1. Home
  2. Companies
  3. Robinhood
Robinhood

Robinhood status: trading issues and outage reports

No problems detected

If you are having issues, please submit a report below.

Full Outage Map

Robinhood is a free-trading app that lets investors trade stocks, options, exchange-traded funds and cryptocurrency without paying commissions or fees.

Problems in the last 24 hours

The graph below depicts the number of Robinhood reports received over the last 24 hours by time of day. When the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line, an outage is determined.

At the moment, we haven't detected any problems at Robinhood. Are you experiencing issues or an outage? Leave a message in the comments section!

Most Reported Problems

The following are the most recent problems reported by Robinhood users through our website.

  • 43% Trading platform (43%)
  • 36% Website (36%)
  • 14% Login (14%)
  • 7% Withdrawals (7%)

Live Outage Map

The most recent Robinhood outage reports came from the following cities:

CityProblem TypeReport Time
Orlando Login 23 days ago
Carlisle Trading platform 23 days ago
Youngstown Trading platform 23 days ago
Columbus Trading platform 23 days ago
Brooklyn Trading platform 23 days ago
Denver Website 23 days ago
Full Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Robinhood Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

  • PHSalt
    #PHSalt (@PHSalt) reported

    @RobinhoodApp your stupid customer service is flat, making up stories or lying, or changing their answers, all oversees, can’t speak or txt to a supervisor, pathetic, there’s is absolutely no help with any issues because your lips service’s only ‘help’ is telling us to wait that they can’t help us

  • Gaudfada
    AG7 (@Gaudfada) reported

    Hey @Kalshi and @RobinhoodApp I am reaching out regarding a critical administrative error on the ⁠HOUSEPARTYNOM⁠ (FL-23) market. The platform currently lists Joe Kaufman and Raven Harrison under FL-23. However, official state qualification records from the June 12 deadline confirm they are running in FL-25 due to the redistricting map. Frontline support ("Greg") refused to escalate, claiming "trader responsibility." This is an internal exchange mapping error, making a fair resolution under your source rules impossible. I have submitted a formal email to compliance and am preparing a CFTC ticket. Please escalate this conversation to a human supervisor immediately to resolve. Thanks.

  • samaburhat
    Ms Al (@samaburhat) reported

    @RobinhoodApp It’s been more than 5 months no one can fix my account …I chat and talk both way no one able to fix …low customer support

  • vscorrpio
    vik ⚡️ (@vscorrpio) reported

    found an interesting honeypot ($RIALTO) on @RobinhoodApp today. i aped it myself, got drained, felt pretty stupid, so i figured i’d reverse it. turns out it was a pretty clean allowance bypass, and you don’t see those every day. CA: 0xefd3db0271aa579b8f9f1e4ab91a9d17fea1faa9 attacker helper: 0x5e3c1C6F90d35499C40A5f5769822AF2a631d702 attacker: 0x281FF81dF0Eca1F3F7Ba2A48499c7A83D216a2A8 both contracts were unverified, so most of the reversing was done with a mix of decompilers, AI, and manual analysis. normally an ERC20 works like this: - alice owns tokens. - alice calls approve(bob, 100). - the contract stores that allowance. - bob can now call transferFrom(alice, someoneElse, 100). without that approval, transferFrom should revert. that’s basically the entire security model behind ERC20 allowances. on $RIALTO, transferFrom has another branch. before it checks the allowance, it loads a value from a hidden mapping in storage slot 0 using msg.sender as the key. if that value is non-zero, the allowance check is skipped completely. roughly: if (hidden[msg.sender] != 0) { // skip allowance check } else { require(allowance[from][msg.sender] >= amount); } the attacker helper contract had hidden[attacker] = 0x64. that single storage value effectively made it a privileged spender. it could call transferFrom(holder, attacker, amount) against any holder without ever receiving an approval from that holder. i also suspect this has a decent chance of slipping past a lot of automated bytecode scanners. most quick scanners look for obvious blacklist logic, owner mints, tax changes, or suspicious selectors. this one hides inside an otherwise normal-looking transferFrom implementation. they were also actively market making the token. volume looked organic, there were real-looking sells, larger buys getting sold into, then the chart recovered again. the price action looked surprisingly legitimate even though the whole thing was all fake. since @RobinhoodApp is only on day 2, stuff like this was bound to show up sooner or later. security tooling and risk scoring on new chains usually takes time to catch up, so don’t blindly trust green checkmarks on terminals like @BasedBot which btw great job for working so well on day0 when nobody else was around stay safe out there.

  • JulieKennis
    Julie 🌟 (@JulieKennis) reported

    @Be_Kind2Others @RobinhoodApp It’s a good look for the customer service

  • adam3us
    Adam Back (@adam3us) reported

    @BitPaine probably defi guys, magical thinkers about leverage... robinhood caps leverage at 2x. though they do have volatility and concentration related variable maintenance margin. so they could be pre-emptively squeezing $STRC margin requirements - @RobinhoodApp users could comment.

  • jvandy50
    Pelosi's Left Areola (@jvandy50) reported

    @stkmarktswinger @Biotech_SD @RobinhoodApp Just wait till you get the joy of talking to their customer service...they made a mistake and I just wanted them to fix it on principle alone, they closed the case before I could even reply lol

  • yichuan_drive
    一川drive 🔴 (@yichuan_drive) reported

    @0xjayfi @Lighter_xyz @RobinhoodApp hahaha, it's 0,046 if I'm not mistaken... Fluffles apparently down... Echo is close

  • HVnS42442600
    Ethreums 👑 (@HVnS42442600) reported

    @rosetina_degen9 @RobinhoodApp @RobinhoodCrypto But what about security concerns with Robinhood Chain, an L2 on Arbitrum, being a new blockchain solution?

  • kindofsmokish
    Smokish ⬛🐂 (@kindofsmokish) reported

    @BFreshHB @arbitrum @RobinhoodApp Already built for Arbitrum and the foundation laughed and basically told me I was wasting my time. Denied me any help up to and including auditing contracts and basically threw my entire Continuous Security Protocol to the side. They are the reason I almost gave up on building.

  • LORELLOFORECAST
    Ryan Lorello (@LORELLOFORECAST) reported

    @RobinhoodApp directly texted me 666. Why did you guys do that? I never asked for 666 payments. Wtf

  • Christo11791474
    Christopher Harmon (@Christo11791474) reported

    @RobinhoodApp @RobinhoodApp 2 weeks off the Gold Card waitlist and your app still won’t let me apply. Broken deep link after Plaid bank linking loops me back to Apply Now every time. 6+ support contacts, pre-written responses, zero resolution. 4 year shareholder. Case ID: 020740746

  • mcjaycrypto
    McJay (@mcjaycrypto) reported

    @Featherpadcc @RobinhoodApp this is so undervalued cus damn this gotta be the first launchapd on this chain

  • JohnMementoMori
    giovanni mori (@JohnMementoMori) reported

    @gabrielhaines @RobinhoodApp It's a promotional yield offered by USDG that DEFINITELY WON'T cause a bankrun when they drop it down to a sustainable level

  • behthere
    Benthere Dunn That (@behthere) reported

    @RobinhoodApp Show me my stocks and etfs, NOT my crypto in my daily chart! Im moving my crypto because you idiots cant or won't give me that option. ****** platform where apps don't work and customer support is **** tier .

  • Gold_btween_ash
    Gold Between Ash (@Gold_btween_ash) reported

    @trenches_alone @RobinhoodApp The problem with these new "tech app" pros is no one knows their team, no real support, lame liquidity to which you cant even swap it on Uniswap (%70) slip penalty = No thanks ill skip on this one 👍

  • Emeraldxyzz
    Emerald (@Emeraldxyzz) reported

    @SlickBTC @RobinhoodApp @robinhoodkittie I hope they fix the refund part, otherwise looking good.

  • degeneer03
    Risavdeb (@degeneer03) reported

    @RobinhoodApp Damn!

  • _the_doge
    The Đoge (@_the_doge) reported

    @RobinhoodApp I need help. I am on vacation getting hacked and potentially robbed and your customer service has done nothing to even help.

  • sol_mocha
    Mocha (@sol_mocha) reported

    @RobinhoodApp Sign up is broken 🤔🤔

  • metaronin
    ⛩metaronin⛩ (@metaronin) reported

    @adam3us @BitPaine @RobinhoodApp Maintenance still at 50%

  • Janni3437662848
    Janni (@Janni3437662848) reported

    @Silver_on_TON @SafeHood_ @RobinhoodApp Yup, too many stupid and greedy people in crypto.

  • JonBras0824
    JohnnyBravo (@JonBras0824) reported

    @liorsela @RobinhoodApp I'm stupid I didn't knew every purchase I had to stake i buy everyday

  • lazydogggy
    Doggy’o (@lazydogggy) reported

    @RobinhoodApp Wow hood will crash hard after this announcement is over

  • TheStockBro
    TheStockBro (@TheStockBro) reported

    @TheSalonDon @RobinhoodApp @vladtenev can you please fix this?

  • BringLogicBack
    WAGMI Capital MGMT 💎⚡ (@BringLogicBack) reported

    @RobinhoodApp Robinhood app is glitchy, terrible spreads, terrible fills, zero customer service, and they just fired a bunch of people to save money. I think I'll skip the one hour commercial about flat earth

  • metrpay
    metr (@metrpay) reported

    metr is working on adding support for @RobinhoodApp chain on @arbitrum what does this mean? if you're a merchant, you'll be able to accept payments via Robinhood Chain!

  • atypinvestor
    The Atypical Investor (@atypinvestor) reported

    @RobinhoodApp Next up, very shortly after the response from Robinhood, I received an email from @public or, rather, I should say an AI agent at Public. This AI agent stated that it could help me with my questions. Unfortunately, on the very first question, it said, "I don't have that specific information" about what I asked. That's not helpful. The other two questions it answered well. In fact, if I were rating the AI for answering questions, formatting the response, etc., I'd give it high marks. However, it didn't answer my first question, and it didn't give me any other way to contact anyone in order to do so and, therefore, was ultimately not a satisfactory reply, either.

  • HarmzMajestic8
    ♛𝖍𝖆𝖗𝖒𝔃 ❄️🧜🏽‍♀️⚔️ (@HarmzMajestic8) reported

    Damn @RobinhoodApp are yall poor or something @AskRobinhood

  • NickADobos
    Nick Dobos (@NickADobos) reported

    @GanseKyle @RobinhoodApp Leverage is on the table, though not currently using it. Wanted to keep out of anything that could go negative and incur debt. Worst case should be goes to zero.