AOL outages and service status in Chinnor, England

Problems in the last 24 hours in Chinnor, England

The chart below shows the number of AOL reports we have received in the last 24 hours from users in Chinnor, England and surrounding areas. An outage is declared when the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line.

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

AOL Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Grotmaster (@grotmaster) reported 3 minutes ago

  @Kohonos234 @AislingOLoughl1 I don't think so, Jhonner. AOL is a friend of ours and has an incisive mind. Poor ole Steo had some rough times, by the sound of it. These riots are exactly what the ZOG want, unfortunately, all part of the plan. It's all ******

• 
  Exencial Research Partners (@exencial_RP) reported 4 minutes ago

  OpenAI Is Forecasting Something That Has Never Happened in 75 Years of Market History Morgan Stanley's Mauboussin studied every 5-year sales growth run for US public companies since 1950. Nearly 19,300 firm-period observations. Fastest ever: AOL at 103% CAGR, and even that was a merger artifact with Time Warner. OpenAI's projection: $13.1bn (2025) → $284bn (2030). An 85% CAGR from a base no company that size has ever compounded from. The earlier $184bn-by-2029 forecast implied 118%. The mean 5-year nominal CAGR in the data: 6.9%, with 11.1% standard deviation. OpenAI's forecast sits 9 to 10 standard deviations out. Mauboussin's caveat is fair, base rates are dynamic and the past doesn't make it impossible. But it would be the single greatest growth achievement in the history of public markets. Price it accordingly. Base Rates of Nominal and Real 5-Year Sales Growth for Firms With $2-5 Billion in Sales, 1950-2025

• 
  Swats24 (@swats24) reported 7 minutes ago

  @TheGrillGeek I never had AOL but a different version of online messenger. Never owned a waterbed but have experienced it. I never owned a record player but seen it in action. Does that give me 19 or brings down my score to 16? Also, I still use a checkbook 👵

• 
  Reboticon (@Reboticant) reported 13 minutes ago

  @icpolicy @kitten_beloved @WomanCorn man its like aol in the old days I would get myself into a lot of trouble

• 
  Darrell Conwell (@DarrellConwell) reported 13 minutes ago

  @BeaconTerraOne @huskyXBT And if you put $1000 in AOL, you'd be **** out of luck. There have been many more AOL's than Apples.

• 
  Marc Hoag (@MarcHoag) reported 15 minutes ago

  @RaminNasibov Does AOL count? Or BBS? Never did much with the latter, but plenty with the former. I also vaguely remember my dad had a CompuServe account. Email addresses were basically a string of numbers as I recall.

• 
  Abhishek Sharma (@abhi100425) reported 15 minutes ago

  Not every inbox shows it yet. Gmail, Yahoo and AOL support BIMI today. Apple Mail and Outlook are limited or still evolving. Setup is free. The VMC is the cost that actually stops most people.

• 
  HonestGamer (@Nightmarepark4) reported 17 minutes ago

  @cmdrexorcist @elliereeves this will make things worst funny thing is AOL had netnanny software since 2000s yet everyone ignored it

• 
  Lazarus (@Lazarus_Capital) reported 18 minutes ago

  @stocktrader989 stock i responded to your tweet "The current debt, interest expense, colo fees and no chance to make profits are reasons not to invest in $CRWV and responded with: "They’ve pioneered the way for neoclouds to get financing with Iran literally copying their DDTL structure, are bringing down their weighted cost of debt, improving margins, and focusing on the higher return business (cloud vs Colo). Their debt is a function of levering up to improve their returns. Their financing ability is actually so good that they’re giving up prepayments since that would weigh down their returns. They’re playing chess while $IREN is figuring out how checkers work" Either you dont understand what im saying or deliberately trying to twist what im saying. If theyre the pioneer in financing, they will be definition (very likely) have more debt compared to "peers", also, I stated they pioneered the way for them to get financing. Im not sure why youre repeatedly trying to paint it as my bull thesis rests on them being first. No. That was a stab at Iran since they literally copied their financing structure. Setting up that if you argue against CRWV's financing, youre basically saying your darling was is following their stupidity. Up to you if you want to make that argument. "Backward looking showing massive improvement- WRONG" I literally said its backward looking in response to you looking at their recent current state financials when theyre going through a grow phase. Literally triple digit YoY rev growth, not to mention ARR and rev backlog. Q1 revs of $2b against a $100B rev backlog. Where do you think the valuation is coming from? Whats happening to their compute deals? How can you model out how much they will earn? By looking at: "Revenue Backlog, RPU & financing- doesn’t hold water". With these names you need to be looking at how theyre executing, what direction theyre going, their rate of growth, margin direction, backlog, etc. IREN for example: missing their own cloud ARR targets, GPU rental prices weakening against a bullish backdrop, ARR growth with no regards to margin, margin compression and return deterioration, lots of power sitting doing nothing while peers have sold out. NBIS for example you did something similar by showing the last 2 Qs that theyre losing money. Yes, theyre building, investment cycle, they will have negative cash flows, look beyond that. I really try to engage and help others learn, and I love to test my thesis against others, sometimes with a little sarcasm and trash talking. I addressed your debt concerns and pointed you to where the value will come from. I dont like addressing someone's concerns and they brush it off like i didnt respond, instead choosing to focus on something I didnt even say like you did here "Pioneers ofter don’t win. Examples 1. Internet- AOL/ Yahoo 2. IPhones- Blackberry 3. BTC mining- Mara $CRWV is slightly improving but still a failed company" I especially dont like when people twist my words, or worse, accuse me of "changing your argument to try to meet your objective".

• 
  skumm🧊 (@skumWgmi) reported 19 minutes ago

  Here's what happens next now that Warner Bros and Paramount are one company. In 6 months: Max and paramount + merge into a single platform. Subscribers get one app. Thousnads of employees get layoffs. The combined $57 billion debt starts driving every content decision. In 12 months: CNN gets sold or spun off. It has been on the table for years. The new company cannot afford to carry a struggling news network alongside a streaming war. In 2 years: The merged studio approaches Apple, Amazon, or a sovereign wealth fund for a capital injection. $57 billion in debt with streaming losses doesn't sustain itself. In 5 years: This merger either saves Hollywood's legacy studios or becomes the AOL Time Warner of the 2020s. There is no middle outcome.