AOL outages and service status in Bear, Delaware

Problems in the last 24 hours in Bear, Delaware

The chart below shows the number of AOL reports we have received in the last 24 hours from users in Bear, Delaware and surrounding areas. An outage is declared when the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line.

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

AOL Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Narratives Film | Research (@NarrativesFilm) reported 5 minutes ago

  For the desperate, diluted and delusional among both sides. Below is the latest News track on the Charlie Kirk debate reach. Dismal reporting, to say the least, which means claiming (by either side) “The Debate” had far reaching affects is factually ****; do do, crap, one massive dung heap, a crock of **** to be more visceral. ...Read it and weep (or, LYAO)! August 14, 2026: Immediately after ZERO coverage August 15, 2026: - Hollywood Life “Candace Owens vs. Andrew Wilson: What Happened at the Debate” - The Bulwark "The Charlie Kirk Murder Business Gets Its Crassest Spectacle Yet" - AOL "Owens 3/10 no evidence-based positions at all" - The Times of India “Candace Owens vs. Andrew Wilson: Inside the Firery Debate Over Charlie Kirk’s Murder...” - Hindustan Times "Who is Andrew Wilson? Did Candace Owens win the debate? 5 key takeaways as duo spars over Charlie Kirk" August 16, 2026: - Townhall “The Great Debate: A Logical Analysis of Candace Owens vs Andrew Wilson” August 18, 2026: - The New Republic “The Charlie Kirk Grift”

• 
  Joseph Rider #Resistance (@JosephRider13) reported 7 minutes ago

  19 never used AOL was a yahoo man from day one

• 
  Scott Allan (@scottya2) reported 16 minutes ago

  @Irina_exh 19. Never had aol address

• 
  Ang•el / מלאך (@AngelCWilliams) reported 17 minutes ago

  Rabbis and Rabbonias Tell Us Eliyahu Kin Shepardic David the Prince Used Illegal AOL Punters To Harbor My Bad Boy Entertainment Account

• 
  ⚔️Tina Truth⚔️ (@_tinatruth) reported 17 minutes ago

  This collided with AOL’s vision to own the future of the internet. Unlike today’s internet services that act as gateways to the online world AOL wanted to control the internet service itself — and also be the place where people spent most of their online time. Users came to AOL for: News. Entertainment. Shopping. Sports. Chat rooms etc.

• 
  Gee Glock (@Geeology101) reported 21 minutes ago

  My **** aol now 😪

• 
  Zaither (@Zaithos) reported 23 minutes ago

  @halenhargreevs Yes. I'm also sister got groomed on AOL dial up old. Was never allowed on a PC because of her.

• 
  Yoyohiku🕹️The Arcade Dweller👾 (@YoYoHiku) reported 25 minutes ago

  @halenhargreevs I used to hate login into AOL or aim 😭

• 
  Boni Blackstone (@BoniLBlackstone) reported 25 minutes ago

  @WWEBabes32 Next to Miss Elizebeth Sunny is THE saddest story in the business. Most downloaded babe on AOL one minute managing the Road Warriors- Next chapter she gets a 17 yr centence for killing Julian Lassiter (75 yrs old) vehicular homicide in Ocalla Florida -**** poster sad over this

• 
  Daniil (@DaniilBuilds) reported 25 minutes ago

  AOL and Time Warner didn’t just pay for what the two companies were worth in January 2000. They paid for what they believed the two companies could become together. The announced merger was valued at roughly $350B, with AOL shareholders expected to own about 55% of the combined company. The logic was easy to understand: combine AOL’s internet business with Time Warner’s media assets and create value neither could generate alone. But there was a financial problem hiding inside that logic. Future synergies are uncertain. The merger closed in January 2001. SEC disclosures later put the acquisition cost at approximately $147B. Then came the accounting reckoning. In 2002, the combined company reported a $98.7B net loss, including a $54.2B goodwill impairment. That $54.2B was non-cash. It did not mean the company suddenly paid out $54.2B in cash. It meant the value previously assigned to acquired goodwill could no longer be supported at the same level. That distinction matters. When you pay upfront for future synergies, you are effectively putting a price on value that still depends on execution. If the synergies arrive, the premium can make sense. If they don’t, shareholders can end up carrying the cost. The most expensive synergy is the one you pay for before you prove it exists.