, you see the shift in your own data before everyone starts posting about it.

• 
  John (@hello_code_) reported 32 minutes ago

  @rcmisk matches what I've seen, the backlink is the actual product, the launch day traffic is just a nice side effect nobody plans around. reddit threads where people already describe the problem convert way better than PH upvote traffic ever did

• 
  peter (@peterb0yd) reported 32 minutes ago

  I have a habit of browsing the internet immediately after sending a prompt in Cursor. My brain doesn't want to context switch to work on a different part of the code. It wants to ensure the code I'm currently working on is complete before I move on to something else. But I also don't want to sit there and wait for the agent to finish working. That's too boring. So the easy thing is to open X, email, or reddit. Herein lies the problem. My goal is to replace this habit with - move around the room and stretch - go outside Any other ideas?

• 
  Matt (@whatsinitforme) reported 37 minutes ago

  @LegalYookay Reddit moderators always shut down such things

• 
  BigTrees (@MoreBigFish) reported 37 minutes ago

  @EricBalchunas @1xNotSure The reason is that over the last 12 yrs there have been many hundreds of thousands of tweets, reddit posts, articles, hit pieces, books and podcasts, all to give you the opinion you have about the man. Some ask why so much effort has been made to take him down - and see a story.

• 
  Mendía Helicopter Tours (@MendiaTours) reported 42 minutes ago

  @PriestRitchie They trained hard for it. Enormous amount of debate and discussion. They forged and refined their rhetoric together. The problem is they were on Reddit, a place that bans truth and dignity and hides dissenting views. They assumed it would be more of the same here

• 
  Cushion Finish (@Cushionfinish21) reported 44 minutes ago

  @moonlarking @pixaxiq @CH4R10T_TV The easy way to tell is the lack of engagement on the post other than views and likes. You can easily find places that will charge you like 15c for 10 likes with a quick Google search - people use them all the time. It's a huge problem on this site as well as Reddit.

• 
  Stepan Nazarov (@stepan__nazarov) reported 51 minutes ago

  @linguinelabs Funny how someone on reddit had almost the exact same error 3 years ago, just with a slightly different shortcut name (but still for waking up)

• 
  BLACK DUMPLING™ (@BlackDumpling) reported 52 minutes ago

  It will go down in history that there was an entire era of the internet where women would tell outlandish stories on Reddit explicitly to drive engagement to a profile that linked to an OF. Like they were straight up violating the Ten Commandments as a marketing strategy.

• 
  Anthony Stephen Mendes (@anthonysmendes) reported 54 minutes ago

  Tips for new Framer creators & developers: Method A: Search on X, Facebook, LinkedIn, Reddit, etc for these terms without quotes- “Looking for, framer” “Hiring, framer” “Need, framer” Set to latest and check the posts within 24 hours. These will give you high intent posts from people who need Framer developers. Method B: If you want to focus on templates, check for posts from creators where they have made a sale. Even better if they’ve included a screenshot. Check the template, see what they’re doing differently, see how new it is to the marketplace. The goal is not to copy. The goal is to understand the following: - How consistent they are with naming assets and layers. - What makes their templates different. - How far do they go to provide value: prompts, video tutorials, documentation, etc Method C: If your goal is to build a portfolio then it’s best to offer pro bono work/free work for brands. Use them under specific guidelines: - Business under 3 years old. - Business never had a Framer website. - Right to share in portfolio/case study. Here you can also make commissions from your remix link/project transfer. Method D: Small time edits on existing Framer websites. Sometimes businesses do this: - Get a template. - Edit and publish it. The edits bring errors that lead to issues in responsiveness & text clipping or asset issues. Offer a small fee to fix it after they add you as an editor. Won’t bring money you’d expect but builds trust.

• 
  Billy Baggins (@BillyOfBagEnd) reported 55 minutes ago

  @dwanbrooks93 @rothschildmd And hopefully those broken records will send a message to Hollywood that people on X and Reddit don’t represent the mass audiences. The Odyssey, too

• 
  Anze Markovic | Performance Creative (@anzedetn) reported 58 minutes ago

  Sometimes the best-performing line in an ad isn’t the hook. It’s the line 20 seconds later that describes the customer’s exact experience: “I wake up, and my ankles look almost normal. Then I spend a few hours standing, and by 3 PM my shoes feel tight, my skin feels stretched, and I’m quietly wondering how I’m supposed to get through the rest of the day.” That level of specificity usually comes from Reddit research. It takes time to dig through the posts, comments, and oddly specific complaints people share when they think nobody is listening to them. But our team loves it. Because that’s where you find the emotional details customers rarely say in a survey: The embarrassment of avoiding sandals. The frustration of pressing a finger into swollen skin and watching the mark stay there. The anxiety of planning your day around when your legs will start aching. Specific recognition keeps people watching because they don’t just understand the problem. They feel seen.

• 
  Kene 🐘 (@spatocodex) reported 58 minutes ago

  If I had to get my first 100 customers from scratch, here’s exactly what I’d do: 1. Cold emails Send 20 highly targeted emails. Lead with a specific outcome, not your product. No replies? Change the email and try again. Keep iterating until you get responses. 2. Social media DMs Find prospects on LinkedIn, X, IG, FB, Reddit, etc. Send a 15-second personalized Loom audit. Make the preview obviously about them. Give value before asking for anything. 3. Affiliate programs Find people who already have your target audience. Offer a commission worth promoting. Make joining and sharing effortless. Tools like @partnacdotcom let you launch and manage the whole program in one place. 4. Partnerships Find complementary businesses serving your ICP. Create a simple referral deal. Give them a reason to send customers your way. Start with 10 good partners, not 1,000 random ones. 5. Communities Find where your ICP already hangs out. Answer questions and solve problems. Don’t drop links everywhere. Become the person people remember when they need the solution.

• 
  Mike Sulka (@SulkaMike) reported 58 minutes ago

  Fable 5.1 has been out for about a day and Reddit has already discovered why some people don't like the way it writes: THE WATERMARK. Except...probably not. Fable 5.1 and Mythos 5.1 are the first new Claude models carrying Anthropic's statistical text watermark, and some users are already wondering whether that's why the newer Claude models feel more verbose, structured or exhausting to read. I went through Anthropic's actual watermark documentation, and their explanation makes that theory pretty hard to defend. The watermark doesn't insert hidden characters or extra words. It only nudges the random choice between equally acceptable next words. Anthropic says its testing found no measurable effect on creativity, readability or output quality, and cites Google's controlled testing of the underlying SynthID-Text approach reaching the same result. It also adds no extra tokens and essentially no latency. And here's the detail I hadn't appreciated: Anthropic is applying the watermark globally, even though it exists largely because of the EU AI Act, because it says it doesn't yet have a durable way to apply it only by geography. Older Claude models are eventually getting it too. Code barely gets watermarked at all when exact token choices matter. Factual passages get less watermarking for the same reason. The watermark lives mostly in places where “grey” and “overcast” are equally good choices. So if Fable 5.1 suddenly feels like it swallowed a management-consulting handbook, I wouldn't blame Brussels just yet. But humans being humans, we quickly try to reverse-engineer model behavior from vibes. Yesterday people thought Fable 5.1 existed because Claude suddenly seemed smarter. Today people think its writing changed because of a watermark. Last week a Gemini model told somebody it was a model that hadn't even been released yet. The Behavioral-Fingerprint Trap keeps winning. We are getting very good at noticing that something changed. We're still pretty terrible at figuring out what changed underneath it. And in 2026, it could be the checkpoint, the harness, the effort setting, the router, the safeguard layer, the system prompt, the watermark... ...or Claude just decided it really wanted to give you twelve bullet points today.