AOL outages and service status in Abingdon, Maryland

Problems in the last 24 hours in Abingdon, Maryland

The chart below shows the number of AOL reports we have received in the last 24 hours from users in Abingdon, Maryland and surrounding areas. An outage is declared when the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line.

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

AOL Issues Reports Near Abingdon, Maryland

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in Abingdon and nearby locations:

• 
  MixMastaPJ (@MixMastaPJ) reported 19 minutes ago from Bel Air North, Maryland

  I wonder if all the "I hate Cancel Culture!" Karen's still have and regularly use: -a newspaper subscription -AOL -George Foreman Grill -Tae Bo VHSs etc Or is cancelling only okay when it's capitalist in nature, and moral and ethical reasons aren't good enough?

• 
  Sharon Antonio (@Sweetielola) reported 28 minutes ago from Pleasant Hills, Maryland

  @AOL How do I get support for an email issue? We have aol through @Verizon and our new IPad bought through @Apple will not allow email to come through.

AOL Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  patrick 🏳️‍🌈 supports labor and palestinians (@pcarterwriter) reported 10 minutes ago

  @Dontcare1369 @jolandiiQ reaching out might be wise :) agent impersonation is a problem, and more than one agency has a warning about it. four agents i know of use aol addresses. one of them is male. <3

• 
  Olivier Groot (@OlivierGroot) reported 11 minutes ago

  @theamelia___ 18 but only as there was no AOL in NL and a waterbed is something I never understood

• 
  AURI (@bossladyaurelia) reported 14 minutes ago

  AOL never asked me for more storage and I have emails for over 20 years….. why Gmail gotta do me like that 😫

• 
  Ragh Pandragon (@RaghPandragon) reported 15 minutes ago

  The truth is stranger. Long ago in the 90's there was still magic in the world every time you wanted to get on the internet you had to electrocute one fairy. Just one. Unfortunately disconnects were an issue. Slowly, one connection at a time, we fed all of the magic creatures into the gaping maw of oblivion to power our ICQ chats and AOL instant messengers. At least until Human Energy Update 3.9 Service Pack 2. Now every time you log in you just lose a little bit of your own soul, no fairy deaths required.

• 
  LagomProphet (@LagomProphet) reported 15 minutes ago

  @thepeacepoet99 Throughout the 80's we'd been told nuclear war was imminent. Literally thought the world was going to end -- then the Soviet Union Collapsed and the western world celebrated! We were full of hope and optimism for a future without the threat of global annihilation. Glam metal morphed into grunge, Goatees for all the men, and flannel on everyone. And weirdly biker shorts, plus ***** packs, doo rags, but also the rise of widely popular rap. Gen X were becoming adult -- much to our non-irradiated surprise. We'd gone from life is hopeless and pointless to life is going to continue so... now what? And what's this internet thing? The internet was inhabited by a select few who kind of had to know stuff until AOL started mailing everyone CDs to give your damn mom access. But still there was no social media -- instead spaces were organized by interests. Which allowed for communal gatekeeping, in a good way. If someone was just trolling the whole Collectable Card Game forum (for example) would boot them off. It wasn't toxic like now. (And there was still a decent chance any Keyboard Warrior would have to confront their victims IRL -- so people were just more chill).

• 
  strengthPlan (@strengthPlan) reported 17 minutes ago

  If you drive or drive a Tesla soon you will be obsolete You will be looked down upon You will be old school the old geezer that did not adopt new technology You will be AOL You will be MySpace If you don’t FSD you are blackberry #tsla

• 
  dorked_web (@dorked_web) reported 22 minutes ago

  It really is true that if you go on here just to hang out and have fun with people all over the internet, it's almost possible to get a little taste of like early-2000's forums and stuff (or for some, maybe AOL chat rooms). I long for the day I can nuke my other account.

• 
  None of your business! (@librab103) reported 22 minutes ago

  @JCA_BelAir @tonybalogna @dave_aldrine Buddy if broadband demand doesn't stay strong, you think SpaceX has a chance? I have dealt with customer service from multiple companies, they are all **** including SpaceX. What new technology? Satellite internet has been around since the 1990s. I had it when AOL was a thing.

• 
  ☽ ☿ ☾ Leigh Evans 🏳️‍⚧️🏳️‍🌈🇺🇦🇲🇽🎬📷 (@Levans6081) reported 30 minutes ago

  Pay no mind That’s been a popular internet bandwagon since aol boards Im old enough to remember the recycled rage garbage apparently Seriously though, if you find a movie too offensive to watch, that’s ok, the entire world doesn’t have to agree with you though, so calm it down

• 
  Daniil (@DaniilBuilds) reported 31 minutes ago

  AOL and Time Warner didn’t just pay for what the two companies were worth in January 2000. They paid for what they believed the two companies could become together. The announced merger was valued at roughly $350B, with AOL shareholders expected to own about 55% of the combined company. The logic was easy to understand: combine AOL’s internet business with Time Warner’s media assets and create value neither could generate alone. But there was a financial problem hiding inside that logic. Future synergies are uncertain. The merger closed in January 2001. SEC disclosures later put the acquisition cost at approximately $147B. Then came the accounting reckoning. In 2002, the combined company reported a $98.7B net loss, including a $54.2B goodwill impairment. That $54.2B was non-cash. It did not mean the company suddenly paid out $54.2B in cash. It meant the value previously assigned to acquired goodwill could no longer be supported at the same level. That distinction matters. When you pay upfront for future synergies, you are effectively putting a price on value that still depends on execution. If the synergies arrive, the premium can make sense. If they don’t, shareholders can end up carrying the cost. The most expensive synergy is the one you pay for before you prove it exists.