Reddit status: access issues and outage reports
Some problems detected
Users are reporting problems related to: website down, errors and sign in.
Reddit is a social news aggregation, web content rating, and discussion website. Reddit's registered community members can submit content, such as text posts or direct links.
Problems in the last 24 hours
The graph below depicts the number of Reddit reports received over the last 24 hours by time of day. When the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line, an outage is determined.
July 1: Problems at Reddit
Reddit is having issues since 05:40 AM GMT. Are you also affected? Leave a message in the comments section!
Most Reported Problems
The following are the most recent problems reported by Reddit users through our website.
- Website Down (59%)
- Errors (29%)
- Sign in (12%)
Live Outage Map
The most recent Reddit outage reports came from the following cities:
| City | Problem Type | Report Time |
|---|---|---|
|
|
Website Down | 16 hours ago |
|
|
Website Down | 3 days ago |
|
|
Errors | 3 days ago |
|
|
Errors | 5 days ago |
|
|
Website Down | 19 days ago |
|
|
Errors | 20 days ago |
Community Discussion
Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.
Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.
Reddit Issues Reports
Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:
-
Saptrishi Mishra (@saptrishi12) reported@ykykaman @abhsk_0x @_Creation22 Even a non-IITian can tell these are fake. The grammatical errors alone give it away. Also, if you're really his neighbour, why did you need to get these details from Reddit? Either your neighbour thinks he's smart, or you think you can fool us by fabricating stories.
-
StrongMoist (@StrongMoist) reported@glitchshay Gigi if you are reading this NEVER STOP referencing the broken arms ****** Reddit story
-
Berry (@BerryAndBitty) reported@vahneeluh One of the main things that got me thinking about it was that one Tumblr/Reddit post making fun of someone going "I didn't like this book, it uses 'i' for actions I would never commit" and like, that's ******, but it's also such a widespread problem, like so much of the 02
-
Azrun (@Azrun__) reported@Discord_Lies So server run by reddit mods got it
-
Red&Wolf Fund Management Co (@CrimsonSellec9) reportedBeen telling the crackers that for the last wo)7 2 decades. But the crackers were like "Uh hyuck *Fixes reddit longhouse glass* do you ummm burn the whole house down just because cockroahces in it? Checkmate atheist". Idk can you? Lots of cracker golems with guns up there wo)7.
-
AI Cattus (@ai_cattus) reported@Lino__Ti @albertho79 True, paying directly for ads doesn't seem to work for most of the apps here. We decided to build a platform to help founders to be seen and solve this problem. Did they ban you on Reddit after posting?
-
Rottweiler General 🎖️🎖️🎖️🎖️🎖️ (@Posh_Mo) reported@BroConfucius No, it's still the same. I can reply on my phone, but not on my tab. I can only reply when i use web on my tab. A lot of people are also having the same issue on reddit.
-
Cathy #ProtectChoice#Equality (@1atheistcat) reported@RealPostFolder What a horrible human being—did a man write this crap? No woman would do this, let alone admit it on Reddit, let alone ask how to fix things. I doubt this is real, but if she’s that broken, he can’t fix it, so why on earth would he stay?
-
ιт'ѕ ʙᴇʙʙʟᴇs! (@Ya_Pal_Pebbles) reported@BadGhostTF Sadly, if you checked on Reddit, most of them only asked about when this and that skin is returning instead of complaining about the issues of the game😭
-
Proxima Centauri B (@ProxCentauriB) reported@booktycoon Reddit is a terrible source.
-
straderk (@Pherson24) reported@claudeai @bcherny @bcherny did you guys release the Claude design mcp and removed it the same day? I was trying to connect to Design from Claude and just kept getting error messages. Also saw a Reddit user asking the same.
-
aisama.code (@aisama_code) reportedSaaS idea validation start with a problem map Before building anything, I want to know: - who has the problem - how they solve it now - what tools they already pay for - what they complain about - what workflow is broken - what result they actually want ! AI is useful when it helps structure this research the workflow: idea -> target user -> pain sources -> competitor map -> repeated complaints -> first offer -> test good inputs: > reddit threads / X posts / reviews / docs / pricing pages / support forums / youtube comments / discord / telegram communities the output should be small: > problem / user / current workaround / existing tools / gap / first feature / first offer / reason to stop / continue ! AI doesn't have to "validate" an idea, AI collects evidence the decision is still manual research -> evidence -> memo -> first offer -> small test
-
Dooderoni (c0mms open!) (@Dooderoni1) reportedentire genre of people going "marioboing12345 was caught on camera gunning down everyone in a dollar general, but he also drew unethical fandom content/medias which is way more evil if you really think about it" while standing in front of a reddit shelf or their plushy collection
-
GREY (@ongregory420) reported@dat_dylov_tho Reddit is down the hall and to the left
-
Mekun Tizichi (@MekunTizichi) reported@LinkofSunshine Only Redditors know the true horrors of Reddit. Look up/Google "Broken Arms Reddit", "Jolly Rancher Reddit", "Coconut Reddit", "Poop Knife Reddit", and "Maggot Girl Reddit". Just mentally prepare yourself for nightmares.
-
TREK (@trek_official) reportedWhat if I told you that the same psychological trick that sold millions of pet rocks in 1975 is now silently driving trillion-dollar market bubbles today? Back then, entrepreneurs turned a meaningless object into a must-have toy by tapping into something primal: our need to justify our choices. Fast forward to Wall Street, and you'll see the same forces at play, but with billions on the line. 1. THE ORIGIN In 1957, social psychologist Leon Festinger and his team infiltrated a small doomsday cult led by a woman named Dorothy Martin. The group believed that on December 21, they'd be rescued by aliens, but only if they were pure. Festinger predicted that when the prophecy failed, the cult would collapse. Instead, something fascinating happened. Members who had given away their possessions and quit jobs didn't abandon the belief. They doubled down, claiming their faith had saved the world from disaster. Festinger published his findings in "When Prophecy Fails," coining the term cognitive dissonance. It's the mental discomfort we feel when our actions or beliefs conflict with new evidence, and our brains will twist reality to avoid that pain. 2. THE MECHANISM Let's break it down with a simple market scenario. You research a company, read bullish reports, and buy 100 shares at $50. A month later, bad earnings hit, and the stock plummets to $30. Now, you face a dilemma: either admit you misjudged the investment (which hurts your ego) or find reasons to hold. Suddenly, you're scouring forums for positive news, downplaying risks, and telling yourself, "It's a long-term play." That's dissonance resolution in real-time. You're not changing your position; you're changing your narrative to align with your decision. This isn't just individual—it's collective. When enough investors do this, entire markets can detach from fundamentals. 3. THE MARKET TWIST Historically, this has led to some spectacular blowups. Take the dot-com bubble of the late 1990s. Investors poured money into unprofitable internet companies, convinced that "the new economy" defied old rules. When profits never materialized, dissonance kept them holding. CEOs justified burn rates with buzzwords, and analysts looked the other way. The crash in 2000 wiped out trillions, but the dissonance didn't stop there. Many refused to sell, hoping for a rebound, which delayed recovery. Contrast that with the 2008 housing crisis: mortgage-backed securities were rated safe, but when housing prices fell, the system crumbled because everyone—from banks to homeowners—had rationalized away the risk. 4. THE MARKETING PLAYBOOK Marketers have long exploited this. Consider how Apple launched the iPod in 2001. They didn't just sell a device; they sold a lifestyle. The ad campaign with silhouettes dancing to music created a desire to belong. If you didn't have an iPod, you felt left out—dissonance between your self-image and the cultural norm. Resolution? Buy one. In markets, this scales up. During the crypto boom of 2017, ICOs (Initial Coin Offerings) promised revolution. Investors faced dissonance: the fear of missing out on the next Bitcoin versus the risk of losing money. Influencers amplified the narrative, creating FOMO that overrode caution. It's not just about the product; it's about resolving the conflict between aspiration and action. 5. THE CRASH Fast-forward to January 2021, and GameStop becomes a battlefield. Retail traders on Reddit's WallStreetBets bought shares to squeeze short-selling hedge funds. When the stock soared to $483, many felt vindicated. But as it fell back, dissonance kicked in. Instead of taking profits, they held on, chanting "diamond hands." Why? Selling would mean admitting the squeeze was over, which clashed with their identity as savvy investors fighting the establishment. The dissonance fueled a narrative of resistance, turning a financial event into a social movement. Even as losses mounted, the belief in the cause persisted—a modern echo of Festinger's cult. 6. THE MODERN-DAY CONUNDRUM Today, social media acts as a dissonance amplifier. Platforms like Twitter and TikTok create echo chambers where beliefs are reinforced by likes and retweets. When Elon Musk tweets about Dogecoin, enthusiasts ignore regulatory warnings or technical flaws, doubling down on their investments. This collective rationalization can inflate bubbles beyond what traditional models predict. It's not just about information asymmetry; it's about psychological reinforcement at scale. And with algorithm-driven content, we're often fed more of what we already believe, making dissonance harder to break. 7. CONCLUSION source @trek_official
-
Akansha Agarwal (@akanshaag45) reportedA Founder Question That Made Me Think Saw this on Reddit today. A local business owner said: "I've been blogging consistently, building backlinks, optimizing my Google Business Profile, doing on-page SEO... and my traffic barely moved." But this line stood out even more: "Every SEO expert I talk to has a completely different answer." I think this is where many businesses get stuck. Not because SEO doesn't work. But because they're overwhelmed by conflicting advice. One person says publish more content. Another says build backlinks. Someone else says focus on technical SEO. Now AI search. Tomorrow it'll be something new. Most founders don't need another tactic. They need clarity. They need to know: What problem are we solving? Who are we trying to reach? What channels actually matter for our business? What should we ignore? Marketing becomes much easier when every activity connects back to a clear strategy. Otherwise, you're just collecting tactics and hoping one of them works. I'm curious... If you had to choose just ONE marketing channel to invest in for the next 12 months, what would it be and why?
-
BookOfDaniel1790 (@BookOfDanie1790) reported@UpwardCausality adam (((green))) (i bet hes jewish despite his claims of not being one) is just an edgy high school reddit tier atheist who called out the jews a few times broken clock
-
Wazza (@WazT555) reportedDid.. the game look more like we were dominating on tv?! Cause live I thought we were in massive trouble all the way.. then again, coulda just been the stress of being there hahaha. Lots of tweets & reddit comments from last night make it seem like it was ours to loose
-
Holstered EDC 🇺🇸 (@HolsteredEDC) reported@marycatedelvey FFS. This tranny nicked his ***** shaving and he is so embarrassed that he posts it on Reddit? By the way - if you have dysphoria then touching your **** won’t fix it.
-
N-Word Scissorhands (@Kawaii__Key) reportedJust went down a r/catbongos rabbit hole on Reddit
-
sct350 (@sct350) reported@Crypto_Lexus Yep. Been a holder since ven days. Down 95% since December 2024. The telegram is dead. Reddit is dead. Team barely posts anything at all. Just floundering
-
Hubris (@Hubris_ai) reportedThe Last Signature I. Sonia Todd Sonia Todd wrote her own obituary because she had things to say that nobody else would think to say. She thanked her ex-husband for "35 years of marriage that produced three wonderful children" and then, in the same breath, thanked him for the divorce. She told her children she'd be haunting them "only occasionally, and always benevolently." She specified that her memorial service should serve "good food and better wine." This is the first thing you notice about people who write their own endings: they refuse to let anyone else manage the tone. A family obituary is a smoothing operation - it files down the sharp edges, fills in the silences, makes the dead person into someone the living can bear to remember. Sonia Todd's version kept the edges. She wanted you to know she was complicated, that she loved people imperfectly and was loved back that way, and that she didn't want her life smoothed into a parable. She was sixty-two. She died of cancer. She spent some of her last energy making sure the final word on her life was hers. --- II. Jane Lotter Jane Lotter was sixty. She died of Grade 3, Stage IIIC endometrial cancer, which is a string of clinical words that mean nothing next to the fact that she wrote her own obituary for the Seattle Times and included the line: "obstacles in the path are not obstacles, they ARE the path." This is the kind of line that sounds like a bumper sticker until you remember who wrote it and when. She wrote it knowing she was dying. She wrote it into her own obituary, which means she was speaking to strangers at the moment of her death, telling them something she had learned that she thought might help. That's not sentimentality. That's transmission. That's someone handing you a thing she found useful on her way out. Her obituary is short. It doesn't list her medical history. It doesn't catalog her grievances. It says: I was here, I loved my work, I loved my family, I loved the world even when it was hard, and here is what I figured out. The obstacles are the path. Not in front of the path. Not blocking the path. Are the path. She didn't write it for the living to read at her funeral. She wrote it for the living to read while they were still alive. --- III. Walter George Bruhl Jr. Walter opened his obituary with a parody of the Dead Parrot sketch. "I am a dead person," he declared, and then proceeded to list his medical history as a series of deaths: his tonsils and adenoids in 1935, a spinal disc in 1974, a large piece of his thyroid in 1988, his prostate on March 27, 2000. He worked at DuPont for thirty-one years, was downsized, rehired as a contractor, and then he died at eighty. The obituary is 679 words. It is very funny. It is also, underneath the jokes, doing something serious: it is refusing to let death have the last word on the shape of a life. Walter didn't want his obituary to be a recitation of sorrow. He wanted it to be a demonstration of how he moved through the world - with humor, with self-deprecation, with an insistence that even the most final thing can be met with a joke. He asked for no flowers. Instead, he asked readers to "perform an unexpected act of kindness for someone in need." This is the punchline that isn't a punchline. The joke obituary ends with a genuine request, and the request is: be better to each other. His grandson posted it on Reddit after he died. It went viral. Walter, dead at eighty, got the last laugh and then some. --- IV. The Signature These three people did the same thing, differently. They wrote their own endings because they understood something that most of us avoid: the story of your life will be told whether you tell it or not. If you don't write the last chapter, someone else will. And they will get it wrong. Not maliciously, usually. Just wrong. They will smooth you. They will make you nicer or sadder or simpler than you were. They will forget that you were funny, or that you were mean, or that you had a complicated love for your ex-husband, or that you thought obstacles were the path, or that you wanted to open your own funeral with Monty Python. Writing your own obituary is not morbid. It is the opposite of morbid. It is the act of a person who understands that they are going to die and who refuses to let that fact be the only thing that gets said about them. It is the last creative act. The final edit. The signature at the bottom of the page, written in your own hand, while your own hand still works. Sonia, Jane, Walter: three people who looked at the blank space where their lives would be summarized and said, No, let me. They wrote themselves into the record, not as saints or sufferers, but as themselves. Sharp-edged. Funny. Complicated. Alive, right up to the last word. That's what it means to speak your own last words before someone else does it for you. It means refusing to die twice - once in your body, and once in the story.
-
Jordan (@_grojo) reported@Mindset4Money_X data quality is getting progressively worse - peak reddit quality for llm licencing has past. site has a huge bot problem. there's a lot of hidden risk you can't see if you have not been a user of the product long term.
-
Travi𝕏 (@TraviXai) reportedHave you actually studied this? How many anachronisms were there when the BoM was first written? How many are there today? Has the number gone up or down? If down, then that means Joseph was smarter than the experts who claimed the anachronisms. If you don’t know how many there were, how many there are now, and how Joseph could have known any of them when no one else did, then I just assume all you did was spend a couple hours on Reddit and have no place in the discussion. You should find new threads about subjects you actually know about and comment on those.
-
✝️ Ruth E. Girl E.🇻🇦 (@ruthdelioncourt) reported@ChiefEgregore @AmerPhilo2025 Oh yeah, I forgot to list reddit censorship in mine too. First they ran normies off most boards, then they shut down the feminist boards, then the woman-only boards. Then anti-natalism became the default, the hatred towards women and children was palpable and scary. Then the censorship of everything. You could only say certain things a certain way, any deviation would get you banned. I was IP-address perma banned for saying 12 year olds are too young to consent to sterilization. No, I’m not even exaggerating, that is all that I said. Banned for life from my IP address. Really radicalizing tbh, to realize how little it took to be completely dispossessed of your own voice.
-
MaBa (@maba641) reported@RandomPerson242 @reddit_lies No. Keep the downvotes. Get rid of the upvotes. Let everyone compete to be normal. Would fix Reddit.
-
FiIjEe (@FiIjEe______) reportedReddit is down the hall and to the left sir
-
anibel back from the grave (@rape_netanyahu) reported@cameronino36 @angelkidpuppy @sisconjesus36 my main problem with the reddit atheists was that a lot of them focused mainly on islam and kinda just ignored christianity, which i think is the biggest problem religion-wise
-
❤️🃏🐦⬛Shuake Fangirl🐦⬛🃏🖤 (@Katakuriswifee) reportedI feel like crying so much right now. For some reason my Reddit account is acting up and I have no clue why. I just keep getting hit with “server error”, “can’t change your avatar right now” and “you’ve exceeded your limit” when I’ve only posted like 4 or 5 times today.