AOL outages and service status in St Austell, England

Problems in the last 24 hours in St Austell, England

The chart below shows the number of AOL reports we have received in the last 24 hours from users in St Austell, England and surrounding areas. An outage is declared when the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line.

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

AOL Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Dave Austin (@EdmundAvalon) reported 6 minutes ago

  @SorchaEastwood Awww. @flyfour banned me because I showed his argument to be nonsense. Typical AOL user, frankly. Dumbing-down of the internet started with ********* like him.

• 
  Paleo Life (@PaleoGina) reported 9 minutes ago

  @SMB_Attorney @nikitabier MSM source = Entrepreneur and AOL? LOL. I recently experienced the life of an FBI press release for a case I was following. Most MSM “outlets” pretty much posted it word-for-word. Several took the time to paraphrase it but introduced some errors/misinformation by doing so. Slop is the norm in MSM news cycles.

• 
  ky (🦄/acc) (@kypwny) reported 12 minutes ago

  when i was working as a cashier, there was this older lady who would come in every so often. we were talking about how she tried to snag a reserved AOL username through support, but i never saw her again after I said I was acquainted with ppl from the original AOL community

• 
  Star Wars Timeline (Ben) 🇷🇺🇺🇸 (@SWT_Channel) reported 15 minutes ago

  @JamesKruczek Like I said, it ain't about a **** measuring contest. That's a 12 year old's domain of debate. I always extended the olive branchi between EU books and Disney's canon books which I read for a first hand exp. to properly praise or criticise them in my reviews. All of it stopped when we all figured out their retarded tactic of slurring the fandom for Disney's financial woes and blaming "toxic male" men with feminist slogans. It's a shame because some modern SW comics were great until they started making everyone gay and introducing "the message". Either way, Disney never gave their "Canon" the chance to shine or compare to the infinitely more compelling epic scope of 40+ year EU world, second only maybe to Warhammer 40K lore. I have a hard time believing you even now, that you couldn't find a single EU novel compelling. Really? Not even one? If you hate them that's fine. Personal opinions are no chip off my shoulder. I can only speak to what I observed at my comic shop and tens of thousands of Star Wars fans I interacted with over the years, from AOL chat rooms, to Prequel fan site message boards, to NYC libraries and my film school. Love it or hate it, most of us knew it as Star Wars canon. We never threw the term around because it wasn't necessary to call spade a spade.

• 
  Chris Edwards (@ChrisWithRobots) reported 17 minutes ago

  Back in the 90's, the major consumer scams were call-in fortune tellers and psychics who would charge a few dollars per minute. And AOL subscriptions that AOL refused to cancel. Those were innocent times. Now it's crypto, AI-assisted impersonations, ransomware...

• 
  Probably Not Your Daddy (@jfriii12311972) reported 22 minutes ago

  @AntiLeftMemes 19 I never had an AOL email.

• 
  Northern Steve (@Stevef756119074) reported 26 minutes ago

  @AntiLeftMemes I never had an AOL address.

• 
  Addicted Hoosier (@AddictedHoosier) reported 28 minutes ago

  @girdley AOL time warner has to be the worst of all time.

• 
  Jeff Opdyke (jeffo) (@DigitalRoamad) reported 31 minutes ago

  All the SpaceX/Elon fanboys are upset that I said SpaceX is a wildly overvalued IPO and that at some point the share price will crater... and that is when you buy. But I hear all kinds of jibber-jabber about what SpaceX does and is and whatever. It's all the same words, just in a different order that defined the last 30 years of tech investing... and I've been around for all of it as a financial writer. So, here's a list of every IPO that was the biggest/most relevant of its time and what came of it: Netscape (1995): The company that lit the dot-com fuse. briefly dominated the internet browser market before Microsoft crushed it by giving away a competing product for free. limped into AOL's arms at a fraction of its peak value. Yahoo (1996): A $13 IPO that became a $110 billion fever dream at the peak of the bubble, then collapsed 93% to $8, spent a decade mismanaging itself into irrelevance, turned down a $44/share Microsoft buyout offer when it was already dying, and was finally sold to Verizon for parts in 2017. Amazon (1997): Went public at $18, rode the bubble to $113, crashed 94% to $6, then methodically became the most dominant retail and cloud computing empire in history. theglobe dot com (1998): Exploded 600% on its first trading day on pure mania with no real business model, and was bankrupt and forgotten within three years. VA Linux (1999): Holds the all-time record for the largest single-day IPO pop — up 700% — on just $17.8 million in annual revenue, and spent the next 15 years slowly selling itself off for scraps at a 90%+ discount to its opening-day price. Google (2004): The rare IPO that was actually priced like a real business, debuted into post-bubble investor skepticism, and rewarded anyone who held it with a 7,500%+ return over 20 years. Facebook/Meta (2012): Priced at $104 billion with a broken mobile strategy, immediately cratered 54% in under four months to $17 as investors fled, then finally cracked the mobile monetization code and turned a humiliating IPO into a 1,300%+ return for anyone who didn't panic. Snap (2017): Sold non-voting shares in a money-losing company with decelerating growth at 25x revenue, popped on day one, collapsed 75% within two years, and now nearly a decade later an IPO investor has still lost more than half their money. Uber (2019): Private market fantasies priced this one at $120 billion, the public market immediately said "no" and sent it below its $45 IPO price on day one, the stock bled another 25% in four months, and it took years of grinding toward actual profitability before the stock finally vindicated long-suffering holders. Alibaba (2014): Legit one of the greatest businesses in the world at IPO, rode to $300, then the Chinese government decided Jack Ma needed to be humbled, and a decade after its record-breaking debut the stock still trades below its first-day opening price. I am NOT saying that SpaceX is a bad company. I am saying SpaceX IPO is stupidly valued by an excessively greedy Wall Street trying to extract as much wealth as possible in this latest tech hype period. SpaceX will go on to great things one day ... but at 90x sales, the shares are destined for a deep, deep enema-like cleansing at some point. Extremely rich valuations never last. The history above tells you the trajectory.

• 
  The Toy Investor (@thetoyinvestor) reported 33 minutes ago

  @FunkoPOPsNews Neopets made me who I am today. Still one of the GOAT games. There was a point where it was in the top three most visited websites daily I think? Right behind AOL and Google. They weren't afraid to actually make items limited. Now every game it seems like everyone has access to everything. I was 10 years old buying out the trading post of limited edition stamps and food items that were needed to get avatars for the message boards. I'd buy out the supply, stick them in my safety deposit box for a month or two, and then bring them back out at triple the price. Some things never change.