1. Home
  2. ❯
  3. Companies
  4. ❯
  5. AOL
  6. ❯
  7. Hammond
AOL

AOL outages and service status in Hammond, Indiana

No problems detected

If you are having issues, please submit a report below.

Full Outage Map
  • AOL generated 0 outage signals in the last 24 hours around Hammond, including 0 direct reports.

AOL (America Online) is an internet portal as well as an internet service provider. As an ISP, AOL offers dial up internet through its AOL Advantage plans.

Problems in the last 24 hours in Hammond, Indiana

The chart below shows the number of AOL reports we have received in the last 24 hours from users in Hammond, Indiana and surrounding areas. An outage is declared when the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line.

At the moment, we haven't detected any problems at AOL. Are you experiencing issues or an outage? Leave a message in the comments section!

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

AOL Issues Reports Near Hammond, Indiana

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in Hammond and nearby locations:

  • TashaRams
    Tasha (@TashaRams) reported from Thornton, Illinois

    @NormanChad I heard it's because they all use @aol as their email service....

  • lilscud1974
    Cheri ❤ Danny's valentine (@lilscud1974) reported from Griffith, Indiana

    @Jeri59686445 @Acyn No problem, I actually worked for Warner Brothers while they were making this one and had a chance to talk to Chris on the phone about it while we set up his guest spot in my AOL Forum. I miss doing that.

AOL Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

  • RZVLAZ
    UltraMan (@RZVLAZ) reported

    @washingtonpost AOL dialup internet is number one internet service provider again. What a time to be alive!

  • ashkenahzee
    Khazar Theory Enthusiast (@ashkenahzee) reported

    @KayakZztee5 @tombelaviv_ At least he has a gallbladder and a mother. One who didn't die ashamed. One who didn't have repressed anger towards her son for being a useful idiot of the feds just like Jason Kessler and mentally ill disabled former employee of Oddcast and AOL. Sven is his new mommy. Evil mommy

  • BeerAce73
    Art 🇺🇲⚓ (@BeerAce73) reported

    @MapQuest MapQuest? Is that like AOL? Stupid *****.

  • RakeshSFNYC
    Rakesh Agrawal (@RakeshSFNYC) reported

    Mapquest holding line on Lake Ontario. I agree, but no doubt it is just a marketing stunt to remind us they exist. I was at AOL when Google Maps launched. The head of Mapquest would send out emails every time they launched a feature saying people would never use Google.

  • eatyellowsno
    Dylan (@eatyellowsno) reported

    @captive_dreamer who ******** reads AOL

  • FlandoCalrissan
    FlandoCalrissian (@FlandoCalrissan) reported

    @theamelia___ 19. Never had an AOL address

  • DaniilBuilds
    Daniil (@DaniilBuilds) reported

    AOL and Time Warner didn’t just pay for what the two companies were worth in January 2000. They paid for what they believed the two companies could become together. The announced merger was valued at roughly $350B, with AOL shareholders expected to own about 55% of the combined company. The logic was easy to understand: combine AOL’s internet business with Time Warner’s media assets and create value neither could generate alone. But there was a financial problem hiding inside that logic. Future synergies are uncertain. The merger closed in January 2001. SEC disclosures later put the acquisition cost at approximately $147B. Then came the accounting reckoning. In 2002, the combined company reported a $98.7B net loss, including a $54.2B goodwill impairment. That $54.2B was non-cash. It did not mean the company suddenly paid out $54.2B in cash. It meant the value previously assigned to acquired goodwill could no longer be supported at the same level. That distinction matters. When you pay upfront for future synergies, you are effectively putting a price on value that still depends on execution. If the synergies arrive, the premium can make sense. If they don’t, shareholders can end up carrying the cost. The most expensive synergy is the one you pay for before you prove it exists.

  • Scott076973722
    Reason Ate Opinions (@Scott076973722) reported

    @theamelia___ 19, I never bothered with AOL except to use the free discs as coasters.

  • ScottUpham
    Scott Upham 🇺🇸 (@ScottUpham) reported

    @MurrayHillGuy1 This guy (me) dating history: - Dated co-worker at grocery store in college, married her after a year, divorced after 9 years. 2 beautiful daughters (who are now 33 & 31). - Dated a former co-worker briefly. - Dated a girl that IM'ed me on AOL Instant messenger, married her after 3 years, divorced after 18 years. 2 beautiful daughters (who are now 21 & 14). - Dated a younger woman (25) on a dating website for a year, bought her a ring but never proposed. Only broken heart of my life (at 50). - A few short relationships from dating apps but nothing longer than 1-2 months. - Long distance relationship with a younger woman I met on IG (we had a mutual). Lasted 4 years but recently fizzled. Back to Square 1!

  • RaphaelDSwift
    🌈Raphael D. Swift 🖤📷💜#MMIW 🎵 (@RaphaelDSwift) reported

    @ZOE_SEQNC @michellexotter It all went down hill when they let AOL out of their box