1. Home
  2. Companies
  3. AOL
  4. Yate
AOL

AOL outages and service status in Yate, England

No problems detected

If you are having issues, please submit a report below.

Full Outage Map
  • AOL generated 0 outage signals in the last 24 hours around Yate, including 0 direct reports.

AOL (America Online) is an internet portal as well as an internet service provider. As an ISP, AOL offers dial up internet through its AOL Advantage plans.

Problems in the last 24 hours in Yate, England

The chart below shows the number of AOL reports we have received in the last 24 hours from users in Yate, England and surrounding areas. An outage is declared when the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line.

At the moment, we haven't detected any problems at AOL. Are you experiencing issues or an outage? Leave a message in the comments section!

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

AOL Issues Reports Near Yate, England

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in Yate and nearby locations:

  • GeoffNoizy
    NoizyGeoff (@GeoffNoizy) reported from Bathford, England

    @Reblou3Rebecca Only one. Never had an AOL account.

AOL Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

  • bossladyaurelia
    AURI (@bossladyaurelia) reported

    AOL never asked me for more storage and I have emails for over 20 years….. why Gmail gotta do me like that 😫

  • VoodooXRocket
    VoodooX-Rocket (@VoodooXRocket) reported

    @boostmobile Boost Mobile reminds me so much of the 1990's AOL. Their customer service makes it one of the worst MVNO carriers today! Their creative accounting is so hard for their reps to understand, so how is a customer going to?

  • DaniilBuilds
    Daniil (@DaniilBuilds) reported

    AOL and Time Warner didn’t just pay for what the two companies were worth in January 2000. They paid for what they believed the two companies could become together. The announced merger was valued at roughly $350B, with AOL shareholders expected to own about 55% of the combined company. The logic was easy to understand: combine AOL’s internet business with Time Warner’s media assets and create value neither could generate alone. But there was a financial problem hiding inside that logic. Future synergies are uncertain. The merger closed in January 2001. SEC disclosures later put the acquisition cost at approximately $147B. Then came the accounting reckoning. In 2002, the combined company reported a $98.7B net loss, including a $54.2B goodwill impairment. That $54.2B was non-cash. It did not mean the company suddenly paid out $54.2B in cash. It meant the value previously assigned to acquired goodwill could no longer be supported at the same level. That distinction matters. When you pay upfront for future synergies, you are effectively putting a price on value that still depends on execution. If the synergies arrive, the premium can make sense. If they don’t, shareholders can end up carrying the cost. The most expensive synergy is the one you pay for before you prove it exists.

  • attitunesmusic
    attitunes music (@attitunesmusic) reported

    @JuicySteen there was a strong appetite by some at AOL Time Warner to get them off the air despite being their highest rated show. It would have depended on if they were able to hang on until Spike opened up.

  • ErniShackleton
    Sir Ernest Shackleton (@ErniShackleton) reported

    @MapQuest Who ******** used map quest anymore. I thought it died along with AOL

  • gigi_rivera71
    Gigi 🇵🇷 (@gigi_rivera71) reported

    @BBfan4life4sure @Iwanthatveto They didn’t have HOH comps to save them or POV. They had to complete task and had to budget for food. They each had to vote 2 people that they wanted to leave each week. The people with the most votes I believe two or three were left for the viewers to decide banishment by calling an 800 number and voting. Live feeds were on AOL which was horrible. And they had live animals in the BY.

  • tb_can
    AlexB (@tb_can) reported

    I was a senior in highschool and was talking to a girl a year younger than me. One time she spent the night and I turned my computer on and hacked the company her dad owned. I found her dad's signature in the payroll files and pointed it out to her. You could tell she was uneasy about it but fascinated at the same time. By the time I graduated I had received three letters from AOL asking me not to hack their ****.

  • simcity31
    Sextant (@simcity31) reported

    @jukan05 I read the beginning of this and knew it’s garbage, written with a conclusion in mind and fillers to get there. Comparing token value to internet subscription is ludicrous. The value of the internet obv is beyond the freaking $50 you paid AOL or whatever ISP. The same for mobile

  • ShmuelLon
    Shmuel Londner 🇮🇱 (@ShmuelLon) reported

    Something about $BSP: they bought AOL at a 5x income before tax, which is optically cheap right? The small issue is that they bought it from Apollo and imho there's zero chance Apollo got a bad deal

  • Poowploof
    Poow | Open Commission on Vgen (@Poowploof) reported

    Alucard had astigmatism before being infected by a demon (why he qualified to AoL? Well, Tigreal.) Apparently when he was younger, he not only had bad eyesight but also bad taste in men.