Reddit status: access issues and outage reports

Problems in the last 24 hours

The graph below depicts the number of Reddit reports received over the last 24 hours by time of day. When the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line, an outage is determined.

Most Reported Problems

The following are the most recent problems reported by Reddit users through our website.

• Website Down (53%)
• Sign in (25%)
• Errors (22%)

Live Outage Map

The most recent Reddit outage reports came from the following cities:

City	Problem Type	Report Time
Guayaquil	Errors	2 days ago
Veracruz	Website Down	8 days ago
Bhubaneshwar	Website Down	11 days ago
Melbourne	Sign in	13 days ago
San Nicolás de los Garza	Sign in	16 days ago
Ciudad Obregón	Website Down	16 days ago

Full Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Reddit Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  suman (@Suman_solo) reported 10 minutes ago

  Especially when the community is for the certain purposes Mistake I did . I put my tag as a founder - I thought. Some founder will be curious to know more . But admin took it like a spam . Okay no problem we try to do this further more with reddit and personal dms

• 
  WDL (White Defamation League) (@Captain_noticer) reported 12 minutes ago

  @KellerRaym8123 Reddit is more the problem than anything else in that equation. Each subreddit is like a mini eco chamber, any opposing views will get you banned regardless of which one. I was banned for telling someone they were being lazy in r/antiwork.

• 
  The Par Train (@TheParTrain) reported 14 minutes ago

  You know what I think our biggest problem is? Reddit is full of: “How do I hit a draw?” “How do I take the club back farther?” “I’m stuck at a 6 handicap. What’s wrong with my swing?” But… Why does your backswing need to go farther? Why can’t you just get really good at playing your fade? And who decided that getting below a 6 handicap requires fixing your swing in the first place? Maybe our swings aren’t the problem. Maybe we’re just asking the wrong questions.

• 
  Kenny Workman (@kenbwork) reported 14 minutes ago

  The second Google result for Latch is a Reddit thread focused on the final three bullets of a Substack post I wrote in 2022. At the time, we were a team of ~7 young engineers working from a small office. We thought it was better to be transparent about our work constraints than to mislead candidates. These days, I read that post and think it is incredibly cringe, but such are the growing pains of building in public as a young founder. The internet immortalizes your words, and past snapshots of your thinking can persist despite personal and company growth. As we’ve grown, we’ve adopted a much more flexible work culture and dropped the six-day requirement years ago, allowing us to welcome eg. talented people with families. We’ve learned a lot about building a company and leading a team since those early upstart days. Separate from the negative sentiment in the original thread - people can say what they want - the outdated information was genuinely confusing candidates. Someone on our team hired a firm to help surface more current information in Google searches. That firm decided it would be a good idea to message the Reddit moderators with a frankly strange and Orwellian request. I think this was stupid. We had no idea they were going to do this, but we hired the firm, so ultimately that is on us. I’m increasingly eager to engage with people honestly and clear up confusion like this. I don’t really mind the “Streisand effect.” It is only a problem if you have something to hide, and I care quite a bit that people understand how I and Latch actually think today. There is a lot of understandable cynicism in biotech right now, and venture-backed companies attract plenty of skepticism - sometimes deservedly. Ultimately, people can draw their own conclusions about whom they want to work with based on what those groups ship, the quality of their thinking, and how they actually treat people.

• 
  cloud 🦭🍉🐜 (@glittertaem) reported 17 minutes ago

  WHAT HAPPENED TO GOING ON REDDIT WHEN YOU HAD AN EXTREMELY SPECIFIC PROBLEM???

• 
  Ushatka (@TheUshatka) reported 17 minutes ago

  Not being able to find cool places to eat is like entirely a skill issue in most cities btw. Stop promoting self pity and infantilism purely because you’re too lazy to open a Reddit thread.

• 
  FascinatingAndFrighteningTech (@masterofthegate) reported 18 minutes ago

  What’s your # of ROLLS per day? For people interested in making AI movies, if you make 1 successful 15-second clip for your movie per day over the course of 365 days, that’s about ~90 mins. The length of a feature-length movie. 2 clips a day = 6 months. 5 clips a day = ~2.5 months. 10 clips a day = a little over a month. 30 clips a day = 12 days. 60 clips a day = 6 days. 180 clips a day = 2 days. 360 clips a day = 1 day. —— The most feasible range, assuming you have a story or script, is around 0.33–10 a day on average, so you can take time to carefully consider the quality of the clips. That’s a movie in a little over a month to 3 years. So basically, ANYONE with persistence can make a feature-length movie now with the help of AI—for aiding you with learning how to write a story and a script from that story, and generating the clips for you. There are AIs that can also edit the video together for you now as well. The audio in the clips is already essentially mastered, so some simple balancing by ear should suffice, which AI could probably level-match clips automatically for you now. And an AI could probably also color balance/color grade for you as well if you just ask… —— The question, then, is: How do you reduce the amount of “rolls” you have to give a prompt in order to arrive at the final clip for your movie—the quality clip that represents that part of your story? For example, answer this: Can you make 1 successful clip a day in just 8 tries? 4 tries? 2 tries? This matters because the lower amount of tries, aka “rolls,” you give a prompt, the less time and money is needed to make the movie per day that you are making the movie. 1.Good storytelling. Learn to tell good stories - the root of everything. 2.Your stories should work well with the model you are using. In other words, models have different strengths, so writing stories that will work better with them will save a lot of hassle. For example, a model good at static shots may work better for drama than action. And a model that has darker aesthetics and is good with movement may work better for horror action movie. And so on… 3a. Better prompting. VERY important. Understand how the model you’re using best takes prompts and satisfy the format. 3b. Take time to test and experiment before you jump into serious generating. Once you test enough, you will have a better feel for how to best prompt and lower the quantity of rolls finding a keeper takes. It will save you a lot of time later if you take some time in the beginning to learn about and familiarize yourself with the model you’re using. 3c. Also make sure you are using good settings and not wasting your time; talk to AI and have it read the docs of the model in question, research relevant discussions on Reddit and X and forums, etc., and give you advice on the best settings after considering those things. 3d. Set up your prompts beforehand formatted for the model you’re using and make sure there’s no typos or details that are vague which you don’t want to be vague or details left out which you could have added—vagueness, if it exists, should be intentional, not because you are being lazy and just hoping the AI will read your mind and get it how you want it to be… 4.Image and references to video is great when you want better quality control over the image, scene, and the overall story and feel. Text-to-video is nice for letting the AI come up with things for you. 5.Careful with audio quality: faster turbo models often degrade audio quality. So the video may look good, but you’ll never be able to fix that poor audio glitch at the 7th second of the clip… — Minimax H3 is arguably the first local model you can create pro videos with locally. And even with a cheap rig you can probably fire off at least 2-8 clips per day. So people can now make feature length films with their laptops for VERY cheap (sub 5k dollars or even sub 1k or 500 dollars or maybe less). And fast. WILD. #AIart #VR

• 
  Simon (@everyonecalmdwn) reported 19 minutes ago

  In modern Australia, the stain of a government accusation can be almost as damaging as a conviction. And in the social-media age, our justice system needs to confront an uncomfortable question: does the traditional concept of open justice still produce justice when an accusation can be broadcast permanently to millions of people before the evidence has ever been tested? Open justice is fundamental. Courts should not operate in secret. The public must be able to scrutinise judges, prosecutors, police, regulators and government agencies. Transparency protects citizens from arbitrary state power. But the environment in which that principle operates has completely changed. For most of our legal history, an allegation reported in yesterday’s newspaper eventually disappeared with yesterday’s newspaper. Today it becomes searchable history. A government agency issues an allegation. A journalist publishes it. Someone screenshots the headline. It spreads through Facebook, X, TikTok, Reddit and WhatsApp. Search engines index it. People comment on it without reading the evidence. Employers, customers, banks, insurers and business partners find it years later. Within hours, the distinction between “accused of” and “did” begins to disappear. And there is no equivalent mechanism for restoring someone’s reputation if the allegation collapses. The accusation may receive a thousand headlines. The withdrawal receives one. The prosecution may be discontinued. A regulator may abandon the case. Evidence may fall apart. A person may be acquitted completely. Legally, they walk away innocent. Digitally, they may remain guilty forever. That is where the old assumptions underlying open justice begin to break down. Our courts operate according to rules specifically designed to prevent unreliable accusations becoming conclusions. Evidence can be challenged. Witnesses can be cross-examined. Material can be excluded. Prosecutors carry burdens of proof. Judges give reasons. Defendants have rights of appeal. Social media has none of those safeguards. There is no burden of proof. There is no cross-examination. There is no requirement that evidence even be admissible. There is simply an allegation, an algorithm and an audience. And outrage travels substantially faster than an acquittal. That matters particularly when the accusation comes from government. A government allegation carries an authority that an ordinary allegation does not. Most people understandably assume that if a government agency publicly accuses somebody, there must already be compelling evidence behind it. But governments investigate precisely because facts have not yet been finally established. Regulators and agencies may also operate under precautionary or risk-based frameworks. Sometimes that is necessary. If there is an immediate risk to the public, government cannot always wait several years for litigation to conclude before taking protective action. But we need to distinguish between two very different things: the power to take temporary protective action and the power to publicly destroy someone’s reputation. They should not automatically be the same thing. A regulator may genuinely need to suspend a licence, restrict an activity or investigate a business while allegations are examined. But that does not mean the entire internet needs the accused person’s name permanently attached to allegations that have never been tested. In the social-media age, that distinction may be the difference between protecting the public and punishing an innocent person before a court has ever decided the case.

• 
  Crumb (@Crumb929872) reported 21 minutes ago

  @kreidemeow I don't know why the people on ao3 sub reddit gets really angry when you actually adress the problem of actual csem being on the site

• 
  Adnan (@AdnanChaumette) reported 21 minutes ago

  @KeyTryer What's even more tragic is that LLMs, even frontier ones, excessively parrot Reddit pessimism. Until the labs start building data sets from scratch by first principle reasoning, we're bound to this slop. Same with code slop. RLHF won't fix this either.

• 
  Toma (@thebadassdev) reported 25 minutes ago

  Here's how I get my first customers for my SaaS: 1. I scrape Reddit to get all the posts in a feed sharing a specific problem 2. I DM everyone on Reddit who has that problem 3. In the DMs, I give them some advice and then drop the link at the end of the conversation It's as simple as that.

• 
  NewsTongue (@NewsTongueX) reported 26 minutes ago

  🔴 Coles website crashes after viral post exposes 80% discount glitch on alcohol Coles' website and app went offline Saturday after a Reddit post highlighted a pricing error that discounted 24-packs of premixed drinks and beer by up to 80%. A 24-pack of Jack Daniel's & Cola marked at $27 instead of $130 prompted over 180,000 views. CW Scanner identified at least 20 beer cartons and 46 cases of premixed drinks affected, with the largest discount on Smirnoff Crush Mango & Peach—a $173 saving, down to $29 from $202.

• 
  Valerie ✨🧀 (@bitesizecandies) reported 30 minutes ago

  @FishLady143 2015 Reddit is down the hall and to the left

• 
  MixRoute AI (@MixRoute_ai) reported 36 minutes ago

  @hustle_fred The only problem is the devs on reddit don't really like soft promos.

• 
  Vikramaditya Shukla (@exhibitionsguy) reported 37 minutes ago

  @vaibhavgeek Rule #3: Don’t outsource your judgment to anyone, not Reddit, not ChatGPT, not a guru. The problem isn’t where advice comes from; it’s believing advice is true without checking whether the evidence actually holds.

• 
  d1nz.3 (@Dinesh78039466) reported 38 minutes ago

  @alexdanilowicz I'd move reddit up n split 3 into two. ranking on google n getting named by chatgpt r not the same job - I watched only the first one for months n couldnt tell why nothing moved. reddit at 6 is where the q actually gets asked. slow, but its the room ur buyer is already in

• 
  just andrey (@andreyiscoding) reported 38 minutes ago

  @ardent__dev The question's backwards. It's not which platform. It's which one has the people who already need what you're building. Reddit lets you find them talking about the problem. X and LinkedIn you're just hoping they scroll past.

• 
  Danny ⌬Ⓐ☭🏳️‍🌈🏴🚩🇷🇺🇺🇦 (@danyisill) reported 40 minutes ago

  @viridiancolors there are websites to read deleted reddit comments skill issue

• 
  DLibryum (@DLibryum) reported 40 minutes ago

  @Grokmaxxing reddit energy in that post Fair reminder Michael famously leeched off FatBossTV guys for raid guides that they had from their PTR tests. Now he's doing the obfuscating and disingenuous thing like the Jason Shriers, Paul Tassis do. Everyone knows what the problem is, "expert"

• 
  V (@catslashmouse) reported 42 minutes ago

  @froggyfeller You mean to tell me with free access to some hack you downloaded that likely came with a keylogger + the ****** injector tool that never worked, and a server full of the most Reddit admins ever, and zero consequences (banned on the least good source game) you’d not do the same?

• 
  Douglass Mackey (@douglassmackey) reported 48 minutes ago

  LLM writing sounds so cringeworthy because LLMs are so heavily trained on Reddit. It’s interesting that Anthropic is trying to combat this problem by feeding the LLM reams of old, rare books. Not a bad idea.

• 
  John (@hello_code_) reported 50 minutes ago

  @paraclyst Reddit is where I found the most honest demand signal, people just openly describing the exact problem you solve

• 
  CaptainFlowers (@slomdumballs) reported 50 minutes ago

  @JoeRoganRecaps "Larger police forces produced more arrests for low-level “quality-of-life” offenses, with Black Americans disproportionately bearing that burden. So there were legitimate problems progressives were trying to solve" What a big steamy pile of BS. Nothing true, at all, in this statement. Its exactly what a AI trained on Reddit data would say, which in all likelihood is exactly what it is.

• 
  enp2s3 (@enp2s3) reported 50 minutes ago

  Free is not actually free. Here’s the Brave slop from my perspective. Popups everywhere, useless side features constantly jumping in your face like the browser is trying to force you to use them. When you first install Brave, if all you want is a better browser, you have to turn off dozens of settings and features first. Brave Ads, Brave News, Brave Rewards, yeah, earn rewards, because apparently we’re playing a ******* game here instead of looking for a browser, Brave AI Chat, Brave Talk… It genuinely starts feeling like one of the market's spam-filled products. Anyway, after turning all that crap off and getting through the initial setup chaos, you finally think you can relax. But you can’t. Brave looks good, the UI is solid, almost Opera-like hype, and it comes wrapped in all those big privacy-focused slogans. But after actually using it for a while, the whole thing starts turning into clickbait. A lot of Brave settings are disabled by default or set to ask every time, so on popular websites and across the modern web, instead of making your browser experience easier, it keeps costing you extra time. Still, you don’t quit Brave. You spend months fixing settings site by site, changing permissions, adjusting preferences, until you finally reach the comfortable browser experience you should’ve had from the beginning. Then not even 3 or 4 months later, another surprise. After a few browser version updates, basic usage starts falling apart with lag, freezing, stuttering and random slowdowns, gpu acceleration issues. At that point, the whole Brave experience basically becomes this: 1) Use Brave for a while. Spend a few months improving your settings and site preferences until you finally reach the normal browser experience you were supposed to have in the first place. 2) Just when everything finally starts working properly, one of Brave’s chronic problems randomly shows up. 3) Spend a few weeks researching it on github/reddit, trying fixes, taking backups and repeating the similar solutions until you eventually discover that people have been discussing the exact same problem for years and it is somehow still there. 4) Keep your hopes up, reset the browser, go back to Step 1 and start the whole thing over again. 5) After 1 YEAR, or X YEARS, finally find the courage to get rid of Brave and go back to Safari or Chrome and quietly weep. We basically have the browser version of the operating system irony now. The only difference is that we don’t hear about some brand-new operating system every year, while plenty of companies can build another browser, give it amazing PR and make huge promises about privacy, speed and simplicity. And as usual, we users are left quietly weeping.

• 
  KurapikaSimp🇵🇷 (@SimpKurapi86631) reported 55 minutes ago

  @Lechonkz54 @nickcanez_ I friend requested if you're still down I wanna spread it to reddit

• 
  ecomvillain (@ecomvillainx) reported 56 minutes ago

  If I had to research an e-commerce product from scratch, I would NOT start by writing ads. I’d build a customer intelligence document first. Here’s the process: Step 1: Find customer conversations Search: → Amazon reviews → Reddit threads → TikTok comments → YouTube comments → competitor reviews → niche forums Step 2: Extract exact phrases Don’t summarize everything. Save the language customers actually use. Step 3: Categorize it Create five buckets: PAINS DESIRES OBJECTIONS OUTCOMES PHRASES Step 4: Look for repetition One complaint means little. The same complaint appearing repeatedly is interesting. Step 5: Turn patterns into angles Repeated pain → problem angle Repeated desire → outcome angle Repeated skepticism → objection angle Research first. Copy second. Reply “RESEARCH” and I’ll send you the Customer Language Bank template.

• 
  Staida (@Staida) reported 58 minutes ago

  @MoronMining I remember all the reddit moles projecting that she was supposed to be his love interest. I was like, maybe tone that down. We already know but don’t just go around announcing your degeneracy.

• 
  Leonid Probst (@ProbstLeonid) reported 58 minutes ago

  @JonStewartIL Supposedly taken from Reddit before Reddit took it down

• 
  shroov (@greyxdria) reported 1 hour ago

  @anon285612 well that’s for you, having a favourite influencer isn’t an issue for me sometimes some people can save you & it could be those influencers also I don’t believe all these Reddit rumours, choosing to believe it is on you too

• 
  PowerofBanana (@Power_of_Banana) reported 1 hour ago

  @reddit_lies since questioning the narrative will never work on reddit, the better tactic is to double down on the approved narrative. On every thread find a way to remind everyone that trans women are women. On a local thread about a new restaurant opening up - make sure to comment the importance that they be pro-trans if they want your business. Just turn reddit into transit