AOL outages and service status in Abergele, Wales

Problems in the last 24 hours in Abergele, Wales

The chart below shows the number of AOL reports we have received in the last 24 hours from users in Abergele, Wales and surrounding areas. An outage is declared when the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line.

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

AOL Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Gary Smith (@inflyte21) reported 1 minute ago

  19. Never had an aol address. Can I substitute for an 8-Track to receive the 20?!??

• 
  the spirit ruckas truth show 🦉💯💃🏽👻😈🌚🌕 (@UGodmother17972) reported 3 minutes ago

  It my wil money n my benefits money not for U nrehab go away U will never be me nor seee my aol money it not for U hoes go **** your self ***** or get U set nl U up n left for dead.

• 
  🐰✨Stark✨🦝🏳️‍⚧️🏳️‍🌈 5% sw2 (@Bunny_Stark89) reported 4 minutes ago

  @piastiques_ Damn people get paid for that now? I was doin it for free back in the aol/msn messenger days 😭😭😭

• 
  Matt Laroo (@Matty_Laroo) reported 8 minutes ago

  Such a weird time discussing AI with anyone who isn't super in the weeds right now. 99.9% of people who have been exposed to AI only know "chat", which in my experience is the worst current use case for AI (can be inaccurate, biased, too sycophantic, etc). Meanwhile, the 0.1% actually building **** (be it apps, businesses, websites, dashboards, slide decks, business plans, etc) or using it to help organize your life (translating "stream of consciousness" into readable notes, managing your inbox/calendar, creating a second-brain wiki from links, etc) is seeing where this is all going. Big difference is that the user (YOU!) have direct input on the outputs, whereas chat is just the delusion that you are getting correct answers from some digital deity (just a text version of brain rot, imo). It makes having conversations super weird, like explaining the potential of the internet to someone who only logged on to AOL to read/send email.

• 
  bill peterson (@billp97309) reported 12 minutes ago

  @Irina_exh I got 19, never had AOL.

• 
  Mo PaPa (@JamesDo16246977) reported 17 minutes ago

  @Irina_exh 19 out of 20. Never used AOL at all.

• 
  MADr0591 (@MADr0591) reported 19 minutes ago

  @The_FJC Two of those I never heard. AOL dial-up

• 
  Daniil (@DaniilBuilds) reported 23 minutes ago

  AOL and Time Warner didn’t just pay for what the two companies were worth in January 2000. They paid for what they believed the two companies could become together. The announced merger was valued at roughly $350B, with AOL shareholders expected to own about 55% of the combined company. The logic was easy to understand: combine AOL’s internet business with Time Warner’s media assets and create value neither could generate alone. But there was a financial problem hiding inside that logic. Future synergies are uncertain. The merger closed in January 2001. SEC disclosures later put the acquisition cost at approximately $147B. Then came the accounting reckoning. In 2002, the combined company reported a $98.7B net loss, including a $54.2B goodwill impairment. That $54.2B was non-cash. It did not mean the company suddenly paid out $54.2B in cash. It meant the value previously assigned to acquired goodwill could no longer be supported at the same level. That distinction matters. When you pay upfront for future synergies, you are effectively putting a price on value that still depends on execution. If the synergies arrive, the premium can make sense. If they don’t, shareholders can end up carrying the cost. The most expensive synergy is the one you pay for before you prove it exists.

• 
  Virginia Ray (@VirginaRay57067) reported 25 minutes ago

  @thorMjolniro It turned out AOL never said that. MB checked it out. AND it turned out to be false. Because I do think she is stupid I believed it and did not check it with grok.

• 
  ⚔️Tina Truth⚔️ (@_tinatruth) reported 27 minutes ago

  But AOL knew a threat was approaching. Broadband internet was gaining momentum. The problem? AOL’s business model was built for the old internet. The slow, dial-up world. To compete with broadband, AOL thought it needed something it didn’t yet have: World-class content. A merger with Time Warner would give AOL access to some of the most valuable media properties in the world. Together, they believed they could dominate the future of the internet.