AOL outages and service status in Gaithersburg, Maryland

Problems in the last 24 hours in Gaithersburg, Maryland

The chart below shows the number of AOL reports we have received in the last 24 hours from users in Gaithersburg, Maryland and surrounding areas. An outage is declared when the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line.

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

AOL Issues Reports Near Gaithersburg, Maryland

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in Gaithersburg and nearby locations:

• 
  Nathan Baca (@NathanBacaTV) reported 40 minutes ago from Germantown View, Maryland

  @LauraGellerTV You apparently didn’t see my smoke signal, can on a string or AOL Instant Message.

• 
  William Bolan 🇺🇲🇺🇦 (@CapitolRailfan) reported 42 minutes ago from Germantown View, Maryland

  Ok you new generation kids: What is AOL, and what did it used to stand for? What service did AOL have until recently? Do you know what a "dial up" is? Submit your answers below.

• 
  Timothy Larkin (@timothyjlarkin) reported 43 minutes ago from Olney, Maryland

  @BillSimmons Like trying to cancel AOL back in the day...

AOL Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  StoneHillWealth (@StoneHillWealth) reported 1 minute ago

  @kejca I was an advisor for Merrill Lynch during the dot com bubble. Henry Blodget said, to buy Yahoo, AOL, and AMZN, one was bound to be a winner. So, it depends on which package you bought. Chris is generally right, MOST of those ‘winning’ stocks of that day turned out to be garbage.

• 
  Integralmdvdt (@integralmdvdt) reported 3 minutes ago

  @theamelia___ 19. Never did aol.

• 
  Jay $ick (@JaySick78) reported 5 minutes ago

  @brockpierson Damn, I forgot those days... and forget trying to download a pic from AOL online to see who you are talking to. A/S/L

• 
  RealNHSMedway (@real_nhs) reported 8 minutes ago

  @DailyMirror What embarrassing drivel you post on the AOL newsfeed! Non-stories, utter crap - I can only imagine what the newspaper must be like! Pathetic excuse for content.

• 
  Friedmo (@_Friedman1) reported 11 minutes ago

  @StorchMoritz i truly believe eth doesn’t do anything. it’s slow archaic, it’s AOL imo. stablecoins and other tech can accomplish what it does

• 
  Yttrium Rapier 🐀 (@YttriumRapier) reported 15 minutes ago

  I still use my AOL email address that I never bothered to replace (It seemed like such a hassle). Are they up to any crook ****? I hope not.

• 
  Thales of Florida (@FloridaThales) reported 17 minutes ago

  @MorlockP Blue collar business is fascinating to me because it's relatively simple (not easy, the work is hard) to succeed in it. Yet so many become broke or never make it. Then you see why. AOL email addresses, people who don't show up on time, never returning sales lead calls. Etc.

• 
  Daniil (@DaniilBuilds) reported 17 minutes ago

  AOL and Time Warner didn’t just pay for what the two companies were worth in January 2000. They paid for what they believed the two companies could become together. The announced merger was valued at roughly $350B, with AOL shareholders expected to own about 55% of the combined company. The logic was easy to understand: combine AOL’s internet business with Time Warner’s media assets and create value neither could generate alone. But there was a financial problem hiding inside that logic. Future synergies are uncertain. The merger closed in January 2001. SEC disclosures later put the acquisition cost at approximately $147B. Then came the accounting reckoning. In 2002, the combined company reported a $98.7B net loss, including a $54.2B goodwill impairment. That $54.2B was non-cash. It did not mean the company suddenly paid out $54.2B in cash. It meant the value previously assigned to acquired goodwill could no longer be supported at the same level. That distinction matters. When you pay upfront for future synergies, you are effectively putting a price on value that still depends on execution. If the synergies arrive, the premium can make sense. If they don’t, shareholders can end up carrying the cost. The most expensive synergy is the one you pay for before you prove it exists.

• 
  𝗝𝗼𝗲 𝗥𝗼𝘀𝗮𝘁𝗼 (@joerosato) reported 27 minutes ago

  @Dan_Jeffries1 Gates never said this. In the 1990s, Microsoft focused on proprietary online networks (MSN) rather than the 'internet'. Think AOL. The 'internet' was a side product you got by connecting to their proprietary service. Downplaying to be the source of connection = marketing 😐

• 
  Deeby🇺🇸 (@deebyman) reported 28 minutes ago

  @MapQuest Who ******** uses Mapquest still, they must use AOL also