1. Home
  2. Companies
  3. AOL
  4. Gonzales
AOL

AOL outages and service status in Gonzales, Texas

No problems detected

If you are having issues, please submit a report below.

Full Outage Map
  • AOL generated 0 outage signals in the last 24 hours around Gonzales, including 0 direct reports.

AOL (America Online) is an internet portal as well as an internet service provider. As an ISP, AOL offers dial up internet through its AOL Advantage plans.

Problems in the last 24 hours in Gonzales, Texas

The chart below shows the number of AOL reports we have received in the last 24 hours from users in Gonzales, Texas and surrounding areas. An outage is declared when the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line.

At the moment, we haven't detected any problems at AOL. Are you experiencing issues or an outage? Leave a message in the comments section!

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

AOL Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

  • JohnnyRingo1625
    TyWebb'sLumberyard (@JohnnyRingo1625) reported

    @AngelaBelcamino Never used a dating app but did find my wife indirectly through an aol chat room.

  • lucaswiman
    [ object Object ] (@lucaswiman) reported

    Plausible paths for Google: 1. They will also start falling behind in TPU design. TPUs will cease to even notionally be a realistic competitor to big players. Maybe they'll sell the IP and TSMC allocation to OpenAI or Anthropic or AMD, or spin it out into an underresourced separate entity. 2. GCP will do very well for a time. Existing LLM inference capacity is going to get more valuable over time, commanding higher prices. At some point, they'll be left with second-rate hardware that's been dramatically outcompeted by ultra-efficient RSI hardware and data centers. It's not inconceivable that their TPUs will literally have the HBM chips pried off of them to put into better hardware by a competitor. 3. Search will have gone from merely declining in usage to declining rapidly in revenue. This will continue for some time as a viable business, like AOL, Juno and yahoo, but with a shrinking user base of aging retirees or barely-online people. They will embrace every dark pattern in the book to adsmaxx, but their core "indexing and understanding all the world's information" will have long since been done much better by model companies. 4. They'll probably release a quite good Gemini or two from inertia this year. Not necessarily SOTA, but good enough to cause a stock rally. This is probably the last place for someone like Sergei Brin to assert control and save the company. 5. Eventually the massive amount of debt taken on building GCP and getting related as buybacks will catch up with them after a credit downgrade. They'll get ripped apart for scraps at the org level, with stakes in various AI companies constituting most of their value, like yahoo! did with alibaba. Sundar Pichai will walk away enormously wealthy having maximized ******** out of some shareholder value.

  • StoneRose95
    StoneRose (@StoneRose95) reported

    @AtomHayts @VideoGameHstry Ahhh Yes Dial Up Internet ******* sucked cause you had to wait for people to get off the damn phone so you access the web i remember AOL lol

  • BadScientryst
    Wile E Coyote - Super Genius (@BadScientryst) reported

    @Primrose771646 Write detailed instructions to invest in Microsoft, Apple, Yahoo, AOL, and a few others. Then I'd write as much advice as I could to help everyone I know. Id be too late to save John Lennon, but in plenty of time to stop 9/11.

  • EvadneFirenze
    Evadne Firenze (@EvadneFirenze) reported

    @GTeafor2 @MDymore @AOL Yes, I think Queen Elizabeth sent a separate invitation outside the general one for the rest of the family. They did turn her down.

  • astrosteve
    astrosteve (@astrosteve) reported

    Fun fact: My computer was so close to being able to not run the original EQ well that if I had anything else running, it would stutter and freeze up. When I had to use AOL for about 2 months, this was a problem because the AOL client had to be running and made EQ stutter.

  • stekkerauto
    stekkerauto 🚗⚡️ (@stekkerauto) reported

    I still sometimes come across people who think that AI is a bad search engine that makes bad text and bad pictures, which is kind of like looking at the internet in 1997 and think it’s about AOL chat rooms. – Benedict Evans

  • quotesdaily100
    Unfiltered (@quotesdaily100) reported

    WHY THESE COMPANIES LOST EVERYTHING 1. Nokia - Failure to adapt to touchscreen era & Weak software ecosystem 2. Blockbuster - Ignoring streaming shift & Late digital investment 3. Kodak - Resisting digital photography & Protecting film business 4. Yahoo - Missed acquisitions & Leadership instability 5. MySpace - Poor user experience & Facebook's faster innovation 6. BlackBerry - Ignoring touchscreen trend & Slow app ecosystem growth 7. Toys R Us - Heavy debt load & E-commerce disruption 8. Sears - Underinvestment in stores & Amazon competition 9. Compaq - Commoditized PC pricing & Acquired by HP after struggles 10. Palm - Fragmented product line & Late platform updates 11. AOL - Slow broadband transition & Failed Time Warner merger 12. Xerox - Missed PC opportunity & Weak commercialization of own innovations 13. Netscape - Lost browser war to Microsoft & Slow product innovation 14. Napster - Legal battles & No sustainable business model 15. Atari - Market flooding & 1983 video game crash 16. Motorola - Slow smartphone transition & Fragmented product strategy 17. Friendster - Technical performance issues & Facebook's rise 18. Digg - Poor site redesign & User exodus to Reddit 19. Vine - No monetization for creators & Instagram's rising competition

  • lucaswiman
    [ object Object ] (@lucaswiman) reported

    Plausible paths for Google: 1. They will also start falling behind in TPU design. TPUs will cease to even notionally be a realistic competitor to big players. Maybe they'll sell the IP and TSMC allocation to OpenAI or Anthropic or AMD, or spin it out into an underresourced separate entity. 2. GCP will do very well for a time. Existing LLM inference capacity is going to get more valuable over time, commanding higher prices. At some point, they'll be left with second-rate hardware that's been dramatically outcompeted by ultra-efficient RSI hardware and data centers. It's not inconceivable that their TPUs will literally have the HBM chips pried off of them to put into better hardware by a competitor. 3. Search will have gone from merely declining in usage to declining rapidly in revenue. This will continue for some time as a viable business, like AOL, Juno and yahoo, but with a shrinking user base of aging retirees or barely-online people. They will embrace every dark pattern in the book to adsmaxx, but their core "indexing and understanding all the world's information" will have long since been done much better by model companies. 4. They'll probably release a quite good Gemini or two from inertia this year. Not necessarily SOTA, but good enough to cause a stock rally. This is probably the last place for someone like Sergei Brin to assert control and save the company. 5. Eventually the massive amount of debt taken on building GCP and getting returned as buybacks will catch up with them after a credit downgrade. They'll get ripped apart for scraps at the org level, with stakes in various AI companies constituting most of their value, like yahoo! did with alibaba. Sundar Pichai will walk away enormously wealthy having maximized ******** out of some shareholder value.

  • jjc123424
    jjc1234 (@jjc123424) reported

    @Matt_Pinner 19 - never had an aol account