1. Home
  2. ❯
  3. Companies
  4. ❯
  5. AOL
  6. ❯
  7. Waltham
AOL

AOL outages and service status in Waltham, Massachusetts

No problems detected

If you are having issues, please submit a report below.

Full Outage Map
  • AOL generated 0 outage signals in the last 24 hours around Waltham, including 0 direct reports.

AOL (America Online) is an internet portal as well as an internet service provider. As an ISP, AOL offers dial up internet through its AOL Advantage plans.

Problems in the last 24 hours in Waltham, Massachusetts

The chart below shows the number of AOL reports we have received in the last 24 hours from users in Waltham, Massachusetts and surrounding areas. An outage is declared when the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line.

At the moment, we haven't detected any problems at AOL. Are you experiencing issues or an outage? Leave a message in the comments section!

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

AOL Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

  • gregnacu
    Gregorio Naçu (@gregnacu) reported

    @MuseumCommodore 17 for me. Never used a TAC-2. I am too young to have seen a C64 running in a store. But I have left things like the 10-print maze running on a C64 I found in use at a daycare. I sadly missed QuantumLink. I called the 800 number once, and an AOL rep answered.

  • FirstDeployAI
    WhiteFlour (@FirstDeployAI) reported

    @2whazzuup My mother still has an AOL email, so no, it will never die.

  • MRHalcomb
    Marianne Halcomb (@MRHalcomb) reported

    @Irina_exh 19. Never used AOL address

  • Packagingbook23
    PackagingMachineryHandbook (@Packagingbook23) reported

    @Irina_exh Never had a but I had Compuserve in the 80s and Genie in90. Both before AOL. Does that count? Otherwise 19

  • TweetsFromWA
    Washingtonian (@TweetsFromWA) reported

    @JimmyC1366 Purchased a desktop computer in the early 90's at Costco for $2500. With a dial-up modem and slow as a snail. And the only way to make thing work was to buy an AOL or other stupid cd disc and pay outrages bills to them.

  • mocowgirl15
    MissouriCowgirl (@mocowgirl15) reported

    For me, it's more that this person has spoken to me in 10 yrs then acted like I've never been on SM or the Internet before when I've on the Internet since I was 8 yrs in the infancy of AOL chatrooms and all the SM platforms. I'm well aware of how to post and my posts.

  • CEOinterview
    CEOInterviews.AI (@CEOinterview) reported

    An early Polygon investor ran the comparison against his own position. Yat Siu @ysiu puts the value split at 90 to 95 percent to the application that owns the customer, with gas fees going to the chain underneath. Polymarket's private valuation is 8 billion dollars. Polygon, the chain Polymarket is built on, is a lot smaller. His analogy is the mid 90s, when AOL bought Time Warner and the ISPs were the giants of the moment. AT&T is worth a lot of money today. It is smaller than Google, Apple and Nvidia. Critical infrastructure keeps getting built. It stops being the biggest company in the room.

  • GKomus79144
    patriotic_canadian (@GKomus79144) reported

    @Reil76 damn.. another part of pop culture gone i still have an aol disc mobile somewhere

  • DJones205
    Denard Jones (@DJones205) reported

    @TampaBae8 My yahoo jawn is still active. Even though I don’t use it daily. Never had an AOL

  • Matty_Laroo
    Matt Laroo (@Matty_Laroo) reported

    Such a weird time discussing AI with anyone who isn't super in the weeds right now. 99.9% of people who have been exposed to AI only know "chat", which in my experience is the worst current use case for AI (can be inaccurate, biased, too sycophantic, etc). Meanwhile, the 0.1% actually building **** (be it apps, businesses, websites, dashboards, slide decks, business plans, etc) or using it to help organize your life (translating "stream of consciousness" into readable notes, managing your inbox/calendar, creating a second-brain wiki from links, etc) is seeing where this is all going. Big difference is that the user (YOU!) have direct input on the outputs, whereas chat is just the delusion that you are getting correct answers from some digital deity (just a text version of brain rot, imo). It makes having conversations super weird, like explaining the potential of the internet to someone who only logged on to AOL to read/send email.