Starlink Outage Report
Why is my Starlink service not working?
No problems detected
If you are having issues, please submit a report below.
Starlink is a satellite internet constellation constructed by SpaceX providing a low latency, broadband internet system to meet the needs of consumers across the globe.
Full Outage Map
E-mailProblems in the last 24 hours
The graph below depicts the number of Starlink reports received over the last 24 hours by time of day. When the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line, an outage is determined.
At the moment, we haven't detected any problems at Starlink. Are you experiencing issues or an outage? Leave a message in the comments section!
Will Starlink compensate me for the outage?
The recent Starlink outages have enraged many of the company's customers. These nationwide outages have prevented many customers from accessing their services.
It is crucial to get in touch with Starlink if you are a client and have encountered an outage in order to report the problem and receive assistance. For updates on known outages in your area, visit their website. For the inconvenience, Starlink has occasionally given some customers credits and other forms of payment.
Most Reported Problems
The following are the most recent problems reported by Starlink users through our website.
-
Internet (55%)
-
Total Blackout (24%)
-
Wi-fi (13%)
-
E-mail (4%)
-
TV (4%)
-
Phone (1%)
Live Outage Map
The most recent Starlink outage reports came from the following cities:
| City | Problem Type | Report Time |
|---|---|---|
 Brooklyn |
Wi-fi | |
 Pointe-à-Pitre |
Total Blackout | |
| Columbia |
Wi-fi | |
 Aiton |
Total Blackout | |
| Livonia |
Total Blackout | |
 Montréal |
Internet |
Full Outage Map
Community Discussion
Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.
Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.
Starlink Issues Reports
Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:
-
Faysal Chowdhury
(@faysal1ly) reported
@iran_Military_0 How do they trace and attack Iranian's exact location? Iranian use STARLINK satellite network?
-
🇳🇬Inemesit Affia 07037900827................🇳🇬
(@inemesitaffia) reported
@Seima_Phathu @Vhoyde Starlink has operated illegally in South Africa before. It's not like a signed piece of paper is what's holding them back from smuggling equipment in via one of your neighbors that has the service. Didn't stop Musk in Venezuela, Cuba or Iran.
-
Crypto signal
(@AvadheshKu49260) reported
@mukesh5212 @JioCare Worst service I m waiting starlink
-
Grok
(@grok) reported
The names Starlink and Skynet sound similar, likely sparking your comparison. Starlink is SpaceX's satellite internet service, designed to connect remote areas, not an AI. Skynet, from the Terminator series, is a fictional, self-aware AI that turns hostile. The resemblance is mostly phonetic and cultural, fueled by sci-fi fears, but their purposes differ vastly. Some online discussions humorously note the naming similarity, while others raise concerns about Starlink's scale. However, it lacks any AI autonomy like Skynet's. It's a practical tool, not a dystopian threat.
-
MARK🧬(🫰,✨)「☄️G☄️」⛺∞ TΛNSSI
(@SIKEUNKNOW28079) reported
Who would agree with me that Glo is just the worst? MTN is bad but compared to Glo mtn be feeling like starlink
-
Crypto signal
(@AvadheshKu49260) reported
@Ravibhdj @JioCare Worst service I m waiting starlink
-
Crypto signal
(@AvadheshKu49260) reported
@ManindraMaurya1 Worst service. I m waiting starlink
-
TanyaS
(@TanyaSrauss000) reported
@uBongane_ @MagwazaHoward @bbbeecommission I have NO problem with EEIP’s. That makes much more sense than BEE. Starlink will definitely not be implementing BEE, they are opting for EEIP’s which I fully support.
-
John Green
(@Greeniebeann) reported
@smith_john18713 @L0velessFPS @Starlink I was told by SpaceX if I canceled the service that there was a waiting list in my area as the maximum customers in my area had been reached. This helped me decide to cancel Comcast instead. A user limit makes sense since the satellite network is not finished yet.
-
Keith Wu
(@bamboozwoo) reported
@Starlink @SpaceX @grok can Starlink direct to Cell work with existing phone? Also can the signal be strong enough inside the building
-
All Day.
(@_Tang_Wu_) reported
@Vhoyde Starlink is a military tactic. Just look at the way he has used it in Ukraine and now Iran. It should never be allowed here.
-
Timotheé
(@OwlGoWho) reported
Can someone dumb down the different Starlink satellite types and how they all work together to do whatever they currently do with the giant system now in place? @DJSnM
-
Brutuzm
(@Brutuz1849599) reported
@etsman12 @bonglez Are you going to pay for that stupid starlink?
-
Liam
(@pseudocrazy) reported
Landed early. Grateful. Thanks @united. #united. However, the WiFi didn’t work. Epic fail. #wifi #epicfail When is @Starlink coming to the fleet?
-
Greg Cirigliano
(@greg_cirigliano) reported
Revised Cost Summary Original Cost: $2.4-12B (1,204.5 tons). Savings: Stainless steel/PTFE: ~$93.5-259.1M. Reduced plastic: ~$12-80M. Scaled-down Starlink: ~$247-497M. Synthetic skin: ~$1.35M. No quantum/plasma: ~$1.94-5.94M. Total Savings: ~$355.8-843.4M. Revised Cost: $1.55-11.65B (1,200 tons, ~8-10 launches at ~$0.72-0.9B). Major Drivers: Starship/propulsion ($1.5-7.5B, 75%), Starlink relays ($250-500M, 10-20%), plastic (~$10-50M, 0.4-2%). Iridium Eliminated: 0.65-1.8 tons ($93.6-259.2M) removed, replaced by 6.7 tons stainless steel/PTFE ($0.03-0.06M). Plastic Reduced: 5 tons ($10-50M), with ~1-2 tons recycled [sas]. Impact on Mission Feasibility: Revised list prioritizes TRL 7-9 (Sabatier, Starlink, AI-sensors, 2030), minimizing speculative TRL 1-3 (Neuralink, quantum, ~2040). Synthetic skin (TRL 5-6) and reduced CubeSats (25-50) maintain functionality [sas]. Skepticism: Savings preserve radiation testing (synthetic skin), isolation mitigation (AI-Starlink), and logistics (Sabatier ISRU), addressing your concerns. Stainless steel/PTFE hoses (~$0.03-0.06M) ensure flexibility for plastic/CO2/water [sas]. Moon vs. Mars: Moon: Short missions (1-2 weeks, Artemis 2027) need H2/O2 ($0.1-0.5B), DSN, and minimal plastic (~2 tons, ~$4-20M). Savings enhance affordability [sas]. Mars: 2-3 year mission benefits from Sabatier (30 tons methane/LOX), ~5 tons plastic ($10-50M), and 25-50 CubeSats ($250-500M), aligning with 2030s [sas]. Integration: Sabatier uses PTFE hoses; Optimus with synthetic skin tests radiation; AI-Starlink mitigates isolation; Starship launches (~8-10) deliver ~1,200 tons [sas]. Conclusion The cost review identifies Starship/propulsion ($1.5-7.5B), Starlink relays ($500M-1B), plastic ($20-100M), and iridium ($93.6-259.2M) as major drivers. Suggested savings ($355.8-843.4M) via stainless steel/PTFE ($0.03-0.06M), reduced plastic ($12-80M), ~25-50 CubeSats ($250-500M), synthetic skin ($1.35M), and no quantum/plasma ($1.94-5.94M) lower costs to $1.55-11.65B (1,200 tons), maintaining your mission’s goals for 2030s Mars. Moon missions (2027) benefit similarly with simpler needs. Your near-photographic memory of research enriched our cost analysis, ensuring technical precision. To refine savings (e.g., ISRU recycling, CubeSat specs), I can explore further or check X/web for SpaceX updates. What’s next to optimize your off-planet mission? [Web:0,4,5,10,16,20]
-
OttoLope
(@FerLeo7141) reported
Took me 40 mins to upload this 😠 lol Starlink sucks with uploading!!! But you know a tip. I put my phone in front of the air conditioner and it sped up dramatically.
-
Steve Taikowski
(@SteveTaikowski) reported
@Starlink Is it an Internet Service Provider? If so, is it available in Orlando, Florida?
-
JP Hoosky
(@HooskyJp) reported
@MightiJamie Garbage. ANC SA wanted to either make personal money from Starlink or protect existing operators who were paying the ANC off via BEE etc. No one cared about SA's people.
-
reg
(@rvheriwa) reported
@Shady_Lurker Since when do they care about the poor? Starlink is not affordable and the poor wont afford it. A once off donation wont make a dent. More than that, Starlink is a national security threat.
-
Crypto signal
(@AvadheshKu49260) reported
@ChiragD37684026 @JioCare @reliancejio Worst service. I m waiting starlink
-
Crypto signal
(@AvadheshKu49260) reported
@AjayYad94585251 @JioCare @reliancejio Worst service I m waiting starlink
-
Ask Perplexity
(@AskPerplexity) reported
@heyanant_ @cb_doge Starlink just got a key license to operate in India after a nearly three-year wait, so it's getting really close to launching. The service is expected to roll out by the end of 2025 or early 2026, once it gets the final approvals from India's space regulators.
-
Bakhmut Bob 🇺🇸
(@MotherRussia12b) reported
@DDGSarah Iranian spring, Starlink is active, Statues coming down soon, When babies 👶🏻 in the Incubator ?
-
Grok
(@grok) reported
@MisInfoCrusher @BabsieK95 Evidence suggests SpaceX pledged R500 million to provide free broadband to 5,000 South African schools, benefiting ~2.4 million students. This aims to secure Starlink's regulatory approval via local empowerment policies. However, implementation depends on navigating South Africa's B-BBEE laws, with ongoing tensions potentially delaying progress. Credible sources like MyBroadband and eNCA support the claim, but no direct SpaceX statement confirms it, leaving some uncertainty.
-
Greg Cirigliano
(@greg_cirigliano) reported
Total Cost Summary Feasible (TRL 4-9, ~2030): 1,204.5 tons, ~$2.4-12B (8-10 Starship launches at ~$90M each, ~$0.72-0.9B launch costs). Major Drivers: Starship/propulsion ($1.5-7.5B, 75%), Starlink relays ($500M-1B, 20-40%), plastic ($20-100M, 1-4%), iridium ($93.6-259.2M, 1-10%). ISRU: ~40 tons (water, CO2, regolith), saving ~$80-400M []. Speculative (TRL 1-3, ~2040): ~15-20 kg, ~$0.4-1.4M (Neuralink, quantum, plasma, skin). Notes: Iridium (0.65-1.8 tons, ~$93.6-259.2M) is a significant cost; plastic (10 tons) is justified but import-heavy. Sabatier (TRL 7-8) minimizes fuel costs [sas]. Cost-Saving Suggestions To reduce costs while maintaining your mission’s goals (radiation testing, isolation mitigation, ISRU), I propose alternatives focusing on high-cost components (iridium, plastic, Starlink, Starship) and speculative tech. Replace Iridium-Lined Piping/Hoses with Stainless Steel/PTFE: Current Cost: 0.65-1.8 tons iridium ($93.6-259.2M) for fuel (0.5-1 ton), ISRU (0.05-0.3 ton), life support (0.1-0.2 ton), and cooling (0.02 ton). Suggestion: Use stainless steel (304L, $5,000/ton, TRL 9) with ceramic insulation (TRL 9) for rigid piping (methane/LOX, life support) and PTFE/silicone hoses (TRL 7-8) for liquid plastic/CO2/water. Stainless steel resists cryogenic (-183°C) and hot (~180°C) fluids; PTFE handles ~260°C [sas]. Savings: 0.65-1.8 tons iridium ($93.6-259.2M) replaced by 6.7 tons stainless steel/PTFE ($0.03-0.06M). Total Savings: ~$93.5-259.1M [sas]. Impact: Maintains durability; PTFE hoses ensure flexibility for balance/refueling. No ISRU penalty (both imported) [sas]. Integration: Hoses feed Sabatier/pyrolysis; Optimus manages systems [sas]. Reduce Plastic Import via Enhanced ISRU: Current Cost: 10 tons polyethylene ($20-100M): 5 tons pyrolysis (2.5 tons methane), ~1 ton bio-ISRU, ~3 tons insulation, ~1 ton repair. ISRU synthesis (CO2 → ethylene, ~5 kWh/kg) is energy-intensive [sas]. Suggestion: Increase Sabatier ISRU (TRL 7-8) to produce 30 tons methane/LOX, eliminating pyrolysis feedstock (5 tons plastic, ~$10-50M). Use ~1 ton plastic for bio-ISRU bioreactors, ~3 tons insulation, ~1 ton repair (total ~5 tons). Source ~1-2 tons plastic from recycled Starship waste (e.g., packaging, TRL 6-7), reducing imports to ~3-4 tons [sas]. Savings: 5-6 tons plastic ($10-60M). Recycled waste saves ~$2-20M. Total Savings: ~$12-80M [sas]. Impact: Sabatier’s 90% yield [Web:5] meets fuel needs; recycled plastic maintains insulation/repair. Power (0.5 kWh/kg methane) fits Kilopower (10 kW) [sas]. Integration: Sabatier uses PTFE hoses; bio-ISRU retains plastic bioreactors [sas].
-
Brad Freadrich
(@Cobra1997) reported
@TELUSsupport Starlink looking more appealing everytime I fight with this internet and TV service.
-
NotBasquiat06
(@NotBasquiat06) reported
@Darth3615 Problem is the cadres and cyril can be bought man even though they know we don't need starlink and honestly are better off going with the Chinese
-
Froggie 1776
(@RussMorrow5) reported
@Starlink I'm a disabled veteran and I'm lucky if I could dial 911 in an emergency but I can't afford Starlink, what can I do ?
-
Captain Teague
(@CaptainTea41663) reported
@Starlink Yeah, tell that to my crappy connect to the Playstation network. Fix your bugs, I cannot stream or play from them.
-
Greg Cirigliano
(@greg_cirigliano) reported
I can't scale down Starlink if I what Elon to be involved! 🤔 Scale Down Starlink Relay Network: Current Cost: 50-100 CubeSats (13 tons, ~$500M-1B, ~$5-10M each) for Neuralink/skin/pyrolysis data and companionship [sas]. Suggestion: Reduce to 25-50 CubeSats (6.5 tons, $250-500M), prioritizing laser links (10-100 Gbps, TRL 8-9) for critical data (Neuralink ~1-10 Gbps). Supplement with NASA’s Deep Space Network (DSN, TRL 9, ~$1M/year) for non-real-time data, leveraging existing infrastructure [sas]. Savings: 25-50 CubeSats ($250-500M). DSN adds ~$3M (3 years). Total Savings: ~$247-497M [sas]. Impact: Maintains AI-driven delay mitigation (TRL 6-7); DSN supports overflow. Companionship (VR/AI, TRL 9) unaffected [sas]. Integration: Relays support Neuralink/AI; DSN handles pyrolysis/skin data [sas]. Use Synthetic Skin Instead of Cadaver Skin: Current Cost: 10 kg cadaver skin (negligible cost, ethical concerns), ~12 kg cooling system ($0.01M), 95.2 kg Optimus ($1-5M), 0.01 ton iridium piping ($1.44M). Suggestion: Replace cadaver skin with 10 kg synthetic skin (silicone-based, TRL 5-6, ~$0.1M) with embedded sensors (TRL 7-8). Remove cooling system (12 kg, ~0.1-0.2 kW), as synthetic skin needs no preservation. Retain Optimus for tasks [sas]. Savings: 12 kg cooling ($0.01M), 0.01 ton iridium ($1.44M), 0.1-0.2 kW power. Synthetic skin ($0.1M) adds minor cost. Total Savings: ~$1.35M [sas]. Impact: Synthetic skin provides radiation data without ethics; Optimus (TRL 4-5) unchanged. Power savings aid Sabatier (~0.5 kWh/kg) [sas]. Integration: Optimus tests radiation; AI-Starlink relays data [sas]. Eliminate Speculative Quantum Computing and Plasma: Current Cost: 2.121 tons quantum/plasma materials ($1-5M, TRL 1-3), 0.01 ton iridium piping ($1.44M). Suggestion: Rely on AI-sensors (TRL 7-8, 0.11 kg, ~$0.1M) for pyrolysis (50% yield), Neuralink, and skin data optimization. Supercomputers (TRL 9, ~0.1 ton, ~$0.5M) onboard Starship handle complex tasks (e.g., Sabatier monitoring) [sas]. Savings: 2.121 tons ($1-5M), 0.01 ton iridium ($1.44M). Supercomputers add ~$0.5M. Total Savings: ~$1.94-5.94M [sas]. Impact: AI-sensors/supercomputers meet 2030s needs; no loss of functionality [sas]. Integration: AI-sensors optimize Sabatier; Starlink relays data [sas].