AOL outages and service status in Fishers, Indiana

Problems in the last 24 hours in Fishers, Indiana

The chart below shows the number of AOL reports we have received in the last 24 hours from users in Fishers, Indiana and surrounding areas. An outage is declared when the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line.

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

AOL Issues Reports Near Fishers, Indiana

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in Fishers and nearby locations:

• 
  Gelly Bean (@funangela) reported 43 seconds ago from Noblesville, Indiana

  @ReginaCarpaccio You need an AOL or Hotmail account. HR takes this **** seriously.

• 
  🦄 Spencer "Socialist Distancing" Sokol 🦄 (@spencersokol) reported 47 minutes ago from Carmel, Indiana

  I have no idea what Fleet is, so I’m just going to assume it’s a social media network made for boomers that requires a sealed AOL CD with your home address to verify your account.

AOL Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Boca G (@BocaG) reported 2 minutes ago

  @lithos_graphein @brockpierson Love it, fond memories of my BBS days. I was one of the first in my area to get a meg drive for my Commodore 64! I still dream of the sound the modem used to make. Then the Prodigy service came along and soon after the mass mailing of AOL disks! That was the end of most BBS’s

• 
  あほ (@Southgarbage) reported 3 minutes ago

  @alx Cuban is a TRAITOR... and an idiot ... AOL MY ***...

• 
  sprint (@sspriint) reported 8 minutes ago

  In June 2000 a room of shareholders raised their hands and approved the worst deal in corporate history. The price tag was $120,000,000,000. When the deal was announced five months earlier it was worth about $165,000,000,000. Nobody stopped the vote. The currency was melting while they counted the hands, and the vote went through anyway. AOL was the buyer. A dial-up company with 23,000,000 subscribers paying monthly for modem access. Time Warner was the target. Cable systems, film studios, magazines, record labels, actual assets producing actual cash. The internet company bought the media empire with stock. Paper bought property. Steve Case knew what his paper was worth. Gerald Levin took it anyway. Watch the men on the steps afterwards. Nobody is arguing. Nobody in that footage looks like they just lost anything. Two years later the combined company wrote down about $99,000,000,000 in a single year. That number is larger than the annual output of most countries. By 2009 the two halves were separated again, and the pieces were worth a fraction of what they carried in. Every analyst covering the deal called it visionary. The vote took minutes. The unwind took nine years.

• 
  RonShiley (@RonShiley) reported 8 minutes ago

  @CitysideFiber Might be the worst service I've ever had. Regret making the switch. I don't think dial up AOL was as bad. The amount of interruptions is excessive.

• 
  The Dread Bunny (@jpvanhoy) reported 10 minutes ago

  @lili_poobear @Phantom_King_99 @gizalovespizza Ok, look, you can probably find a half dozen slightly different definitions of the word "evolve" online (we both know you didn't use a dead-tree dictionary). But the fact remains, to not evolve is to stagnate. Even the definition you gave, if converted the boolean opposite, would say, "to NOT develop gradually, especially from a simple to a more complex form", and you could then argue that OP wants it to get more complex, but RAPIDLY rather than SLOWLY. The point is technology should always advance. Just because you're unhappy with some specific implementation of technology in the present, doesn't mean that "advance" will mean "things get worse". It's pretty childish to take that position, in fact. I mean, for ****'s sake, you're ON THE INTERNET right now, probably using either wireless broadband, or wired broadband access to post this message. Can you imagine sitting in at your computer desk, with the monitor riser and built-in CD-ROM storage slots, dialing into AOL in about 1996 and saying, "GAH! I don't want technology to evolve any more. I'm tired of sitting here waiting for JPGs of John Stamos to take 40 seconds to load. I'm tired of getting my directions from Mapquest!"

• 
  Blink (@HRTLegal) reported 15 minutes ago

  @Sprocketguys @neoavatara The Internet peaked when it was a hodgepodge of isolated intranet service providers (AOL, Compuserve, Prodigy, etc) that had their own internal stuff you interacted with and you only used the www to go to a legit web site, not some social media garbage dump.

• 
  Currer Ellis (@ActonBell) reported 18 minutes ago

  @DerrickEvans4WV Can we just go back to AOL and dial up internet? Do we really need everything connected to everything…? I don’t think so. Let’s cancel this AI stuff.

• 
  Rich (@RichardWyl39256) reported 19 minutes ago

  @SeaeyesTri I remember setting up my dial up connection on AOL. It was so slow back then

• 
  PIL Watch Group (pilwatchgroup) (@pilwatchgroup) reported 23 minutes ago

  @LiveLawIndia SC made an Himalayan effort to ensure 'Art of living' (AOL) is bailed out brushing aside concerns of environmental groups. SC says river Bank was already damaged in part. If that be so would 'AOL' have any business to damage it further. If AOL knew the damage,why use the site?

• 
  TylerSchlittPhotography (@Stormchaser_TS) reported 24 minutes ago

  @spann They still suck. They distribute your content and you would think something like it being on MSN or yahoo AOL different platforms like that would be a sale. Nope that is a partners and they give it to them for free so you make zero dollars off of it. I happen to me. Literally one of the worst third-party brokers out.