AOL outages and service status in Claremore, Oklahoma

Problems in the last 24 hours in Claremore, Oklahoma

The chart below shows the number of AOL reports we have received in the last 24 hours from users in Claremore, Oklahoma and surrounding areas. An outage is declared when the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line.

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

AOL Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Ailuridae 👻✨ 🏆 🥀 🐁🪤 (@HereForOneGhost) reported 5 minutes ago

  @Chimurusan I used AOL free floppies once or twice, but all their call endpoints were long distance, so no, never had an AOL address. "Dictionary" should presumably be "paper dictionary", since I use a dictionary at least several times a month currently, it is just online.

• 
  Richard Gallagher (@RichardRicoba) reported 8 minutes ago

  @Ken_FiveSolas 18, never used AOL email and never slept on a waterbed

• 
  GH HILL (@GHHILL1911) reported 9 minutes ago

  Any 2010 Tech Nostalgia? Working on Privateer. I started this one - at least put it into Google Docs... In 2010. MUCH has changed since this, technology-wise. I mentioned certain Tech Things by name that described those tech things in some detail. The problem is all of that stuff - ALL OF IT - is painfully outdated. AOL. Skype. Blackberry. Hotel Phone Calls. Adobe Flash. Now, I COULD keep all this stuff and keep Privateer a period piece, but I don't think anyone is waxing nostalgic about 2010 Tech Trends.

• 
  Ian Landsman (@IanLandsman) reported 10 minutes ago

  @jessethanley @PatBergie We’ll hash this out tomorrow but don’t agree. Slack is basically just AOL IM. Think AI pilled are way over thinking how many problems AI directly solves for normal people. It’s not many. Now indirectly sure. Medical breakthroughs, better software, as part of a good home robot. But direct it’s basically just google search.

• 
  Aceman67 (@aceman67) reported 14 minutes ago

  @aaliyahvtuber_ 19. Never used AOL

• 
  WarzonePrez (@WarzonePrez) reported 16 minutes ago

  @yukiwaru_ Yeah, but this is kinda like cancelling AOL or Sirius XM. You call up enraged by something stupid, and by the end of the call you somehow have 3 free months and forgot why you called in the first place. That kind of "cancelled", i think.

• 
  ramzy (@0xRamzy) reported 19 minutes ago

  AOL paid $165 billion to win Time Warner in 2000 and wrote off $99 billion of it two years later. A quiet Yale lecture from 2007 proves the same mechanic that killed that deal is silently draining money from every homebuyer, every hiring manager, and every person who has ever won an eBay auction. The lecture is part of the free game theory course Yale posted online. The professor teaches with a hundred undergraduates and a piece of chalk. No slides, no textbook required. His name is Ben Polak. He ran Yale's economics department, was later made Provost of the university, and spent fifteen years teaching this same course to a lecture hall of students paying $60,000 a year for seats a stranger with an internet connection could sit in for free. The idea has a name. The winner's curse. It was first identified in a 1971 paper by three oil engineers at Atlantic Richfield who had noticed something odd about their industry. Every major oil company in America was bidding on offshore drilling rights in the Gulf of Mexico. They all had geologists and the same maps. The winner of each lease, on average, was losing money on the field. The engineers proved that when everyone estimates the same object with roughly equal error, the person who wins is almost always the one who over-estimated the most. Winning was proof of being wrong. The check they wrote was the receipt. The full lecture fits into three sentences. If you and a room full of reasonable people are all bidding for the same thing, your best estimate of it is almost certainly too high. If it were low, you would not be the one winning. The number of losers you beat is information about how wrong you are. Polak's summary is one line: shade your bid. Not because you are stupid. Because winning is the strongest signal in the market that you paid too much. Concrete case: a young couple bids on a three-bedroom house against fourteen other offers in a hot April market. They win at $80,000 over asking. They feel triumphant for one week. Two years later three of the losing bidders have bought the same style house on the same street for $60,000 less. The couple never sees a "for sale" sign. They just have a mortgage that eats every raise for the next decade. Every buyer who has ever won a house at $30,000 over the second-highest offer paid $29,999 more than the market thought it was worth. Every hiring manager who beat two other companies to a candidate is paying the number that was too high for two other adults. Every free-agent contract in sports that "shocks the league" was set by the one general manager who was most optimistic in the room. The lecture is on YouTube. Yale posted it in 2007. Almost none of the millions who have watched it ever shaded a bid on the next thing they wanted. The math is free. Bidding a little less than you feel like on the next thing you want to win is the entire edge. ↓

• 
  Ming the Beauty Supply Store Baddie (@QtrWaterClassic) reported 19 minutes ago

  These kids will NEVER understand the prayers we threw up in the air so that the internet would connect, the hope that no one picked up the house phone to interrupt the internet, and the image of that running man across the screen from the AOL cd

• 
  Arafly (@arafly_kristin) reported 21 minutes ago

  18, but only because we never had AOL service and were too poor for a Walkman (I did eventually get a Diskman).

• 
  DJ Richards (@stumblebum54) reported 26 minutes ago

  @unseen1_unseen This is what’s was like trying to cancel an AOL account back in the day. But this account says it’s based in Africa so probably not especially credible.