AOL outages and service status in Round Rock, Texas

Problems in the last 24 hours in Round Rock, Texas

The chart below shows the number of AOL reports we have received in the last 24 hours from users in Round Rock, Texas and surrounding areas. An outage is declared when the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line.

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

AOL Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Inside Agitator (@AbsolutelyMalc1) reported 7 minutes ago

  @CodeByPoonam "most companies won't do this" actually most tech companies do this. AOL also minted thousands of paper millionaire employees, including janitors. then they acquired Time Warner and the stock went down every day after

• 
  Lab-Man (@LaboratoryMan6) reported 8 minutes ago

  @ThrillaRilla369 AOL. I lost my *** on that garbage company when my brokerage managed account doubled down on AOL-Time Warner.

• 
  FOOHAHA (@ArtieLeecock) reported 10 minutes ago

  @MrDavidAngelo Like trying too cancel AOL back in the day

• 
  ***** and Bases (@BallsAndBases) reported 11 minutes ago

  @ThrillaRilla369 Mine was @aol. Damn I'm old

• 
  Lazarus (@Lazarus_Capital) reported 15 minutes ago

  @stocktrader989 stock i responded to your tweet "The current debt, interest expense, colo fees and no chance to make profits are reasons not to invest in $CRWV and responded with: "They’ve pioneered the way for neoclouds to get financing with Iran literally copying their DDTL structure, are bringing down their weighted cost of debt, improving margins, and focusing on the higher return business (cloud vs Colo). Their debt is a function of levering up to improve their returns. Their financing ability is actually so good that they’re giving up prepayments since that would weigh down their returns. They’re playing chess while $IREN is figuring out how checkers work" Either you dont understand what im saying or deliberately trying to twist what im saying. If theyre the pioneer in financing, they will be definition (very likely) have more debt compared to "peers", also, I stated they pioneered the way for them to get financing. Im not sure why youre repeatedly trying to paint it as my bull thesis rests on them being first. No. That was a stab at Iran since they literally copied their financing structure. Setting up that if you argue against CRWV's financing, youre basically saying your darling was is following their stupidity. Up to you if you want to make that argument. "Backward looking showing massive improvement- WRONG" I literally said its backward looking in response to you looking at their recent current state financials when theyre going through a grow phase. Literally triple digit YoY rev growth, not to mention ARR and rev backlog. Q1 revs of $2b against a $100B rev backlog. Where do you think the valuation is coming from? Whats happening to their compute deals? How can you model out how much they will earn? By looking at: "Revenue Backlog, RPU & financing- doesn’t hold water". With these names you need to be looking at how theyre executing, what direction theyre going, their rate of growth, margin direction, backlog, etc. IREN for example: missing their own cloud ARR targets, GPU rental prices weakening against a bullish backdrop, ARR growth with no regards to margin, margin compression and return deterioration, lots of power sitting doing nothing while peers have sold out. NBIS for example you did something similar by showing the last 2 Qs that theyre losing money. Yes, theyre building, investment cycle, they will have negative cash flows, look beyond that. I really try to engage and help others learn, and I love to test my thesis against others, sometimes with a little sarcasm and trash talking. I addressed your debt concerns and pointed you to where the value will come from. I dont like addressing someone's concerns and they brush it off like i didnt respond, instead choosing to focus on something I didnt even say like you did here "Pioneers ofter don’t win. Examples 1. Internet- AOL/ Yahoo 2. IPhones- Blackberry 3. BTC mining- Mara $CRWV is slightly improving but still a failed company" I especially dont like when people twist my words, or worse, accuse me of "changing your argument to try to meet your objective".

• 
  EnKcre (@EnKcre) reported 17 minutes ago

  @catco718 @ThrillaRilla369 @AOL You need help.

• 
  𝙴𝚖𝚖𝚊𝚗𝚞𝚎𝚕 🇬🇭🦉(PropAMM dealer) (@Mawuko) reported 18 minutes ago

  @mariorz > That works for the top 50 assets. It cannot serve permissionless asset creation. Skill issue. There are many market-making firms that currently have and actively generate the strategies needed to service even long tail assets. I directly engage with MMs pretty much every other day and the host of them will outright disprove your entire post with what they have. Not sure why this misconception about long-tail assets being unviable for PropAMMs seems to have legs in the minds of some but anyone who knows ball knows that's naïve at best. Being of the opinion that the future and security of permissionless asset creation in DeFi lies on the shoulders x*y=k is like thinking the future of travel will always be horses or that AOL is the future of the web in 2002.

• 
  Evan Kirstel #B2B #TechFluencer (@EvanKirstel) reported 20 minutes ago

  Before Broadband, There Was 3Com and U.S. Robotics On June 12, 1997, 3Com completed its $6.6 billion merger with U.S. Robotics, the largest deal the data networking industry had ever seen. At the time, it made obvious sense. 3Com was a major force in Ethernet cards, hubs, switches, and enterprise networking. U.S. Robotics was the great modem brand, helping millions of people get online through phone lines, patience, and that unforgettable dial-up screech that sounded like a fax machine losing an argument. The deal was also a snapshot of the internet before broadband became normal. Offices were being wired with Ethernet. Homes were dialing into the web. Remote workers connected through access servers. Getting online was still something you did deliberately, not something that surrounded you. U.S. Robotics was in the middle of the 56K modem wars, pushing its x2 technology against the Rockwell and Lucent K56flex camp before the V.90 standard settled the fight in 1998. Line quality, compression, compatibility, and a few extra kilobits decided whether the web felt useful or miserable. 3Com brought the LAN side. Ethernet cards in PCs. Hubs and switches in offices. Networks that turned standalone computers into connected organizations. Cisco was becoming the giant in the room, and the market was shifting from selling components to controlling the connectivity stack. The two halves of the deal aged very differently. The modem business was massive, then faded fast as dial-up gave way to cable, DSL, Wi-Fi, fiber, and mobile data. U.S. Robotics became a nostalgia trigger for anyone who remembers waiting for AOL to connect. Ethernet never went away. It moved from office LANs into data centers, carrier networks, industrial systems, cloud infrastructure, cars, and now AI clusters. Speeds, cables, and workloads all changed, and the core idea kept scaling. That is rare in tech. Most technologies age into museums. Ethernet aged into the backbone. Its future still looks strong, because AI data centers, cloud platforms, telecom networks, and edge computing all need more bandwidth, lower latency, and cheaper scale. The merger itself did not age as well. Dial-up was already on borrowed time. Palm, which came along with U.S. Robotics, was spun off in 2000 and briefly worth more than its parent. By that same year, 3Com had spun U.S. Robotics back out as an independent company. The biggest networking merger in history unwound in three years. Still, the deal marks a real turning point. Before broadband, before Wi-Fi everywhere, before smartphones and cloud and AI factories, the internet had to be stitched together one modem, one Ethernet card, and one phone line at a time. For a brief moment, 3Com and U.S. Robotics sat at the center of that transition.

• 
  Ian ᯅ (@somenuso) reported 22 minutes ago

  @POTFES This is not accurate. The DMA, DSA, AI Act, and similar frameworks are not examples of member states forcing Brussels to overregulate. They are EU level regulatory projects, proposed, negotiated, adopted, and enforced through the EU institutional system. Member states are part of that machine, but pretending the problem is only national fragmentation conveniently ignores what Brussels itself is doing. And yes, a deeper internal market would be useful. Easier company formation, better access to capital, lower compliance costs, cheaper energy, and less fragmentation would help. But that is not the same as giving the Commission more power to micromanage technology. If American tech dominates, Europe should compete by building better products on honest market terms, not by regulating superior foreign companies and hoping European champions appear afterward. Markets are not static. IBM, Intel, Microsoft, Nokia, BlackBerry, Yahoo, AOL, MySpace, and many others once looked dominant in their own domains. They were challenged, displaced, or diminished because better technologies, better products, and better business models emerged. That is how real competition works. Innovation comes from builders, capital, talent, risk, and consumer choice. It does not come from Brussels officials deciding how platforms should be designed.

• 
  ReOpenPa (@reopenpa) reported 23 minutes ago

  @dr_bouchard @mediainfluence9 @JuddLegum AI isn't a traditional bubble. AI is in its infancy - like looking at AOL and saying you'll never shop on the internet.