AOL outages and service status in Palmer, Texas

Problems in the last 24 hours in Palmer, Texas

The chart below shows the number of AOL reports we have received in the last 24 hours from users in Palmer, Texas and surrounding areas. An outage is declared when the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line.

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

AOL Issues Reports Near Palmer, Texas

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in Palmer and nearby locations:

• 
  STAY YALL ASSES HOME! (@OfficialDJTJ) reported 5 minutes ago from Glenn Heights, Texas

  Lmfao bih we on aol. I can hear that shit now!

AOL Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Laurie Hardman (@LaurieLyricalG) reported 5 minutes ago

  @EllieJayWrites You know I might be over there more if it was formatted exactly like it is here. I still use AOL email, I don't like change LOL.. I post my daily videos there, but not much else and I don't hang there

• 
  Jokerukky (@JauntyyGurl) reported 6 minutes ago

  @Jailyn2025 What has being a Nigerian got to do with your ability to be sensible…has it occurred to you that he said it to save her ***?has it occurred to you that he eventually voted her *** out?this same aol never pulled him for a chat cause she knew she had no chance !**** movie night 📌

• 
  Goebz (@Raptor_RUD) reported 10 minutes ago

  @SpaceX service is hands down a nerd's dream. At 37 years old, having gone from getting an AOL disk at the Grand Union to 300+ Mbps from space tickles me in a way my wife can’t.

• 
  Ulises Lima (@visceral_real) reported 10 minutes ago

  @C2thaL2thaIGG Not anymore, not after seeing the reaction of ñïggërs everywhere, **** them, I hope they aol get killed, I even prefer Jews over them now

• 
  🔻agitprop + absurdity🔻 (@agtprpnabsrdty) reported 12 minutes ago

  Different decade, same math: half the S&P 500 is priced at levels that a dot-com CEO called proof of investor insanity while watching his company crater 90%. The rotation at the top: In early 2000, the ten most valuable S&P 500 companies read like a monument to permanent dominance: Microsoft, General Electric, Cisco, Walmart, ExxonMobil, Intel, Lucent, IBM, Citigroup, AOL. A generation later, only Microsoft remains. GE was carved into three separate companies. Lucent was absorbed by Nokia. AOL became the cautionary tale attached to the worst merger in corporate history. Cisco and Intel spent 25 years climbing back to their dot-com peaks. Citigroup, IBM, Walmart, and ExxonMobil still exist, but none crack the top ten. The new top ten is Nvidia, Apple, Microsoft, Alphabet, Amazon, Meta, and the AI infrastructure complex. Investors in 2000 were also certain they were buying the future's permanent giants. The data says most of today's winners won't be in the top ten a generation from now either, and there is no mechanism by which you find out which ones survive in advance. The valuation problem: In 2002, after Sun Microsystems collapsed 90%, CEO Scott McNealy explained to investors exactly what a 10x sales multiple actually demands: 100% of revenues paid as dividends for ten consecutive years, with zero costs, zero R&D, zero taxes, and zero employees. He was describing the math of the price investors had paid for his stock as a form of collective psychosis. Today, 51% of the S&P 500 by market cap trades above 10x sales. Half the index. The AI narrative is functioning as the dot-com narrative functioned: a story compelling enough to make the math feel optional. The math has never been optional.

• 
  𝙴𝚖𝚖𝚊𝚗𝚞𝚎𝚕 🇬🇭🦉(PropAMM dealer) (@Mawuko) reported 13 minutes ago

  @mariorz > That works for the top 50 assets. It cannot serve permissionless asset creation. Skill issue. There are many market-making firms that currently have and actively generate the strategies needed to service even long tail assets. I directly engage with MMs pretty much every other day and the host of them will outright disprove your entire post with what they have. Not sure why this misconception about long-tail assets being unviable for PropAMMs seems to have legs in the minds of some but anyone who knows ball knows that's naïve at best. Being of the opinion that the future and security of permissionless asset creation in DeFi lies on the shoulders x*y=k is like thinking the future of travel will always be horses or that AOL is the future of the web in 2002.

• 
  Simon Khalaf (@Simonkhalaf) reported 14 minutes ago

  @markpinc @jonoringer Consider the source. Buying junk assets and milk them for cash. Not a bad business, but there is no reason to say that how others are doing it is wrong. I ran AOL, and I know.

• 
  Ronald Bolte (@bolte_rona27994) reported 16 minutes ago

  @WorkElizab Probably Joe he can't do any more damage. Kind of like AOL being the employee of the year at Goya

• 
  ***** and Bases (@BallsAndBases) reported 16 minutes ago

  @ThrillaRilla369 Mine was @aol. Damn I'm old

• 
  Cody Bryan Shelton (@codeye1974) reported 16 minutes ago

  @michaelwgehl @patriot_savvy Man, take this **** back to AOL, grandpa.