AOL Outage Report in Bogota, New Jersey

Problems in the last 24 hours in Bogota, New Jersey

AOL signals over the past 24 hours, with local activity from Bogota, New Jersey and nearby areas. The dashed baseline applies to service-wide activity, not to local outage confirmation.

• Service-wide signals
• Service-wide baseline

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

AOL Issues Reports Near Bogota, New Jersey

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in Bogota and nearby locations:

• 
  spooky gootz (@raygootz) reported 8 seconds ago from Manhattan, New York

  @skinnymysterio WCW cut everyones salaries in half in 92 cause they could. Also AOL wanted wrestling ******** off tnt didnt matter if nitro started destroying raw in ratings. All these corporate pricks are the same.

• 
  $h0wT!m3 (@hecmel_) reported 8 minutes ago from Manhattan, New York

  @doll_aim Whatever works but AIM/AOL was the ****

• 
  Tanooki Joe™️ (@TanookiKuribo) reported 8 minutes ago from Manhattan, New York

  @NerdOutWithMe @53rdCard I still sign in to check my mail. I could just go to AOL dot com but I like signing in like I’m visiting a place from my childhood. No one is there anymore, I’m the only one.

• 
  TheFeralOne (she/her) (@tracey_f) reported 10 minutes ago from Manhattan, New York

  @nashmallow People laugh that I still have my OG AOL address but I use it for most things if it's not a Google related, but I NEVER see spam in my inbox, and there are only occasional false catches. And lemme tell ya, that spam folder is full to bursting every day.

• 
  chrisghent.near ᵍᵐ (@ChrisGhent) reported 16 minutes ago from Newark, New Jersey

  @whiskeybaarrell @delia_cai Damn is this really a negative? I send all my junk to @AOL… nearly 20 years of junk in there.

• 
  Golden Girls LIVE! (@goldengirlsBOS) reported 16 minutes ago from Manhattan, New York

  @AOLSupportHelp We are having trouble here in NYC of sending emails with attachments on AOL. Never had this problem before.

• 
  Michael Riley (@Michael203W8) reported 20 minutes ago from Manhattan, New York

  @piersmorgan @elonmusk Piers I’m a big fan but this is the second worst deal (AOL/TW No.1) In history. Twitter has never made money, that was before ad revs dropped and before you tack on interest costs of $13b. Debacle

• 
  Matthew Weaver (@mattheweaver) reported 22 minutes ago from Montclair, New Jersey

  @cvspharmacy you have the ability to make 2020 less awful, get rid of the car-length long receipts. We all have email, even “Karen” has @aol #cvsreceipts

• 
  dominic (@Globalmess65) reported 29 minutes ago from Manhattan, New York

  @ReformedBroker sorry sweetie but $ORCL is not the last of the bunch... $CSCSO and $INTC have never made new highs. Neither has $AOL lol

• 
  🇩🇴 Jesse Jackson (@718Shaun) reported 32 minutes ago from Manhattan, New York

  When that happened I said “AOL set me up! This computer has a virus, all these damn pop ups” lol

• 
  Levon Hughey (@LevonHughey) reported 36 minutes ago from Manhattan, New York

  @TinaDesireeBerg This was a mindfuck to say the least. The piece of **** who made the poll did the old capital “i”/lower case “L” trick in the username. I used to do **** like that in AOL chat rooms back in the 2000s to **** with people.

• 
  HelenHighly “somewhat in the business of truth”🐀 (@Helen_Highly) reported 37 minutes ago from Manhattan, New York

  @MsHannahMurphy 👆 Whut?! Is this what you were referring to, @dcboyisangry? Or did you just instinctively know not to trust Mvsk with your debit card? Holy moley, I'd rather send my PIN to a exiled prince who asked me for help via AOL.

• 
  Brittany♚ (@britshaniece) reported 39 minutes ago from Manhattan, New York

  Think about how horny you gotta be to see some porn in the Fleets. That UX is horrible. AOL dial-up porn.

• 
  Erin L. Thompson (@artcrimeprof) reported 40 minutes ago from Manhattan, New York

  On #CovidCampus: a family friend in his late 60’s just emailed me from his AOL account, subject line “Hello this is [his name],” to ask if I could come over to help him figure out Zoom for the class he’s adjuncting at a major university, so, yeah, this isn’t going to go smoothly.

• 
  therealsylviaTee (@tmrch28) reported 46 minutes ago from Manhattan, New York

  @hopefulmetsfan @Mets This game took me back to the early days of the AOL message boards where no one was spared when games like this happened This offense or lack thereof is embarrassing While the pitching is doing the job the bats are in a coma Poor max he got the Degrom offense

• 
  Jason Schulweis ☕️ (@jschulweis) reported 52 minutes ago from Manhattan, New York

  My thoughts on the Yahoo/AOL news summed up as follows: - as a former Yahoo, I still bleed Purple for the brand. It mattered so much to so many for so long, and still does to a degree (just in different ways) - The middle is a bad place to be. If you can’t compete in scale…

• 
  Kristen Booth (@Kristen_Booth) reported 54 minutes ago from Manhattan, New York

  Why is my #ATT network buffering like a late 90s #AOL dial-up? 😡🤬😡🤬

• 
  single (@mariedaniellex3) reported 56 minutes ago from Manhattan, New York

  Is there a 2019 version of an aol chatroom for ppl with abandonment issues

• 
  slim maw (@yakameiin) reported 56 minutes ago from Newark, New Jersey

  Best thing about the streaming era is we don't have to listen to no ******* "aol exclusive" tags on every damn song.

• 
  IG:@illrecognizeill (@illrecognizeill) reported 58 minutes ago from Bronx, New York

  Bronx girls on Instagram be thinking this **** is AOL in 1998 with screen names like BxJeterGrl1086.

AOL Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  My Full Name is uh.. (@t14159) reported 2 minutes ago

  @brockpierson That modem is too new. It doesn't have any microphones. Go back to the source with an acoustic coupler modem. Of course, you're going to have a little trouble getting a working telephone handset and analog phone line. At least the AoL CDs will be easy to find.

• 
  DEMediaIsPropaganda -TXIconoclast Apostle (@WhoIsVendix) reported 6 minutes ago

  @dom_lucre Smart People Never Trust Media CNN Worthless since apx 2000 When Bannon Brokered Sale. Maybe better under Time Warmer but CEO gone soon after insane AOL buy I schooled older but very green Bannon on need 4 Conserv media at HBS along w Defense Free Riding & China Threat

• 
  Paul Walsh (@Paul__Walsh) reported 10 minutes ago

  People keep asking why Apple allowed OpenAI to build a ChatGPT integration for Messages. Do get to the point, I don’t think Apple anticipated a company using the permissions required by ChatGPT specifically to read, analyse and store people’s Messages when the Messages app includes iMessage and not just SMS. The entire point of iMessage is that it’s rich media *and* end to end encrypted. The permissions OpenAI needs exist for legitimate software, and Apple warns people before granting them. Backup software needs Full Disk Access to back up protected files. Security software needs it to inspect files for malicious activity. Disk utilities need it to search, recover and manage protected files. It’s similar to WebView. It gave developers a way to display parts of an app that could change without requiring a new app release and App Store review, such as terms of service, privacy policies and other remotely hosted content. In 2014, I predicted developers would eventually use WebView across every major app, with some apps built almost entirely inside it. I also warned this would create a security problem because WebView had no protection against dangerous links or malicious code typically found on webpages. Developers could make a WebView look identical to the native app, so people wouldn’t know whether they were using the app itself or interacting with a website. Today, in-app security is a multibillion dollar industry because it’s obvious that opening links inside an app might not be as safe as it should be. Most predictions, especially in the context of digital risk, are not believed by a lot of people. But they become obvious eventually. Today, I’m saying OpenAI’s ChatGPT integration with Apple Messages is more dangerous for some people than almost anything else on the market. Of course someone can take screenshots and send them to the FBI, repeat something they were told, or deliberately share a private conversation. That completely misses the point. None of those things is equivalent to giving an AI service automated access to read, analyse and store entire message histories involving everyone someone communicates with. Comparing deliberate human disclosure with automated access at scale ignores the capability that makes this fundamentally different. And why it removes the main benefit of end to end encryption. I can’t comprehend how security professionals can defend anything that undermines the purpose of end to end encryption by saying "but encryption isn’t broken". Protecting messages while they’re being transmitted means very little if an agent can systematically read, analyse and store them before they’re sent or after they’re received. Apple permissions have legitimate purposes. This particular use of them is the problem. During the early 2000s, I advocated for browser extensions. During the mid to late 2000s, before the first iPhone when mobile web didn't exist, I advocated for mobile web instead of WAP. In 2015, I advocated for chatbot integrations across messaging platforms and business tools. I’m a developer advocate, an open standards advocate, child safety advocate, and privacy advocate. I co-founded 2 W3C initiatives, including the Mobile Web Initiative, where I was tasked with rewriting Tim Berners-Lee’s vision of "One Web". And was a significant contributor to 8 technical specifications, including the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.0. I care about humanity. I don’t advocate for one thing in isolation from everything else. I’m a technical expert in specific areas with OSINT skills and 30 years across web, telecom, and mobile. 💡 I consider every stakeholder affected by open standards, technology, and legislation. Sometimes convenience justifies a privacy tradeoff. Sometimes privacy should take priority over security, and sometimes security should take priority over privacy. None of these should be treated as an absolute regardless of the consequences. In 2017, the PKI Consortium asked me to advise them privately and write about the impact DV SSL certificates and HTTPS Everywhere were having on anti phishing security. I faced fierce criticism from privacy advocates who argued that the connection should be encrypted even if the person on the other end was an impersonator. Those were their words. If you care, search for "Insecure Elephant in the Room". The fundamental reasons phishing works were the same when I was impersonated in 1996 when phishing was first discovered on the AOL network, the same when I wrote about it in 2017, and the same today. Now I have to argue with some security professionals defending something that undermines the purpose of end to end encryption. They need to look beyond the mechanics of software and encryption. Technology is an enabler. We need to consider human behaviour, how people will actually use a capability, and what happens when that behaviour occurs at scale. Also, the potential intent that goes beyond a website or privacy statement. I’ve faced this repeatedly over the years. Today, when I argue that government policies and age verification introduced in the name of online child safety and preventing child exploitation are actually surveillance measures, child safety advocates accuse me of not caring about children. This isn’t rocket science. Add AI to everything, even if you’re willing to accept the risks to yourself. But please don’t add AI in ways that undermine another person’s right to privacy or, depending on the context, their personal safety. Some people's lives depend on their ability to rely on end to end encryption. We're not talking about SMS. 💡Criticising the technology used to pursue an objective doesn’t mean opposing the objective.

• 
  Salvo (@Salvo8284) reported 11 minutes ago

  @AYTOarchive Never saw that, but kept getting AOL CD's in the mail for ages.

• 
  T s (@Ts7705421096234) reported 12 minutes ago

  @harryjsisson Cool. Mapquest is a thing again. Maybe I will stop getting **** for using my aol email from 30 years ago. Every thing comes back into style?

• 
  Fred Johnston (@JohnstonFredJ) reported 13 minutes ago

  @getwhatugive @LynAldenContact You’re collapsing the product and the protocol. BlackRock/MSTR make money if demand for bitcoin rises. Demand rises when access gets easier: brokerage accounts, 401ks, treasuries, Lightning, hardware wallets. Shrinking the buyer pool would hurt their bags. That’s the opposite incentive of “reduce access.” Early internet had AOL too. Walled gardens expanded the user base first. The open network still won because the protocol wasn’t owned by AOL.Same here. An ETF is not a modem ban. Anyone can still run a node, hold keys, and send sats. Institutions can offer a wrapper. They cannot revoke the chain. “Gemini agrees” is not an argument. The music-sharing analogy also fails: Napster was illegal and centralized. Bitcoin settles on a public ledger. You don’t sterilize that by listing a ticker.

• 
  Sextant (@simcity31) reported 17 minutes ago

  @jukan05 I read the beginning of this and knew it’s garbage, written with a conclusion in mind and fillers to get there. Comparing token value to internet subscription is ludicrous. The value of the internet obv is beyond the freaking $50 you paid AOL or whatever ISP. The same for mobile

• 
  Asymmetric Edge Research (@AsymEdge) reported 17 minutes ago

  @2147mill The problem with the normie test is that the internet passed it in 1999 too. Totally non techy families were on AOL back then as well, over 20 million of them by the end of 1999. Amazon went from 17 million customers to 25 million between 1999 and 2001 and nearly doubled revenue, and the stock still lost 94% over those two years. So usage only tells you the thing is real. For the bubble question I look at what people pay for the earnings. Cisco was over 100x forward at the 2000 top, Nvidia is under 20x right now. Same thing with the crypto half of your post by the way. Nobody uses gold day to day either and that never made gold a bubble.

• 
  Just an old Marine (@needtobuild) reported 20 minutes ago

  @theikigaiguy @amazon Yep, same thing day after day. And history will repeat. A company thinks it’s infallible, but lose one customer here another there. And it adds up. Before long they become Sears, Kmart and AOL. IMO; They will end up splitting shopping and prime off eventually.

• 
  VoodooX-Rocket (@VoodooXRocket) reported 22 minutes ago

  @boostmobile Boost Mobile reminds me so much of the 1990's AOL. Their customer service makes it one of the worst MVNO carriers today! Their creative accounting is so hard for their reps to understand, so how is a customer going to?