AOL outages and service status in Hixson, Tennessee

Problems in the last 24 hours in Hixson, Tennessee

The chart below shows the number of AOL reports we have received in the last 24 hours from users in Hixson, Tennessee and surrounding areas. An outage is declared when the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line.

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

AOL Issues Reports Near Hixson, Tennessee

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in Hixson and nearby locations:

• 
  Craig Johnson (@cjjohn1974) reported 3 minutes ago from Chattanooga, Tennessee

  @AOL worst customer service I have ever received. All my emails deleted and the only way they will help is to sign up for their pay service. Been with them for 20 years +

• 
  Joel Becker (@introvertedone) reported 7 minutes ago from Chattanooga, Tennessee

  Today in #GeekHistory 7/1/2009: After being acquired by AOL, the original CompuServe (later rebranded as CompuServe Classic) is shut down

AOL Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  𝚖𝚊𝚗𝚒𝚙𝚞𝚕𝚊𝚝𝚎 (@manipulate) reported 5 minutes ago

  a lot of you have never been punted off of aol at 3am and it shows.

• 
  (PRESS)Scotty Fife (aka) NevNukeMonster (@fife_scotty680) reported 5 minutes ago

  @TommyO1947 And every body posted pictures on face book too So who is to blame, the consumer. They kept posting stuff on the lives, and leaving updates at default. Man followed right off the pier. AOL for a while all were using it. Then the discovery of FTP lmao No more chatting in public, we built are own room and games too. And not one American can go without that comm unit for a week All seem naked without, there is a problem. Powerless over that or the next follower post. GodRocks Crazy

• 
  Rock Hard & Spew Facts (@JCA_BelAir) reported 6 minutes ago

  @jamusp Yeah, but their servers are all still running Win2K Server and Bob lost the database passwords when AOL took them over That's really why they won't change it--Vivian in the Mail Room has them written down on a PostIt stuck to the backside of the plotter printer, but don't tell anyone. It's hilarious watching Bob grumble and act like he's not still looking for it every morning while he tries to make his coffee last him until lunch since they caught him using a 2nd K-cup but he only bought into one share of the employee coffee pool Bob's a douche. He also manages their social media accounts, btw. Just sayin'

• 
  joubalspacker (@joubalspacker) reported 8 minutes ago

  @thenarr47271717 @Bit_Faced @theswansjr Your analogy is a bit off Current Bitcoin is not 'The Internet' but more akin to the walled garden of America Online capable of serving only a select few... AOL was consumed by the wider permissionless network that served everybody... If BTC can only serve the masses via custodians it will be no different than a CBDC => It will be outcompeted by a freer money

• 
  🌻 (@Heartofgold4422) reported 10 minutes ago

  Back in the AOL days I could hang out in the baseball chat rooms all evening. Now, I make one comment in on a post, just playim around & people get all fuggin serious & lecturey 🙄

• 
  Daniil (@DaniilBuilds) reported 11 minutes ago

  AOL and Time Warner didn’t just pay for what the two companies were worth in January 2000. They paid for what they believed the two companies could become together. The announced merger was valued at roughly $350B, with AOL shareholders expected to own about 55% of the combined company. The logic was easy to understand: combine AOL’s internet business with Time Warner’s media assets and create value neither could generate alone. But there was a financial problem hiding inside that logic. Future synergies are uncertain. The merger closed in January 2001. SEC disclosures later put the acquisition cost at approximately $147B. Then came the accounting reckoning. In 2002, the combined company reported a $98.7B net loss, including a $54.2B goodwill impairment. That $54.2B was non-cash. It did not mean the company suddenly paid out $54.2B in cash. It meant the value previously assigned to acquired goodwill could no longer be supported at the same level. That distinction matters. When you pay upfront for future synergies, you are effectively putting a price on value that still depends on execution. If the synergies arrive, the premium can make sense. If they don’t, shareholders can end up carrying the cost. The most expensive synergy is the one you pay for before you prove it exists.

• 
  soph (@agentofsunlight) reported 13 minutes ago

  @rizcriz i got in so much trouble once in middle school for going on aol chat rooms LMAO

• 
  Shmuel Londner 🇮🇱 (@ShmuelLon) reported 18 minutes ago

  Something about $BSP: they bought AOL at a 5x income before tax, which is optically cheap right? The small issue is that they bought it from Apollo and imho there's zero chance Apollo got a bad deal

• 
  Betty Egg (@betty_egg) reported 19 minutes ago

  @TylerW35386 I learned grammar in AOL metal chat - but I never hung out with any of those people...

• 
  sixstringsavant (@sixstringsavant) reported 19 minutes ago

  @akafaceUS It used to take days to cancel AOL. Now you just have to resist the temptation of Sirius radio for $5 a month. No, would you pay $3 a month?