1. Home
  2. Companies
  3. AOL
  4. Princes Risborough
AOL

AOL outages and service status in Princes Risborough, England

No problems detected

If you are having issues, please submit a report below.

Full Outage Map
  • AOL generated 0 outage signals in the last 24 hours around Princes Risborough, including 0 direct reports.

AOL (America Online) is an internet portal as well as an internet service provider. As an ISP, AOL offers dial up internet through its AOL Advantage plans.

Problems in the last 24 hours in Princes Risborough, England

The chart below shows the number of AOL reports we have received in the last 24 hours from users in Princes Risborough, England and surrounding areas. An outage is declared when the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line.

At the moment, we haven't detected any problems at AOL. Are you experiencing issues or an outage? Leave a message in the comments section!

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

AOL Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

  • MustardFren
    mustard (@MustardFren) reported

    @gingertophat We'll blackpill tomorrow but tonight Tonight we whitepill Tonight we look back on how far we've come I been around since the internet was new...AOL ****...we've come so far my friend I promise you

  • Pay_Troll_Toll
    The Troll Toll (@Pay_Troll_Toll) reported

    @LegionHoops Tim never played in a finals game. Maybe he should have done an aol chat room or something

  • Will_Schryver
    Will Schryver (@Will_Schryver) reported

    2000–2002: Bubble, Terror & Scandal 2000: NASDAQ peaks at 5,048 (March 10) and begins a 78% collapse. AOL announces the $165B Time Warner merger — the worst deal ever 2001: 9/11 closes markets until Sept 17 — the longest shutdown since 1914. Enron collapses in December 2002: WorldCom's $11B fraud → Sarbanes-Oxley. The bear bottoms in October, down 49%

  • c000game
    c000game (@c000game) reported

    @neogeo8man Honestly a fascinating bit of internet history fluff to me that my generation HATED "lol" and saw it as a sign of endless inept low-IQ ****-humor AOL/CompuServ migrants. Then we gradually started using it ironically, like "lol" for "how stupid". Then we just started meaning "heh"

  • NipNapShite
    NipNapShite (@NipNapShite) reported

    @keithapearson Still very much on aol Might have been their first customer 🤪

  • liberty91362
    liberty91362 (@liberty91362) reported

    @brivael I worked at Time Warner for 24 years, and lost hundreds of thousands of my 401k in the infamous AOL merger that killed off the greatest media company in the world—the worst merger in corporate history. I mostly blame Steve Case and his other AOL cronies, who dumped all their stock right at the merger, while all the TW Execs and employees kept their stock and lost billions. I remember McKinsey’s empty suits seemed to be everywhere at Time Warner drying its death throes, and it always seemed like McKinsey helped orchestrate its collapse.

  • davidburkus
    Dr. David Burkus (@davidburkus) reported

    WSJ profiled Bending Spoons this week — the Milan company that owns AOL, Evernote, and Vimeo, run by executives in their 30s and staffed by people who are sometimes younger than the software they've been hired to fix. It's actually a story about why so many applicants never make it through the door. Hundreds of thousands apply every year — enough that the rejection rate makes Harvard look like an easy yes — and most of them are optimizing for the wrong thing: credentials, polish, a great answer to "tell me about yourself." Almost anyone can be gracious to the person deciding their future. It's how they treat someone who can't do anything for them that's hard to fake. Last year: roughly 800,000 applications, 286 hires, an acceptance rate near 0.04% — tighter than Citadel's famously selective quant recruiting (0.36%), something like a hundred times harder than Harvard. That selectivity isn't a gut call. A dedicated team inside the company grades every interview against fixed criteria, then tracks how each hire performs months and years later, feeding the results back into the model. CEO Luca Ferrari has said the signal his team weights hardest is exactly this — how a candidate treats the people who have zero power over the outcome: the assistant, the receptionist. Not decency theater. Data: how you act in front of power is a performance; how you act in front of none is closer to the truth. That gap gets coded straight into the model, right alongside the interview scores. I'd bet you've done the reverse of this in the last week without noticing — warm with your boss, a little short with someone who couldn't do anything for you either way. Most companies say they hire for character. Very few test it anywhere the candidate isn't being watched by someone who can help them. Worth trying on your own team — just notice who's kind to the person who can't do anything for them.

  • Eyedocduncan
    Jeff (@Eyedocduncan) reported

    @24tog 19 I never had an AOL email address lol

  • Berzirk
    A real, good guy (@Berzirk) reported

    @marklevinshow ... bro... you're linking to an AOL story? You rely know your demographic, don't you. I'll wait for the next CD to arrive so I can get a 30 day trial if their dial-up service, so U can check it out. After my 2pm supper, of course.

  • catgirlprostate
    maddy catgirlprostate (@catgirlprostate) reported

    @hzrnvm I am actually aware of this because there's a shocking amount of British pensioners who still have AOL email addresses and occasionally I need to help them set them up at work