AOL outages and service status in Kearney, Missouri

Problems in the last 24 hours in Kearney, Missouri

The chart below shows the number of AOL reports we have received in the last 24 hours from users in Kearney, Missouri and surrounding areas. An outage is declared when the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line.

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

AOL Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Andreux👨🏿‍💻 (@and_reux) reported 48 seconds ago

  a researcher just showed CSS alone can escape the boundaries of an email and mess with the webmail interface itself across Outlook, Gmail, Fastmail, Proton, Yahoo, AOL: fake login screens, stolen tokens, hijacked UI actions, even manipulated AI assistants that read your inbox. no JS required

• 
  Walkon (@walkonOU812) reported 6 minutes ago

  @01Patriot1776 Back in the AOL days? My brother talked me into the chat rooms.. I did it as a goof and never serious. I met a lady who just thought I was funny and her husband was in the same chat room.? Became friends online. I met them and he sent me a lot of work.. lifelong friends

• 
  Mother Medusa🐉 (@LotheAlien) reported 6 minutes ago

  @jasminexETH @dreamgrl432 Can’t get any two **** *** step verification codes cuz the whole **** don’t work unless I buy storage. @gmail y’all out yall got damn mind I’m going back to yahoo and aol funky *** thriving company. Over 15 years of a bottomless pit is what made you USEFUL. hope the company fail

• 
  Nubi ⚖️🪲 (@NubiStreams) reported 6 minutes ago

  @communitybf 19, never had aol I had Netscape haha

• 
  Aremu Azeez (@aremz04) reported 7 minutes ago

  There's a line in The Lean Startup that stung when I read it last week: "learning" is the oldest excuse in the book for a failure of execution. Eric Ries tells the story of IMVU's first product. His team spent six months building an instant-messaging add-on, based on a genuinely smart-sounding strategy: piggyback on existing IM networks (AOL, Yahoo!, MSN), ride their network effects, spread virally through people's existing friend lists. Whiteboard-brilliant. They launched. Nobody used it. When they finally sat real customers down in front of the product, every assumption fell apart. Customers weren't scared of learning new software - the average teenager ran eight IM clients at once. They didn't want to chat with existing friends through avatars - they wanted to meet strangers. The "obvious" barrier the whole strategy was built around wasn't a barrier at all. Ries's point isn't "test more." It's sharper than that: in a startup, any effort that doesn't produce evidence about what customers actually want is waste - no matter how well it's executed. He calls the real version of this validated learning, to separate it from the after-the-fact story you tell yourself when something doesn't work. I'm sitting in a smaller version of that exact test right now with Owoye. One of the assumptions baked into the product is that WhatsApp and IG sellers want their invoices auto-matched to incoming payments. It sounds obviously useful from where I sit. But that's precisely the position IMVU's team was in - certain, and wrong, about what would remove friction for their customer. So this week will not be spent refining the feature. It will be spent in conversations with actual sellers, watching how they track who's paid right now - screenshots, memory, WhatsApp scrollback - before deciding whether "auto-match" solves their problem or just mine. The uncomfortable question worth asking about your own product this week: is the thing you're building solving a problem your customer has, or a problem you have with how your customer works?

• 
  TyWebb'sLumberyard (@JohnnyRingo1625) reported 7 minutes ago

  @AngelaBelcamino Never used a dating app but did find my wife indirectly through an aol chat room.

• 
  Dazlidorne (@Dazlidorne) reported 7 minutes ago

  @ayligerwolf 20. I mean, a few were borderline. Never had an aol address, but I e-mailed someone who did. Same thing with the waterbed. Never had one, but I have been on one.

• 
  tmnxeq (@tmnxeq) reported 8 minutes ago

  @0xljki obviously there was demand for bandwidth in '99, most people or businesses had none (this is kinda binary and you had to lay pipes throughout the whole country) operationally, this was a high margin business - you lay the pipe once (expensive capex) & but then can AOL CDs to every households, with virtually no marginal cost for addtl customer. "compute buyers have high margins" - brother what have you been smoking. xAI (admittedly now a compute seller) is losing gazillions - maybe that's why they went from buying/producing compute to selling. OAI/ANT have no published financials but spoiler, they are losing billions per year 1/2

• 
  Michael Jefferson (@shadowmrj) reported 9 minutes ago

  @JordynneGrace Oh ****. I'm AoL mailing list efedding old.

• 
  Bandana Pictures (@bandanapictures) reported 16 minutes ago

  @lhallwriter 19. Never had an AOL email address.