1. Home
  2. Companies
  3. AOL
  4. Llandeilo
AOL

AOL outages and service status in Llandeilo, Wales

No problems detected

If you are having issues, please submit a report below.

Full Outage Map
  • AOL generated 0 outage signals in the last 24 hours around Llandeilo, including 0 direct reports.

AOL (America Online) is an internet portal as well as an internet service provider. As an ISP, AOL offers dial up internet through its AOL Advantage plans.

Problems in the last 24 hours in Llandeilo, Wales

The chart below shows the number of AOL reports we have received in the last 24 hours from users in Llandeilo, Wales and surrounding areas. An outage is declared when the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line.

At the moment, we haven't detected any problems at AOL. Are you experiencing issues or an outage? Leave a message in the comments section!

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

AOL Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

  • MzJenniferB
    Jennifer B (@MzJenniferB) reported

    19 Never used an aol email but I did have the other one lol

  • Jebornik
    Jebornik 🇺🇸 ✝️ (@Jebornik) reported

    @disagreebutter Never had an aol address

  • DennisDown94756
    Dennis Downs (@DennisDown94756) reported

    @Starlink I can remember $4.95 a month for AOL back when people could afford it ! What's a matter Elon, can't make millions so going for billions instead ? Chicken **** filthy rich bastards.

  • NotAzehara
    NotAzehara (@NotAzehara) reported

    @CielaNox Im probably older than you and there are some of these that i know about and used by people around me yet I have never used. - water bed - phone booth - fax machine - aol address - mix tape - post card - check book

  • scottx70
    Scottx70 (@scottx70) reported

    @CJGRISHAM Courtesy of Larry Johnson STFU Here is the heart of the problem. The Combat Logistics Force today numbers about 34 ships — a figure that has stayed essentially flat for well over a decade. On paper, stability. In practice, a slow hollowing, because the demands on that force have grown while its most capable ships have disappeared. Around 2010, the Navy operated all four of its Supply-class fast combat support ships. Today only two remain. In the mid-2010s the Navy inactivated two of them into reserve to save roughly $30 million a year each in operating costs — a decision that looked reasonable on a spreadsheet and looks indefensible from the deck of a hungry ship. The reason it bites is arithmetic: replacing the combined capability of one fast support ship typically takes an oiler plus a dry cargo ship — two hulls, two crews, two schedules — to move the fuel, ammo, and food that one ship used to carry in a single package. Cut the fast support fleet in half and every sustained single-carrier mission becomes harder to feed. The rest of the force is aging underneath the flat headline. The Henry J. Kaiser-class oilers that form the backbone date to the 1980s and are being retired faster than their replacements arrive. The new John Lewis-class oiler program is meant to recapitalize the fleet with some twenty ships, but the lead ship only delivered in 2022 and just one was fully operational by mid-2025. The Navy’s own newer answer — a smaller, more numerous “light replenishment oiler,” the T-AOL — does not begin construction until FY2027 and will not arrive in numbers until the 2030s. The analytic consensus across defense researchers is blunt: the logistics force is not enough, and not fast enough, for the demands now being placed on it.

  • TheShottyStrms
    The Shotty, And Abigail Deltani (@TheShottyStrms) reported

    Fax machine: yup Rotary phone: seen, never used Encyclopedia: yup Floppy disk: I was an early 90s kid. Yes. Aol address: never had one but I think my dad did Record player: family had one Film camera: depends. If this is actual movie film, no. If classic roll of film you have to develop? Yes. Mixed tape: had a few. Phone booth: yes. Cursive: man it has been a long time but yes. Check book: yes. Typewriter: yes Dictionary: multiple times before Google was a thing VCR: it was how I watched the original land before time, secret of NIMH, and others. Paper map: yes. Waterbed: once Postcard: multiple times Walkman: wasn't that lucky Phonebook: yes. 17/20

  • Irunwithdogs
    Jon Lareau (@Irunwithdogs) reported

    @BaileyRoseBoyle @AshleyInMKE That makes sense, and I'd imagine you're not alone in the experience of knowing what some things are despite never having actually used/ done them, like an AOL account.

  • rundle_r
    Jay Rundle (@rundle_r) reported

    @JohannBiermann1 The bit worth adding: they never sell what they buy, so this isn't a flipper; it's more like a hospice for tired apps that turns a profit. AOL and Evernote under one Italian roof is a sentence that shouldn't exist but does.

  • Xehemang26
    Xehemang (@Xehemang26) reported

    @ANI Why you giving space to this stupid buffoon. He is just ignorant aol.

  • CentrumJosh
    Josh Centrum (@CentrumJosh) reported

    @Rajatsoni Calling XRP holders stupid while chasing BTC because it was invented first is hilarious. By that logic we should all still be using AOL and BlackBerrys. Tech history is littered with first movers that got passed by better technology. BTC has had 15+ years to scale and and hasn’t