1. Home
  2. Companies
  3. AOL
  4. Scarborough
AOL

AOL outages and service status in Scarborough, England

No problems detected

If you are having issues, please submit a report below.

Full Outage Map
  • AOL generated 0 outage signals in the last 24 hours around Scarborough, including 0 direct reports.

AOL (America Online) is an internet portal as well as an internet service provider. As an ISP, AOL offers dial up internet through its AOL Advantage plans.

Problems in the last 24 hours in Scarborough, England

The chart below shows the number of AOL reports we have received in the last 24 hours from users in Scarborough, England and surrounding areas. An outage is declared when the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line.

At the moment, we haven't detected any problems at AOL. Are you experiencing issues or an outage? Leave a message in the comments section!

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

AOL Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

  • Danstonie
    🕸 (@Danstonie) reported

    @ShivenChabria Its why i know anyone who makes fun of post grunge acts like puddle of mudd or godsmack never saw their early unplugged stuff. People will say the about a girl cover, but the puddle of mudd aol unplugged session they did in 2003 was insanely good, and godsmack sounds better live

  • Grabbs555
    Erik Griggs (@Grabbs555) reported

    @Irina_exh 18...never had an AOL address or a waterbed

  • kenalex71
    @KenAlex71 (@kenalex71) reported

    @Irina_exh 19. Never had an AOL account

  • SloppyK556
    Kevin K (@SloppyK556) reported

    @Irina_exh 18. Never sent a postcard and never had an AOL address.

  • NedSmith940069
    Ned Smith (@NedSmith940069) reported

    @ToddVercoe @DrFeed5 nah dude, 1994 AOL. anyone who say "we" had it prior to then is full of ****. Maybe 1-2 kids talked to each other online, but the internet shifted with AOL in '94 - '95. Seems like a ton of large companies let employees take home their old work PCs. Suspect msft/apple funded it

  • tb_can
    AlexB (@tb_can) reported

    I was a senior in highschool and was talking to a girl a year younger than me. One time she spent the night and I turned my computer on and hacked the company her dad owned. I found her dad's signature in the payroll files and pointed it out to her. You could tell she was uneasy about it but fascinated at the same time. By the time I graduated I had received three letters from AOL asking me not to hack their ****.

  • K_Oswal
    Kalyani 🔱 (@K_Oswal) reported

    Oye @sardesairajdeep why so quiet. Werent you jumping n dancing when Vimlendu n that other man Mishra now dead made false allegations on AOL? Yr wife after her horrible fake the nation video went begging for forgiveness to Gurudev. When are you apologizing? Saanp suungh gaya?

  • DaniilBuilds
    Daniil (@DaniilBuilds) reported

    AOL and Time Warner didn’t just pay for what the two companies were worth in January 2000. They paid for what they believed the two companies could become together. The announced merger was valued at roughly $350B, with AOL shareholders expected to own about 55% of the combined company. The logic was easy to understand: combine AOL’s internet business with Time Warner’s media assets and create value neither could generate alone. But there was a financial problem hiding inside that logic. Future synergies are uncertain. The merger closed in January 2001. SEC disclosures later put the acquisition cost at approximately $147B. Then came the accounting reckoning. In 2002, the combined company reported a $98.7B net loss, including a $54.2B goodwill impairment. That $54.2B was non-cash. It did not mean the company suddenly paid out $54.2B in cash. It meant the value previously assigned to acquired goodwill could no longer be supported at the same level. That distinction matters. When you pay upfront for future synergies, you are effectively putting a price on value that still depends on execution. If the synergies arrive, the premium can make sense. If they don’t, shareholders can end up carrying the cost. The most expensive synergy is the one you pay for before you prove it exists.

  • TomOlenik
    Thomas Olenik (@TomOlenik) reported

    @signorina37H 56k was blazing fast. I was an AOL customer beefier they went public with a 14.4k modem in a 486-66 machine and a whopping 8 MB RAM.

  • BeerAce73
    Art 🇺🇲⚓ (@BeerAce73) reported

    @MapQuest MapQuest? Is that like AOL? Stupid *****.