AOL outages and service status in Ross on Wye, England

Problems in the last 24 hours in Ross on Wye, England

The chart below shows the number of AOL reports we have received in the last 24 hours from users in Ross on Wye, England and surrounding areas. An outage is declared when the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line.

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

AOL Issues Reports Near Ross on Wye, England

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in Ross on Wye and nearby locations:

• 
  C Jones (@cejonesy) reported 37 minutes ago from Monmouth, Wales

  @AOLSupportHelp think my account has been hacked. I cant verify account as it has an old number. Please help

AOL Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Dennis Downs (@DennisDown94756) reported 1 minute ago

  @Starlink I can remember $4.95 a month for AOL back when people could afford it ! What's a matter Elon, can't make millions so going for billions instead ? Chicken **** filthy rich bastards.

• 
  Dana Pico (@Dana_TFSJ) reported 1 minute ago

  @BostonBridget .@AOL is 36 now; even if she chose to thaw out a few, and have them fertilized and implanted, how old would she be when she had her first pregnancy? Every extra year increases the odds for a bad pregnancy and disabled child. @JillFilipovic

• 
  frakmaga2025 (@FrakMAGA2022) reported 4 minutes ago

  @Futurenvesting Well, you can be sure that any company they buy is struggling for cash or can't grow, so they buy them and having a big layoff. Some AI info Financial Impact of the Strategy Skyrocketing Revenue: Consolidated revenue surged from $387 million in 2023 to $1.31 billion in 2025, and hit $704 million for Q2 2026 alone. High Operating Margins: Their operating and adjusted profitability have expanded rapidly, with adjusted operating margins reaching 54% and operating profits more than doubling to $278 million in 2025. The Debt Trade-off: While the individual apps become profitable, the parent company funds its aggressive shopping spree (acquiring giants like Vimeo, AOL, Eventbrite, and Airtable) through heavy borrowing. This leaves them carrying billions in debt, meaning a significant chunk of their operating income goes toward servicing interest payments. The stock went public on July 1, 2026, pricing its initial public offering at $29.00 per share. It surged 40% on its first day and currently trades around $39.31. The Good: Revenue skyrocketed 126% year-over-year to $704.2 million, and adjusted earnings per share hit $0.46 (beating the $0.27 consensus). The Bad: The company’s full-year 2026 revenue guidance came in at $2.78 billion to $2.82 billion, missing Wall Street’s $2.90 billion projection. The Growth Reality: While headline growth looks massive, organic revenue growth was just 3%. Almost all of the revenue expansion is coming from bought growth—specifically the rapid fire-sale absorptions of companies like AOL, Eventbrite, and Vimeo.

• 
  Chris Kepford (@kippyNYC) reported 4 minutes ago

  @MissAuroraSnow Never change ! You haven't changed since a million years ago when we used to talk on I think it was Yahoo or AOL or something about Kurt Vonnegut. I bet you don't remember that ha

• 
  chloë☔️ (@chloeevansj) reported 9 minutes ago

  yes I’m aware I am projecting but damn. we had swing sets, tv, nintendos, AOL and in my case, ouija boards, too. We loved talking to ghosts.

• 
  Aceman67 (@aceman67) reported 12 minutes ago

  @aaliyahvtuber_ 19. Never used AOL

• 
  FRESH™👻👑 (@PalmBeach561) reported 12 minutes ago

  I remember back when we had aol chat rooms and would just talk **** about everything and any thing

• 
  Wyn Arctos (@WynArctos) reported 13 minutes ago

  I never had a AOL address, the rest well...no comment.

• 
  🔥 PALANTARD 🔥 (@cidman00) reported 14 minutes ago

  @thinkReal AOL was the **** back then

• 
  Scottx70 (@scottx70) reported 14 minutes ago

  @CJGRISHAM Courtesy of Larry Johnson STFU Here is the heart of the problem. The Combat Logistics Force today numbers about 34 ships — a figure that has stayed essentially flat for well over a decade. On paper, stability. In practice, a slow hollowing, because the demands on that force have grown while its most capable ships have disappeared. Around 2010, the Navy operated all four of its Supply-class fast combat support ships. Today only two remain. In the mid-2010s the Navy inactivated two of them into reserve to save roughly $30 million a year each in operating costs — a decision that looked reasonable on a spreadsheet and looks indefensible from the deck of a hungry ship. The reason it bites is arithmetic: replacing the combined capability of one fast support ship typically takes an oiler plus a dry cargo ship — two hulls, two crews, two schedules — to move the fuel, ammo, and food that one ship used to carry in a single package. Cut the fast support fleet in half and every sustained single-carrier mission becomes harder to feed. The rest of the force is aging underneath the flat headline. The Henry J. Kaiser-class oilers that form the backbone date to the 1980s and are being retired faster than their replacements arrive. The new John Lewis-class oiler program is meant to recapitalize the fleet with some twenty ships, but the lead ship only delivered in 2022 and just one was fully operational by mid-2025. The Navy’s own newer answer — a smaller, more numerous “light replenishment oiler,” the T-AOL — does not begin construction until FY2027 and will not arrive in numbers until the 2030s. The analytic consensus across defense researchers is blunt: the logistics force is not enough, and not fast enough, for the demands now being placed on it.