AOL outages and service status in Whitsett, North Carolina
No problems detected
If you are having issues, please submit a report below.
- AOL generated 0 outage signals in the last 24 hours around Whitsett, including 0 direct reports.
AOL (America Online) is an internet portal as well as an internet service provider. As an ISP, AOL offers dial up internet through its AOL Advantage plans.
Problems in the last 24 hours in Whitsett, North Carolina
The chart below shows the number of AOL reports we have received in the last 24 hours from users in Whitsett, North Carolina and surrounding areas. An outage is declared when the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line.
At the moment, we haven't detected any problems at AOL. Are you experiencing issues or an outage? Leave a message in the comments section!
Community Discussion
Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.
Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.
AOL Issues Reports Near Whitsett, North Carolina
Latest outage, problems and issue reports in Whitsett and nearby locations:
-
Mark Dodson ©️ (@MarkD629) reported from Glen Raven, North Carolina@Kayla_Annmarie She’s good with technology just hasn’t found a need to change. I keep my AOL email too, I never use it as I have two others but I give it to people like businesses that I really don’t want contacting me
AOL Issues Reports
Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:
-
Poopeye™ (@ThePoopeye) reportedHow do all these people have 10s of thousands of "followers"? People that don't necessarily post anything new or just re-posts of other peoples' thoughts & work. I don't get it. I've been a member for a while now (w/ THIS acct - my orig was cancelled by Twitter during COVID for telling the factual scientific truth about masks based on my years in Bio-Nanotechnology). Is it strictly from those "Follow" train lists? I learned early on to stay away from those - I check out EVERYBODY I ever follow first & personally (not necessarily relying upon Grok's "Profile Summary", although those may get me interested to take a gander). I try to engage those who engage with me and avoid silly flame-wars. I don't post to GET followers, I generally post current stream-of-consciousness thoughts, what's on my mind at that moment & not really organizing them into proper English "articles". Plus I'm not really good at pithy comments - I speak from my heart & soul and EXPLAIN myself & my reasoning for coming to different conclusions. And I typically don't engage in irrational, emotional hyperbole & name-calling. I truly want to know what others think and LEARN (you're never too old to learn!). For DECADES on BBSes (Bulletin Board Systems - pre-graphical internet days, modem-connected social systems for discussion, research & debates), the Usenets (newsgroups, pre-graphical/HTTP/HTML internet days when time on the internet was purchased through 3rd party vendors like CompuServe by the hour - 70s & 80s, pre-AOL (which is slightly pre-HTTP/HTML/Mozilla-Netscape graphical internet revolution) - where everything was command-line driven in ASCII, EBCDIC, ISO set or ATASCII or the like). Am I just too old, boring, long-winded, obnoxious, opinionated or what? I know its annoying with me posting about my health, but I've gotta vent SOMEWHERE and NO ONE on X knows me personally. Not that it matters so much now, I'm heading down the stretch-run to Home plate, but even paying for Elon's blue-checkmark, I don't get many hits/views or responses/engagement, it is pretty comparable to my "free" account that I use solely for NFL stuff where I have 1 whole "follower", which is probably one of those online ho-bags. It's not that I'm looking to "earn" from X and I'll NEVER post things just for click-bait value. I'm just really curious how these other accounts accrue so many followers for literally not doing much,
-
Foaly Pub (@FoalyReviews) reportedsomeone get this guys Website posted or at grok for me... I'm getting this thing.... **** ADS that **** getting worse then the ad spam with all those ******* banner ad's those of us that remember the late 90's-00's and AOL days constant pop-out ad's if you went to the wrong sites
-
Willis Eschenbach (@WEschenbach) reported@WilliamTaborDDS Say what? I've NEVER had an AOL email account. You sure you're posting in the right thread? w.
-
🦶🏻🪶Ticklish Situations 🪶🦶🏻 (@tiklsituation) reported@LGarretson66717 Ohh I never heard of that unfortunately. Once aol started going down and FB started to rise ask Insta it just scattered but Twitter or x. Then you got into it a bit but had to file around
-
Luke West (@lukewestbooks) reported@ShiningArowsR17 @AirlockOpen Same. Never had an AOL account.
-
On Orbit Satellite 📻 (@KM4OOS_EM71) reportedAOL Instant Messenger never needed a data center. I fail to see your point. Can I host a social media server? I fail to see your point.
-
zee ₊˚⊹♡ (@mypostworldiary) reportedi hate when older generations think gen z wasnt also actively using physical media/earlier internet too like **** off u AOL *** i see ur dentures falling
-
ArudhiJ (@ArudhiJ) reported@ehdande Says a real estate developer🧐 Since when did you hear matatu owners support a light rail transport system! AOL
-
Dan דן (@dan_araz) reported@claudeai Why not for us that don’t spend $1200 a year? Why put us thru a meter like AOL in the old days when parents opened their phone bills and went bananas. And all that for a mythos lite which is what fable is. You’re pushing people away. To quote your own Claude in an interaction w me: “Makes sense as a complaint — Fable being the restricted, safety-hardened variant of the same underlying model is exactly why “why not just give me the real thing” feels reasonable.”
-
⚡imp0stor⚡₿ (@x_imp0stor) reported@FullMetalTrav I was the architect of the AOL help page deployment on the vendor side for 10 or so years. I optimized and redeployed the entire stack more than one time. It took around 52 servers to handle the traffic spikes and was split between 2 data centers w/ failover.