AOL outages and service status in Gilberts, Illinois
No problems detected
If you are having issues, please submit a report below.
Full Outage Map
- AOL generated 0 outage signals in the last 24 hours around Gilberts, including 0 direct reports.
AOL (America Online) is an internet portal as well as an internet service provider. As an ISP, AOL offers dial up internet through its AOL Advantage plans.
Problems in the last 24 hours in Gilberts, Illinois
The chart below shows the number of AOL reports we have received in the last 24 hours from users in Gilberts, Illinois and surrounding areas. An outage is declared when the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line.
At the moment, we haven't detected any problems at AOL. Are you experiencing issues or an outage? Leave a message in the comments section!
Live Outage Map Near Gilberts, Illinois
The most recent AOL outage reports came from the following cities: Fox River Grove.
| City | Problem Type | Report Time |
|---|---|---|
 Fox River Grove
|
2 months ago |
Community Discussion
Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.
Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.
AOL Issues Reports
Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:
-
coopsmyboy (@coopsmyboy) reported@AOL Surely screaming into a void but I’ve got to say, your app has become UNUSABLE! No longer a source for news. Takes a half hour to get to the damn article you click on. @AOL
-
* (@vansantospiero) reported@RaulRei86168412 @KutterIsKing AOL damn unc
-
Mike Ostuni (@stocksharpie197) reported@timothysykes We just had good earnings for so many tech companies, that is different from the crash time. I recall AOL going from 80 to 160 or so then splitting, like four times before I finally bought at 80 then it never saw 85 again. Different periods.
-
Michael Wall (@sound4movement) reported@l_mejiaC my heart…I’d hang an aol mailer in my studio
-
cajunmental (@cajunmental) reported@AOL This dude been a bad cop for a while
-
Nintendo Prime (@NintyPrime) reported@Stephen_Agnew @TRIPSTER0 "Why is that weird." I've been on social media since social media was nothing but yahoo chat rooms and AOL Instant Messenger. People say and do all sorts of ****. BOTH IRL and Online. And what they they do, why they do it, that's on them. I have zero curiosity around it. Just because someone is talking publicly, doesn't mean I have to care. Like, I am friends with AndresRestart. But before we were friends, he was a fellow content creator. I valued his thoughts on content creation and his approach to making his videos - but before we were friends? Nothing else he said publicly mattered. Because I didn't know him enough to know why I should even care what he's talking about. "You should welcome that curiosity" I should welcome people questioning literally everything I say or do? All it makes me want to do is not say or do any of it. ", not shame it or be a **** towards people who ask you curious questions." So your questions are "curious", mine are "being a ****". Got it. "If someone asks you a question, just answer them." No. I don't have to answer anything I don't want to answer. What the hell kind of reasoning is this? Do you just answer everyone's question all the time? If you don't feel like answering - don't. You don't owe them anything. They are strangers on the internet. They couldn't be less relevant to your life. "Have a normal conversation on X" I argue normal conversations don't exist on X. Because if what I see is normal, I don't want to be on this planet anymore. "being defensive and being a jerk to them." Not only have your questions been answered, I asked questions in return. So I get it: You can ask me questions and if I don't want to answer it then but ask you a question in kind, and you don't want to answer it then - I'm the ****, you're the innocent bystander. If my post isn't asking a question, I am not asking for anyone's thoughts, nor taking questions. I do Q and A's for that. Commentary is just that, and people are free to disagree or not with my commentary. They are free to ask, or not questions. And I am free to answer those questions, or not. You seem to have this definition of "nromal" that is inherently "you must do what is asked of you because I said so". Nah, I don't. There is no normal. How I am behaving right now is perfectly, 1000%, considered normal among my friends. "Nothing you do here is your private business" lol "you do it publicly and so the public has a right to ask about your public actions" And I have a right to respond to a question, with a question. "Just give an honest answer and move on." I did. You didn't like my answer.
-
Janette Klein (@jkdestin) reported@cnnbrk @CGasparino Look forward to some of your thoughts, Charlie — on how the “worst deal in history” — cost ‘The Mouth of the South’ ~$8b. “The deal is widely regarded as one of the worst mergers in history. AOL-Time Warner took a massive ~$99 billion write-down in 2002 (the largest corp. loss at the time), and the company later split apart.”
-
Rob (@Rob424336273101) reported@AOLSupportHelp No as email doesn't work as I haven't used it in over a year and phone number cut off too
-
@Nobody (@NobodysRebel) reportedAllegedly this is common knowledge but @nodqdotcom don't research **** after aol sold Teds braves and WCW he sold all of his stock and stepped away in 2002
-
Bitcoin⚡️Baddie (@bitcoinbaddie) reported@anonchain @cryptopunks “Collectibles will be valued for when they were created, not just what they look like.” IMO, that really applies more in the physical world — like first edition Pokémon cards or a Babe Ruth rookie card. We don’t exactly value AOL 1.0 software the same way, right? That said, I 100% agree $uPeg has something novel and innovative for this cycle, and I think it’ll do well long term regardless. But if the team wants to lean heavily into “on-chain provenance,” they should look at Ordinals. I was there from day one, and people got absolutely rekt chasing sub-100 inscriptions 🤡 and over time, inscriptions didn’t matter. My whole point is: lean into everything. Don’t alienate or cut off a feature that many collectors genuinely find value in. There was never a need to completely remove visual rarity when it wasn’t hurting anything. May be except their egos.