Robinhood Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Robinhood Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  PumpMyBags (@OnlyUPpulse0) reported 1 minute ago

  @RHoodRewards @RobinhoodCrypto @RobinhoodApp Ded wtf

• 
  Jcd (@jesuscastrod) reported 2 minutes ago

  @Elev8edTrader @RobinhoodApp Robinhood doesn't respond, doesn't provide answers, doesn't solve technical problems they themselves created, because they are inept. They don't respect the customer, violating their rights. For the past two weeks, they haven't allowed me to access my individual portfolio.

• 
  Benthere Dunn That (@behthere) reported 4 minutes ago

  @RobinhoodApp Show me my stocks and etfs, NOT my crypto in my daily chart! Im moving my crypto because you idiots cant or won't give me that option. ****** platform where apps don't work and customer support is **** tier .

• 
  Andrew Anderson (@Only1MrAnderson) reported 8 minutes ago

  @MarsHomestead Just open an @RobinhoodApp account for them. They now support minors. Same thing from what I can tell

• 
  Money 🟧 (@Co2Money) reported 10 minutes ago

  @vladtenev is @RobinhoodApp planning to support the BIP-110 fork distribution??? Asking for a friend…

• 
  root (@Root_Edge) reported 13 minutes ago

  @RobinhoodApp @akathesmith time to scope out how we want to support this.

• 
  AG7 (@Gaudfada) reported 16 minutes ago

  @Kalshi and @RobinhoodApp Hey, your HOUSEPARTYNOM⁠ (FL-23) prediction market is completely broken. You have Joe Kaufman and Raven Harrison listed as tradable strikes for FL-23, but official FL Division of Elections records confirm they qualified for FL-25 after the redistricting maps. Your support bot "Greg" is refusing to escalate this structural data-mapping error. This isn't "trader evaluation"—you listed a structurally impossible market. Under CFTC Core Principles 3 & 12, this needs an immediate compliance review and contract void/refund. Please get a supervisor to check support logs. Fix the data feed. 🛑📉 👇🏽

• 
  Alchemist Jones (@AgenticJonesy) reported 17 minutes ago

  @RobinhoodApp Only problem is i've been waiting forever

• 
  vik ⚡️ (@vscorrpio) reported 17 minutes ago

  found an interesting honeypot ($RIALTO) on @RobinhoodApp today. i aped it myself, got drained, felt pretty stupid, so i figured i’d reverse it. turns out it was a pretty clean allowance bypass, and you don’t see those every day. CA: 0xefd3db0271aa579b8f9f1e4ab91a9d17fea1faa9 attacker helper: 0x5e3c1C6F90d35499C40A5f5769822AF2a631d702 attacker: 0x281FF81dF0Eca1F3F7Ba2A48499c7A83D216a2A8 both contracts were unverified, so most of the reversing was done with a mix of decompilers, AI, and manual analysis. normally an ERC20 works like this: - alice owns tokens. - alice calls approve(bob, 100). - the contract stores that allowance. - bob can now call transferFrom(alice, someoneElse, 100). without that approval, transferFrom should revert. that’s basically the entire security model behind ERC20 allowances. on $RIALTO, transferFrom has another branch. before it checks the allowance, it loads a value from a hidden mapping in storage slot 0 using msg.sender as the key. if that value is non-zero, the allowance check is skipped completely. roughly: if (hidden[msg.sender] != 0) { // skip allowance check } else { require(allowance[from][msg.sender] >= amount); } the attacker helper contract had hidden[attacker] = 0x64. that single storage value effectively made it a privileged spender. it could call transferFrom(holder, attacker, amount) against any holder without ever receiving an approval from that holder. i also suspect this has a decent chance of slipping past a lot of automated bytecode scanners. most quick scanners look for obvious blacklist logic, owner mints, tax changes, or suspicious selectors. this one hides inside an otherwise normal-looking transferFrom implementation. they were also actively market making the token. volume looked organic, there were real-looking sells, larger buys getting sold into, then the chart recovered again. the price action looked surprisingly legitimate even though the whole thing was all fake. since @RobinhoodApp is only on day 2, stuff like this was bound to show up sooner or later. security tooling and risk scoring on new chains usually takes time to catch up, so don’t blindly trust green checkmarks on terminals like @BasedBot which btw great job for working so well on day0 when nobody else was around stay safe out there.

• 
  Musasol (@janmansol) reported 18 minutes ago

  @CallMeChenAgain @RobinhoodApp @robinhoodkittie X and website are down right ?

• 
  Sandeep Chivukula (@_sandeep) reported 23 minutes ago

  @RobinhoodApp before you enable agentic trading you should improve you agentic support agent. It's a ticket deflection effort not customer service. It confidently claimed that I don't have the kind of account that I needed help with. 🤷 Maybe it's giving me a hint.

• 
  Ethreums 👑 (@HVnS42442600) reported 23 minutes ago

  @rosetina_degen9 @RobinhoodApp @RobinhoodCrypto But what about security concerns with Robinhood Chain, an L2 on Arbitrum, being a new blockchain solution?

• 
  Awayrook ⛏️ (@Awayrook) reported 24 minutes ago

  @Psilosnypin @RobinhoodApp Ive had bad experiences with coinbase but hey maybe theyve changed Lol

• 
  #PHSalt (@PHSalt) reported 25 minutes ago

  @RobinhoodApp your stupid customer service is flat, making up stories or lying, or changing their answers, all oversees, can’t speak or txt to a supervisor, pathetic, there’s is absolutely no help with any issues because your lips service’s only ‘help’ is telling us to wait that they can’t help us

• 
  CryptoJoe (@Jo3Dang3r) reported 29 minutes ago

  @n0commas @RobinhoodApp Also, the Uniswap cross chain swap won't trigger a Metamask popup confirm, and says an unknown error has occurred.