AOL outages and service status in Lewiston, Maine

Problems in the last 24 hours in Lewiston, Maine

The chart below shows the number of AOL reports we have received in the last 24 hours from users in Lewiston, Maine and surrounding areas. An outage is declared when the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line.

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

AOL Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Mystiqueknight13 (@playstationfox5) reported 9 minutes ago

  @Nyaralot3p @hasanthehun Like an elder god your incomprehensible...ly stupid. Personally I don't get your last toward hasan. He's ugly, sociopathic, an idiot, and a horrible liar. He can't even speak fast. Ppl streaming him have to do twice the speed hes so slow. Hes the AOL of streamers.

• 
  blue diamond (@Diamondairre) reported 15 minutes ago

  @AOL stop being an ******* go back to you bartending

• 
  string (@doctorcalf) reported 19 minutes ago

  What was that free dial up service that came on a CD, around the time of AOL

• 
  Vernon Foster (@VernonFost13133) reported 21 minutes ago

  @GaryCollin37052 his tariff policy. His tariffs amount to the largest U.S. tax increase as a share of GDP since 1993 (Tax Foundation) , roughly $1,500 per household in 2026 (Tax Foundation) . Trade: the Supreme Court ruled he couldn't impose tariffs under emergency powers (aol) , but he's kept

• 
  Wompus Poe (@WompusPoe) reported 23 minutes ago

  @Lockload15 Damn dial up internet, should have switched to high speed dial up and AOL mail lol!!!

• 
  Terry @MahsMining🍁 (@MahsMining) reported 25 minutes ago

  @danbulmer70 AOL....OMG I threw away those disks. Never give them to my customers because it would just cause sooooo much headache. So many ID 10 T issues.

• 
  Bill Bishop (@niubi) reported 25 minutes ago

  This pro-PRC model industry group from Silicon Valley is interesting but I think not thinking long-term. Why can’t the frontier labs do something like AOL did with its Greenhouse project and say OK, I will let you distill but we want equity in your company and/or a fee. AOL got equity for promotion/placement on the screen. (we committed 30+ million at MarketWatch, helped traffic and the ipo a lot, but worst company I have ever negotiated with). Anyway, apologies for the digression, but why couldn’t this be similar but for distillation access, and the labs like Anthropic and OpenAI could end up with a really interesting portfolio of companies, some of which might become quite valuable, and those smaller firms’ VCs could also benefit? Otherwise, does it really make sense for a huge swathe of the American technology industry to end up dependent on PRC models? Haven’t we learned any lessons from other industries where PRC firms have been able to come in at a very low cost with good products and effectively create dependencies that crowd at all other competitors? And now we are talking about the most transformative industry in many years, and it could be even worse if it’s built in part through some problematic practices in terms of distillation attacks and export control violations, if some of US government’s and frontier labs’ claims are true?

• 
  LeobenSage (@Johnnysage79) reported 26 minutes ago

  @PublicEnemiesHQ The only difference is Time Warner/AOL already had WCW. It was tanking before they merged, WWE was at great heights when TKO took over. TKO is like a bar owner that waters down the booze after a great night. WWE seems to just be people walking around, yelling, and crashing out.

• 
  Rick (@eeekster) reported 26 minutes ago

  Never had an AOL address.

• 
  Poopeye™ (@ThePoopeye) reported 31 minutes ago

  How do all these people have 10s of thousands of "followers"? People that don't necessarily post anything new or just re-posts of other peoples' thoughts & work. I don't get it. I've been a member for a while now (w/ THIS acct - my orig was cancelled by Twitter during COVID for telling the factual scientific truth about masks based on my years in Bio-Nanotechnology). Is it strictly from those "Follow" train lists? I learned early on to stay away from those - I check out EVERYBODY I ever follow first & personally (not necessarily relying upon Grok's "Profile Summary", although those may get me interested to take a gander). I try to engage those who engage with me and avoid silly flame-wars. I don't post to GET followers, I generally post current stream-of-consciousness thoughts, what's on my mind at that moment & not really organizing them into proper English "articles". Plus I'm not really good at pithy comments - I speak from my heart & soul and EXPLAIN myself & my reasoning for coming to different conclusions. And I typically don't engage in irrational, emotional hyperbole & name-calling. I truly want to know what others think and LEARN (you're never too old to learn!). For DECADES on BBSes (Bulletin Board Systems - pre-graphical internet days, modem-connected social systems for discussion, research & debates), the Usenets (newsgroups, pre-graphical/HTTP/HTML internet days when time on the internet was purchased through 3rd party vendors like CompuServe by the hour - 70s & 80s, pre-AOL (which is slightly pre-HTTP/HTML/Mozilla-Netscape graphical internet revolution) - where everything was command-line driven in ASCII, EBCDIC, ISO set or ATASCII or the like). Am I just too old, boring, long-winded, obnoxious, opinionated or what? I know its annoying with me posting about my health, but I've gotta vent SOMEWHERE and NO ONE on X knows me personally. Not that it matters so much now, I'm heading down the stretch-run to Home plate, but even paying for Elon's blue-checkmark, I don't get many hits/views or responses/engagement, it is pretty comparable to my "free" account that I use solely for sports-related stuff where I have 1 whole "follower", which is probably one of those online ho-bags. It's not that I'm looking to "earn" from X and I'll NEVER post things just for click-bait value. I'm just really curious how these other accounts accrue so many followers for literally not doing much,