1. Home
  2. ❯
  3. Companies
  4. ❯
  5. AOL
  6. ❯
  7. Wilmette
AOL

AOL outages and service status in Wilmette, Illinois

No problems detected

If you are having issues, please submit a report below.

Full Outage Map
  • AOL generated 0 outage signals in the last 24 hours around Wilmette, including 0 direct reports.

AOL (America Online) is an internet portal as well as an internet service provider. As an ISP, AOL offers dial up internet through its AOL Advantage plans.

Problems in the last 24 hours in Wilmette, Illinois

The chart below shows the number of AOL reports we have received in the last 24 hours from users in Wilmette, Illinois and surrounding areas. An outage is declared when the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line.

At the moment, we haven't detected any problems at AOL. Are you experiencing issues or an outage? Leave a message in the comments section!

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

AOL Issues Reports Near Wilmette, Illinois

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in Wilmette and nearby locations:

  • grahamatcollege
    Stowe God Cooks (@grahamatcollege) reported from Evanston, Illinois

    are there any other PBS KIDS ONLY NO NICKELODEON NO CARTOON NETWORK who are also YAHOO MESSENGER NO AOL INSTANT MESSENGER who are also TWENTY TWELVE TUMBLR

  • EvansWefixbikes
    Curtis Evans (@EvansWefixbikes) reported from Evanston, Illinois

    Young people give me **** when they see my my AOL email address. No, no, no, I’m not behind the times, I was online before you were born.

AOL Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

  • oddhanfoo
    oddhan (@oddhanfoo) reported

    @pennyelizabeths I've been online since before people had heard of AOL. I've seen the technology advance. Mass gov surveillance is always a threat has never relied on any one technology, how Flock works and is used is a threat to civil rights and data centers, which long preceded it, are not.

  • djchainsaw01
    Sterling Marsh (@djchainsaw01) reported

    @Irina_exh 19... Never had AOL!

  • johndillen77
    john (@johndillen77) reported

    @Irina_exh 19. Never had an AOL email

  • Greywulf4
    Greywulf (@Greywulf4) reported

    @Irina_exh Never had AOL

  • MatyasFulop
    matyas fulop (@MatyasFulop) reported

    @neetintel @CommunityNotes If Emergency Action Messages aren't used for emergencies what does the military use then? AOL Instant Messenger?

  • _tinatruth
    ⚔️Tina Truth⚔️ (@_tinatruth) reported

    This collided with AOL’s vision to own the future of the internet. Unlike today’s internet services that act as gateways to the online world AOL wanted to control the internet service itself — and also be the place where people spent most of their online time. Users came to AOL for: News. Entertainment. Shopping. Sports. Chat rooms etc.

  • Charter_DG
    Charter.DG (@Charter_DG) reported

    @ToddVercoe We had aol dial up cd's and prodigy the first real forum was just starting up...thoug most people were not logged in and never heard of it. We didn't have a real Internet...

  • byajperez
    A.J. Perez (@byajperez) reported

    @ChelseaV @DegenerateTBone Is your AOL that slow you didn’t see my next tweet?

  • scottya2
    Scott Allan (@scottya2) reported

    @Irina_exh 19. Never had aol address

  • DaniilBuilds
    Daniil (@DaniilBuilds) reported

    AOL and Time Warner didn’t just pay for what the two companies were worth in January 2000. They paid for what they believed the two companies could become together. The announced merger was valued at roughly $350B, with AOL shareholders expected to own about 55% of the combined company. The logic was easy to understand: combine AOL’s internet business with Time Warner’s media assets and create value neither could generate alone. But there was a financial problem hiding inside that logic. Future synergies are uncertain. The merger closed in January 2001. SEC disclosures later put the acquisition cost at approximately $147B. Then came the accounting reckoning. In 2002, the combined company reported a $98.7B net loss, including a $54.2B goodwill impairment. That $54.2B was non-cash. It did not mean the company suddenly paid out $54.2B in cash. It meant the value previously assigned to acquired goodwill could no longer be supported at the same level. That distinction matters. When you pay upfront for future synergies, you are effectively putting a price on value that still depends on execution. If the synergies arrive, the premium can make sense. If they don’t, shareholders can end up carrying the cost. The most expensive synergy is the one you pay for before you prove it exists.