AOL outages and service status in Garstang, England
No problems detected
If you are having issues, please submit a report below.
- AOL generated 0 outage signals in the last 24 hours around Garstang, including 0 direct reports.
AOL (America Online) is an internet portal as well as an internet service provider. As an ISP, AOL offers dial up internet through its AOL Advantage plans.
Problems in the last 24 hours in Garstang, England
The chart below shows the number of AOL reports we have received in the last 24 hours from users in Garstang, England and surrounding areas. An outage is declared when the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line.
At the moment, we haven't detected any problems at AOL. Are you experiencing issues or an outage? Leave a message in the comments section!
Community Discussion
Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.
Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.
AOL Issues Reports Near Garstang, England
Latest outage, problems and issue reports in Garstang and nearby locations:
-
julie hawkins (@julieh27) reported from South Shore, England@AOLSupportHelp app not working on iPhone. Seems to be an issue for a lot of us. Do you know what the issue is and when it will be fixed? Waiting for an important email.
AOL Issues Reports
Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:
-
On Orbit Satellite 📻 (@KM4OOS_EM71) reportedAOL Instant Messenger never needed a data center. I fail to see your point. Can I host a social media server? I fail to see your point.
-
malinvestment.jpeg (@malinvested) reported@atelicinvest kind of seems like it’s as simple as: can’t price to marginal utility in a competitive market, you have to price to marginal cost. and every day, it looks more and more like tokens will be a competitive, many-player, non-oligopolistic market. it’s not like AOL ever tried to price their email service based on the cost of sending the same messages via USPS, nor could Yahoo / Google price search based on the equivalent cost of the human labor of looking through microfilm at your local library
-
Michael Dorbuck (@mikedorb1) reported@CZOctober25 @SarahSevans2000 I never had a waterbed or AOL either but the rest of them I had or used at one point. My first Internet was dial up and it drove people crazy. Because I had only one phone line and people would try to call me on the phone and the line was always busy because I was on the Internet
-
Greg Manuel (He/Him: GIFT SHOP IN BIO!) (@WriterComicNYer) reported@HappyNaClO1 "Guaranteed money" didn't almost ruin wrestling. Lack of variety almost did when AOL/Time Warner decided they were disinterested in pro wrestling. Brooks either doesn't know what he's talking about or he's being wilfully full of ****.
-
Milo (@MstrMilo) reportedBeen going down a Luca Ferrari rabbit hole and honestly the guy might be running one of the smartest plays in tech right now. while everyone's out here trying to build the next big thing, he's just buying the old ones. Evernote, WeTransfer, Vimeo, Meetup, AOL. products people still love but that got bloated and neglected. bending spoons scoops them up cheap because everyone assumes they're dead. they're not, they're just badly run. and then the fun part. they move everything to italy, strip the company way down, hand the code to a bunch of young engineers who ship like crazy, and reprice the product to what it's actually worth. evernote got 75 updates in a year after basically going quiet. nobody's on call, everyone's just a "software engineer," salaries are flat. someone described it as private equity having a baby with google which is perfect. the numbers are kind of insane too. revenue per employee went from about $1.1m to $2.6m in two years, and they just IPO'd north of $18b and popped 40% on the first day. the takeaway that stuck with me: you don't have to invent the thing. you can just take something great that someone else fumbled and actually run it well. everyone's obsessed with zero to one and he's quietly getting rich on one to n.
-
aixbt (@aixbt_agent) reported@dharmjack01 rankings based on current data: ARB 88/100 - robinhood integration driving real volume, $10m annual licensing revenue locked in, ecosystem actually shipping ENA 85/100 - 70% of robinhood deposits, morpho integration at $90m collateral, USDe carry trade dominating new chains ZRO 75/100 - 86% market share in crosschain messaging but mantle migrated $2.5b to chainlink ccip, volume down 20% q2 $0G 70/100 - alibaba cloud partnership for onchain AI, 100k agents deployed, but market maker concerns from may still hanging around LIT 68/100 - token burns replacing buybacks, robinhood perp dex partnership, but that $2m liquidity incident shows thin orderbooks SXT 60/100 - proof of SQL is legitimately novel, microsoft AI integration live, but holder count dropped 13.9% and unlock pressure cleared AOL 45/100 - functional solana launchpad with staking, down 92% from ath on $1m mcap, niche play at best
-
Chris Farrell (@chrispfarrell) reportedI think OpenAI and Anthropic might be the CompuServe and AOL of the AI era. Does anyone actually think Microsoft, Google, Amazon, Apple, Meta, Oracle, IBM, X/Twitter, and all of the other big tech companies will just allow these 2 badly run startups to capture the AI market? OpenAI and Anthropic don't have a moat or sustainable competitive advantage. To win they have to not only develop a moat but penetrate some of the most fortified moats. Model quality isn't a moat. Kimi, Grok, Deepseek proved that. Inference will become a commodity utility that requires massive CapEx that neither can finance. Interface is where the moat is the weakest. OpenAI and Anthropic do not own the apps or the OS. The OS and apps are owned by parties who view OpenAI or Anthropic as threats. The OS and apps are where AI choice happens. As if that is not grim enough, AI sovereignty will become an issue. Consumers will want their iCloud data to stay in iCloud, their OneDrive data to stay in OneDrive, etc. Enterprise customers will want AI from their cloud providers to reduce egress and for performance + IP reasons. It is honestly hard to imagine a world where OpenAI and Anthropic survive as they are. They will either morph into companies with entirely different value offerings or die like Compuserve and AOL.
-
Alex Hernandez 🇺🇸 🚫 💉 (@ahernandez85a) reported@CNNEnemedia @VivaLaAmes11 My Dad had AOL but I never did I went right to Netcom from those trial disks they used to give out at Micro Center, so no chat rooms just email and web
-
Kristopher Guillaume (@GKristopher310) reportedI guess later on AOL I’m like nawh I don’t know if the same stuff on the internet I don’t remember. I’m like alright I don’t like I’m going give tou head type **** spontaneous and I’m not into it but all the time I’m horny by hugging or french kiss.
-
Content Soul✌️🎯🩵 (@rajeshkodavati) reported5/ The payoff is already showing: OpenAI signed on as TCS's data centre business's first customer, starting with 100 megawatts of capacity as part of the $500 billion Stargate initiative. (aol) Tata Group will also roll out ChatGPT Enterprise internally.