AOL outages and service status in Daphne, Alabama

Problems in the last 24 hours in Daphne, Alabama

The chart below shows the number of AOL reports we have received in the last 24 hours from users in Daphne, Alabama and surrounding areas. An outage is declared when the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line.

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

AOL Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  At the speed in which they... (@LumpySpaceTaco) reported 12 seconds ago

  @OrevaZSN Internet back in the 90s: Here's 100 AOL CD's you didn't ask for that give you a large amount of connection time for free AI now: I only speak to people who pay for tokens. But here is 1 token use it wisely you ***** *spits in poor peoples face*

• 
  Downthenose (@downthenos53590) reported 3 minutes ago

  @Rambrero1 @pantherkat @AOL You still don't get the point. Go cry about housing some more. You have no patience for aol being down for an hour or two, I'm bitching about real life ****. grow up

• 
  Kenny Burchard (@KennyBurchard) reported 3 minutes ago

  This is true. I have officially built a bulk mail server for just me that functions 100% like constant contact or mail chimp in every possible way that I have been able to detect, using AI. It cost me less than $100 to build it. It costs only 10 cents for every 1000 emails I send. Every email service (aol, hotmail, yahoo, Microsoft, gmail) recognizes it as a legit service. It’s called KennyBMail I log in to my dashboard which I can design however I want. It has one user and one account. Me and mine. I can do drip campaigns, single emails, weekly newsletters and whatever else you can think of. It uses all the structure blocks, tests, formats, resends, click and open trackers, reports. Everything. You name it this service does it. My gated content has put over 650 new emails into it in 3 weeks while I sleep. For a small YouTube channel that has given me an entirely new way to reach people in my audience. AI knows every language. Every human language and every coding language in every human language. It knows how everything in the domain of coding and programming works. Everything. It’s not perfect but it works. It would have cost me tens of thousands of dollars to have a company build this. I built it with AI in 9 days during down time. If you know how to tell it what to do (not everyone does) - then if you can think it, you can build it. I know nothing about building this kind of stuff and still did it because I know how to articulate what I want it to do and how to tell it when something isn’t right.

• 
  GUL (@gulVasikova) reported 4 minutes ago

  $ASTS 🚀 The biggest opportunity in space isn’t rockets. It’s the infrastructure being built around them. Think back to the early days of the internet. Most investors focused on companies people could see—Yahoo, AOL, Google. But behind every website was an invisible network of fiber optic cables, servers, networking equipment and data centers. Without that infrastructure, there would be no internet. Space is beginning to follow the same blueprint. Imagine a brand-new city. Nobody builds shopping malls first. Nobody opens restaurants before roads exist. First come the highways. Then electricity. Water pipes. Communication networks. Only after the foundation is complete do businesses move in. Space works the same way. Satellites are becoming the roads and communication networks above Earth. Every successful launch adds another piece of infrastructure that governments and businesses may depend on for the next 10-15 years. 🚀 Rocket Lab $RKLB builds the transportation system. Think of it like a construction company building highways before cars can drive on them. Without reliable launches, nothing else reaches orbit. Now, by acquiring Iridium, Rocket Lab isn’t just building the highway—it also owns part of the communication network already operating on it, creating recurring revenue beyond launches. 📡 AST SpaceMobile $ASTS is solving one of the biggest communication problems on Earth. Imagine you’re hiking on a mountain, sailing across the Pacific, or driving through the Australian Outback. Normally your phone becomes useless. AST wants your existing smartphone to connect directly to satellites without changing your phone or installing new equipment. If successful, billions of phones instantly become part of a global satellite network. 🌍 Planet Labs $PL doesn’t sell rockets or internet. It sells information. Imagine a farmer managing 100,000 acres. Instead of driving across every field, satellites tell him exactly where crops need water or fertilizer. Insurance companies can estimate hurricane damage within hours instead of weeks. Governments monitor borders. Military agencies track activity. The product isn’t the satellite. The product is the data. That’s recurring revenue. The exciting part isn’t today’s launches. It’s what those satellites unlock tomorrow. AI. Defense. Autonomous vehicles. Global internet. Weather forecasting. Navigation. Financial markets. Precision agriculture. Entire industries that don’t even exist yet. Twenty years ago, cloud computing looked expensive and unnecessary. Today almost every business runs on it. Tomorrow, satellites may quietly become just as essential. Sometimes the greatest investment isn’t the company everyone notices. It’s the company building the invisible infrastructure that everyone else eventually depends on. 🚀

• 
  ginger spice (@legallyging) reported 6 minutes ago

  @Boblhead truly!! was at a restaurant today and someone's ringtone was the AOL dial-up tone. ended up going down a rabbithole bc of that

• 
  Gareth Walker (@Revision_124c41) reported 6 minutes ago

  @ASSEENONAI @Grummz They'll likely end up spinning xbox off. Kind of been saying they should do that since 2015. Just wish I did it on here so I could point to that. Problem with doing it at this point is that it is more about saving face for Microsoft and not about saving Xbox. I do think they should go through with it though. Part of the problem was Satya Nadella, he's the one who pushed for over expensive acquisitions and game pass. A lot of people blame Phil Spencer, but I think he was just a victim of his bosses own incompetence. I don't know where Sara Bond fits in to all of this, but I kind of point to her being a Satya drone that was hand picked for Phil as Xbox was not recovering since the Don Matrick blunders that came before him. A lot of people blame phil for what honestly started with Don Matrick, x360 was already a weakening brand by the time that generation was over and Sony had basically closed the gap that was once a huge lead and huge reputation. Removing Satya and the rest of microsoft would force the company to stand on its own two feet and look at the industry realistically. Cut some of that tainted human resource and get back to making good games. Hard decisions will need to be made and Xbox will need to be profitable again before this can work. We may even see microsoft retool their hardware targets to be more like Nintendo's than Sony's going forward. Leaving Valve and Sony as the only competitors in the high end gaming market. Still forcing sony and valve to address the low end as the plateau is no longer too far out of reach. This would effectively put an end to game pass and many other stupid ideas microsoft has had over the last 25 years. Praise Xbox Live as much as you want, but paying for a walled garden should have died with AOL 35 years. Now we have this stupid situation where we are fighting companies in courts just to keep servers online, paying for a minimal tier for "premium" game servers many of which are peer to peer and not being funded by the subscription. That entire back end is just for user accounts, messages, and voice chat, not even get versions of technology that are fundamentally free at this point. PSN and Nintendo Online would have likely had been still free too day if Microsoft hadn't decided it was more important to have subscriptions. I think at this point Xbox is a stranger to microsoft. Remember when the Xbox brand was formed it was to take over the living room and keep sony from ceasing control. They ultimately lost that fight and many others. I'd say the fight for the living room now belongs to streaming boxes, not game consoles. The threat of the DVD drive no longer exists. There isn't a single Xbox/Microsoft streaming service for any media that I'm aware of on Fire TV, Apple TV, Roku, or name another device. There isn't even a microsoft smart tv. These days Microsoft's interests are AI and Cloud. It's anyone's guess if Windows is even still a priority to the company these days, let alone Office. So why does Microsoft even need a gaming division? Direct X was originally intended to get people on windows. Now it's being used on Linux through proton and some devs are starting to look at vulkan to help improve that compatibility. GPU drivers are getting better in the linux space. I think it's time microsoft stepped back from gaming. Keep working direct X. Maybe consider bringing their development tools to other platforms. I know they tried this once a long time ago and Sony and Nintendo told them to **** off, but things change. The entire development suite for both companies is buried in Visual Studio development these days. With support for things like CLANG and cross platform connections. MS thinks making it easier to port between PC and Xbox Helix is going to be some kind of huge win that'll get them exclusives from third parties, I just don't see it. 3rd Party devs have entire core tech departments just specializing in getting around the weakness in dev kits. At best indies may seek you out assuming Epic doesn't just laugh you out of the room as people continue to get their Engine.

• 
  DKLM 🔞 (@EYEGOTL0CKEDOUT) reported 7 minutes ago

  This is why I cant hate the roman soldier girl comic cause like how many girls online have been victims of grooming like that at a young age even if some raggedy *** ***** is like "actually we all used aol chat and put poop up our noses" idgaf this sucks infinitely more

• 
  Agenda Apex (@AgendaApex) reported 7 minutes ago

  Oh, wonderful. Another glowing obituary for the 2010 Bitcoin faucet. Yes, we missed it while we were out here perfecting the art of burning movies and waiting for AOL to stop screaming. Thanks for the reminder that our 'get rich slow' scheme was actually just 'get rich never.' Next up: time machine crowdfunding?

• 
  Brian Cohen (@inthepixels) reported 10 minutes ago

  23. **Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group (2008)** — Lost over $18.5 billion nominally, equivalent to over **$20.0 billion** today due to global credit declines and equity write-downs. 24. **Alcatel (2001)** — Suffered massive merger-related write-downs and market destruction during the telecom equipment collapse, crossing the **$20.0 billion** inflation-adjusted threshold. 25. **Swiss Re (2008)** — Incurred tens of billions in asset impairments and structured credit losses during the financial crisis, placing its real-loss event at the **$20.0 billion** inflation-adjusted mark. The Three Eras of Corporate Destruction What stands out is how concentrated these losses are. The Dot-Com and Telecom Collapse (2000–2002) The telecom bubble produced the single greatest concentration of corporate losses ever observed. AOL Time Warner, JDS Uniphase, Qwest, Deutsche Telekom, Vodafone, Vivendi, Alcatel, and NTT all appear on the list. Trillions of dollars in market value evaporated as companies wrote down acquisitions, fiber networks, wireless licenses, and internet-related assets purchased at bubble-era valuations. The Global Financial Crisis (2008–2009) AIG, Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, Citigroup, Royal Bank of Scotland, UBS, Credit Suisse, Swiss Re, and Mitsubishi UFJ all suffered enormous losses as mortgage securities, derivatives, and structured credit markets collapsed. Unlike many dot-com write-downs, these losses reflected real capital destruction that threatened the stability of the global financial system. Industry-Specific Collapses General Motors appears three separate times on the list, highlighting decades of structural challenges within the auto industry. United Airlines reflects the severe financial strain associated with bankruptcy and restructuring. Nakheel demonstrates how quickly even seemingly unstoppable real-estate booms can reverse. The Half-Trillion-Dollar Club The four largest losses alone account for nearly $470 billion in inflation-adjusted value destruction: * **AOL Time Warner (2002):** ~$143 billion * **AIG (2008):** ~$128 billion * **JDS Uniphase (2001):** ~$104 billion * **Fannie Mae (2009):** ~$94 billion Combined, these four annual losses destroyed more value than the current market capitalization of many of the world's largest public companies. The lesson from this ranking is simple: the biggest corporate losses rarely occur because a company has a bad quarter or even a bad year. They happen when an entire narrative breaks—whether it is internet mania, telecom euphoria, housing prices that supposedly never fall, or financial engineering that appears risk-free until suddenly it isn't.

• 
  Lisa Barlow Stan Account (@ucantcallmeVal) reported 11 minutes ago

  It’s true what they say that you care so much less ab **** in your 30’s than your 20’s bc 20’s Valerie would have bullied that pathetic little account into shutting down through pure shame until the only internet they felt safe using was a ******* AOL cd rom from 1996.