AOL outages and service status in Hopewell, Virginia

Problems in the last 24 hours in Hopewell, Virginia

The chart below shows the number of AOL reports we have received in the last 24 hours from users in Hopewell, Virginia and surrounding areas. An outage is declared when the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line.

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

AOL Issues Reports Near Hopewell, Virginia

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in Hopewell and nearby locations:

• 
  Ethan (@Big_E_61) reported 38 minutes ago from Colonial Heights, Virginia

  @RC3_All_Day @mkbrogaa_ Shit, I don’t blame her. That aol email is probably why yo PlayStation account got hacked by that dude in Brazil.

AOL Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Sterling Marsh (@djchainsaw01) reported 4 minutes ago

  @Irina_exh 19... Never had AOL!

• 
  Alley AL (@BackAlleyAL_) reported 5 minutes ago

  @SouthernGo40189 @markasual5 @BadQualityMemes No it means you never used a computer pre google as in AOL

• 
  Firetruck (@fire37water) reported 5 minutes ago

  @Irina_exh 19. Never had an AOL

• 
  DOT_Singularity🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸 (@DOT_singularity) reported 5 minutes ago

  @SteveMoraco Boo- friggidty-hooo, This is nothing new. I want the AI to be able to pull in context from **** I wrote on AOL in 1995. My online **** game was strong! If you're Laboring under some expectation of ever having true privacy in the digital world , it's a fools errand. Crack on.

• 
  BoomKen (@Ken417063De) reported 10 minutes ago

  @PokeRestockApp @Pagan_GMR That was the first rule of the internet when AoL & CompuServe was sending the FREE cds to everyone & everything. NEVER give ANYONE your real name online there was even a PSA about it.

• 
  MADr0591 (@MADr0591) reported 13 minutes ago

  @The_FJC Two of those I never heard. AOL dial-up

• 
  real missing talon hours (@iheartlog) reported 14 minutes ago

  once the aol screenshots of them being an emetophile hit the fandom all bets were off. now it's talking about puking every night, the other band members spitting **** up constantly, etc...you love to see it.

• 
  Daniil (@DaniilBuilds) reported 15 minutes ago

  AOL and Time Warner didn’t just pay for what the two companies were worth in January 2000. They paid for what they believed the two companies could become together. The announced merger was valued at roughly $350B, with AOL shareholders expected to own about 55% of the combined company. The logic was easy to understand: combine AOL’s internet business with Time Warner’s media assets and create value neither could generate alone. But there was a financial problem hiding inside that logic. Future synergies are uncertain. The merger closed in January 2001. SEC disclosures later put the acquisition cost at approximately $147B. Then came the accounting reckoning. In 2002, the combined company reported a $98.7B net loss, including a $54.2B goodwill impairment. That $54.2B was non-cash. It did not mean the company suddenly paid out $54.2B in cash. It meant the value previously assigned to acquired goodwill could no longer be supported at the same level. That distinction matters. When you pay upfront for future synergies, you are effectively putting a price on value that still depends on execution. If the synergies arrive, the premium can make sense. If they don’t, shareholders can end up carrying the cost. The most expensive synergy is the one you pay for before you prove it exists.

• 
  The Dread Bunny (@jpvanhoy) reported 16 minutes ago

  @lili_poobear @Phantom_King_99 @gizalovespizza Ok, look, you can probably find a half dozen slightly different definitions of the word "evolve" online (we both know you didn't use a dead-tree dictionary). But the fact remains, to not evolve is to stagnate. Even the definition you gave, if converted the boolean opposite, would say, "to NOT develop gradually, especially from a simple to a more complex form", and you could then argue that OP wants it to get more complex, but RAPIDLY rather than SLOWLY. The point is technology should always advance. Just because you're unhappy with some specific implementation of technology in the present, doesn't mean that "advance" will mean "things get worse". It's pretty childish to take that position, in fact. I mean, for ****'s sake, you're ON THE INTERNET right now, probably using either wireless broadband, or wired broadband access to post this message. Can you imagine sitting in at your computer desk, with the monitor riser and built-in CD-ROM storage slots, dialing into AOL in about 1996 and saying, "GAH! I don't want technology to evolve any more. I'm tired of sitting here waiting for JPGs of John Stamos to take 40 seconds to load. I'm tired of getting my directions from Mapquest!"

• 
  CEOInterviews.AI (@CEOinterview) reported 17 minutes ago

  An early Polygon investor ran the comparison against his own position. Yat Siu @ysiu puts the value split at 90 to 95 percent to the application that owns the customer, with gas fees going to the chain underneath. Polymarket's private valuation is 8 billion dollars. Polygon, the chain Polymarket is built on, is a lot smaller. His analogy is the mid 90s, when AOL bought Time Warner and the ISPs were the giants of the moment. AT&T is worth a lot of money today. It is smaller than Google, Apple and Nvidia. Critical infrastructure keeps getting built. It stops being the biggest company in the room.