AOL outages and service status in Bayonne, New Jersey

Problems in the last 24 hours in Bayonne, New Jersey

The chart below shows the number of AOL reports we have received in the last 24 hours from users in Bayonne, New Jersey and surrounding areas. An outage is declared when the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line.

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

AOL Issues Reports Near Bayonne, New Jersey

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in Bayonne and nearby locations:

• 
  Nellie Berlicchi (@NellieBerlicchi) reported 15 minutes ago from Jersey City, New Jersey

  @nypost AOL is a moron. Don’t care about her college because she is still as stupid as stupid can B.

• 
  Greg Bildson (@gbildson) reported 24 minutes ago from Jersey City, New Jersey

  @verge All the Yahoo and AOL companies that had to integrate this crap thank you

• 
  Yolanda Alejandre (@yolainc) reported 47 minutes ago from Jersey City, New Jersey

  @wvjoe911 @AOL That's funny they do it all with no help from the media.

• 
  Bobby L (@lechaflan) reported 55 minutes ago from Jersey City, New Jersey

  My favorite AOL/AIM profile was simply Times New Roman size 12 white background simply saying "Loading..." and away msg was "just got into a really bad accident. be back later"

AOL Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Minh Nguyệt🌙 (@mnguyetinvests) reported 7 minutes ago

  @_tinatruth Steve Bartlett explained financial bubbles in one minute. The AOL–Time Warner story is a powerful reminder that HIGH VALUATION IS NOT THE SAME AS REAL VALUE. It reminded me of something I wrote on August 17 on my post 👇 A GREAT ASSET doesn’t automatically make a GREAT INVESTMENT. Pay too much, and your returns can suffer. Allocate too much capital, and one mistake can damage your entire portfolio. That’s why I believe good investing isn’t just about choosing the right asset. It’s about paying the RIGHT PRICE and sizing your position wisely. The AOL–Time Warner story didn’t teach me that lesson. It reinforced it. If you haven’t read my August 17 post yet, I think it adds another perspective to this conversation. 👇

• 
  Alley AL (@BackAlleyAL_) reported 8 minutes ago

  @SouthernGo40189 @markasual5 @BadQualityMemes No it means you never used a computer pre google as in AOL

• 
  Fred Johnston (@JohnstonFredJ) reported 8 minutes ago

  @getwhatugive @LynAldenContact You’re collapsing the product and the protocol. BlackRock/MSTR make money if demand for bitcoin rises. Demand rises when access gets easier: brokerage accounts, 401ks, treasuries, Lightning, hardware wallets. Shrinking the buyer pool would hurt their bags. That’s the opposite incentive of “reduce access.” Early internet had AOL too. Walled gardens expanded the user base first. The open network still won because the protocol wasn’t owned by AOL.Same here. An ETF is not a modem ban. Anyone can still run a node, hold keys, and send sats. Institutions can offer a wrapper. They cannot revoke the chain. “Gemini agrees” is not an argument. The music-sharing analogy also fails: Napster was illegal and centralized. Bitcoin settles on a public ledger. You don’t sterilize that by listing a ticker.

• 
  Jenna (@JennaMeshelle) reported 9 minutes ago

  @PCSoonersFan Those damn AOL chat rooms lmaooooo 😭

• 
  Ang•el / מלאך (@AngelCWilliams) reported 12 minutes ago

  Rabbis and Rabbonias Tell Us Eliyahu Kin Shepardic David the Prince Used Illegal AOL Punters To Harbor My Bad Boy Entertainment Account

• 
  Poow | Open Commission on Vgen (@Poowploof) reported 12 minutes ago

  Alucard had astigmatism before being infected by a demon (why he qualified to AoL? Well, Tigreal.) Apparently when he was younger, he not only had bad eyesight but also bad taste in men.

• 
  Daniil (@DaniilBuilds) reported 14 minutes ago

  AOL and Time Warner didn’t just pay for what the two companies were worth in January 2000. They paid for what they believed the two companies could become together. The announced merger was valued at roughly $350B, with AOL shareholders expected to own about 55% of the combined company. The logic was easy to understand: combine AOL’s internet business with Time Warner’s media assets and create value neither could generate alone. But there was a financial problem hiding inside that logic. Future synergies are uncertain. The merger closed in January 2001. SEC disclosures later put the acquisition cost at approximately $147B. Then came the accounting reckoning. In 2002, the combined company reported a $98.7B net loss, including a $54.2B goodwill impairment. That $54.2B was non-cash. It did not mean the company suddenly paid out $54.2B in cash. It meant the value previously assigned to acquired goodwill could no longer be supported at the same level. That distinction matters. When you pay upfront for future synergies, you are effectively putting a price on value that still depends on execution. If the synergies arrive, the premium can make sense. If they don’t, shareholders can end up carrying the cost. The most expensive synergy is the one you pay for before you prove it exists.

• 
  Stephanie Stephens (@stephsings1) reported 15 minutes ago

  Never had an AOL email address

• 
  Ragh Pandragon (@RaghPandragon) reported 15 minutes ago

  The truth is stranger. Long ago in the 90's there was still magic in the world every time you wanted to get on the internet you had to electrocute one fairy. Just one. Unfortunately disconnects were an issue. Slowly, one connection at a time, we fed all of the magic creatures into the gaping maw of oblivion to power our ICQ chats and AOL instant messengers. At least until Human Energy Update 3.9 Service Pack 2. Now every time you log in you just lose a little bit of your own soul, no fairy deaths required.

• 
  Time Capsule Tales (@timecaptales) reported 17 minutes ago

  On the day Michael Jackson died in 2009, the internet collapsed. The LA Times, AOL, TMZ, AIM, and several other major sites completely crashed. Searches for the King of Pop spiked to an insane ~4.2 million per minute. Google believed it was under some kind of cyber attack because of the sudden flood of people searching “Michael Jackson”. Twitter went down and Wikipedia crashed around 3:15 p.m. PDT.