AOL outages and service status in Millis, Massachusetts

Problems in the last 24 hours in Millis, Massachusetts

The chart below shows the number of AOL reports we have received in the last 24 hours from users in Millis, Massachusetts and surrounding areas. An outage is declared when the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line.

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

AOL Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  DJ Richards (@stumblebum54) reported 4 minutes ago

  @unseen1_unseen This is what’s was like trying to cancel an AOL account back in the day. But this account says it’s based in Africa so probably not especially credible.

• 
  Josh Centrum (@CentrumJosh) reported 6 minutes ago

  @Rajatsoni Calling XRP holders stupid while chasing BTC because it was invented first is hilarious. By that logic we should all still be using AOL and BlackBerrys. Tech history is littered with first movers that got passed by better technology. BTC has had 15+ years to scale and and hasn’t

• 
  ramzy (@0xRamzy) reported 8 minutes ago

  AOL paid $165 billion to win Time Warner in 2000 and wrote off $99 billion of it two years later. A quiet Yale lecture from 2007 proves the same mechanic that killed that deal is silently draining money from every homebuyer, every hiring manager, and every person who has ever won an eBay auction. The lecture is part of the free game theory course Yale posted online. The professor teaches with a hundred undergraduates and a piece of chalk. No slides, no textbook required. His name is Ben Polak. He ran Yale's economics department, was later made Provost of the university, and spent fifteen years teaching this same course to a lecture hall of students paying $60,000 a year for seats a stranger with an internet connection could sit in for free. The idea has a name. The winner's curse. It was first identified in a 1971 paper by three oil engineers at Atlantic Richfield who had noticed something odd about their industry. Every major oil company in America was bidding on offshore drilling rights in the Gulf of Mexico. They all had geologists and the same maps. The winner of each lease, on average, was losing money on the field. The engineers proved that when everyone estimates the same object with roughly equal error, the person who wins is almost always the one who over-estimated the most. Winning was proof of being wrong. The check they wrote was the receipt. The full lecture fits into three sentences. If you and a room full of reasonable people are all bidding for the same thing, your best estimate of it is almost certainly too high. If it were low, you would not be the one winning. The number of losers you beat is information about how wrong you are. Polak's summary is one line: shade your bid. Not because you are stupid. Because winning is the strongest signal in the market that you paid too much. Concrete case: a young couple bids on a three-bedroom house against fourteen other offers in a hot April market. They win at $80,000 over asking. They feel triumphant for one week. Two years later three of the losing bidders have bought the same style house on the same street for $60,000 less. The couple never sees a "for sale" sign. They just have a mortgage that eats every raise for the next decade. Every buyer who has ever won a house at $30,000 over the second-highest offer paid $29,999 more than the market thought it was worth. Every hiring manager who beat two other companies to a candidate is paying the number that was too high for two other adults. Every free-agent contract in sports that "shocks the league" was set by the one general manager who was most optimistic in the room. The lecture is on YouTube. Yale posted it in 2007. Almost none of the millions who have watched it ever shaded a bid on the next thing they wanted. The math is free. Bidding a little less than you feel like on the next thing you want to win is the entire edge. ↓

• 
  Washingtonian (@TweetsFromWA) reported 12 minutes ago

  @JimmyC1366 Purchased a desktop computer in the early 90's at Costco for $2500. With a dial-up modem and slow as a snail. And the only way to make thing work was to buy an AOL or other stupid cd disc and pay outrages bills to them.

• 
  Wyn Arctos (@WynArctos) reported 17 minutes ago

  I never had a AOL address, the rest well...no comment.

• 
  Dasha’s Diary (@dariaisnthungry) reported 18 minutes ago

  Just had the craziest dream about my ex’s telling me they moved to the aol near Tel Aviv and it’s haunted by monitoring spirits and how it’s very important that I talk to my ex alone. It was so bad that my ex need someone to help him get dressed and he wouldn’t look at anyone

• 
  Matt (@TeeReno) reported 20 minutes ago

  @BadfishRanch @BlueFlameBlues As someone who was nearing 30 in the mid-2000s when started I had never had an AOL account before. Blew my mind that all my counterparty interactions were using that platform. No ICE chat then too but you could message anyone in the bid stack which is bonkers to think about too

• 
  Cannonball1976 (@jkcannon1) reported 23 minutes ago

  @usanewshq The people offended never would've survived an AOL chatroom *eyeroll*

• 
  Gretchen (@mkeGingerGal) reported 23 minutes ago

  @AshleyInMKE 19. Never had an aol account.

• 
  Dana Pico (@Dana_TFSJ) reported 24 minutes ago

  @BostonBridget .@AOL is 36 now; even if she chose to thaw out a few, and have them fertilized and implanted, how old would she be when she had her first pregnancy? Every extra year increases the odds for a bad pregnancy and disabled child. @JillFilipovic