AOL outages and service status in New Boston, New Hampshire

Problems in the last 24 hours in New Boston, New Hampshire

The chart below shows the number of AOL reports we have received in the last 24 hours from users in New Boston, New Hampshire and surrounding areas. An outage is declared when the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line.

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

AOL Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Sinjin (@Sinjin69602033) reported 2 minutes ago

  @pizzahut I really don’t know how a powerhouse corporation loses its standing. Cutting costs on supplies, overextending locations, hiring a new ad company, promotional programs that managers can’t really work- but Pizza Hut is following the pathway of Toys R Us, Blockbuster and AOL. I’m going to avoid my usual florid word choices and just tell you, I paid almost $70.00 for a recent delivery. It was 45 minutes late. The Food was room temperature. 2 Cold drinks were missing. And a dessert item was doubled. BTW can anyone tell me what a delivery cost is? And why would the drivers tip default to 18%? Tips are to insure promptness. It didn’t work this time. The driver was not really an employee, she was hired on by another company and could offer no explanation except - “This is what they gave me.” Along with, “Sorry it’s late.” And, “You can go on the website and let them know”. Going back on that wonky website is the last thing I wanted to do, I’d almost rather eat room temperature food and apologize to my buddies for the poor culinary turn out. I called the store, but no one would talk to me ( it just rang ) so here I am letting all you fine people in cyber space know about it. A loss of quality control is sometimes accidental, but I also think it’s because the employees really don’t care. I’d guess further that the employees don’t care because they think their bosses don’t care.

• 
  Stephanie Stephens (@stephsings1) reported 4 minutes ago

  Never had an AOL email address

• 
  BoomKen (@Ken417063De) reported 6 minutes ago

  @PokeRestockApp @Pagan_GMR That was the first rule of the internet when AoL & CompuServe was sending the FREE cds to everyone & everything. NEVER give ANYONE your real name online there was even a PSA about it.

• 
  Michael Dunphy (@mikld1260) reported 10 minutes ago

  @Irina_exh 17 never used a Fax machine or a floppy disk or an AOL address. The others I used on a regular basis

• 
  Lambretta (@LambrettaGP1971) reported 12 minutes ago

  @james_spir19274 19. Never owned a water bed but have lain on one Can't remember ever having an AOL address. Would have had the Aussie equivalent tho

• 
  Jay $ick (@JaySick78) reported 15 minutes ago

  @brockpierson Damn, I forgot those days... and forget trying to download a pic from AOL online to see who you are talking to. A/S/L

• 
  Zaither (@Zaithos) reported 16 minutes ago

  @halenhargreevs Yes. I'm also sister got groomed on AOL dial up old. Was never allowed on a PC because of her.

• 
  PIL Watch Group (pilwatchgroup) (@pilwatchgroup) reported 16 minutes ago

  @LiveLawIndia SC made an Himalayan effort to ensure 'Art of living' (AOL) is bailed out brushing aside concerns of environmental groups. SC says river Bank was already damaged in part. If that be so would 'AOL' have any business to damage it further. If AOL knew the damage,why use the site?

• 
  Daniil (@DaniilBuilds) reported 19 minutes ago

  AOL and Time Warner didn’t just pay for what the two companies were worth in January 2000. They paid for what they believed the two companies could become together. The announced merger was valued at roughly $350B, with AOL shareholders expected to own about 55% of the combined company. The logic was easy to understand: combine AOL’s internet business with Time Warner’s media assets and create value neither could generate alone. But there was a financial problem hiding inside that logic. Future synergies are uncertain. The merger closed in January 2001. SEC disclosures later put the acquisition cost at approximately $147B. Then came the accounting reckoning. In 2002, the combined company reported a $98.7B net loss, including a $54.2B goodwill impairment. That $54.2B was non-cash. It did not mean the company suddenly paid out $54.2B in cash. It meant the value previously assigned to acquired goodwill could no longer be supported at the same level. That distinction matters. When you pay upfront for future synergies, you are effectively putting a price on value that still depends on execution. If the synergies arrive, the premium can make sense. If they don’t, shareholders can end up carrying the cost. The most expensive synergy is the one you pay for before you prove it exists.

• 
  Minnow (@Phila_Mino) reported 20 minutes ago

  No Nick, I'm done talking about dad. I'm exhausted, let him cancel his own AOL subscription and change the TV input by himself, I'm out.