1. Home
  2. ❯
  3. Companies
  4. ❯
  5. Starlink
Starlink

Starlink Outage Report

Why is my Starlink service not working?

No problems detected

If you are having issues, please submit a report below.

Starlink is a satellite internet constellation constructed by SpaceX providing a low latency, broadband internet system to meet the needs of consumers across the globe.

Full Outage Map

Problems in the last 24 hours

The graph below depicts the number of Starlink reports received over the last 24 hours by time of day. When the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line, an outage is determined.

At the moment, we haven't detected any problems at Starlink. Are you experiencing issues or an outage? Leave a message in the comments section!

Most Reported Problems

The following are the most recent problems reported by Starlink users through our website.

  • 52% Internet (52%)
  • 23% Total Blackout (23%)
  • 16% Wi-fi (16%)
  • 4% E-mail (4%)
  • 3% TV (3%)
  • 1% Phone (1%)

Live Outage Map

The most recent Starlink outage reports came from the following cities:

CityProblem TypeReport Time
Boston Internet 4 hours ago
Winter Internet 11 hours ago
Livermore Internet 13 hours ago
Columbus Internet 15 hours ago
Portland Wi-fi 15 hours ago
Noida Total Blackout 16 hours ago
Full Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Starlink Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

  • TarynceNelson
    T. (@TarynceNelson) reported

    @_Hustle96 Bell just as bad fam. Starlink just now can't do this anymore.

  • okarthik42
    Karthik (@okarthik42) reported

    @KenKirtland17 For the $10B Jeff is spending to 3236 Kuiper satellites, Starship can put 128000 Starlinks worst-case $/kg and at the *ABSOLUTE* best-case $/kg (which most likely won't happen) it can put *check's math* 2880000 Starlink satellites. How much does the Atlas V 551 cost again?

  • KyleEme86781918
    Kyle Emery (@KyleEme86781918) reported

    @Thorman_Lungie @Tyler0309 @nextspaceflight I agree I could totally see an "unintentional" collision with a Kuiper satellite into a Starlink one. Then the following day Wall Street Journals Headline would be "Elon Musk crashed his satellite into Amazon's, intentionally blocking internet for millions of poor people."

  • KillEmWitSatire
    KillEmWitSatire (@KillEmWitSatire) reported

    @rooikar1 @elonmusk @thesheetztweetz Live in rural Canada. The only service I can get is fixed LTE at 10 down 1 up, for $114/ month. I'll gladly pay the extra 15 bucks for starlink.

  • okarthik42
    Karthik (@okarthik42) reported

    F9 is $27M/launch. Jeff's $10B is 370 F9 launches or 370*60=22200 Starlink satellites, compared to Amazon Kuiper's measly 3236. For $10B, Starship can put 128000 satellites (assuming *worst-case* price of $30M/launch and *worst-case* 384 satellites/launch). Jeff has no chance. 3/

  • hamandcheese
    Samuel Hammond 🌐🏛 (@hamandcheese) reported

    @PHPete Yes it's the wrong time to pour money into rural broadband when Starlink has a solution that's far cheaper and more comprehensive. What don't you get?

  • Brewdog1985
    Brewdog1985 (@Brewdog1985) reported

    @Tesmanian_com Thats cool and all but what about American citizens whos government paid starlink millions in Government subsidies. I have waited 10 year for service all while these company keep getting paid in my tax dollars!!

  • JasonCarpentier
    Jason Carpentier (@JasonCarpentier) reported

    @thebeerbitch @CityOfNOLA So, I'm going for beta of Starlink by SpaceX its looking super promising outside of the old school services. Some of my customers back in Texas had incredibly slow rural internet. I'll be careful I need internets.

  • idontwa86202030
    Reductionist (@idontwa86202030) reported

    @Clarksterh @robinhanson Kessler syndrome is not an issue with Starlink. There have been /extensive/ simulations by third parties, you don't get chain reactions even with very pessimistic assumptions. Orbital debris in general is a much more valid concern, but SpaceX is managing that quite well

  • hamandcheese
    Samuel Hammond 🌐🏛 (@hamandcheese) reported

    @jake_gotta So your argument is that Starlink is too expensive in comparison to a solution that's even more expensive without enormous subsidies?

  • Olivier56999622
    Olivier Ouellet (@Olivier56999622) reported

    @bizstancepro easy have a phone whit 2 sim cards on different network and use Starlink has internet provider

  • landryst
    Stephen Landry (@landryst) reported

    @HallAudree @slashgear Yeah, 7mbs down is going to put a strain on streaming. I'd hope for more like 15-25mbs down, especially if multiple people want use it at the same time for work and entertainment. Starlink is advertising 100mps down, but, of course, that's *advertised* Internet speed ... .

  • attractfunding
    So you want to (@attractfunding) reported

    Rogers phone network done in Toronto. #Starlink

  • DJBigMikeL
    DJ BigMike (@DJBigMikeL) reported

    @elonmusk Canada cell phone service is expensive and unreliable. Can you use starlink to do satellite Phone services at an affordable rate?

  • FidatyLol
    Fidaty 🚀 (@FidatyLol) reported

    @nextspaceflight But it could also be SpaceX refusing to service them because they are competing starlink no ?

  • juliesauls901
    julie-*VOTING*-mom 💙💫🌊 Against Fascism (@juliesauls901) reported

    @AristotleBuzz @ArFB You and Starlink are our only hope for decent internet going forward. Like right now my ViaSat router was randomly powered off by ViaSat (totes normal for a beautiful sunny day) and my Verizon signal is sitting at one bar of 1x. Really frustrating.

  • Nacho_Oshe
    Oshe (@Nacho_Oshe) reported

    @LandsharkRides Atleast in rural U.S that Musk internet is starting to test people getting his crazy fast satellite internet. Have buddy right outside broadband service area currently using a convoluted series of routers to share internet with neighbor down the road That signed up for starlink.

  • usrbinpikachu
    All four of my moves are nap (@usrbinpikachu) reported

    Look, I signed up for Starlink. Not because I have any hope of it being good, but because it's nearly impossible to be worse than what I have now. But it's not the solution.

  • nbeaudrot
    Mr. Nick Beaudrot (3 years of Summer School) (@nbeaudrot) reported

    @AgainstGop @hamandcheese (1) Latency a big issue for web browsing/apps. LTE-like latency is pretty good, but as this article points out Starlink is still an order of magnitude slower than fixed-line connections. (2) I haven't seen anything on how many total users these systems can handle.

  • dumberthaniron
    Jeff Bridenstone (@dumberthaniron) reported

    @Blackprojects @amazonnews @ulalaunch These are gonna be a bit higher up tho, so wont be as bad as starlink

  • jason_e_pyle
    Jason Pyle (@jason_e_pyle) reported

    @landryst @HallAudree @slashgear It sure does sound like Starlink has solved some of the problems with lag that has always been around since satellite existed. I worked with someone who had Hughes Internet if you can remember that. It was abysmal for him.

  • TheLongshot2112
    Jason Birzer (@TheLongshot2112) reported

    @ComradeEevee His take is that Starlink is magically going to solve all of those problems. Never mind that it hasn't in the past.

  • hamandcheese
    Samuel Hammond 🌐🏛 (@hamandcheese) reported

    @nbeaudrot Starlink's latency is 20ms to 40ms with data speeds that vary from 50Mb/s to 150Mb/s. Rural broadband's benefit-cost ratio was already terrible, but becomes astronomically worse when the marginal benefit amounts to a few milliseconds.

  • okarthik42
    Karthik (@okarthik42) reported

    @KenKirtland17 For the $10B Jeff is spending to 3236 Kuiper satellites, Starship can put 128000 Starlinks worst-case $/kg and at the *ABSOLUTE* best-case $/kg (which most likely won't happen) it can put *checks math* 2880000 Starlink satellites. How much does the Atlas V 551 cost again?

  • usp3t
    usp3 (@usp3t) reported

    @TMFAssociates Thats wonderful depiction “Every one of our satellites is like a Ford Focus—it does the same thing, it gets tested, it works—while Starlink satellites are like Teslas: They launch them and then they have to upgrade and fix them, or even replace them altogether,”

  • PhalanxWarrior
    John Y. (@PhalanxWarrior) reported

    @elonmusk I love SpaceX, Starlink, Teslas(I own one)and Neuralink. Elon, please support Cytodyn’s Leronlimab. It saves one out of 4 or could have saved 140K americans.FDA too slow.. Elonlimab..please..TY.

  • okarthik42
    Karthik (@okarthik42) reported

    @KenKirtland17 For the $10B Jeff is spending to put 3236 Kuiper satellites, Starship can put 128000 Starlinks worst-case $/kg and at the *ABSOLUTE* best-case $/kg (which most likely won't happen) it can put *checks math* 2880000 Starlink satellites. Oof. How much is the Atlas V 551 again?

  • DinkSinger
    **** Singer (@DinkSinger) reported

    Eventually, Starlink will also provide internet backbone service using inter-satellite laser links that are far faster than terrestrial fiber. 4/ End

  • DinkSinger
    **** Singer (@DinkSinger) reported

    Starlink will not be competing with internet service providers in urban areas but it will be very big in providing backhaul to mobile network operators. As 5G expands and serves fixed locations, Starlink is designed to accommodate 50% of global backhaul. 3/

  • Brewdog1985
    Brewdog1985 (@Brewdog1985) reported

    @SpeedballHippie Are they the same rivals that have not upgraded there internet systems in years and charge outrageous price for garbage!! Good i hope starlink puts them out of business that's the point!!!! 10 year instill waiting on server my provider has gotten millions in government subsidies