1. Home
  2. Companies
  3. AOL
  4. Orange Park
AOL

AOL outages and service status in Orange Park, Florida

No problems detected

If you are having issues, please submit a report below.

Full Outage Map
  • AOL generated 0 outage signals in the last 24 hours around Orange Park, including 0 direct reports.

AOL (America Online) is an internet portal as well as an internet service provider. As an ISP, AOL offers dial up internet through its AOL Advantage plans.

Problems in the last 24 hours in Orange Park, Florida

The chart below shows the number of AOL reports we have received in the last 24 hours from users in Orange Park, Florida and surrounding areas. An outage is declared when the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line.

At the moment, we haven't detected any problems at AOL. Are you experiencing issues or an outage? Leave a message in the comments section!

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

AOL Issues Reports Near Orange Park, Florida

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in Orange Park and nearby locations:

  • ConstanceH20
    Connie Smith Hartman (@ConstanceH20) reported from Lakeside, Florida

    @AOL He is an idiot. He's quoted the same verbiage since 24 hours of disappearing.

AOL Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

  • CinemaPrincipia
    Chris (@CinemaPrincipia) reported

    @DustyRondeau @PJB170 @WeWatchedAMovie I'm sorry but do you really think parents pimping out their kids is best addressed by going after people other than the parents. Also, that wasn't what these stings were. There are statistics on molestation. 1 in 5 children are propositioned on the internet. It happened to me regularly in the old AOL days. (AOL did nothing to crack down on it initially) However, that is not who molested me. The number of kids molested by a stranger online is so small it isn't even statistically significant. Because I'm a survivor, I've talked to other survivors a lot in different groups and literally have never met anybody who was molested by a stranger.

  • pwiscombe
    Peter Wiscombe (@pwiscombe) reported

    @Latterdaytruth The video clip of the TV show Cheers where Rebecca is asking why more men can’t bring flowers and is misheard as Mormons: back in the early days of of AOL I found the clip and edited it so instead of saying “I wish someone would send me some damn roses” it says “I wish someone would send me some some roses” so I could share it with my in-laws who wouldn’t have appreciated the “damn” Now my version is the most common one you can find on the Internet.

  • Wisco_Steve
    WiscoSteve (@Wisco_Steve) reported

    @gbean2288 @RyanShead Clam down boomer, disconnect from AOL and touch grass. Moran is actually the correct spelling, unless you are new to AOL.

  • Coach_I5
    RealCoachI (@Coach_I5) reported

    @ChrisMizTV @CFBDirect Man, i’ve been just playing offline while watching movies and whatever because i don’t dare risk my Dynasty while watching, but it is just sad. The entire mode is slow and clunky. I feel like i’m on AOL in 1996.

  • Fricat
    Asinus Asinum Fricat (@Fricat) reported

    19. Never got AOL

  • Zeusb1968
    Jesus (@Zeusb1968) reported

    @Matt_Pinner 19,I never had an AOL account

  • redefiningpc
    Proud Conservative (@redefiningpc) reported

    @JosephMRyan1 19, never had AOL.

  • tnt1352172047
    Tnt13521 (@tnt1352172047) reported

    @Matt_Pinner 19, never had AOL account

  • yuki_yagami
    Emwil Doct. | Could Be Retiring Anytime Soon (@yuki_yagami) reported

    18 of 20 (never used AOL or a waterbed)

  • aremz04
    Aremu Azeez (@aremz04) reported

    There's a line in The Lean Startup that stung when I read it last week: "learning" is the oldest excuse in the book for a failure of execution. Eric Ries tells the story of IMVU's first product. His team spent six months building an instant-messaging add-on, based on a genuinely smart-sounding strategy: piggyback on existing IM networks (AOL, Yahoo!, MSN), ride their network effects, spread virally through people's existing friend lists. Whiteboard-brilliant. They launched. Nobody used it. When they finally sat real customers down in front of the product, every assumption fell apart. Customers weren't scared of learning new software - the average teenager ran eight IM clients at once. They didn't want to chat with existing friends through avatars - they wanted to meet strangers. The "obvious" barrier the whole strategy was built around wasn't a barrier at all. Ries's point isn't "test more." It's sharper than that: in a startup, any effort that doesn't produce evidence about what customers actually want is waste - no matter how well it's executed. He calls the real version of this validated learning, to separate it from the after-the-fact story you tell yourself when something doesn't work. I'm sitting in a smaller version of that exact test right now with Owoye. One of the assumptions baked into the product is that WhatsApp and IG sellers want their invoices auto-matched to incoming payments. It sounds obviously useful from where I sit. But that's precisely the position IMVU's team was in - certain, and wrong, about what would remove friction for their customer. So this week will not be spent refining the feature. It will be spent in conversations with actual sellers, watching how they track who's paid right now - screenshots, memory, WhatsApp scrollback - before deciding whether "auto-match" solves their problem or just mine. The uncomfortable question worth asking about your own product this week: is the thing you're building solving a problem your customer has, or a problem you have with how your customer works?