AOL outages and service status in Ogunquit, Maine

Problems in the last 24 hours in Ogunquit, Maine

The chart below shows the number of AOL reports we have received in the last 24 hours from users in Ogunquit, Maine and surrounding areas. An outage is declared when the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line.

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

AOL Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Uncle Drunky 🥃 (@uncledrunky) reported 8 minutes ago

  The early days of AOL were just as bad as current social media except we didn't have it everywhere we went

• 
  David R (@Deemakesmoney) reported 11 minutes ago

  @muheediva01 Login to AOL

• 
  Matchalover (@hauntedhomesinc) reported 11 minutes ago

  @prisyum Don't even make me start to try to remember my AOL login

• 
  Andrew Long, MD, ESQ (@AverageSizeAndy) reported 11 minutes ago

  @Joshua_Graham50 @1982VintageNut The email this account uses is an AOL email. Sit down child.

• 
  Val Duke (@ValDjuk) reported 14 minutes ago

  @AzzaliahC @ICQ Xfire and Skype both opened in 2003, June 2015 and May 2025 accordingly shut down. Where were you then? Or even Google Chat (2005- June 2017). If you cared about actual quality, you would have used AIM since at least 2010 (AOL literally bought ICQ in 1998, same owner!) or use IRC

• 
  WeAreNotGoingToMars (@WeAreNotGTM) reported 15 minutes ago

  I'm going to call about this in the morning... The man survived the attack, but it doesn't feel like they're doing enough to find out who committed this crime. Instead, they are already painting a picture with unconfirmed sources saying that he said something inappropriate to someone's girlfriend. When I asked AI to tell me where this information came from, it could only refer to an AOL article, and then the replication of this unconfirmed sources narrative with subsequent publications... Basically, it's a bunch of bullshit that people kept replicating. It's wild to see the level of trauma this man experienced, and for the immediate narrative to be spun that he is the perpetrator. That is what is disturbing me the most about this case... Both of his eyes begin to swell shut, and blood was squirting out the side of his neck. That is an extremely violent beating in the middle of broad daylight... It is literally an attempted murder. Anytime a weapon is used to impale a location such as the neck, it is a felony offense and the person's image needs to be shared immediately. Hundreds of people witnessed this in broad daylight. There should have already been a press conference to calm the public. Why is no one trying to reassure the public that they're safe? How can they be safe if no one knows the identity of a crazy murderous maniac roaming the streets? These are just some of the thoughts that are probably going through some of the people's heads that were traumatized by this event. I genuinely feel for them. I'm happy this man survived and didn't bleed out... It was the awareness of applying the pressure that probably saved his life. Had he been unconscious and without help, he probably would have died from bleeding out right there on the ground. I'll definitely be following up on this story...

• 
  Lazarus (@Lazarus_Capital) reported 16 minutes ago

  @stocktrader989 stock i responded to your tweet "The current debt, interest expense, colo fees and no chance to make profits are reasons not to invest in $CRWV and responded with: "They’ve pioneered the way for neoclouds to get financing with Iran literally copying their DDTL structure, are bringing down their weighted cost of debt, improving margins, and focusing on the higher return business (cloud vs Colo). Their debt is a function of levering up to improve their returns. Their financing ability is actually so good that they’re giving up prepayments since that would weigh down their returns. They’re playing chess while $IREN is figuring out how checkers work" Either you dont understand what im saying or deliberately trying to twist what im saying. If theyre the pioneer in financing, they will be definition (very likely) have more debt compared to "peers", also, I stated they pioneered the way for them to get financing. Im not sure why youre repeatedly trying to paint it as my bull thesis rests on them being first. No. That was a stab at Iran since they literally copied their financing structure. Setting up that if you argue against CRWV's financing, youre basically saying your darling was is following their stupidity. Up to you if you want to make that argument. "Backward looking showing massive improvement- WRONG" I literally said its backward looking in response to you looking at their recent current state financials when theyre going through a grow phase. Literally triple digit YoY rev growth, not to mention ARR and rev backlog. Q1 revs of $2b against a $100B rev backlog. Where do you think the valuation is coming from? Whats happening to their compute deals? How can you model out how much they will earn? By looking at: "Revenue Backlog, RPU & financing- doesn’t hold water". With these names you need to be looking at how theyre executing, what direction theyre going, their rate of growth, margin direction, backlog, etc. IREN for example: missing their own cloud ARR targets, GPU rental prices weakening against a bullish backdrop, ARR growth with no regards to margin, margin compression and return deterioration, lots of power sitting doing nothing while peers have sold out. NBIS for example you did something similar by showing the last 2 Qs that theyre losing money. Yes, theyre building, investment cycle, they will have negative cash flows, look beyond that. I really try to engage and help others learn, and I love to test my thesis against others, sometimes with a little sarcasm and trash talking. I addressed your debt concerns and pointed you to where the value will come from. I dont like addressing someone's concerns and they brush it off like i didnt respond, instead choosing to focus on something I didnt even say like you did here "Pioneers ofter don’t win. Examples 1. Internet- AOL/ Yahoo 2. IPhones- Blackberry 3. BTC mining- Mara $CRWV is slightly improving but still a failed company" I especially dont like when people twist my words, or worse, accuse me of "changing your argument to try to meet your objective".

• 
  Ian ᯅ (@somenuso) reported 17 minutes ago

  @POTFES This is not accurate. The DMA, DSA, AI Act, and similar frameworks are not examples of member states forcing Brussels to overregulate. They are EU level regulatory projects, proposed, negotiated, adopted, and enforced through the EU institutional system. Member states are part of that machine, but pretending the problem is only national fragmentation conveniently ignores what Brussels itself is doing. And yes, a deeper internal market would be useful. Easier company formation, better access to capital, lower compliance costs, cheaper energy, and less fragmentation would help. But that is not the same as giving the Commission more power to micromanage technology. If American tech dominates, Europe should compete by building better products on honest market terms, not by regulating superior foreign companies and hoping European champions appear afterward. Markets are not static. IBM, Intel, Microsoft, Nokia, BlackBerry, Yahoo, AOL, MySpace, and many others once looked dominant in their own domains. They were challenged, displaced, or diminished because better technologies, better products, and better business models emerged. That is how real competition works. Innovation comes from builders, capital, talent, risk, and consumer choice. It does not come from Brussels officials deciding how platforms should be designed.

• 
  Ronald Bolte (@bolte_rona27994) reported 19 minutes ago

  @WorkElizab Probably Joe he can't do any more damage. Kind of like AOL being the employee of the year at Goya

• 
  Exencial Research Partners (@exencial_RP) reported 23 minutes ago

  OpenAI Is Forecasting Something That Has Never Happened in 75 Years of Market History Morgan Stanley's Mauboussin studied every 5-year sales growth run for US public companies since 1950. Nearly 19,300 firm-period observations. Fastest ever: AOL at 103% CAGR, and even that was a merger artifact with Time Warner. OpenAI's projection: $13.1bn (2025) → $284bn (2030). An 85% CAGR from a base no company that size has ever compounded from. The earlier $184bn-by-2029 forecast implied 118%. The mean 5-year nominal CAGR in the data: 6.9%, with 11.1% standard deviation. OpenAI's forecast sits 9 to 10 standard deviations out. Mauboussin's caveat is fair, base rates are dynamic and the past doesn't make it impossible. But it would be the single greatest growth achievement in the history of public markets. Price it accordingly. Base Rates of Nominal and Real 5-Year Sales Growth for Firms With $2-5 Billion in Sales, 1950-2025