AOL outages and service status in Gloucester, Virginia

Problems in the last 24 hours in Gloucester, Virginia

The chart below shows the number of AOL reports we have received in the last 24 hours from users in Gloucester, Virginia and surrounding areas. An outage is declared when the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line.

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

AOL Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Orelli אורלי (@orellidagod) reported 1 minute ago

  @Abrakhadabra93 Thoses nostalgia videos hurt in sucha weird way. It's like the era we grew up in was an illusion like it never happened. So far back in my memory pre internet social media era. I still remember dial up, AOL MTV, N64 , PS1

• 
  Coach George (@CoachGeorgeCRA) reported 2 minutes ago

  @CryptoEmpressX Ok. Can't remember if login was from Yahoo or AOL

• 
  Foaly Pub (@FoalyReviews) reported 4 minutes ago

  NEVER RUN CODE IF YOU DON'T KNOW WHAT IT DOES!!! ******* hell we learned this **** back when AOL was still a primary internet access software(Dialup) how are you still this stupid... treat every software like its a virus threat run it in a VPN first or run it through threat tools

• 
  BonkDaCarnivore (@BonkDaCarnivore) reported 7 minutes ago

  Speaking of suing and losing, did you know that John Cardildo once sued AOL (yes, that AOL - remember he's a Boomer)? It must have been strange for him to be on the Plaintiff's side of the court. Anyhow, not only did he lose his lawsuit (he's never won in court period), but AOL countersued him and got a judgement for $90,547.95 against him. Hey Johnny Boy, did you ever pay your debts?

• 
  Michael Basar (@MGBasar1) reported 8 minutes ago

  @miracles7k @Excellentsalvic 19 of 20. Never had AOL.

• 
  Joe Biden’s Ice Cream Man (@TCard2020) reported 9 minutes ago

  @heysoyvic @AmericanAir Completely disagree. The only thing that American has going for it are the employees. The planes suck. The loyalty program doesn’t exist anymore. The WiFi is = aol. I don’t know how the employees can get up and go to work every day. It’s rare that I meet a bad one.

• 
  Robert Flynn 🐶🐱🌴✝🇺🇸🇩🇴🇮🇪🇨🇴🇭🇰🇹🇼 (@RobertFlynn202) reported 11 minutes ago

  @honeymoon250 19 Never had an AOL address.

• 
  jims mac attack (@lehmacaroni) reported 12 minutes ago

  @hthieblot So, specific sites? Mini clip Crazy **** Aol games

• 
  bennrudd (@bennrudd) reported 14 minutes ago

  US is fighting 2 war. Ammunition depleted. Ukraine swallowed all weapons n US army never thought they taking Iran. That's y EM said AOL is an idiot. She shld capitalised on this issue. Y expect Mamdani

• 
  Mayank Agrawal (@mayankagrawal) reported 15 minutes ago

  Should we need to pay for email? In 2006, AOL and Yahoo announced priority delivery for senders willing to pay somewhere around a penny per message, with the promise that those messages would bypass the spam filter. The diagnosis behind it was correct. Email often breaks because sending is free, and when volume costs nothing, volume becomes the strategy (hello AI outbound!). Everything built afterward (filters, blocklists, sender reputation scores) is an attempt to patch a problem that is fundamentally about economics, and not about technology. Today, the same dynamic plays out on a much larger surface. AI agents can complete forms, take surveys, open accounts, and browse sites at a scale that would have been unimaginable for a spam operation twenty years ago, and most of that activity still registers in company dashboards as ordinary human demand. What I find most encouraging about Proof of Human is that this doesn't require the previous tradeoff. There's no toll, no puzzle, and nothing for a genuine visitor to notice or solve, because verification runs continuously in the background across the whole session rather than at a single checkpoint. When a decision does get made, there's a record behind it that a team can actually inspect, rather than an opaque score they're asked to trust. The email industry spent two decades learning that you can't tax your way to trust, and that authentication works better than obstruction. That lesson is worth carrying into whatever comes next.