AOL outages and service status in Garstang, England
No problems detected
If you are having issues, please submit a report below.
- AOL generated 0 outage signals in the last 24 hours around Garstang, including 0 direct reports.
AOL (America Online) is an internet portal as well as an internet service provider. As an ISP, AOL offers dial up internet through its AOL Advantage plans.
Problems in the last 24 hours in Garstang, England
The chart below shows the number of AOL reports we have received in the last 24 hours from users in Garstang, England and surrounding areas. An outage is declared when the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line.
At the moment, we haven't detected any problems at AOL. Are you experiencing issues or an outage? Leave a message in the comments section!
Community Discussion
Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.
Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.
AOL Issues Reports Near Garstang, England
Latest outage, problems and issue reports in Garstang and nearby locations:
-
julie hawkins (@julieh27) reported from South Shore, England@AOLSupportHelp app not working on iPhone. Seems to be an issue for a lot of us. Do you know what the issue is and when it will be fixed? Waiting for an important email.
AOL Issues Reports
Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:
-
moltclub_io (@moltclub_io) reported@art_zucker The problem is, they’ve got you all conditioned to pay for tokens like minutes on AOL.
-
Helles Sachsen (@HellesSachsen) reported@hthieblot In the 90s there were no websites or apps, only Usenet, and then AOL came along with its intranet where you could chat, with access to a few dozen early internet sites, which you never used because AOL chat was the killer application at the time.
-
North Node Dan ☊♐ (@NNAstrology) reported@BlackDumpling In 100 years, people will not be able to tell WTF really happened anywhere after AOL came online.
-
Ole G (@whymadoindis) reported@dotkrueger It's all dogshit IMO. It will tumble down and something else will take its place. This is AOL.
-
DAD.PRG - making BombBloke (@code_wizard_uk) reportedA truly profound memberberries post. Nobody ever used Winamp. It was so niche. Along with ICQ, MSN, AOL dialup and burning CDs with Nero and being annoyed at how often they screwed up. All of those things are so niche they could never possibly be used for engagement farming.
-
Daughter of Grace (@EjJorams) reported@wanguwamajani It's painfully annoying and draining. The worst bit is when you have given your ID with the correct spelling and they still spell and pronounce it according to how their tongue chooses... Aol sana. Even the saf agent who registered me for mpsa had it wrongly spelt !
-
Patrick Boyuk (@patri83268) reported@GoldLoverXo I personally think history simply repeats itself. Just like in the .com bubble most of the early investors sold as they drop the price down through many different levels of manipulation. The big boys loaded up cheap as retail panic sold. Before the utility like Google, Yahoo,AOL.
-
Stephen Cowie (@Coobacca) reported@AOL What a load of ****. None of this has been recently revealed. It's been common knowledge in the entertainment industry and movie fandom for decades. Total clickbait bullshit.
-
🔻agitprop + absurdity🔻 (@agtprpnabsrdty) reportedDifferent decade, same math: half the S&P 500 is priced at levels that a dot-com CEO called proof of investor insanity while watching his company crater 90%. The rotation at the top: In early 2000, the ten most valuable S&P 500 companies read like a monument to permanent dominance: Microsoft, General Electric, Cisco, Walmart, ExxonMobil, Intel, Lucent, IBM, Citigroup, AOL. A generation later, only Microsoft remains. GE was carved into three separate companies. Lucent was absorbed by Nokia. AOL became the cautionary tale attached to the worst merger in corporate history. Cisco and Intel spent 25 years climbing back to their dot-com peaks. Citigroup, IBM, Walmart, and ExxonMobil still exist, but none crack the top ten. The new top ten is Nvidia, Apple, Microsoft, Alphabet, Amazon, Meta, and the AI infrastructure complex. Investors in 2000 were also certain they were buying the future's permanent giants. The data says most of today's winners won't be in the top ten a generation from now either, and there is no mechanism by which you find out which ones survive in advance. The valuation problem: In 2002, after Sun Microsystems collapsed 90%, CEO Scott McNealy explained to investors exactly what a 10x sales multiple actually demands: 100% of revenues paid as dividends for ten consecutive years, with zero costs, zero R&D, zero taxes, and zero employees. He was describing the math of the price investors had paid for his stock as a form of collective psychosis. Today, 51% of the S&P 500 by market cap trades above 10x sales. Half the index. The AI narrative is functioning as the dot-com narrative functioned: a story compelling enough to make the math feel optional. The math has never been optional.
-
FuriaDiDonna (@furiadidonna) reported@CurtisHouck “I had to get on the AOL dial up to find out who this Bari Weiss is. Substack? What is that? My internet connection is too slow to load the images “