1. Home
  2. ❯
  3. Companies
  4. ❯
  5. AOL
  6. ❯
  7. Bere Alston
AOL

AOL outages and service status in Bere Alston, England

No problems detected

If you are having issues, please submit a report below.

Full Outage Map
  • AOL generated 0 outage signals in the last 24 hours around Bere Alston, including 0 direct reports.

AOL (America Online) is an internet portal as well as an internet service provider. As an ISP, AOL offers dial up internet through its AOL Advantage plans.

Problems in the last 24 hours in Bere Alston, England

The chart below shows the number of AOL reports we have received in the last 24 hours from users in Bere Alston, England and surrounding areas. An outage is declared when the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line.

At the moment, we haven't detected any problems at AOL. Are you experiencing issues or an outage? Leave a message in the comments section!

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

AOL Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

  • TylerW35386
    𓆏𓍝⇦⇦⇦ (@TylerW35386) reported

    @betty_egg I am pre-aol by years and years. aol is when the internet became entirely stupid.

  • TheDavidVinc
    Davidvinc (@TheDavidVinc) reported

    I remember when I was young and my mother would take me to the mall. I would bring a small notepad and pencil, then sit in Walden Books and write down things I had to do where I was stuck when I couldn't afford the guide. And as far as Gamefaqs is concerned, I don't think I knew that existed till like 1998 or 1999. It's not like we had social media to talk about different websites, I had to search using AOL keywords.

  • DollsEyeAvoider
    Schinto Beans (@DollsEyeAvoider) reported

    @DaddyWarpig Based on how utterly ******* ignorant AOL news headlines read in 2003 before the Iraq invasion, this doesn't surprise me in the least. I expect it to be this bad or worse now.

  • KingStudebaker
    KingStudebaker (@KingStudebaker) reported

    @MapQuest Lol. People use this ap??? Let me get my old AOL account and login

  • ckiser40
    C.R. Kiser (@ckiser40) reported

    @ambermac AOL users and Blackberry users rejoice! What a **** app.

  • ScottUpham
    Scott Upham 🇺🇸 (@ScottUpham) reported

    @MurrayHillGuy1 This guy (me) dating history: - Dated co-worker at grocery store in college, married her after a year, divorced after 9 years. 2 beautiful daughters (who are now 33 & 31). - Dated a former co-worker briefly. - Dated a girl that IM'ed me on AOL Instant messenger, married her after 3 years, divorced after 18 years. 2 beautiful daughters (who are now 21 & 14). - Dated a younger woman (25) on a dating website for a year, bought her a ring but never proposed. Only broken heart of my life (at 50). - A few short relationships from dating apps but nothing longer than 1-2 months. - Long distance relationship with a younger woman I met on IG (we had a mutual). Lasted 4 years but recently fizzled. Back to Square 1!

  • jack_hammer22
    Jack Hammer (@jack_hammer22) reported

    @TaraServatius John is a rino *** just like the rest. Its one big **** show the senate. Mitch AOL. Maxine AOL. Thune and the rest traitors.

  • DaniilBuilds
    Daniil (@DaniilBuilds) reported

    AOL and Time Warner didn’t just pay for what the two companies were worth in January 2000. They paid for what they believed the two companies could become together. The announced merger was valued at roughly $350B, with AOL shareholders expected to own about 55% of the combined company. The logic was easy to understand: combine AOL’s internet business with Time Warner’s media assets and create value neither could generate alone. But there was a financial problem hiding inside that logic. Future synergies are uncertain. The merger closed in January 2001. SEC disclosures later put the acquisition cost at approximately $147B. Then came the accounting reckoning. In 2002, the combined company reported a $98.7B net loss, including a $54.2B goodwill impairment. That $54.2B was non-cash. It did not mean the company suddenly paid out $54.2B in cash. It meant the value previously assigned to acquired goodwill could no longer be supported at the same level. That distinction matters. When you pay upfront for future synergies, you are effectively putting a price on value that still depends on execution. If the synergies arrive, the premium can make sense. If they don’t, shareholders can end up carrying the cost. The most expensive synergy is the one you pay for before you prove it exists.

  • garyeppenbaugh
    Gary Eppenbaugh (@garyeppenbaugh) reported

    @MapQuest Holy hell, we thought you went to go hang out with Ask Jeeves for the weekend at his mountain cabin with Napster, Netscape, and AOL Instant Messenger

  • tigerbitewand
    Amanda Rankin (@tigerbitewand) reported

    Catfish people I mean like for real they're scamming stupid people I'm not a stupid person on XP I could actually go into the register keys and pull out Trojan horses like AOL... It was not allowed on my computer it was not one of my emails Yahoo was... Anybody else recognize how