AOL Outage Report in Buford, Gwinnett County, Georgia
No problems detected
If you are having issues, please submit a report below.
AOL (America Online) is an internet portal as well as an internet service provider. As an ISP, AOL offers dial up internet through its AOL Advantage plans.
Problems in the last 24 hours in Buford, Georgia
The chart below shows the number of AOL reports we have received in the last 24 hours from users in Buford and surrounding areas. An outage is declared when the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line.
At the moment, we haven't detected any problems at AOL. Are you experiencing issues or an outage? Leave a message in the comments section!
Most Reported Problems
The following are the most recent problems reported by AOL users through our website.
-
E-mail (84%)
-
Internet (8%)
-
Total Blackout (7%)
-
Wi-fi (1%)
-
Phone (%)
Live Outage Map Near Buford, Gwinnett County, Georgia
The most recent AOL outage reports came from the following cities: Cumming.
| City | Problem Type | Report Time |
|---|---|---|
Community Discussion
Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.
Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.
AOL Issues Reports Near Buford, Georgia
Latest outage, problems and issue reports in Buford and nearby locations:
-
Mark Scott 🇺🇦
(@MarkSco53500888) reported
from
Johns Creek, Georgia
@mmpadellan 1. Never had an AOL account. Not because I couldn’t have… just because I didn’t.
AOL Issues Reports
Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:
-
FOR ALL THE WOMEN AND MEN IN IRAN
(@ramtin1986) reported
@Ojeda4America Twitter will never die. We still have AOL, MySpace, etc. etc.
-
@leelu_san
(@leelu41072492) reported
@GinAndTonic1965 @Rainmaker1973 We were fiddling with it at McDonnell Douglas earlier then that, but I started using AOL for email because it was the only service at the time that handled attachments. I needed to send my time and expense sheets to the consulting company in L.A. from Detroit.
-
Tahdigh
(@tahdigh) reported
@elonmusk you ever use AOL back in the day? If you broke their Terms of Service (TOS) you were booted off (kind of like a time out) and given a warning. 3 violations your account got terminated. Suspension doesn’t have to be permanent. And why no monetary penalty for breaking the rules?
-
Jiří Lebl 🇺🇦
(@rednekulo) reported
@strxwmxn @DudeBroDook That's like saying that the web is stupid because you can't build an AOL on it (BTW, I did hear this argument at the time), and AOL will of course always be more successful because it is not a bunch of different hard to use websites (it still is that).
-
.
(@BoutilierDan) reported
@sr021x @elonmusk I have never used Twitter never will. I only use MySpace and AOL chat.
-
Tahdigh
(@tahdigh) reported
@BillyM2k you ever use AOL back in the day? If you broke their Terms of Service (TOS) you were booted off (kind of like a time out) and given a warning. 3 violations your account got terminated. Suspension doesn’t have to be permanent. And why no monetary penalty for breaking the rules?
-
Robert C.
(@RobertC50586534) reported
@jacobsmellton Just looked through your old colorized photos on AOL. I didn't realize that Mata Hari actually shaved her armpits. Too bad, she was a spy and got shot right between the eyes.
-
Arcueid🚩Bjornstad💘(LVL 32)
(@theRealArcueid) reported
from
Coram, New York
@rehab_kyle @vocaloidfagboy I'm a Wizard who used to be online since the 1990s and I predate /b/, so I associate Being Online still with Trying to Be polite -the Internet went from being Virgin (aol) to chad (b) to Virgin (modern social media) in your local argot, from my pov. But alas, I never
-
Sergio Vengeance 🇺🇲🎮🤘
(@SergioVengeance) reported
@nolawroundhere @Kent_in_Utah @justinamash The man who fought the troll, and failed. Zeran v. AOL - Section 230 "Lawsuits seeking to hold a service liable for its exercise of a publisher's traditional editorial functions – such as deciding whether to publish, withdraw, postpone or alter content – are barred"
-
Sergio Vengeance 🇺🇲🎮🤘
(@SergioVengeance) reported
@moosejaa @ZeekArkham First Amendment protects freedom to not associate. Section 230 - Zeran v. AOL "Lawsuits seeking to hold a service liable for its exercise of a publisher's traditional editorial functions – such as deciding whether to publish, withdraw, postpone or alter content – are barred"