1. Home
  2. Companies
  3. AOL
  4. Sutton in Ashfield
AOL

AOL outages and service status in Sutton in Ashfield, England

No problems detected

If you are having issues, please submit a report below.

Full Outage Map
  • AOL generated 0 outage signals in the last 24 hours around Sutton in Ashfield, including 0 direct reports.

AOL (America Online) is an internet portal as well as an internet service provider. As an ISP, AOL offers dial up internet through its AOL Advantage plans.

Problems in the last 24 hours in Sutton in Ashfield, England

The chart below shows the number of AOL reports we have received in the last 24 hours from users in Sutton in Ashfield, England and surrounding areas. An outage is declared when the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line.

At the moment, we haven't detected any problems at AOL. Are you experiencing issues or an outage? Leave a message in the comments section!

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

AOL Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

  • RobertAnthony_T
    Robert Anthony (@RobertAnthony_T) reported

    @ClayTravis I was 14 when the strike it and a die hard Yankees fan, I was devastated- I did come back in 1995. I watch baseball every single day, and bet on it. Not parlays, never a parlay or prop bet - real actual old school bets, my minimum bet is $1200. Sometimes a lot more. I bet $9000 on the Mets earlier tonight because I liked them a lot. So I bet heavy and regularly. I'm down about $20K this baseball seaod but that's besides the point and a long way to go. In terms of the game - baseball has a major flaw that's like a cancer. Strikeouts. NL struck out 15 times in the all star game. The pitchers are collectively better than ever, and the hitters are no longer embarrassed to strike out. That's a deadly combination. Players like Luis Arraez, who hits .330, hardly ever strikes out, and gets key hits are not valued. Arraez could barely muster up a 1 year deal. These baseball executives aren't the sharpest. Back to the main point - if baseball goes on a long hiatus, which I think they will - if you ask me the under/over is May 2028. Because once 2027 is lost, they aren't going to play chicken again until 2028. So around May 2028 is when I suspect they would cobble together a deal. If they do what I suspect the sport will never ever be the same. It will be completely decimated. Revenue will be slashed. It will make 1994 look like a party. In 1994 there was nothing to even do, we didn't even have dial up AOL yet in house. Now there are endless options and endless entertainment. There are influencers (whatever you want to call them) that we never even heard of who are talented and get tens of millions of views- and the kids love them. Throw in the shorts that warped all the kids attention span, and everything else on social media sites - there is endless amounts of entertainment and competition for a buck. MLB is clearly delusional if they think are going to go on an 18 month hiatus and thing they are going to make $12-$13 billion in revenue again. They will not. And to be super frank - the game is pretty boring when compared to college football, NFL, or even the NBA (hate to admit it), if I didn't bet on this **** I wouldn't even watch it. MLB will completely destroy itself if there is a hiatus to the degree that they can't begin to understand. It would be like a nuclear bomb dropped on the sport, clearly they are all too dumb (owners and players ) to realize. I can't see any way there isn't a work stoppage. Going to be MLB Armageddon.

  • brianfarley6
    brian farley (@brianfarley6) reported

    @earthlink sucks. I'm 2 weeks into my new 5G service a day ir is plagued with problems. It runs like AOL

  • Game_City_Baby
    MazzMos (@Game_City_Baby) reported

    @DudespostingWs Someone across town used to talk **** to him on AOL and he'd be at their door in 8 ******* minutes on foot

  • MM_USA_2020
    Matt (@MM_USA_2020) reported

    Highly recommend anyone still using @AOL to stop immediately. Its impossible to login on different devices and when the verification code isn't received customer service is useless and just hangs up without explanation just saying they "can't proceed with the call"

  • JohnnyACE562
    𝔸𝕔𝕖♠️🇳🇬☠️ 3 KINGS WILL RISE🇧🇫🇳🇪🇲🇱👑👑👑 (@JohnnyACE562) reported

    @Ghfg32290189 Why not? Every merger they get into goes bad for a reason. AOL? AT&T? Discovery? Now this.

  • aakashgupta
    Aakash Gupta (@aakashgupta) reported

    Researchers tracked 344,753 websites over 18 months to map where American attention actually goes online. The answer is email. Gmail alone is 16% of all desktop time. Add Yahoo, Outlook, and AOL, and inboxes eat nearly a quarter of every hour Americans spend at a computer. That's double the combined total of Facebook, X, Reddit, Instagram, Discord, and WhatsApp. The legacy numbers are the wild part. Yahoo Mail, at 3.71%, gets more attention than ChatGPT, Reddit, and Netflix combined. AOL Mail, a service most people assume died with dial-up, beats Instagram and Discord combined. Yahoo still has roughly 225 million active mail users, skewing Gen X and Boomer: people who opened an account in 1999 and never saw a reason to leave. Google Search sits at just 2.33%. The front door of the entire internet gets less time than Yahoo's inbox, because search is engineered to end fast. Every second you spend on a results page is a second Google failed. The chart measures desktop, which explains the shape. Your phone is where you play. Your computer is where you work. And the work of being an American in 2026, the bills, the receipts, the school notices, the job applications, still runs through a protocol invented in 1971. Strip away 30 years of apps and the desktop internet is a post office with better graphics.

  • AlisonSomin
    Alison Somin (@AlisonSomin) reported

    @NancyAFrench I never actually canceled my AOL email but no one in my life has written me there for a long, long time

  • eeemas1
    eeemas (@eeemas1) reported

    @GlobeLife **** **** **** you and your ******* email spam ads on AOL

  • SergioVengeance
    Sergio Vengeance 🇺🇲🎮🤘 (@SergioVengeance) reported

    @JoelKatz @RealZaikTorek @Awk20000 Not to mention the very first big section 230 case was about AOL and them being too slow to censor a malicious troll who was spreading confirmed lies that led to harassment. So even if the argument is "the website didn't censor this" then that's a core Section 230 argument.

  • quentin_andrews
    QA (@quentin_andrews) reported

    @RetroByteVault You get AOL trial on CD, You get an AOL trial on CD, EVERYONE GETS A DAMN AOL TRIAL ON CD!!!