1. Home
  2. Companies
  3. AOL
  4. North Miami Beach
AOL

AOL outages and service status in North Miami Beach, Florida

No problems detected

If you are having issues, please submit a report below.

Full Outage Map
  • AOL generated 0 outage signals in the last 24 hours around North Miami Beach, including 0 direct reports.

AOL (America Online) is an internet portal as well as an internet service provider. As an ISP, AOL offers dial up internet through its AOL Advantage plans.

Problems in the last 24 hours in North Miami Beach, Florida

The chart below shows the number of AOL reports we have received in the last 24 hours from users in North Miami Beach, Florida and surrounding areas. An outage is declared when the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line.

At the moment, we haven't detected any problems at AOL. Are you experiencing issues or an outage? Leave a message in the comments section!

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

AOL Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

  • t14159
    My Full Name is uh.. (@t14159) reported

    @brockpierson That modem is too new. It doesn't have any microphones. Go back to the source with an acoustic coupler modem. Of course, you're going to have a little trouble getting a working telephone handset and analog phone line. At least the AoL CDs will be easy to find.

  • LambrettaGP1971
    Lambretta (@LambrettaGP1971) reported

    @james_spir19274 19. Never owned a water bed but have lain on one Can't remember ever having an AOL address. Would have had the Aussie equivalent tho

  • mblaydes1
    Mark Blaydes (@mblaydes1) reported

    @brockpierson I would login to AOL than go make dinner. By the time I came back the home page may have uploaded

  • amazing_AI_
    Amazing.AI. (@amazing_AI_) reported

    @ThisOldTech2 As a computer user since '94, I'm trying to figure out why I never got a browser in a box. of course, I did access the Web through AOL at the beginning. 🤔

  • KingLouis0074
    The Monarch Child Beyond 007 (Sovereignty) (@KingLouis0074) reported

    @AOL @INTERPOL_USA The Crown Issues this Statement Again to The Earths Crisis and Poverty. @cekinglimited

  • DOT_singularity
    DOT_Singularity🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸 (@DOT_singularity) reported

    @SteveMoraco Boo- friggidty-hooo, This is nothing new. I want the AI to be able to pull in context from **** I wrote on AOL in 1995. My online **** game was strong! If you're Laboring under some expectation of ever having true privacy in the digital world , it's a fools errand. Crack on.

  • RakeshSFNYC
    Rakesh Agrawal (@RakeshSFNYC) reported

    Mapquest holding line on Lake Ontario. I agree, but no doubt it is just a marketing stunt to remind us they exist. I was at AOL when Google Maps launched. The head of Mapquest would send out emails every time they launched a feature saying people would never use Google.

  • DaniilBuilds
    Daniil (@DaniilBuilds) reported

    AOL and Time Warner didn’t just pay for what the two companies were worth in January 2000. They paid for what they believed the two companies could become together. The announced merger was valued at roughly $350B, with AOL shareholders expected to own about 55% of the combined company. The logic was easy to understand: combine AOL’s internet business with Time Warner’s media assets and create value neither could generate alone. But there was a financial problem hiding inside that logic. Future synergies are uncertain. The merger closed in January 2001. SEC disclosures later put the acquisition cost at approximately $147B. Then came the accounting reckoning. In 2002, the combined company reported a $98.7B net loss, including a $54.2B goodwill impairment. That $54.2B was non-cash. It did not mean the company suddenly paid out $54.2B in cash. It meant the value previously assigned to acquired goodwill could no longer be supported at the same level. That distinction matters. When you pay upfront for future synergies, you are effectively putting a price on value that still depends on execution. If the synergies arrive, the premium can make sense. If they don’t, shareholders can end up carrying the cost. The most expensive synergy is the one you pay for before you prove it exists.

  • DollsEyeAvoider
    Schinto Beans (@DollsEyeAvoider) reported

    @DaddyWarpig Based on how utterly ******* ignorant AOL news headlines read in 2003 before the Iraq invasion, this doesn't surprise me in the least. I expect it to be this bad or worse now.

  • pizzaxyz
    jrat (@pizzaxyz) reported

    @DylanMcD8 I had one and it was the hottest thing my junior year. My school had just gotten WiFi and they hadn’t blocked aol instant messenger. I’d still have it if some dude hadn’t broken in my house :(