1. Home
  2. Companies
  3. AOL
  4. Warsaw
AOL

AOL outages and service status in Warsaw, Indiana

Problems detected

Users are reporting problems related to: e-mail and internet.

Full Outage Map
  • AOL generated 0 outage signals in the last 24 hours around Warsaw, including 0 direct reports.

AOL (America Online) is an internet portal as well as an internet service provider. As an ISP, AOL offers dial up internet through its AOL Advantage plans.

Problems in the last 24 hours in Warsaw, Indiana

The chart below shows the number of AOL reports we have received in the last 24 hours from users in Warsaw, Indiana and surrounding areas. An outage is declared when the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line.

June 8: Problems at AOL

AOL is having issues since 12:40 AM GMT. Are you also affected? Leave a message in the comments section!

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

AOL Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

  • bsports1234
    Big Cat Sports (@bsports1234) reported

    @Xfinity resorting to the old AOl tactics of their web site not working and constantly logging you out or "technical issues" when trying to pull up your bill.

  • Anon7127
    Anon🇬🇧Restore Britain🇬🇧 (@Anon7127) reported

    @SnowyEngland Yes indeed,so would I.A lot of my mates were heavily into MSN chat when it was still dial up (AOL),but I was never interested back then🫡🇬🇧

  • dorkweeb
    dane garrus, dweeb (@dorkweeb) reported

    @ExistentialEnso More like saying “I’ve never used Hotmail” or “I’ve never used AOL” or “I’ve never used Netscape Navigator.”

  • Mr_Wabb
    Mr_Wabb (@Mr_Wabb) reported

    @Seven_of_7_ Puhlease, I need something with at least 14400 bps modem & free AOL status disk Appreciate the help tho

  • AdamBLiv
    Adam Livingston (@AdamBLiv) reported

    Imagine you're in 1995 and someone shows you the internet. Early websites, dial-up, the whole nine yards. You wait four minutes for a JPEG to load. Halfway through loading, it disconnects. You think "this is stupid, this will never work, I'm going back to the Yellow Pages." That person lost the century. Bitcoin's short-term price is set by the most emotional participants in the most leveraged 24/7 market in human history. Futures traders, retail tourists, ETF arbitrageurs, guys who got tipped off on Reddit... these are the people setting the price on any given Tuesday. They are not the story. The story is that banks are building custody infrastructure. Governments are discussing strategic reserves in official policy documents. Accounting standards got reformed. Advisors can now put Bitcoin in client portfolios through their existing platforms without calling their compliance department and causing a medical event. The people who called the internet dead in 1996 were technically correct about AOL's stock price and completely wrong about everything that mattered. The marginal seller is loud and the structural integrators are quiet. History belongs to the quiet ones.

  • swats1963
    Sam Porter (@swats1963) reported

    @DrBerryPierre Internet must be moving slow… you still have aol ?

  • agtprpnabsrdty
    🔻agitprop + absurdity🔻 (@agtprpnabsrdty) reported

    Different decade, same math: half the S&P 500 is priced at levels that a dot-com CEO called proof of investor insanity while watching his company crater 90%. The rotation at the top: In early 2000, the ten most valuable S&P 500 companies read like a monument to permanent dominance: Microsoft, General Electric, Cisco, Walmart, ExxonMobil, Intel, Lucent, IBM, Citigroup, AOL. A generation later, only Microsoft remains. GE was carved into three separate companies. Lucent was absorbed by Nokia. AOL became the cautionary tale attached to the worst merger in corporate history. Cisco and Intel spent 25 years climbing back to their dot-com peaks. Citigroup, IBM, Walmart, and ExxonMobil still exist, but none crack the top ten. The new top ten is Nvidia, Apple, Microsoft, Alphabet, Amazon, Meta, and the AI infrastructure complex. Investors in 2000 were also certain they were buying the future's permanent giants. The data says most of today's winners won't be in the top ten a generation from now either, and there is no mechanism by which you find out which ones survive in advance. The valuation problem: In 2002, after Sun Microsystems collapsed 90%, CEO Scott McNealy explained to investors exactly what a 10x sales multiple actually demands: 100% of revenues paid as dividends for ten consecutive years, with zero costs, zero R&D, zero taxes, and zero employees. He was describing the math of the price investors had paid for his stock as a form of collective psychosis. Today, 51% of the S&P 500 by market cap trades above 10x sales. Half the index. The AI narrative is functioning as the dot-com narrative functioned: a story compelling enough to make the math feel optional. The math has never been optional.

  • dafullpackage
    Beefy (King) (@dafullpackage) reported

    @djvlad You need to stop tricking and announcing it. Paying for free **** is ain't a flex, plus AOL opened the floodgates in the 90s

  • KALY77005361
    KALY (@KALY77005361) reported

    @kenneth_kizza @Pariyodan07 @KakwenzaRukira How could Besigye have taken leadership at parliament when he's never been an MP? What I know is the likes of Wafula, Aol, Winnie Kiiza etc were once LoPs from FDC and the leadership of then was KB. Are you saying that he immediately left Najja after stepping down?

  • agtprpnabsrdty
    🔻agitprop + absurdity🔻 (@agtprpnabsrdty) reported

    Different decade, same math: half the S&P 500 is priced at levels that a dot-com CEO called proof of investor insanity while watching his company crater 90%. The rotation at the top: In early 2000, the ten most valuable S&P 500 companies read like a monument to permanent dominance: Microsoft, General Electric, Cisco, Walmart, ExxonMobil, Intel, Lucent, IBM, Citigroup, AOL. A generation later, only Microsoft remains. GE was carved into three separate companies. Lucent was absorbed by Nokia. AOL became the cautionary tale attached to the worst merger in corporate history. Cisco and Intel spent 25 years climbing back to their dot-com peaks. Citigroup, IBM, Walmart, and ExxonMobil still exist, but none crack the top ten. The new top ten is Nvidia, Apple, Microsoft, Alphabet, Amazon, Meta, and the AI infrastructure complex. Investors in 2000 were also certain they were buying the future's permanent giants. The data says most of today's winners won't be in the top ten a generation from now either, and there is no mechanism by which you find out which ones survive in advance. The valuation problem: In 2002, after Sun Microsystems collapsed 90%, CEO Scott McNealy explained to investors exactly what a 10x sales multiple actually demands: 100% of revenues paid as dividends for ten consecutive years, with zero costs, zero R&D, zero taxes, and zero employees. He was describing the math of the price investors had paid for his stock as a form of collective psychosis. Today, 51% of the S&P 500 by market cap trades above 10x sales. Half the index. The AI narrative is functioning as the dot-com narrative functioned: a story compelling enough to make the math feel optional. The math has never been optional.