AOL outages and service status in North Miami Beach, Florida

Problems in the last 24 hours in North Miami Beach, Florida

The chart below shows the number of AOL reports we have received in the last 24 hours from users in North Miami Beach, Florida and surrounding areas. An outage is declared when the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line.

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

AOL Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Call Your First Witness (@RickRoot714) reported 7 minutes ago

  @jonstewart Wasn’t the implosion of AOL caused because they started out charging their customers use by the hour and people were paying three and $400 a month to use AOL, because they were fresh, they were new and everybody wanted in. Then along came Earthlink and other dial-up network providers who charged you $20 a month. And people were leaving AOL in droves. And the bottom fell out.

• 
  Link Maxwell (@LnkMxwl) reported 8 minutes ago

  @AdamThePooi Part of it is I remember some of the old AOL chatrooms that I used to hang out in and those were, shall we say, not healthy places for a middle schooler to be in. If I can spare the next generation from learning some of that stuff until they're adults, then good.

• 
  12 (@SkyRelay) reported 11 minutes ago

  @om_patel5 lmao cyber 101 - i feel bad for the mass amount of people who didn’t grow up in the sub7 AOL 2.5 IRC era

• 
  BonkDaCarnivore (@BonkDaCarnivore) reported 11 minutes ago

  @johncardillo 1) No you didn't win, and the court records show it 2) Still not my name 3) Let's dig into your stupid claims even as they are. Your left screenshot, which I already went and pulled from the courts, shows the case was dismissed due to identity theft, NOT a judgement (see first attachment). Congratulations, John, you just committed defamation against that man. 4) Your second screenshot defeats itself. I've went ahead and marked it up for you (see 2nd attachment). You keep posting a WITHDRAWAL of an attempt. Now I know you don't know what that means since your FICO score is sub-500 and you can't buy a house, but that means it was withdrawn due to error. If you do a public records search, the bank in question stated that the note was sold between holding companies and the payments he was making weren't being properly applied to the new account, not that he wasn't paying. Meanwhile, there is nothing in the court history that says the judgement AOL got against you was dismissed or even satisfied. So you're lying. You're really bad at this.

• 
  Darken Duchess (@DarkenDuchess) reported 12 minutes ago

  @DisrespectedThe I ask quite a few people about how they feel about all social media platforms and when I ask about X they tend to stop, blank stare and say. “ oh people are just too mean over there” 👀 I don’t know how long you’ve been on the Internet, but I went through the age of AOL and yahoo chat rooms. And this is what you guys settle on what’s called mean ? I ask them to explain what they mean by that and they start rattling off a bunch of stuff that happens on every platform. So never ends with a real answer or discussion. Because they feel they can’t be bothered with it. What’s your take?

• 
  Mayank Agrawal (@mayankagrawal) reported 12 minutes ago

  Should we need to pay for email? In 2006, AOL and Yahoo announced priority delivery for senders willing to pay somewhere around a penny per message, with the promise that those messages would bypass the spam filter. The diagnosis behind it was correct. Email often breaks because sending is free, and when volume costs nothing, volume becomes the strategy (hello AI outbound!). Everything built afterward (filters, blocklists, sender reputation scores) is an attempt to patch a problem that is fundamentally about economics, and not about technology. Today, the same dynamic plays out on a much larger surface. AI agents can complete forms, take surveys, open accounts, and browse sites at a scale that would have been unimaginable for a spam operation twenty years ago, and most of that activity still registers in company dashboards as ordinary human demand. What I find most encouraging about Proof of Human is that this doesn't require the previous tradeoff. There's no toll, no puzzle, and nothing for a genuine visitor to notice or solve, because verification runs continuously in the background across the whole session rather than at a single checkpoint. When a decision does get made, there's a record behind it that a team can actually inspect, rather than an opaque score they're asked to trust. The email industry spent two decades learning that you can't tax your way to trust, and that authentication works better than obstruction. That lesson is worth carrying into whatever comes next.

• 
  Gregory Pozzo (@GregoryPozzo) reported 21 minutes ago

  @MikePeyton55 @honeymoon250 I never did AOL. I'm only 46, but I'm not too young for it. I just never used it. I never had a waterbed, but I have slept on one before. I had no idea that they still existed, though!

• 
  David Smith (@DavidSm72135093) reported 21 minutes ago

  @SaltyMommaC My wife and I used AOL and never used myspace.

• 
  BonkDaCarnivore (@BonkDaCarnivore) reported 22 minutes ago

  @johncardillo 1) No you didn't win, and the court records show it 2) Still not my name 3) Let's dig into your stupid claims even as they are. Your left screenshot, which I already went and pulled from the courts, shows the case was dismissed due to identity theft, NOT a judgement (see first attachment). Congratulations, John, you just committed defamation against that man. 4) Your second screenshot defeats itself. I've went ahead and marked it up for you (see 2nd attachment). You keep posting a WITHDRAWAL of an attempt. Now I know you don't know what that means since your FICO score is sub-500 and you can't buy a house, but that means it was withdrawn due to error. If you do a public records search, the bank in question stated that the note was sold between holding companies and the payments he was making weren't being properly applied to the new account, not that he wasn't paying. Meanwhile, there is nothing in the court history that says the judgement AOL got against you was dismissed or even satisfied. So you're lying. You're really bad at this. And oh, by the way, Johnny Boy, I'm gonna go ahead and forward all of this to him, cause now he has a rock solid defamation suit against you. And he's litigious AF. Enjoy, bitchboy, heh.

• 
  No One (@GriffBamber) reported 23 minutes ago

  @voodoodaddy1973 19. I never had an aol address