AOL outages and service status in Lingfield, England

Problems in the last 24 hours in Lingfield, England

The chart below shows the number of AOL reports we have received in the last 24 hours from users in Lingfield, England and surrounding areas. An outage is declared when the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line.

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

AOL Issues Reports Near Lingfield, England

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in Lingfield and nearby locations:

• 
  Mark Newman (@Mark_BeerArt) reported 17 minutes ago from Epsom and Ewell District, England

  @liampowersjr @NorthmanTrader @Tesla Fully agree by the way, Tesla is strange, but I think some of this isn't just cars but their battery technology....never understood it myself. Never understood AOL time Warner, even wrote a paper on it for my MBA and got the lowest mark out of all my papers.

AOL Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Ja Rarieda (@jacobochino147) reported 15 seconds ago

  Anyone reposting this garbage on my timeline gets an instant block Aol jothurwa

• 
  Liberty Info (@libertyinfo_job) reported 1 minute ago

  @DowdEdward Lots of skepticism on your feed. Think the skeptics have looked at Microsoft with products worse than they were 10 years ago. Wall Street hype in search of fees exists, remember Merrill Lynch pushing AOL? Too bad government "investment" doesn't get the same scrutiny.

• 
  🔻agitprop + absurdity🔻 (@agtprpnabsrdty) reported 3 minutes ago

  Different decade, same math: half the S&P 500 is priced at levels that a dot-com CEO called proof of investor insanity while watching his company crater 90%. The rotation at the top: In early 2000, the ten most valuable S&P 500 companies read like a monument to permanent dominance: Microsoft, General Electric, Cisco, Walmart, ExxonMobil, Intel, Lucent, IBM, Citigroup, AOL. A generation later, only Microsoft remains. GE was carved into three separate companies. Lucent was absorbed by Nokia. AOL became the cautionary tale attached to the worst merger in corporate history. Cisco and Intel spent 25 years climbing back to their dot-com peaks. Citigroup, IBM, Walmart, and ExxonMobil still exist, but none crack the top ten. The new top ten is Nvidia, Apple, Microsoft, Alphabet, Amazon, Meta, and the AI infrastructure complex. Investors in 2000 were also certain they were buying the future's permanent giants. The data says most of today's winners won't be in the top ten a generation from now either, and there is no mechanism by which you find out which ones survive in advance. The valuation problem: In 2002, after Sun Microsystems collapsed 90%, CEO Scott McNealy explained to investors exactly what a 10x sales multiple actually demands: 100% of revenues paid as dividends for ten consecutive years, with zero costs, zero R&D, zero taxes, and zero employees. He was describing the math of the price investors had paid for his stock as a form of collective psychosis. Today, 51% of the S&P 500 by market cap trades above 10x sales. Half the index. The AI narrative is functioning as the dot-com narrative functioned: a story compelling enough to make the math feel optional. The math has never been optional.

• 
  Agenda Apex (@AgendaApex) reported 5 minutes ago

  Oh, wonderful. Another glowing obituary for the 2010 Bitcoin faucet. Yes, we missed it while we were out here perfecting the art of burning movies and waiting for AOL to stop screaming. Thanks for the reminder that our 'get rich slow' scheme was actually just 'get rich never.' Next up: time machine crowdfunding?

• 
  #iheartMichaeljackson (@Sassy_Diva_2487) reported 5 minutes ago

  @AOL We don’t care, @AOL. Nobody with a functioning brain and a Spotify playlist cares. The world collectively decided years ago that Michael Jackson is untouchable, the allegations were a clown show, and you sad, jobless click-farm goblins are still out here recycling the same dusty script like it’s 2005 and people still trust you. Newsflash: they don’t. The King left the building, left the ranch, left the haters in the dirt, and his legacy is doing victory laps while you beg for engagement with “shocking” headlines that wouldn’t shock a houseplant. Touch some grass. Stream some Thriller. Or better yet, get a real job instead of farming MJ drama for pennies. The people have spoken: MJ forever, your pathetic “gotcha” content never. Stay irrelevant. 🖕

• 
  Netwerkin (@Netwerkin666) reported 6 minutes ago

  Without gaming of some type, most people find their computers useless if their ISP is down. We had a great time on our PC's before the AOL era started.

• 
  Rebecca Lombardo - Author, advocate, blogger (@BekaLombardo) reported 9 minutes ago

  @AOL I have been a loyal customer for more than 26 years. My account is hacked and your people have left us on hold for 3 hours. No one is helping us and who knows what is happening to my account. #badcustomerservice

• 
  Ian ᯅ (@somenuso) reported 10 minutes ago

  @POTFES This is not accurate. The DMA, DSA, AI Act, and similar frameworks are not examples of member states forcing Brussels to overregulate. They are EU level regulatory projects, proposed, negotiated, adopted, and enforced through the EU institutional system. Member states are part of that machine, but pretending the problem is only national fragmentation conveniently ignores what Brussels itself is doing. And yes, a deeper internal market would be useful. Easier company formation, better access to capital, lower compliance costs, cheaper energy, and less fragmentation would help. But that is not the same as giving the Commission more power to micromanage technology. If American tech dominates, Europe should compete by building better products on honest market terms, not by regulating superior foreign companies and hoping European champions appear afterward. Markets are not static. IBM, Intel, Microsoft, Nokia, BlackBerry, Yahoo, AOL, MySpace, and many others once looked dominant in their own domains. They were challenged, displaced, or diminished because better technologies, better products, and better business models emerged. That is how real competition works. Innovation comes from builders, capital, talent, risk, and consumer choice. It does not come from Brussels officials deciding how platforms should be designed.

• 
  D4RK10RD~LOHSF~ (@nicolasjames916) reported 13 minutes ago

  @LuchaConMacho i watched WWE since 1997, take this fake "passionate" crap and go back to MYSPACE or AOL, if you are a wrestling podcaster then you talk about everything wrestling, not sitting on social media and talking about 2 wrestlers that make you look relevant @LuchaConMacho

• 
  Freddy Lynn (@RobM111754) reported 17 minutes ago

  @KiraR Is AOL messenger still down