AOL outages and service status in Enfield, Connecticut

Problems in the last 24 hours in Enfield, Connecticut

The chart below shows the number of AOL reports we have received in the last 24 hours from users in Enfield, Connecticut and surrounding areas. An outage is declared when the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line.

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

AOL Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Liquid Barb 🌻🟧💙🌈🦋 (@LiquidBarb) reported 6 minutes ago

  @SarahSevans2000 Never had AOL or a Walkman, but all the rest & more!

• 
  Robert (@towdow3) reported 9 minutes ago

  @TimoTweetss this tweet shows that you ARE that guy. I have an AOL email and i one point i hadn't checked it for ten years. I had no problem checking it. TEN YEARS.

• 
  Sloppy Barris (@sloppybarris) reported 9 minutes ago

  If you wanna know more you can **** all the way off (to one of my x-rays). I leave the pii on most of the time. AOL keyword: spine, maybe. Or ask me anything!

• 
  Kevin Shuley (@eternity_comics) reported 10 minutes ago

  @ThrillaRilla369 I remember the AOL chatrooms, you couldn't call someone a moron online, they'd cancel your account for 6 months over it and say it's a family community

• 
  Kevin Jones (@NomentionofKev) reported 11 minutes ago

  @LexiAIexander Not crazy making, it's by design. AI frustrates the customer & impedes any real change to the account because even canceling a subscription becomes a tour de force with its labyrinthian path to a result. My old cable company has this system which replicates AOL in its last days.

• 
  f_marzotto (@f_marzotto) reported 12 minutes ago

  $BSP is a masterpiece. Just not of innovation. Working in Big Tech, you get used to seeing what actual scale and innovation look like. So watching Italy crown Bending Spoons as its great tech champion - a team that buys beloved, declining brands like AOL, Evernote, WeTransfer, and Meetup to "revive" them - has been fascinating. Their $18 billion IPO is largely deserved: they are exceptional operators. They make neglected software fast and profitable. The machine works. But there are two things you can do to a fading product. You can make it modern and profitable again - or you can make it win again, attracting new people who genuinely love it. Bending Spoons does the first brilliantly. The second, almost never. Their own SEC prospectus reveals the trick. Organic growth was 13% last year, and just 6% last quarter. Net revenue retention is 94%, meaning each cohort of users is worth less a year later, even after aggressive price hikes. This isn't a base being won back; it's a base leaking quietly, taxed harder on the way out. This is exactly why comparing them to Big Tech is so revealing. Picture $META putting WhatsApp or Instagram behind a paywall tomorrow. There would be a global uproar. Meta has the most locked-in audience on Earth, yet they refuse to charge them. Why? Because they are still chasing growth. Bending Spoons charges its captive audiences precisely because it has no growth left to protect. They execute the exact playbook that would make Meta a supervillain, but on smaller apps with weaker exits - and we call it genius. The reviled villain treats its users better than the celebrated innovator. A true maker earns its price by building something genuinely better; you pay because you want to stay. Bending Spoons didn't build these products; braver people did. They buy them when they are loved and hard to quit, and turn them into extraction machines. They are professional converters of makers into takers. Charging people because they want to stay makes everyone richer. Charging them because they can't leave just moves money from users to shareholders. One is a gain for the world. The other is a transfer. And every switch they flip is one more bill on people already drowning in subscriptions, asked to pay again for what they once had free. Of course, the business works. Rent extraction is the safest business on earth: low risk, fast payback, nothing to invent. But compare that to actual innovation. Whatever you think of Elon Musk, he took real risk on things that didn't exist yet: Tesla forced open the EV industry, SpaceX made rockets reusable, and each time the rest of the world had to follow. He earned his success by growing the pie; Bending Spoons pours the same ingenuity into nag screens and cancellation mazes, carving up a pie someone else baked. Let's not call a toll booth a cathedral. Celebrate rent-collection as innovation, and we teach our best makers to optimize the past instead of building the future.

• 
  Spookyspoon 🇺🇲 (@Spookyspoon16) reported 16 minutes ago

  @lilhousgreendor 18. Never had an AOL address. What is a paper mat?

• 
  Boni Blackstone (@BoniLBlackstone) reported 17 minutes ago

  @90sWWE 1997 "The year of the goose" Grey Goose for Tammy unfortunately. She's rotting in an Ocalla Florida prison for DUI vehicular homicide. 7th offense. No liscence, no insurance, boyfriends car. Sad story in this biz. Most DL'd AOL star to orange jumpsuit. -**** poster

• 
  MichaelJensen1 (@_Kadmos1) reported 17 minutes ago

  If Netflix won, I would still oppose it. I tend to not be a fan of these media mergers. AOL TimeWarner should have not been allowed. Microsoft getting Activision Blizzard was a bad idea. SkyDance getting Paramount? Horrible. Disney getting 20CF? Stupid. Now, the 2006 Disney-Pixar merger I do side with. Disney getting Marvel and Lucasfilm? Wish the smaller 20CF got both of those companies.

• 
  FiendFix 🤔 (@FiendFix) reported 18 minutes ago

  @reborn_444 It was only free because PSN was dog **** when it launched back in 06. **** felt like AOL 😭